Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Look how washed out Barrera looked against Pac
look how washed out naz looked against barrera
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Barrera looks proper drained
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Look how washed out Barrera looked against Pac
look how washed out naz looked against barrera
To be fair I dont think Nas can use that excuse . It ws the biggest fight of his career whereas Pac was just another fight for Barrera
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Barrera looked ill against Pac
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Barrera looked ill against Pac
We could see he wasnt in the best physical condition. He didnt box with the focus or intesnity he did when he fought Nas . Also we know for a fact that his training in big bear was interupted by the Forrest fires .
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
already did and yes he actually did in the past but guess what mab and naz never reach any better level after they got owned and pac did ;) so if you put Torrencampo with pac again, pac will murder him ;D
GAME what else you got?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
already did and yes he actually did in the past but guess what mab and naz never reach any better level after they got owned and pac did ;) so if you put Torrencampo with pac again, pac will murder him ;D
GAME what else you got?
Thats just your opinion . Its my opinion Barrera would beat Pac in a return and yes he did reach a better level after he lost to Pac cuz he went on to beat Morales - a man who went on to beat Pac
Manny has lost and drew since the Barrera fight . Get over it
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Leave me alone ive just been bleeding banned again they thought i was that fucking Pedro
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef4334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salhadin
Naz was beat because he came forward against barrera. Anybody who comes forward against naz gets knocked out.
Pac would come forward with those wild rushes and get dropped fast.....
who has naz fought that is worth mentioning in the like of barerra? barerra has the least power among the top four featherweight and he dropped hamed. you make it seem like hamed is unhittable.. i doubt that naz would even showboat against pac.. he wont have time to do that
he didnt get dropped against barrera nd also its been said several times that naz has only had flash knockdowns nd hes got a poor defense so i think u need to look closer at wots being said also i think naz would have more of a chance of beating pac than nebody in the division now although i think guzman or jmm would have a gd chance of beating pac nd i dont think barrera could put in the sort of perfomence he would need to beat pac nemore.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
already did and yes he actually did in the past but guess what mab and naz never reach any better level after they got owned and pac did ;) so if you put Torrencampo with pac again, pac will murder him ;D
GAME what else you got?
Thats just your opinion . Its my opinion Barrera would beat Pac in a return and yes he did reach a better level after he lost to Pac cuz he went on to beat Morales - a man who went on to beat Pac
Manny has lost and drew since the Barrera fight . Get over it
mab won a decision over morales in the third. all three fight of mab and eric could of gone either way because neither one could beat down eachother like how pac beat both of them down. theres a different between actually beating an opponent down then just rewarded the decision, and yes pac has gone after the mab fight with one lost and one draw, but can you actually say pac was prime when he drew against jmm and lose the first one against eric ? i didn't think so, anyone would tell you even the pac haters that pac was one deminsional then, but anyone would tell you that pac has improve since his last lost. pac was putting the elite through hell when he wasn't even fully primed. his first 126lbs fight he murdered mab, then right afterwards he drew with jmm, and first 130lbs fight he lost to eric, thats an excellent schedule for a young raw fighter. name someone at the same age as pac then that has put elites through scares like that. but now 28 pac has just reach his prime scary ain't it?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Leave me alone ive just been bleeding banned again they thought i was that fucking Pedro
leave you alone? ;D I help you out with cool clicks when you needed it. Remember when you posted that thread about u got banned yea i cc u then, but u need better posting i guess to solve ur problem ;)
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
already did and yes he actually did in the past but guess what mab and naz never reach any better level after they got owned and pac did ;) so if you put Torrencampo with pac again, pac will murder him ;D
GAME what else you got?
Thats just your opinion . Its my opinion Barrera would beat Pac in a return and yes he did reach a better level after he lost to Pac cuz he went on to beat Morales - a man who went on to beat Pac
Manny has lost and drew since the Barrera fight . Get over it
mab won a decision over morales in the third. all three fight of mab and eric could of gone either way because neither one could beat down eachother like how pac beat both of them down. theres a different between actually beating an opponent down then just rewarded the decision, and yes pac has gone after the mab fight with one lost and one draw, but can you actually say pac was prime when he drew against jmm and lose the first one against eric ? i didn't think so, anyone would tell you even the pac haters that pac was one deminsional then, but anyone would tell you that pac has improve since his last lost. pac was putting the elite through hell when he wasn't even fully primed. his first 126lbs fight he murdered mab, then right afterwards he drew with jmm, and first 130lbs fight he lost to eric, thats an excellent schedule for a young raw fighter. name someone at the same age as pac then that has put elites through scares like that. but now 28 pac has just reach his prime
scary ain't it?
Not really no . Take away the win over an undertrained Barrera and Pacs record is full of hasbeens and never weres .
