Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Forget the silly alphabet belts - you're (bilbo) picking the champ on your interpretation of formlines. That just complicates things further. How about Casamayor already having a victory over Campbell?
Marquez is the MAN because Casa was the man. Campbells three alpahbets mean fuck all. Fact. ;)
This is exactly how I see it!
Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PRIDE OF BOSTON
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Forget the silly alphabet belts - you're (bilbo) picking the champ on your interpretation of formlines. That just complicates things further. How about Casamayor already having a victory over Campbell?
Marquez is the MAN because Casa was the man. Campbells three alpahbets mean fuck all. Fact. ;)
This is exactly how I see it!
You're smarter than what you look ;D
(think ive done that one before..a?)
Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PRIDE OF BOSTON
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Forget the silly alphabet belts - you're (bilbo) picking the champ on your interpretation of formlines. That just complicates things further. How about Casamayor already having a victory over Campbell?
Marquez is the MAN because Casa was the man. Campbells three alpahbets mean fuck all. Fact. ;)
This is exactly how I see it!
You're smarter than what you look ;D
(think ive done that one before..a?)
I'm sure it has been ;D
