Re: Who do think is the hardest hitter pound for pound.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by halo
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Heres how I see it no particular order.....
Old School:
Joe Louis - 69 wins 55 ko's
Jack Johnson - 82 wins 61 ko's
Jimmy Wilde - 133 wins 103 ko's
Yesteryear:
Zarate - 66 wins 63 ko's
Gomez - 44 wins 42 ko's
Marciano - 49 wins 43 ko's
McClellan - 31 wins 29 ko's
Current:
Wladdy - 48 wins 43 ko's
RMarquez - 37 wins 33 ko's
Cotto - 30 wins 25 ko's
PDL - 31 wins 28 ko's
New School:
Valero - 22 wins 22 ko's
Oganov - 26 wins 26 ko's
Haye - 19 wins 18 ko's
Katsidis - 22 wins 20 ko's
Berto - 18 wins 16 ko's
Good list! Am wondering why you did not consider George Foreman?
I was TRYING very hard not to repeat names of fighters already listed.
You can see how well I did...... ;D
I just wanted to put up different names instead of repeating names....
But BIG George is def. up there with the hardest punchers so is Frazier, Shavers oh! and what about Tommy Morrison.
you can't really base it all on records. MOst young fighters who becomes great fighter have about 80%+ knock out record already but later on they get those decisions over better oppenents. So those % start to decrease. You have to consider knock out fasion and most of all on quality oppenents.
I couldn't agree with you more on this and that is exactly why I split them up in the groups I did.
Cause their is NO WAY IN HELL that I would list a fighter like Berto and Katsidis and Oganov along with fighters like Zarate, McClellan and the rest of those older fighters.
Sometimes, judging based on percentage is deceiving. Valero has 22 out of 22 but it does not make him a harder puncher than the Pacman.I believe it was the point of Julius Rain.
Re: Who do think is the hardest hitter pound for pound.
if we are talking old fighter I like the power of Edwin Rosario.
Re: Who do think is the hardest hitter pound for pound.
Quote:
Originally Posted by superg
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Quote:
Originally Posted by halo
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
Heres how I see it no particular order.....
Old School:
Joe Louis - 69 wins 55 ko's
Jack Johnson - 82 wins 61 ko's
Jimmy Wilde - 133 wins 103 ko's
Yesteryear:
Zarate - 66 wins 63 ko's
Gomez - 44 wins 42 ko's
Marciano - 49 wins 43 ko's
McClellan - 31 wins 29 ko's
Current:
Wladdy - 48 wins 43 ko's
RMarquez - 37 wins 33 ko's
Cotto - 30 wins 25 ko's
PDL - 31 wins 28 ko's
New School:
Valero - 22 wins 22 ko's
Oganov - 26 wins 26 ko's
Haye - 19 wins 18 ko's
Katsidis - 22 wins 20 ko's
Berto - 18 wins 16 ko's
Good list! Am wondering why you did not consider George Foreman?
I was TRYING very hard not to repeat names of fighters already listed.
You can see how well I did...... ;D
I just wanted to put up different names instead of repeating names....
But BIG George is def. up there with the hardest punchers so is Frazier, Shavers oh! and what about Tommy Morrison.
you can't really base it all on records. MOst young fighters who becomes great fighter have about 80%+ knock out record already but later on they get those decisions over better oppenents. So those % start to decrease. You have to consider knock out fasion and most of all on quality oppenents.
I couldn't agree with you more on this and that is exactly why I split them up in the groups I did.
Cause their is NO WAY IN HELL that I would list a fighter like Berto and Katsidis and Oganov along with fighters like Zarate, McClellan and the rest of those older fighters.
Sometimes, judging based on percentage is deceiving. Valero has 22 out of 22 but it does not make him a harder puncher than the Pacman.I believe it was the point of Julius Rain.
Am I being misunderstood here? ???
I never based my list on %.
And I'll repeat it again for the reasons mentioned is the reason why I broke the fighters into groups.
Again I didn't want to metion fighters that were alread listed/mentioned.
