Nope. Thats why I said Hatton got a gift ;)
Printable View
Nope. Thats why I said Hatton got a gift ;)
Yep he did. And professional judges, don't mean shat, and we all know it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Hard to believe that this post is still going, but like i said , everybody knows who won that fight.
Yeah, C-O-L-L-A-Z-O.Quote:
Originally Posted by Salhadin
Not according to the Judges oh and this Poll ;D
That fight was a draw...I know there are a lot of Hatton fans here but he didn't win. It seems these days judges are less and less likely to score fights a draw.
I wouldn't have complained at a draw or if Collazo got it it was a close fight simple as that...
no robbery IMO ;)
I dont understand that statement mate???Quote:
Originally Posted by Jman76
How can a judge be less likely to score a fight a draw, they dont judge a fight after 12 rounds, its on a round by round basis, so they score it round after round then tally it up at the end?? So what your saying doesn't make sense, if they add up at the end and it's a draw its a draw a judge isnt keeping track of what the score is, they dont tally up till the end of the fight.
You know the real problem...
Hatton won more rounds.
Collazo Won his rounds bigger.
and thats it for me ;)
Aprt from the 1st ;D Spot on wiv thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Saddo