Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The fact that you have to break everything down into bite sized chunks and then tie yourself in knots defending the indefensible rather than just accepting most people are not quite as stupid as you, speaks volumes El Kabong.
You are just constantly begging to be called a Nazi or a Fascist so the you can justify your own stupefying silence on what most people would consider to be pretty basic common values. You think you are so special that you can not even see the hilarious hypocrisy of willfully misreading everything written by everyone, whilst invoking the same incredulous response as the fake woke people you so accurately mirror. Here you are telling where i can post satire and complaining that i do not at mention people, to make things perfectly clear to people like yourself who can see no further than the tip of your nose, because your head is always up your arse.
It is a thread entitled 'Conspiracy Theories' and like the PC muppet that you have always been, you fake incredulity when i mention the NWO and Freemasons as though they have nothing to do with Conspiracy theories. You use the place like a soapbox, when you could be using it as an opportunity to stop hectoring people who have been where you are now 20+ yrs ago, and actually learn something.
Pretty much the response I expected from you.
I didn't tell you where to post the satire you shared. All I wanted to do was make sure you knew it was satire because you didn't comment on it at all you just posted the article and given your history of misunderstanding me and my posts yeah I questioned whether or not you knew that was satire and so I asked. I didn't say "don't post it" I didn't say "you can't post that here" those are things I NEVER did Beanz.
Also I didn't say you had to @ mention anyone. You didn't respond with a quote, you didn't mention a poster by name, I posted, you responded to me, you posted again, you posted a third time and it was in response to SOMEONE. So if you do that and you don't mention the poster you're responding to and you don't quote the post you're responding to then I guess you leave that up for interpretation ergo my asking "What are you on about?" to which you could have said "Oh, that was a response to ______ and not you" but you didn't you chose your default position which is to be combative towards me.
Fake incredulity? I merely asked what you were talking about. What the actual fuck Beanz? Do you think I know what goes on inside your head?
You've NEVER been where I am or where I'm from and likewise I've never been where you are or where you're from....so one would assume that clear communication between us would be a positive in allowing each other to get a glimpse of understanding, but nah feel free to continue being combative with me as fucking usual.
