Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by erics44

Quote:

Originally Posted by jahmez

Floyd's fans can argue as much as they want but the fact that there is an eternal debate over his record alone speaks volumes.

the only volumes it speaks is that he is the best and people are always going to try and disprove that

don't try and put some deep psycological nonsense on the fact that floyds RECORD being constantly debated proves he isn't that good

Take it however you want but there really isn't anything psychological about it. People constantly criticize his record because there's reason to. Don't know why you think that means they believe he isn't that good either. If anything its the other way around. Floyd frustrates a lot of people because of how good he actually is yet how unwilling he seems to be towards wanting to raise the stakes and put it on the line. That's why he doesn't get a "fair shake" and cries that no one appreciates him.

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jahmez

Quote:

Originally Posted by erics44

Quote:

Originally Posted by jahmez

Floyd's fans can argue as much as they want but the fact that there is an eternal debate over his record alone speaks volumes.

the only volumes it speaks is that he is the best and people are always going to try and disprove that

don't try and put some deep psycological nonsense on the fact that floyds RECORD being constantly debated proves he isn't that good

Take it however you want but there really isn't anything psychological about it. People constantly criticize his record because there's reason to. Don't know why you think that means they believe he isn't that good either. If anything its the other way around. Floyd frustrates a lot of people because of how good he actually is yet how unwilling he seems to be towards wanting to raise the stakes and put it on the line. That's why he doesn't get a "fair shake" and cries that no one appreciates him.

so are you saying it is constantly debated coz its so good?

Re: Floyd's resume.

So Mayweather came back and beat Jmm the same guy who later out boxed Pac and then knocked him out i think that is a ok comeback. I mean its not like what Leonard did but you can not mock that win really because that guy beat the shit out Pac after and he looked like a gatekeeper with Mayweather.

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr140

So Mayweather came back and beat Jmm the same guy who later out boxed Pac and then knocked him out i think that is a ok comeback. I mean its not like what Leonard did but you can not mock that win really because that guy beat the shit out Pac after and he looked like a gatekeeper with Mayweather.

People shit on that win like it's nothing and chalk it up to Floyd missing weight or being the bigger man, but when you watch the fight Floyd didn't fight like the bigger man. He was quicker, smarter, and more talented than the smaller man. He countered the holy shit out of one of the best and most dangerous counter punchers of this generation.

Floyd made JMM look pedestrian, and that's something nobody has ever done before or after.

Re: Floyd's resume.

It's like when people dog Roy Jones for his competition and when you bring up a guy like James Toney, people say "oh well James wasn't in shape".

Roy Jones pitched a shut out vs PRIME James Toney. Sometimes you have to look past wins, ect and see how one guy handles a true elite fighter. When you're pitching shutouts against guys like James Toney and JMM, I don't want to hear excuses about it. That's a special talent.

Re: Floyd's resume.

When Floyd claims to be the greatest of all time then we are entitled to scritinise his record/resume/cv as much as we like because it does stand up to the claim that he is GOAT.

Re: Floyd's resume.

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

He is an all time great but he is lacking the fights to make himself the greatest or near the greatest.

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

He is an all time great but he is lacking the fights to make himself the greatest or near the greatest.

I don't consider him an all time great :-X

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

He is an all time great but he is lacking the fights to make himself the greatest or near the greatest.

I don't consider him an all time great :-X

Well your just a hater then because he clearly is

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

He is an all time great but he is lacking the fights to make himself the greatest or near the greatest.

I don't consider him an all time great :-X

Well your just a hater then because he clearly is

So is Manny Pac then.

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

He is an all time great but he is lacking the fights to make himself the greatest or near the greatest.

I don't consider him an all time great :-X

Well your just a hater then because he clearly is

Label me what you like son :o I always thought you were better than that :-X but Floyd is CLEARLY not an all time great or we wouldn't be having this debate :-X

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr140

So Mayweather came back and beat Jmm the same guy who later out boxed Pac and then knocked him out i think that is a ok comeback. I mean its not like what Leonard did but you can not mock that win really because that guy beat the shit out Pac after and he looked like a gatekeeper with Mayweather.

People shit on that win like it's nothing and chalk it up to Floyd missing weight or being the bigger man, but when you watch the fight Floyd didn't fight like the bigger man. He was quicker, smarter, and more talented than the smaller man. He countered the holy shit out of one of the best and most dangerous counter punchers of this generation.

Floyd made JMM look pedestrian, and that's something nobody has ever done before or after.

Bull Crap! JMM lost the fight with Floyd fight cause he can't handle the outside style plain and simple. Unless you think someone like Chris John belongs in the Top 50 P4P list of all time?

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

He is an all time great but he is lacking the fights to make himself the greatest or near the greatest.

I don't consider him an all time great :-X

Well your just a hater then because he clearly is

Label me what you like son :o I always thought you were better than that :-X but Floyd is CLEARLY not an all time great or we wouldn't be having this debate :-X

Name 10 ATGs

Re: Floyd's resume.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe

Quote:

Originally Posted by La Cucaracha

I'm not shitting on the win, just stating that for someone who claims to be the best ever his record is lacking :p when he came back he never fought the best fighter in his division (Pacquiao) :-\ OK so we give him another warm-up fight :p because he fought Mosley next, but then followed with Ortiz, Cotto and Guerrero :p

What everyone is saying that Floyd is a fantastic fighter :cool: but he needed certain fights to make him an all time great ;)

He is an all time great but he is lacking the fights to make himself the greatest or near the greatest.

I don't consider him an all time great :-X

Well your just a hater then because he clearly is

Label me what you like son :o I always thought you were better than that :-X but Floyd is CLEARLY not an all time great or we wouldn't be having this debate :-X

Name 10 ATGs

In no particular order:

Robinson
Armstrong
Ali
Greb
Pep
J. Wild
Duran
J. Johnson
J. Louis
B. Leonard
B. Ross

:D