JMM is my favourite current boxer, i haven't really been following boxing or the lead up to this fight. But i will be rooting for JMM all the way.
Printable View
JMM is my favourite current boxer, i haven't really been following boxing or the lead up to this fight. But i will be rooting for JMM all the way.
Team Dinamita baby. Screwed twice..it's time to get what's yours! Marquez via 12 rounds of schooling.
The 2nd one I Marquez winning 115-112 I believe it was. Up to you to decide if that's a consider a close fight or not. The 1st fight I had it 115-110 Marquez. Which is actually the same card provided by Guy Jutras (who thank God just recently returned to judging fights). The other 2 idiots Burt Clements and John Stewart had it wrong. Clements is a decent judge. He clearly had an off night. Stewart is a terrible judge. No surprise he turned in a deplorable scorecard. Neither one has the boxing knowledge Guy Jutras has. Combined them and they still don't come close. Jutras is a boxing encyclopedia. His card mirrored mine. We gave Pacquiao the first (10-6) and the 2nd round. After that it was all Marquez. 115-110. By all rights that should of been the universal scorecard. But it wasn't. Cuz to many muthafukkas pay attention to what they scored the previous round. So they see they given Marquez 6 rounds in a row. And they start thinking people might think there being bias Marquez. So they give the next close round to Pacquiao despite it not really being deserved.Quote:
Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner
........... rrrrrright.Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent DemiseThe hell I can't. My scorecard is right. Anybody else that disagrees with it is wrong. And I know more than you. Scoring fights is not an exact science. It doesn't have to be. There is still a right way and wrong way to do it. Lot of muthfukkas think that just cuz a fool is an offical judge he knows the sport. Wrong. 60% have no buisness being judges.Quote:
Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCornerYou already said that boxing scoring is not an exact science so until they find a better way on how to score a fight, we can disagree with the result but in a VERY CLOSE fight, you cannot insist that your score is right and the judges are wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by milesOkay, Pac got the verdict of the judges in their second bout. But boxing scoring is not an exact science and when you have most boxing writers and forum members arguing that Marquez won then you have to give that its weight as well. This means that the boxing writers and forum members judging are likewise not an exact science. So how can one be better than the other when both are not exact science. And what do you mean by most? How many are this in numbers?Quote:
Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner
They say history is only written by the winners, but that does not mean that we ignore what really happened and what contemporary commentators really thought at the time. But you are giving great value to the scores of those commentators who agrees with you. How many commentators did you know of that expressed their opinion as to who won?
The second fight in particular was close, but most believe Marquez edged it. How many in numbers is this 'most' that you talk about with regards to all the people who watched the fight.?
Question for you: Are those two fights close or did any of them dominate the other?
It's not that I don't like Pacquiao, who really comes across as a gentleman and one of the good guys who actually does end up victorious, but I do want JMM to spring an upset. I remember staying up to watch the second fight, and I was completely exhausted, but within 3 minutes I was wide awake again. JMM won a convert with his bravery that night, and I didn't think Pac deserved the win.
Hopefully we get back to the JMM of those days, and this time he can turn the screw on the Pac-man and his significant hype machine.
I don't like or dislike manny, but marquez is a favorite so hope he got one last great one in him and gets the w but sadly doubtful, this one is probably a couple years to late...
Marquez fight
Boxing Guru UK
Don't post links on the main board they get deleted.
ive never seen links getting deleted.. watcha talking about..
Ill just stop providing links.. Doesnt affect me. lol
We already have the links in other boards, there's spies that travel to forums. Looking to get links took down, which is why we post them in the other boards.Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
I'm backing Marquez!!!
Gotcha.. I eat spies for breakfast. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ICBWe already have the links in other boards, there's spies that travel to forums. Looking to get links took down, which is why we post them in the other boards.Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
ICB is right, no links on the main board. A big no no.
Once again, marquez got robbed but we all know he won. This calls for a celebration.
I have no doubt in my mind that floyd knocks pac out within ten.. Pac is slipping and im even more convinced floyd would toy with him.