Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Here are the evidence your honor...
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Both feet off canvas? :o Sweet!
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
So you're only evidence is
"Well Barerra beat Hamed and Pacquiao beat Barerra so he is OBVIOUSLY better!!!"
great evidence like I've never heard of the man who beat the man logic before ::** And it's like NEVER been proven wrong ::** Because boxing isnt about style its about who beats who.. its a basic A B and C science!!
And by this logic I can safely say that Mayorga could knock out Mosley in three rounds.. why? because Forrest did it ;D And we saw what Mayorga did to him.. it makes perfect perfect sense!!!
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
So you're only evidence is
"Well Barerra beat Hamed and Pacquiao beat Barerra so he is OBVIOUSLY better!!!"
great evidence like I've never heard of the man who beat the man logic before ::** And it's like NEVER been proven wrong ::** Because boxing isnt about style its about who beats who.. its a basic A B and C science!!
And by this logic I can safely say that Mayorga could knock out Mosley in three rounds.. why? because Forrest did it ;D And we saw what Mayorga did to him.. it makes perfect perfect sense!!!
I'm no stranger to sarcasm. You layed it on me pretty thick just like James Spader in "Tommy Boy" LOL!
You're good @ it, I tell you that.
Anyways, Like I said before, Barrera is the common opponent for both.
And style does make difference. But it's not just about style though, the pro-resume makes bigger difference.
If Naz fights Pac and apply the same tactics that he pulled on MAB, he will end up on stretcher on his way to hospital or even in the morgue (god forbid).
Naseem Hamed never really passed any true tests to remember.
He never came out of true gritty wars or showed his resolve like pac has.
Naz fought one elite fighter, got beaten, retired, and now he's someone's cellbitch.
Pac defeated future hall of famers and still kicking butt.
LOL! Pac aint no Mayorga.
Actually Mayorga is more like Naz, being arrogant and cocky that he is.
And where's Mayorga and Hamed now?... :'( I guess they do have something in common. ;)
I think Naz is still in prison with his cell master Tyrone :
http://blog.thesweetscience.com/2006.../#comment-3336
Don't drop the soap in the shower Naz!
;D
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Here are the evidence your honor...
What ???
a.) Learn to speak English
b.) Stop posting irrelevant pictures
c.) I could go and get pics of Pac getting knocked out by nobodies but it would mean nothing
josef4334 - I said Nasem always got off the floor to win and its true . I never said he beat Barrera . You just misinterpreted my post because you were seeing red at the time.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Look how washed out Barrera looked against Pac
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Pac and Hamed are NOT in the same level.
NAZ had a hard time with Kelley. And he didn't survived against MAB.
Yes he did survive against Barrera and Barrera won by 3 rounds.
This is true Ice i don't know why people act as though he murdered Hamed Ice have a CC ;)
:coolclick: back i had fight even after 8 or 9 rounds if i remember so did Ledderman its just later rounds Barrera pulled away and he would of won by 4 points on my card but he had a point deduction so he won by 3 points on my card.
I can understand why you guys are basing Hamed from his buttkicking that he received from Barrera.
Barrera is the common denominator for both guys.
According from Barrera-Marquez bout just this year, obviously MAB is still not a shot fighter.
He even floored Marquez like Pac did.
My point is MAB still kicking butt from his win against NAZ, and from his lost against Pac.
Anyways, Pac is one quick individual when he uses speed like against Barrera.
How would Naz react when he gets tagged with several powerpunches and finds no one to hit afterwards?
Isn't it the same Barrera who kept outboxing the supposed to be boxer that pacman KO'd?
MAB is as great a boxer as you can find, yet he never had a chance to keep pacman off him.
Can Hamed do it who relies on power and speed but lacks basic skills. It's not as easy as it looks for Hamed,. ..
but it is for Pacman.
I hate Naz i wanted to see him lose but thats not the point here Barrera fought on the backfoot using his jab not trading Pac would come forward and trade and that can be disaster against Naz forgetting the Barrera fight because Pac wouldn't be backing off and Naz has the power to turn out Pacs lights.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Barrera completly changed his style for Naz fight had he fought coming forward like he normally did he would'nt have lasted to long Naz were'nt on his A game thats for sure
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Naz was beat because he came forward against barrera. Anybody who comes forward against naz gets knocked out.
Pac would come forward with those wild rushes and get dropped fast.....
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salhadin
Naz was beat because he came forward against barrera. Anybody who comes forward against naz gets knocked out.
Pac would come forward with those wild rushes and get dropped fast.....
who has naz fought that is worth mentioning in the like of barerra? barerra has the least power among the top four featherweight and he dropped hamed. you make it seem like hamed is unhittable.. i doubt that naz would even showboat against pac.. he wont have time to do that
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef4334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salhadin
Naz was beat because he came forward against barrera. Anybody who comes forward against naz gets knocked out.
Pac would come forward with those wild rushes and get dropped fast.....
who has naz fought that is worth mentioning in the like of barerra?
barerra has the least power among the top four featherweight and he dropped hamed. you make it seem like hamed is unhittable.. i doubt that naz would even showboat against pac.. he wont have time to do that
Barrera does not have the least power and he did not floor Nas ???
