Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
Word is Bush wanted to let it out during his re-election campaign to seal the victory but the big three (Warren Buffett, Trainer Monkey, and Han Solo) told him to shut the fuck up, we've got grand strategy to worry about.
It was the trigger happy Solo that shot him in the first place. He thought he could claim the bounty.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Youngblood
Ouma, u know Bush clearly covered up the death. I mean, how else could he have written his memoirs with his biggest regret being not being able to capture bin Laden. People aren't just going to turn away that sort of revenue.
You believe Bush capable of writing his own memoirs?
you believe in spaghetti monsters?
point is, no one is going to sign their name to a failure of that magnitude, given all the costs, in lives, dollars, and reputation falsely. As much as there is/was to dislike about him and his policies, it is one of the few truths he was capable of, if even in hindsight.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Youngblood
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Youngblood
Ouma, u know Bush clearly covered up the death. I mean, how else could he have written his memoirs with his biggest regret being not being able to capture bin Laden. People aren't just going to turn away that sort of revenue.
You believe Bush capable of writing his own memoirs?
you believe in spaghetti monsters?
point is, no one is going to sign their name to a failure of that magnitude, given all the costs, in lives, dollars, and reputation. As much as there is/was to dislike about him and his policies, it is one of the few truths he was capable of, if even in hindsight.
It was only a failure if their goal was to kill Bin Laden. But if their goal was merely to use him as a face for the war on terror in order to carry out their agenda in the Middle East how did they fail?
Was it a failure that they didn't find WMD's in Iraq or did they only use that claim as a pretext for going in?
Were they really concerned about the loss of life in Vietnam? Certainly not the Viet Cong they werent, Nixon wanted to nuke them all or blows the dams and dykes to drown them all in their villages.
Capturing Bin Laden and the war on terror was never their goal, that was merely the false flag story they told in order to carry out their aims. Bit difficult to justify going into Afghanistan and Iraq if they have done nothing to you.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
you keep moving the goal posts bilbo. deflecting the point because you are on weak ground. if reason and logic don't fit, you just move on to something else. zomg guys, it can't be true..pearl harbor, remember?
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Well, Iraq never did anything to us, even if you believe (gullible fucks) that Al Qaeda really pulled of 9/11.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Youngblood
you keep moving the goal posts bilbo. deflecting the point because you are on weak ground. if reason and logic don't fit, you just move on to something else. zomg guys, it can't be true..pearl harbor, remember?
Keep living in the Matrix YB....
They won't take me though. This hobbit knows how deep the rabbit hole is and what pills to take.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Bilbo, why did we say that almost all of the hijackers were Saudis? Seems like a strange choice.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
Bilbo, why did we say that almost all of the hijackers were Saudis? Seems like a strange choice.
Mate I dont write the fucking conspiracy stories I only believe them!
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
;D Solid.
I just don't see why we couldn't find any Iraqis or Afghanistanis to do it. Since it was a CIA operation (they had ties with him, that's not a conspiracy theory, just the truth.)
I mean granted it didn't matter, they were able to convince a gullible and scared American public that a bunch of Saudis flying planes into the twin towers meant we had to invade Iraq. But, still, you'd think they could have found some Iraqis to do it. It would have added something to the war buildup.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
how did my picture get removed that fast? I liked that picture.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OumaFan
how did my picture get removed that fast? I liked that picture.
insta hotlinking killer. to make up for it, here's a talking dog.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGeKSiCQkPw
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
This thread is what I imagine an Oliver Stone brain storming session is like. Seriously some of yall need to go into script writing b/c the international intrigue and mystery is scintillating.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
I just cant believe Amir Khans relatives were working with Bin Laden on that compound...it just mind bottling.
Re: Should Bin Laden have been taken alive?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
No Contest
I just cant believe Amir Khans relatives were working with Bin Laden on that compound...it just mind bottling.
Amir Khan? It would have to be him and his relatives wouldn't it? I am really not impressed.