JC outboxed lacy and showed what a boxing clinic truly is..but close your eyes and put a prime RJJ in with JC..just be honest to yourself.
Printable View
JC outboxed lacy and showed what a boxing clinic truly is..but close your eyes and put a prime RJJ in with JC..just be honest to yourself.
I see a pick em fight. Roy having to work harder than he ever has in any fight with Joe's work rate. Not an easy one by any account.Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Even if we were just to swap opponents for both fighters.
Pretend JC had RJJ opponents and RJJ vice versa up until the first tarver fight.
Im pretty sure roy would have a higher KO% with JC opponents and remain easily undefeated.
JC on the other hand (still a great boxer) would have a few losses under his belt. ie: toney, hopkins and would calzaghe risk moving up in weight..naaa.
JC could not even complete the list.
As much i like JC stamina, fast hands and boxing skills he just seems to have missed the boat in say a handful of fighters he could have fought to erase any doubt in anyones mind..but, 46-0 is still a very well respected achievement.
Just take more risks!
Delahoya SD Mayweather prime for prime.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by impLets not bring de la hoya into this.Quote:
Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHERMaybe....But i can't see him having dela hoya's no in any era! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
P.s This is what u call a masterpiece:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_Mobffky2w
Any prime or potential that Lacy would have had was beaten out of him in this fight. It happens in boxing. Other examples could be Trinidad vs. Reid, Chavez vs. Taylor, or Trinidad vs. Vargas. Going into the fight Lacy's people thought that Joe was a joke! How wrong they were! In fact thinking about it calzaghe has produced masterclass after masterclass...Lacy, Eubank, Kessler, Jones etc
Floyd already beat the golden boy at his weight, his ring, his gloves.
At 147 at any era it would be another gatti part 2.
Dont underestimate floyd. No fighter adjusts like he does.
We still havent seen the best of floyd.
With or without the PED'S? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
With or without coke ?Quote:
Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHERWith or without the PED'S? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
Preferably without.Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBWith or without coke ?Quote:
Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHERWith or without the PED'S? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by imp
LooooooolQuote:
Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHERPreferably without.Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBWith or without coke ?Quote:
Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHERWith or without the PED'S? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by imp