Re: Why should Calzaghe have the privilege
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEANIE
Were u having a go at me? It was Seanie who started the stupid argument. I get exactly what u mean tho. I hate the whole 'Hopkins only fought welterweights' thing. I mean he destroyed a 32-0 Glen Johnson who went on to be a force at LHW.
Yeah Tito started at 147 but he KTFO Joppy before the Hopkins fight, and Joppy was a good MW who went the distance with Hopkins and Taylor.
RJJ was unstoppable at MW when the nard fought him and BHOP gave him a tough fight.
Taylor beat Hopkins when he was over 40.
Hopkins beat Tarver at LHW when Tarver was the man at LHW!
Calzaghe is a great fighter, and i understand if u like him, he has beaten down the challengers he has faced, and has generally done so with ease. I can understand if u like him, but dont try and make out like Hopkins hasnt done as much in his career as Joe cos he has more big names on his opponent list.
Just be a fan of both and hope they fight.
Johnson may have been 32 - 0 but his record had more padding than a comfy sofa.
[/quote]
Face it your just way too biased towards Joe. Glen Johnson is a top LHW, yet u said Hopikns has only beaten smaller men.
Your argument was killed. You said Hopkins wouldnt have ruled MW if RJJ had been there. Well Joe wouldnt have ruled SMW if RJJ had been there. What a ridiculous argument.
Fucken Fanboys.
Re: Why should Calzaghe have the privilege
Well we already know what happen when Bernard Fought him but we willl never know how Calzaghe would of done with him.
Re: Why should Calzaghe have the privilege
I think how Johnson comes forward throwing them big shots 1 after another like he did against Woods i think he would catch Calzaghe while doing that stupid showboating he cant do and gets stopped.
Re: Why should Calzaghe have the privilege
Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEANIE
Were u having a go at me? It was Seanie who started the stupid argument. I get exactly what u mean tho. I hate the whole 'Hopkins only fought welterweights' thing. I mean he destroyed a 32-0 Glen Johnson who went on to be a force at LHW.
Yeah Tito started at 147 but he KTFO Joppy before the Hopkins fight, and Joppy was a good MW who went the distance with Hopkins and Taylor.
RJJ was unstoppable at MW when the nard fought him and BHOP gave him a tough fight.
Taylor beat Hopkins when he was over 40.
Hopkins beat Tarver at LHW when Tarver was the man at LHW!
Calzaghe is a great fighter, and i understand if u like him, he has beaten down the challengers he has faced, and has generally done so with ease. I can understand if u like him, but dont try and make out like Hopkins hasnt done as much in his career as Joe cos he has more big names on his opponent list.
Just be a fan of both and hope they fight.
Johnson may have been 32 - 0 but his record had more padding than a comfy sofa.
Face it your just way too biased towards Joe. Glen Johnson is a top LHW, yet u said Hopikns has only beaten smaller men.
Your argument was killed. You said Hopkins wouldnt have ruled MW if RJJ had been there. Well Joe wouldnt have ruled SMW if RJJ had been there. What a ridiculous argument.
Fucken Fanboys.
[/quote]
:appl: :appl: CC
Re: Why should Calzaghe have the privilege
I do not see Johnson Beating Calzaghe even if he did catch him Calzaghe not Woods and he probable take Johnson more serious.
Re: Why should Calzaghe have the privilege
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr140
I do not see Johnson Beating Calzaghe even if he did catch him Calzaghe not Woods and he probable take Johnson more serious.
Calzaghe obviously did. Since he pulled to face him more than once
Re: Why should Calzaghe have the privilege
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAYWEATHER P4P#1
Calzaghe could have pushed for Jones though when he ruled Lightheavy in the same way Woods pushed for his shot or Lacy and Kessler pushed for there shot at Calzaghe.Calzaghe has never really pushed for a fight and travelled to get it .
Lots of boxers pushed for Jones, but Jones used the excuse that he wasnt prepared to leave the USA.