How did you score the fight??? (Post your scorecard)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dutch Sam

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

Here's mine  ;D:
RD 1 Tie
RD 2 Oscar
RD 3 Floyd
RD 4 Oscar
RD 5 Floyd
RD 6 Oscar
RD 7 Oscar
RD 8 Oscar
RD 9 Floyd
RD 10 Floyd
RD 11 Floyd
RD 12 Oscar

Winner : The Golden Boy 115 - 114

C. Giampa   :liar:  :kick:

---

First round wasn't a tie Floyd clearly won it thats why everyone else on this thread scored it for Mayweather because it was clearly his round.

---

CLEARLY?  I think NOT!  The rounds Floyd CLEARLY won were 9, 10, 11.  I'll watch round one more carefully though...still " CLEARLY " is exaggerated.

---

No it isn't all commentators had him winning it Ledderman had him winning it even people who thought Oscar won had Mayweather winning it.

I don't see how you had it a tie it was Mayweathers round no debate needed it was his round for certain.

---

I scored that round for Mayweather, but after scoring the Oscar's fights with Tito and Mosley (2nd) for the Golden Boy, I deliberately showed a little bias to Floyd, that round was dead, very little in it, if I was to watch it again, I might well score it even.

---

It wasn't even there was 9 shots landed for Floyd and 4 for Oscar even though its not many punches it was still clearly Mayweathers round.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by porkypara

115-116=ODLH

---

I have to add I was a well oiled when I scored this. :drinker:


Also you cant score a fight probolly off the TV.Being at ringside for a fight is totaly different than watching on the box.


Glad it was a good fight and a good night for boxing. ;D

yes and no, it's sometimes harder to tell the effect punches have from the tv but the advantages are the better angles and replays you get.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Missy

yes and no, it's sometimes harder to tell the effect punches have from the tv but the advantages are the better angles and replays you get.

---

Exactly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by porkypara

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by porkypara

115-116=ODLH

---

I have to add I was a well oiled when I scored this. :drinker:


Also you cant score a fight probolly off the TV.Being at ringside for a fight is totaly different than watching on the box.


Glad it was a good fight and a good night for boxing. ;D

---

And you can score a fight on tele you have better view on tele because you get better close up and replays at ringside you can hear punches better and atmosphere is fantastic ect but for you to say you can't score fight properly on tele is incorrect imo.

To score a fight propoly you need to be there IMO.


Boxing is not a sport of gadgets and gizmos,and that goes for the scoring as well.Thats why the judges are ringside not eles where.


If you want gadgets and gizmos watch American football.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by porkypara

To score a fight propoly you need to be there IMO.


Boxing is not a sport of gadgets and gizmos,and that goes for the scoring as well.Thats why the judges are ringside not eles where.


If you want gadgets and gizmos watch American football.

---

That's almost keeping tradition for the sake of keeping tradition though.
What about a combination of the two?
I can't remember which fight, but I think it was Lampley or Merchant who was talking about the idea of judges having monitors beside them as they score a fight.
During brief moments where their vision may be obstructed, for example by a referee, they can take a quick glance down over to the monitor. And look back up to the action again once their line of vision isn't impaired.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by meowza

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by porkypara

To score a fight propoly you need to be there IMO.


Boxing is not a sport of gadgets and gizmos,and that goes for the scoring as well.Thats why the judges are ringside not eles where.


If you want gadgets and gizmos watch American football.

---

That's almost keeping tradition for the sake of keeping tradition though.
What about a combination of the two?
I can't remember which fight, but I think it was Lampley or Merchant who was talking about the idea of judges having monitors beside them as they score a fight.
During brief moments where their vision may be obstructed, for example by a referee, they can take a quick glance down over to the monitor. And look back up to the action again once their line of vision isn't impaired.

---

Good point :coolclick:

exactly if a fighter has his back to you how can you tell what lands and what is blocked? you can from tv.

Let's all SCORE it again this time with the SOUND OFF my friends! ;D

HBO tonight!

if i have to actually type what im referring to than you dont belong on this forum


TE AMO :-*

i've already watched three times without the sound by force though, because i forgot to plug the audio wire into the VCR while i was taping it...

117- 111 for floyd

MAyweathers incorperated into your heading there .
Audio plug out /one eye patch on ???

I already have 116-113 Mayweather

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andre

MAyweathers incorperated into your heading there .
Audio plug out /one eye patch on ???

---

how'd you know..even with one eye i saw that delahoya was beaten easily... ;)

116-112 for me