Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Althugz
Bando, I've really learnt to love you over the past few weeks. I don't know what I'd do one day if I arrived here and didn't see your question mark ending sentences (even when you're not asking a question)
*hugs*
Plus you know me so well. Any talk of JC being "great" does indeed induce a feeling of nausea in me.
I NO;D ????????????????:lolhaha:
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Bhops is Calzaghe's bitch, plain and simple. Not only did that snaggle tooth conman get outworked but he also got anal raped in the process so you tell me who owns who...
fuckin fake ass boring punk..
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Althugz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Bhops is Calzaghe's bitch, plain and simple. Not only did that snaggle tooth conman get outworked but he also got anal raped in the process so you tell me who owns who...
fuckin fake ass boring punk..
Yup, he outworked Bhop in the compubox "bitch slaps" stats by about 400 to zero and also easily outworked his opponent in the "hitting thin air" section too.
So in answer to your question Bhop won vs the Welsh bum-raping con man due to neither of those statistics being a requirement to win a boxing match (nor is ass rape)
I can SEE you are a Calzaghe fan, it must be very hard for you to express your feeling for this great boxer. O I forgot?????????????. Hug's;D
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
As for the hypothetical rematch? Pretty simple. There's a reason Hopkins pushed and pushed for a rematch. And while Calzaghe didn't.
Most retarded thing I have ever heard you say. Hopkins didn't get the W and joe did... Of course he wanted a rematch more.
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
As for the hypothetical rematch? Pretty simple. There's a reason Hopkins pushed and pushed for a rematch. And while Calzaghe didn't.
Most retarded thing I have ever heard you say. Hopkins didn't get the W and joe did... Of course he wanted a rematch more.
If thats the most retarded thing he has said then it must be extremely retarded :cool:
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Stupid arguments from the Hopkins crowd.
It was an easy Calzaghe win and that's without the invisible low blows and all that nonsense.
Outlanded, out thrown and old with a wonky willy.
With a nob like that I am amazed he continued.
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Yup... ;)
How many people do you know win a fight and then demand a rematch more than the loser did? ??? :rolleyes:
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Yup... ;)
How many people do you know win a fight and then demand a rematch more than the loser did? ??? :rolleyes:
bredis prescott?
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
As for the hypothetical rematch? Pretty simple. There's a reason Hopkins pushed and pushed for a rematch. And while Calzaghe didn't.
Most retarded thing I have ever heard you say. Hopkins didn't get the W and joe did... Of course he wanted a rematch more.
Damn. 10 days it took you to build up the courage to finally quote my post. Amazing.
It's not even about who won or loss stupid. It's about leaving no doubt. Regardless of who got the win, it was a close fight. Whoever says otherwise is either stupid like you or can't fucking score. Considering Calzaghe had nobody else of note to fight he should of took the rematch and removed all doubt. Like champions do. You think Mayweather needed to rematch Jose Luis Castillo? No. He was already set to move up. But he decided to remove all doubt. Everybody knew De La Hoya was better than Chavez when they finally metal. But the ending to there first fight didn't quiet Chavez. So he removed all doubt. It's what champions do. But not everybody is built like that. Some fighters know in there heart they got a lucky win and would do every thing they can to avoid a rematch. Hatton-Collazo is great example. Lennox Lewis did to Vitali. Calzaghe has history doing it. He claimed he didn't do rematches to avoid a facing Robin Reid again. Years later the coward rematches Mario Veit. There was unfinished bisness in the Hopkins fight that should of been addressed. But they weren't. Why? Cuz Cokezaghe knew in his heart he got a gift.
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
As for the hypothetical rematch? Pretty simple. There's a reason Hopkins pushed and pushed for a rematch. And while Calzaghe didn't.
Most retarded thing I have ever heard you say. Hopkins didn't get the W and joe did... Of course he wanted a rematch more.
Damn. 10 days it took you to build up the courage to finally quote my post. Amazing.
It's not even about who won or loss stupid. It's about leaving no doubt. Regardless of who got the win, it was a close fight. Whoever says otherwise is either stupid like you or can't fucking score. Considering Calzaghe had nobody else of note to fight he should of took the rematch and removed all doubt. Like champions do. You think Mayweather needed to rematch Jose Luis Castillo? No. He was already set to move up. But he decided to remove all doubt. Everybody knew De La Hoya was better than Chavez when they finally metal. But the ending to there first fight didn't quiet Chavez. So he removed all doubt. It's what champions do. But not everybody is built like that. Some fighters know in there heart they got a lucky win and would do every thing they can to avoid a rematch. Hatton-Collazo is great example. Lennox Lewis did to Vitali. Calzaghe has history doing it. He claimed he didn't do rematches to avoid a facing Robin Reid again. Years later the coward rematches Mario Veit. There was unfinished bisness in the Hopkins fight that should of been addressed. But they weren't. Why? Cuz Cokezaghe knew in his heart he got a gift.
nah man
calzaghe never rematched, and if he was to rematch anyone, reid deserved one more than hopkins coz he put up more of a fight :)
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
As for the hypothetical rematch? Pretty simple. There's a reason Hopkins pushed and pushed for a rematch. And while Calzaghe didn't.
Most retarded thing I have ever heard you say. Hopkins didn't get the W and joe did... Of course he wanted a rematch more.
Damn. 10 days it took you to build up the courage to finally quote my post. Amazing.
It's not even about who won or loss stupid. It's about leaving no doubt. Regardless of who got the win, it was a close fight. Whoever says otherwise is either stupid like you or can't fucking score. Considering Calzaghe had nobody else of note to fight he should of took the rematch and removed all doubt. Like champions do. You think Mayweather needed to rematch Jose Luis Castillo? No. He was already set to move up. But he decided to remove all doubt. Everybody knew De La Hoya was better than Chavez when they finally metal. But the ending to there first fight didn't quiet Chavez. So he removed all doubt. It's what champions do. But not everybody is built like that. Some fighters know in there heart they got a lucky win and would do every thing they can to avoid a rematch. Hatton-Collazo is great example. Lennox Lewis did to Vitali. Calzaghe has history doing it. He claimed he didn't do rematches to avoid a facing Robin Reid again. Years later the coward rematches Mario Veit. There was unfinished bisness in the Hopkins fight that should of been addressed. But they weren't. Why? Cuz Cokezaghe knew in his heart he got a gift.
nah man
calzaghe never rematched, and if he was to rematch anyone, reid deserved one more than hopkins coz he put up more of a fight :)
I deal in facts only.
Fact 1. He had a hard fight against Robin Reid. A SD win that many thought Reid deserved to win. Rematch? No.
Fact 2. He had a close fight against Bernard Hopkins in which he was knocked down and stunned more than once. A SD win that many gave to Hopkins. Rematch? No.
Fact 3. He destroyed Mario Veit in less than 3 minutes. It was a legit knock out without controversy. Rematch? Yes.
Facts don't fucking lie.
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Violent Demise
I deal in facts only.
Fact 1. He had a hard fight against Robin Reid. A SD win that many thought Reid deserved to win. Rematch? No.
Fact 2. He had a close fight against Bernard Hopkins in which he was knocked down and stunned more than once. A SD win that many gave to Hopkins. Rematch? No.
Fact 3. He destroyed Mario Veit in less than 3 minutes. It was a legit knock out without controversy. Rematch? Yes.
Facts don't fucking lie.
the bit in bold isnt a fact
this alone makes your post inacurrate and i am unable to continue with our conversation until you right your wrong :)
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Obviously I read your post 10 days ago denise and only got the courage to reply now. You're so important that I had to spend 10 days getting fired up to deal with you... :rolleyes:
Also Calzaghe didn't rematch Hopkins cos he knew he'd lose.
You must be psychic Venereal... You can clearly look deep into a man and see what he is thinking.
:vd:
(did you ever think calzaghe might think he won clear enough? Shocking idea I know!)
Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe I and result of a hypothetical rematch
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Obviously I read your post 10 days ago denise and only got the courage to reply now. You're so important that I had to spend 10 days getting fired up to deal with you... :rolleyes:
Also Calzaghe didn't rematch Hopkins cos he knew he'd lose.
You must be psychic Venereal... You can clearly look deep into a man and see what he is thinking.
:vd:
(did you ever think calzaghe might think he won clear enough? Shocking idea I know!)
All way's interesting people want Hopkins, to win but did he, some say a close fight I say not Joe was made the winner, if you don't like it's how it go's don't bitch about it Hopkins lost take it on the chin if you can.;D
