-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VictorCharlie
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Not an international popularity contest, an international treaty. Like the UN treaty. If you sign the UN treaty and then go off invading another country without agreement from the UN Security Council then you're going against the will of the international community and breaking the treaty you signed up to.
Or if you don't sign treaties that everybody else has signed up to like the chemical weapons treaty. Look at the small list of countries that haven't signed and you see the usual suspects when it comes to ignoring international law.
Please name the specific treaty that the US signed that stipulates what makes a military action legal. Mind you we've previously pointed out that the UN Charter is not binding international law. Outside of the US Congress and President there isn't any other legal process for American military action. End of story. Call it immoral, unpopular, etc but trying to apply a legal basis to war is plain absurd.
Agreed, the UN is useless. What they did in Rwanda alone should discredit them. Slavery still goes on in parts of Africa, Christians being killed all over the Middle East and what has the UN done. All you America bashers should get down on yours knees and kiss Old Glory, if not, we are going to invade your country then give you billions of dollars to rebuild, so there.
When America pays out billions of dollars in reconstruction money who gets the billions of dollars? Who do they pay those billions to?
just about any shady figure in said country, usually funneled to Swiss accounts.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VictorCharlie
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Not an international popularity contest, an international treaty. Like the UN treaty. If you sign the UN treaty and then go off invading another country without agreement from the UN Security Council then you're going against the will of the international community and breaking the treaty you signed up to.
Or if you don't sign treaties that everybody else has signed up to like the chemical weapons treaty. Look at the small list of countries that haven't signed and you see the usual suspects when it comes to ignoring international law.
Please name the specific treaty that the US signed that stipulates what makes a military action legal. Mind you we've previously pointed out that the UN Charter is not binding international law. Outside of the US Congress and President there isn't any other legal process for American military action. End of story. Call it immoral, unpopular, etc but trying to apply a legal basis to war is plain absurd.
Agreed, the UN is useless. What they did in Rwanda alone should discredit them. Slavery still goes on in parts of Africa, Christians being killed all over the Middle East and what has the UN done. All you America bashers should get down on yours knees and kiss Old Glory, if not, we are going to invade your country then give you billions of dollars to rebuild, so there.
When America pays out billions of dollars in reconstruction money who gets the billions of dollars? Who do they pay those billions to?
just about any shady figure in said country, usually funneled to Swiss accounts.
How about American corporations like Halliburton and Bechtel? The corporations Cheney and Rumsfeld used to run?
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I see it has become personal again, Lyle. :rolleyes:
Where I live has nothing to do with the crisis in Syria. If I was living in England my views would be the same as you well know. Likewise, the work that I do has nothing to do with having views on international political affairs. I do a job, a peaceful job, and that is all that there is to that. It has nothing to do with Syria. I do well, but that doesn't mean that I have no values. If I don't enjoy what I do then I will look for another teaching job because teaching is what I do. My rebellion is living overseas as a sojourner, but I have studied to teach and teach I shall. You say I stand for nothing, but what the heck do you stand for? I live for my family and the faint hope that the homeland can improve itself. I want good things for the UK, it angers me that it isn't what it should be.
The Christian faith is that humans are inherently evil, but I don't adhere to that. I don't do evil things and most people don't do evil things. However, concentrations of power are very prone to doing evil things and I just point out where the leading concentrations of power do just that. US foreign policy of 50 years has shown it repeatedly, revelations about your secret services are likewise showing a pull towards wrongdoing, those are just the facts.
I don't want the world to end, I just want people to aspire to be better people and to care for one another more. The politics has to lead that from the front as society has shown it can't level the playing field. I don't think the West practices caring very well with broken families being the norm rather than the exception, with governments hell bent on privatising everything they can, with jobs being outsourced in their millions, with state pensions being funneled into hedge funds, with 12 million Americans relying on tips to top up their 2 dollars and 14 cents per hour. It is a sick, sick, state of affairs and I feel little regard for any of the people that have caused it. Would I like to see those responsible brought to account for their crimes against society? Sure, I would. However, I am not advocating nuclear apocalypse or anything so drastic.
As for Walrus, this is a decent place to live and with the right skills and qualifications, you can do well and I do. That however has nothing to do with politics nor Syria. I could be doing the work that I do in 4 dozen countries and my political views would be the same. It is an asinine argument.
Where you live and what you do has everything to do with your world view. You have not been talking about Syria, I really don't think you give a shit about them, you have been talking about America, against whom you are biased. Also, Christianity does not view humans as evil as evidenced by John 3:16. Stop spouting bias in your head as fact.
You forgot to read the Old Testament.
Again you fail to back up your argument and so it is pretty asinine. If there is anything I say about America that is untrue then say it, otherwise it isn't biased and must be true. Also, you clearly know very little about me if you think I wouldn't hold the same views in the UK or in dozens of other countries. My views will only change with concrete policy changes and they haven't materialised which is something that even Lyle recognises in the case of Obama.
Need I remind you that the old testament is pre Christian or does that not fit into your thinking
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I see it has become personal again, Lyle. :rolleyes:
Where I live has nothing to do with the crisis in Syria. If I was living in England my views would be the same as you well know. Likewise, the work that I do has nothing to do with having views on international political affairs. I do a job, a peaceful job, and that is all that there is to that. It has nothing to do with Syria. I do well, but that doesn't mean that I have no values. If I don't enjoy what I do then I will look for another teaching job because teaching is what I do. My rebellion is living overseas as a sojourner, but I have studied to teach and teach I shall. You say I stand for nothing, but what the heck do you stand for? I live for my family and the faint hope that the homeland can improve itself. I want good things for the UK, it angers me that it isn't what it should be.
The Christian faith is that humans are inherently evil, but I don't adhere to that. I don't do evil things and most people don't do evil things. However, concentrations of power are very prone to doing evil things and I just point out where the leading concentrations of power do just that. US foreign policy of 50 years has shown it repeatedly, revelations about your secret services are likewise showing a pull towards wrongdoing, those are just the facts.
I don't want the world to end, I just want people to aspire to be better people and to care for one another more. The politics has to lead that from the front as society has shown it can't level the playing field. I don't think the West practices caring very well with broken families being the norm rather than the exception, with governments hell bent on privatising everything they can, with jobs being outsourced in their millions, with state pensions being funneled into hedge funds, with 12 million Americans relying on tips to top up their 2 dollars and 14 cents per hour. It is a sick, sick, state of affairs and I feel little regard for any of the people that have caused it. Would I like to see those responsible brought to account for their crimes against society? Sure, I would. However, I am not advocating nuclear apocalypse or anything so drastic.
As for Walrus, this is a decent place to live and with the right skills and qualifications, you can do well and I do. That however has nothing to do with politics nor Syria. I could be doing the work that I do in 4 dozen countries and my political views would be the same. It is an asinine argument.
Where you live and what you do has everything to do with your world view. You have not been talking about Syria, I really don't think you give a shit about them, you have been talking about America, against whom you are biased. Also, Christianity does not view humans as evil as evidenced by John 3:16. Stop spouting bias in your head as fact.
You forgot to read the Old Testament.
Again you fail to back up your argument and so it is pretty asinine. If there is anything I say about America that is untrue then say it, otherwise it isn't biased and must be true. Also, you clearly know very little about me if you think I wouldn't hold the same views in the UK or in dozens of other countries. My views will only change with concrete policy changes and they haven't materialised which is something that even Lyle recognises in the case of Obama.
Need I remind you that the old testament is pre Christian or does that not fit into your thinking
So you only accept the post rehab God? Fair enough! ;D
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I see it has become personal again, Lyle. :rolleyes:
Where I live has nothing to do with the crisis in Syria. If I was living in England my views would be the same as you well know. Likewise, the work that I do has nothing to do with having views on international political affairs. I do a job, a peaceful job, and that is all that there is to that. It has nothing to do with Syria. I do well, but that doesn't mean that I have no values. If I don't enjoy what I do then I will look for another teaching job because teaching is what I do. My rebellion is living overseas as a sojourner, but I have studied to teach and teach I shall. You say I stand for nothing, but what the heck do you stand for? I live for my family and the faint hope that the homeland can improve itself. I want good things for the UK, it angers me that it isn't what it should be.
The Christian faith is that humans are inherently evil, but I don't adhere to that. I don't do evil things and most people don't do evil things. However, concentrations of power are very prone to doing evil things and I just point out where the leading concentrations of power do just that. US foreign policy of 50 years has shown it repeatedly, revelations about your secret services are likewise showing a pull towards wrongdoing, those are just the facts.
I don't want the world to end, I just want people to aspire to be better people and to care for one another more. The politics has to lead that from the front as society has shown it can't level the playing field. I don't think the West practices caring very well with broken families being the norm rather than the exception, with governments hell bent on privatising everything they can, with jobs being outsourced in their millions, with state pensions being funneled into hedge funds, with 12 million Americans relying on tips to top up their 2 dollars and 14 cents per hour. It is a sick, sick, state of affairs and I feel little regard for any of the people that have caused it. Would I like to see those responsible brought to account for their crimes against society? Sure, I would. However, I am not advocating nuclear apocalypse or anything so drastic.
As for Walrus, this is a decent place to live and with the right skills and qualifications, you can do well and I do. That however has nothing to do with politics nor Syria. I could be doing the work that I do in 4 dozen countries and my political views would be the same. It is an asinine argument.
Where you live and what you do has everything to do with your world view. You have not been talking about Syria, I really don't think you give a shit about them, you have been talking about America, against whom you are biased. Also, Christianity does not view humans as evil as evidenced by John 3:16. Stop spouting bias in your head as fact.
You forgot to read the Old Testament.
Again you fail to back up your argument and so it is pretty asinine. If there is anything I say about America that is untrue then say it, otherwise it isn't biased and must be true. Also, you clearly know very little about me if you think I wouldn't hold the same views in the UK or in dozens of other countries. My views will only change with concrete policy changes and they haven't materialised which is something that even Lyle recognises in the case of Obama.
Need I remind you that the old testament is pre Christian or does that not fit into your thinking
So you only accept the post rehab God? Fair enough! ;D
it just proves you are making argument against that which you know very little of. It's called contempt prior to investigation.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I see it has become personal again, Lyle. :rolleyes:
Where I live has nothing to do with the crisis in Syria. If I was living in England my views would be the same as you well know. Likewise, the work that I do has nothing to do with having views on international political affairs. I do a job, a peaceful job, and that is all that there is to that. It has nothing to do with Syria. I do well, but that doesn't mean that I have no values. If I don't enjoy what I do then I will look for another teaching job because teaching is what I do. My rebellion is living overseas as a sojourner, but I have studied to teach and teach I shall. You say I stand for nothing, but what the heck do you stand for? I live for my family and the faint hope that the homeland can improve itself. I want good things for the UK, it angers me that it isn't what it should be.
The Christian faith is that humans are inherently evil, but I don't adhere to that. I don't do evil things and most people don't do evil things. However, concentrations of power are very prone to doing evil things and I just point out where the leading concentrations of power do just that. US foreign policy of 50 years has shown it repeatedly, revelations about your secret services are likewise showing a pull towards wrongdoing, those are just the facts.
I don't want the world to end, I just want people to aspire to be better people and to care for one another more. The politics has to lead that from the front as society has shown it can't level the playing field. I don't think the West practices caring very well with broken families being the norm rather than the exception, with governments hell bent on privatising everything they can, with jobs being outsourced in their millions, with state pensions being funneled into hedge funds, with 12 million Americans relying on tips to top up their 2 dollars and 14 cents per hour. It is a sick, sick, state of affairs and I feel little regard for any of the people that have caused it. Would I like to see those responsible brought to account for their crimes against society? Sure, I would. However, I am not advocating nuclear apocalypse or anything so drastic.
As for Walrus, this is a decent place to live and with the right skills and qualifications, you can do well and I do. That however has nothing to do with politics nor Syria. I could be doing the work that I do in 4 dozen countries and my political views would be the same. It is an asinine argument.
Where you live and what you do has everything to do with your world view. You have not been talking about Syria, I really don't think you give a shit about them, you have been talking about America, against whom you are biased. Also, Christianity does not view humans as evil as evidenced by John 3:16. Stop spouting bias in your head as fact.
You forgot to read the Old Testament.
Again you fail to back up your argument and so it is pretty asinine. If there is anything I say about America that is untrue then say it, otherwise it isn't biased and must be true. Also, you clearly know very little about me if you think I wouldn't hold the same views in the UK or in dozens of other countries. My views will only change with concrete policy changes and they haven't materialised which is something that even Lyle recognises in the case of Obama.
Need I remind you that the old testament is pre Christian or does that not fit into your thinking
So you only accept the post rehab God? Fair enough! ;D
it just proves you are making argument against that which you know very little of. It's called contempt prior to investigation.
I am reading the books with as much patience as I can muster. God is a selfish lunatic and the only explanation one can give is that he is a fake manipulated by crude 0 century operators who tried to give him a make over.
He still looks like a cunt, to most ordinary people though.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I see it has become personal again, Lyle. :rolleyes:
Where I live has nothing to do with the crisis in Syria. If I was living in England my views would be the same as you well know. Likewise, the work that I do has nothing to do with having views on international political affairs. I do a job, a peaceful job, and that is all that there is to that. It has nothing to do with Syria. I do well, but that doesn't mean that I have no values. If I don't enjoy what I do then I will look for another teaching job because teaching is what I do. My rebellion is living overseas as a sojourner, but I have studied to teach and teach I shall. You say I stand for nothing, but what the heck do you stand for? I live for my family and the faint hope that the homeland can improve itself. I want good things for the UK, it angers me that it isn't what it should be.
The Christian faith is that humans are inherently evil, but I don't adhere to that. I don't do evil things and most people don't do evil things. However, concentrations of power are very prone to doing evil things and I just point out where the leading concentrations of power do just that. US foreign policy of 50 years has shown it repeatedly, revelations about your secret services are likewise showing a pull towards wrongdoing, those are just the facts.
I don't want the world to end, I just want people to aspire to be better people and to care for one another more. The politics has to lead that from the front as society has shown it can't level the playing field. I don't think the West practices caring very well with broken families being the norm rather than the exception, with governments hell bent on privatising everything they can, with jobs being outsourced in their millions, with state pensions being funneled into hedge funds, with 12 million Americans relying on tips to top up their 2 dollars and 14 cents per hour. It is a sick, sick, state of affairs and I feel little regard for any of the people that have caused it. Would I like to see those responsible brought to account for their crimes against society? Sure, I would. However, I am not advocating nuclear apocalypse or anything so drastic.
As for Walrus, this is a decent place to live and with the right skills and qualifications, you can do well and I do. That however has nothing to do with politics nor Syria. I could be doing the work that I do in 4 dozen countries and my political views would be the same. It is an asinine argument.
Where you live and what you do has everything to do with your world view. You have not been talking about Syria, I really don't think you give a shit about them, you have been talking about America, against whom you are biased. Also, Christianity does not view humans as evil as evidenced by John 3:16. Stop spouting bias in your head as fact.
You forgot to read the Old Testament.
Again you fail to back up your argument and so it is pretty asinine. If there is anything I say about America that is untrue then say it, otherwise it isn't biased and must be true. Also, you clearly know very little about me if you think I wouldn't hold the same views in the UK or in dozens of other countries. My views will only change with concrete policy changes and they haven't materialised which is something that even Lyle recognises in the case of Obama.
Need I remind you that the old testament is pre Christian or does that not fit into your thinking
So you only accept the post rehab God? Fair enough! ;D
it just proves you are making argument against that which you know very little of. It's called contempt prior to investigation.
I am reading the books with as much patience as I can muster. God is a selfish lunatic and the only explanation one can give is that he is a fake manipulated by crude 0 century operators who tried to give him a make over.
He still looks like a cunt, to most ordinary people though.
Thanks for proving my point. For someone who shares similar ideas about Mayweather as I, I am surprised you can be such a cunt in other matters.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I see it has become personal again, Lyle. :rolleyes:
Where I live has nothing to do with the crisis in Syria. If I was living in England my views would be the same as you well know. Likewise, the work that I do has nothing to do with having views on international political affairs. I do a job, a peaceful job, and that is all that there is to that. It has nothing to do with Syria. I do well, but that doesn't mean that I have no values. If I don't enjoy what I do then I will look for another teaching job because teaching is what I do. My rebellion is living overseas as a sojourner, but I have studied to teach and teach I shall. You say I stand for nothing, but what the heck do you stand for? I live for my family and the faint hope that the homeland can improve itself. I want good things for the UK, it angers me that it isn't what it should be.
The Christian faith is that humans are inherently evil, but I don't adhere to that. I don't do evil things and most people don't do evil things. However, concentrations of power are very prone to doing evil things and I just point out where the leading concentrations of power do just that. US foreign policy of 50 years has shown it repeatedly, revelations about your secret services are likewise showing a pull towards wrongdoing, those are just the facts.
I don't want the world to end, I just want people to aspire to be better people and to care for one another more. The politics has to lead that from the front as society has shown it can't level the playing field. I don't think the West practices caring very well with broken families being the norm rather than the exception, with governments hell bent on privatising everything they can, with jobs being outsourced in their millions, with state pensions being funneled into hedge funds, with 12 million Americans relying on tips to top up their 2 dollars and 14 cents per hour. It is a sick, sick, state of affairs and I feel little regard for any of the people that have caused it. Would I like to see those responsible brought to account for their crimes against society? Sure, I would. However, I am not advocating nuclear apocalypse or anything so drastic.
As for Walrus, this is a decent place to live and with the right skills and qualifications, you can do well and I do. That however has nothing to do with politics nor Syria. I could be doing the work that I do in 4 dozen countries and my political views would be the same. It is an asinine argument.
Where you live and what you do has everything to do with your world view. You have not been talking about Syria, I really don't think you give a shit about them, you have been talking about America, against whom you are biased. Also, Christianity does not view humans as evil as evidenced by John 3:16. Stop spouting bias in your head as fact.
You forgot to read the Old Testament.
Again you fail to back up your argument and so it is pretty asinine. If there is anything I say about America that is untrue then say it, otherwise it isn't biased and must be true. Also, you clearly know very little about me if you think I wouldn't hold the same views in the UK or in dozens of other countries. My views will only change with concrete policy changes and they haven't materialised which is something that even Lyle recognises in the case of Obama.
Need I remind you that the old testament is pre Christian or does that not fit into your thinking
So you only accept the post rehab God? Fair enough! ;D
it just proves you are making argument against that which you know very little of. It's called contempt prior to investigation.
I am reading the books with as much patience as I can muster. God is a selfish lunatic and the only explanation one can give is that he is a fake manipulated by crude 0 century operators who tried to give him a make over.
He still looks like a cunt, to most ordinary people though.
Thanks for proving my point. For someone who shares similar ideas about Mayweather as I, I am surprised you can be such a cunt in other matters.
I exist on my own terms. It is caled honesty.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I see it has become personal again, Lyle. :rolleyes:
Where I live has nothing to do with the crisis in Syria. If I was living in England my views would be the same as you well know. Likewise, the work that I do has nothing to do with having views on international political affairs. I do a job, a peaceful job, and that is all that there is to that. It has nothing to do with Syria. I do well, but that doesn't mean that I have no values. If I don't enjoy what I do then I will look for another teaching job because teaching is what I do. My rebellion is living overseas as a sojourner, but I have studied to teach and teach I shall. You say I stand for nothing, but what the heck do you stand for? I live for my family and the faint hope that the homeland can improve itself. I want good things for the UK, it angers me that it isn't what it should be.
The Christian faith is that humans are inherently evil, but I don't adhere to that. I don't do evil things and most people don't do evil things. However, concentrations of power are very prone to doing evil things and I just point out where the leading concentrations of power do just that. US foreign policy of 50 years has shown it repeatedly, revelations about your secret services are likewise showing a pull towards wrongdoing, those are just the facts.
I don't want the world to end, I just want people to aspire to be better people and to care for one another more. The politics has to lead that from the front as society has shown it can't level the playing field. I don't think the West practices caring very well with broken families being the norm rather than the exception, with governments hell bent on privatising everything they can, with jobs being outsourced in their millions, with state pensions being funneled into hedge funds, with 12 million Americans relying on tips to top up their 2 dollars and 14 cents per hour. It is a sick, sick, state of affairs and I feel little regard for any of the people that have caused it. Would I like to see those responsible brought to account for their crimes against society? Sure, I would. However, I am not advocating nuclear apocalypse or anything so drastic.
As for Walrus, this is a decent place to live and with the right skills and qualifications, you can do well and I do. That however has nothing to do with politics nor Syria. I could be doing the work that I do in 4 dozen countries and my political views would be the same. It is an asinine argument.
Where you live and what you do has everything to do with your world view. You have not been talking about Syria, I really don't think you give a shit about them, you have been talking about America, against whom you are biased. Also, Christianity does not view humans as evil as evidenced by John 3:16. Stop spouting bias in your head as fact.
You forgot to read the Old Testament.
Again you fail to back up your argument and so it is pretty asinine. If there is anything I say about America that is untrue then say it, otherwise it isn't biased and must be true. Also, you clearly know very little about me if you think I wouldn't hold the same views in the UK or in dozens of other countries. My views will only change with concrete policy changes and they haven't materialised which is something that even Lyle recognises in the case of Obama.
Need I remind you that the old testament is pre Christian or does that not fit into your thinking
So you only accept the post rehab God? Fair enough! ;D
it just proves you are making argument against that which you know very little of. It's called contempt prior to investigation.
I am reading the books with as much patience as I can muster. God is a selfish lunatic and the only explanation one can give is that he is a fake manipulated by crude 0 century operators who tried to give him a make over.
He still looks like a cunt, to most ordinary people though.
Thanks for proving my point. For someone who shares similar ideas about Mayweather as I, I am surprised you can be such a cunt in other matters.
I exist on my own terms. It is caled honesty.
I stand corrected, you're an honest cunt, thanks for clearing that up.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
I exist on my own terms. It is caled honesty.
Oh is it now? So you answer to no one? Not your job, not your wife, not the laws of South Korea? Must be nice to be the only anarchist who has found that little slice of paradise.....shame you don't SEEM happy from your various posts.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
At the end of the day, I am the master of my own destiny. So no, at the end of the day work, society, law, nor family are not going to make the decisions that affect me. As someone who doesn't believe they are inherently evil, most of the time that results in sensible, practical decisions. An anarchist would be plotting societal meltdown, but I have no interest in that. The system generally works, this isn't America. 100 dollars is all I pay for healthcare and a bit more on top privately for serious things and I use it all the time. You would die (literally) to have the fairness of the systems we have here.
Also, don't you sit there complaining about Obama in the comfort of your Mummies home? You are the last person to be lecturing about life choices and anarchy. I read a book and I will interpret the book based upon the words there before me. Again, Lyle, you are a poor reader of people and have nothing to say beyond personal criticism. Loser.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
so now it's our health system you want to put down. Is that foreign policy or are you judging where you live to somewhere else which is something you said you never do.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
so now it's our health system you want to put down. Is that foreign policy or are you judging where you live to somewhere else which is something you said you never do.
Lyle turned this personal with some spiel about my work and anarchy. Lyle is bitter and angry that everything people have been saying is true, he cannot come back with anything enlightened and so his only recourse is to hate on the teaching profession. He is a fat loser, is very vindictive and yes, paying thousands of dollars a year for health care is rotten. That is where anarchy needs to come from. It isn't needed in a system that is treating people fairly. Also you show your colours with talk of 'our' health system. I find that to be frankly quite ridiculous. Basically you are a sad nationalist with this talk of 'our' and obsession with locations. You are small minded and obviously a bit thick judging by your Bible talk. You have nothing to add and so I have put you into your compartmentalised box. I might open the box to prod you occasionally, but you clearly have nothing worthwhile to say as evidence by your contributions to this thread. You clearly need to learn more about your country and it's historical relations with other countries. Once you are clued in I might open the box.
As for old Lyle, king of sidetracking, distortion, and personal vendetta. Well, you are an idiot and won't fit into a box and so you are being locked in the room and Mummy won't let you eat any icecream after dinner. Now don't cry, if you don't stop crying, you won't be watching Fox news. That's it Lyle, the television is going off. Lock.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
I am actually proud to be put down by someone of your ilk
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
I am actually proud to be put down by someone of your ilk
God is evil, do you forget how he wanted to fry the people of Israel at the Mount of Sinai? My ilk has nothing to do with it, the fact that he was a cunt is an obvious fact.
There is/was no God, it was always a system of control.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Stop trying to be controversial, you think that shit you spew shows intelligence. Your views are not as precious as you think they are.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Stop trying to be controversial, you think that shit you spew shows intelligence. Your views are not as precious as you think they are.
What makes you think I am trying to be controversial? I don't need to try anything.
Also, I don't think these views are an expression of intelligence in the least, they are expressions of rationality and truth.
You are bound by a text and a government propaganda system, I just think you are an idiot and that your country is the leading terrorist state and that there is no God.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Stop trying to be controversial, you think that shit you spew shows intelligence. Your views are not as precious as you think they are.
What makes you think I am trying to be controversial? I don't need to try anything.
Also, I don't think these views are an expression of intelligence in the least, they are expressions of rationality and truth.
You are bound by a text and a government propaganda system, I just think you are an idiot and that your country is the leading terrorist state and that there is no God.
at least you are consistent in your stupidity
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Stop trying to be controversial, you think that shit you spew shows intelligence. Your views are not as precious as you think they are.
What makes you think I am trying to be controversial? I don't need to try anything.
Also, I don't think these views are an expression of intelligence in the least, they are expressions of rationality and truth.
You are bound by a text and a government propaganda system, I just think you are an idiot and that your country is the leading terrorist state and that there is no God.
at least you are consistent in your stupidity
Fuck you. I am clever and aware. You need to prove it. yourself.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Hey settle down. I have no problem with you personally. Do you think anything you said about religion or the US is unique. I have heard it all before. Yes, I threw some personal insults but in reality I have a policy not to anger over people I don't know. I save my anger for my loved ones. Nothing you say has much effect on me, and I don't mean that as an insult, it's just all a tape that has been played many times. In the end, I wish you well. Much of what I said was supposed to be funny but with the absence of physiognomy the message gets lost.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Stop trying to be controversial, you think that shit you spew shows intelligence. Your views are not as precious as you think they are.
What makes you think I am trying to be controversial? I don't need to try anything.
Also, I don't think these views are an expression of intelligence in the least, they are expressions of rationality and truth.
You are bound by a text and a government propaganda system, I just think you are an idiot and that your country is the leading terrorist state and that there is no God.
at least you are consistent in your stupidity
Fuck you. I am clever and aware. You need to prove it. yourself.
Are you aware of how stupid anarchy is? Apparently not
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gandalf
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Stop trying to be controversial, you think that shit you spew shows intelligence. Your views are not as precious as you think they are.
What makes you think I am trying to be controversial? I don't need to try anything.
Also, I don't think these views are an expression of intelligence in the least, they are expressions of rationality and truth.
You are bound by a text and a government propaganda system, I just think you are an idiot and that your country is the leading terrorist state and that there is no God.
at least you are consistent in your stupidity
Fuck you. I am clever and aware. You need to prove it. yourself.
Are you aware of how stupid anarchy is? Apparently not
Get back in your room, you snivelling little bitch. And take your little hoe by the hand before I lock the door.
Walrus + ElKabong = United Slaves of America.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Gandalf, wanna be intellectual, and not doing well at it.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
I'm watching boxing. So do that, get back in the ocean, or sit in your box. Take your pick.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Ah, intellectual, rumours, cuntlike, sensitive, you are the whole package. You are an iota away from being a puffer.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
My name is Gandalf, indicating moody, but great Wizard. You name is Walrus, indicating ugly creature of the water with a foul, fishy odour. Be gone fish muncher, or I shall turn you into a toad.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Guess we need to stop....miles and miles' friends who wish to remain anonymous have gotten a little sand in their vaginas
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Guess we need to stop....miles and miles' friends who wish to remain anonymous have gotten a little sand in their vaginas
I hate when that happens
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
I am Miles' friend and that sand did not exist. Who is walrus? I am also friends with Lyle. This attacking and meanness has to stop.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
I am Miles' friend and that sand did not exist. Who is walrus? I am also friends with Lyle. This attacking and meanness has to stop.
;D Funny,read through the last couple of pages and eventually I had this image of kids in a sand box just going off covering each other in it. Some funny retorts to read.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Dont know what to think about this, but caught a drift of it somehow yesterday.
Interesting news clips are shown showing some British compainies sale of the stuff to Syria. In its pure form like that, Fluoride kills on exposure to it,you put your hand in a bucket of it you are gone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et1NSxT1K4w
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
i am miles' friend and that sand did not exist. Who is walrus? I am also friends with lyle. This attacking and meanness has to stop.
i am the walrus, goo goo ga joob
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
i am miles' friend and that sand did not exist. Who is walrus? I am also friends with lyle. This attacking and meanness has to stop.
i am the walrus, goo goo ga joob
quiet, egg man.
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
i am miles' friend and that sand did not exist. Who is walrus? I am also friends with lyle. This attacking and meanness has to stop.
i am the walrus, goo goo ga joob
quiet, egg man.
Go yell at those Chinese kids, the walrus has views which are welcome here
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
so many garbage politicians from us are very unfair, that system was very unfair with my president from this latin country, they were totally hypocritic too, when I was a kid I believed that it was good but it was all a lie, none has elected the garbage politicians of there as the world owners, none would do it, get the fuck out and go home, although if justice was justice they would have to be severely punished
-
Re: Are you for or against intervening in Syria?
...wonder what the votes will be if people took out the 'politics' from it...
I have no politics or ideological baggage behind my back so for me, any madman who murders his own people wholesale, go on and get him whereever he may be, and if anyones gonna do it for us, I say thank you...
The civilized world had no business letting the Ruanda genocide happen, right in front of its eyes...but who cares about a million or so poor black folks, right? tsk, tsk..
