Just another one of Wacko's Drunken Round by Rounds : Pacquiao Morales III

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GAyME :cwm23:

:cwm33: finished yet ?
Your posts are too long and boring . You dont honestly expect me to read that dribble do ya . Im guna keep this short ( like your genitalia ) . . . you are a waste of space.

---

well im sure youve read it :crazy3: you just got stumped :knock_out:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GAyME :bomb:

Your lack of boxing knowledge is clearly evident so just like your existance , this debate is pointless

---

look whos talkin :Moon: kiss this muthafwocka

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GAyME :censored:

Here we go . I will verbally destroy you once again and send you home with ya tail between ya legs.

---

you did your best
but :deal2: ive proven my point
so please :tombstone:


P.S.
lesson for the day:
'when youve just taken a lickin and youve got nothing left...
tell 'em you never read their post cuz its too long and boring' :baby:

I can see that having the last word means so much to you so i'm not guna let you have it . Not yet anyway ;D

Difference between me and you is im debating with fact whereas you are debating with opinion . I've won the argument hands down and now you are resorting to your usual BS petty insults . You may aswel have just raised the white flag cuz thats how its coming across . Totally out of your depth here trying to discuss boxing.

:jerk:

chin? slip? chin? slip? chin? slip? chin? slip?

Come on fellas, there's no need for all this! :-\

Like you GAME, I believe MAB has what it takes to get one back on Pac in a rematch but this isnt the way to respond. You should rise above it or start a new thread. This thread has had its run now. If Mr Answer really believes that Pac would stop Barrera before the 3rd round even begins then fair enough. I think its drivel but Im not going to debate that here!! ;D

No need to get personal over minor quibbles regarding facts that did indeed happen during fights.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

chin? slip? chin? slip? chin? slip? chin? slip?

---

Great comeback ;D It rivals that of Ali vs Berbick and Leonard vs Camacho with its success ;)

Miles - I cant resist playing with him but youre a sensible bloke so i'll listen to what you say,therefore this will be my final post. I will let the_answer have the last word as it means more to him than it does to me .

I enjoyed it though ! :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GAME

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

chin? slip? chin? slip? chin? slip? chin? slip?

---

Great comeback ;D It rivals that of Ali vs Berbick and Leonard vs Camacho with its success ;)

Miles - I cant resist playing with him but youre a sensible bloke so i'll listen to what you say,therefore this will be my final post. I will let the_answer have the last word as it means more to him than it does to me .

I enjoyed it though ! :)

---

CC, for having it in you to give this silly stuff up. And you have been clicked too the_answer.....now you two start a new thread or get a fricking room!! ;D

it aint over yet... i'll love to have the last words like GAyME said ;D

Quote:

---

I can see that having the last word means so much to you

---

it do mean a lot to me :nono:

Quote:

---

I will let the_answer have the last word as it means more to him than it does to me

---

definitely.. watch :scratchchin:

Quote:

---

I never said Barrera was past his prime when he lost to Pac .

---

:bs:

Quote:

---

For the record I never said Barrera wasnt in his prime in the 1st fight . You fabricated that to suit your argument

---

:liar:






this is the exciting part :excited: the moment of truth

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GAyME

I suppose time will tell . [size=10pt]What im saying is Pac wasnt beating a prime Marco that night[/size] . Manny went on to get outboxed by [size=10pt]Marquez and Morales , two inferior Mexicans[/size] so how could he beat the best Mexican ? cuz Barrera wasnt focused that night thats why .

We can go round and round in circles but all that matters is the rematch . Im saying Barrera UD . You can go and put all ya life savings on Pac if you are so sure the 1st 1 wasnt a fluke

---

:dontknow:


dude its over... :smash: 'the numbers dont lie' :deal2:






peace to the whole forum :angel:





and thanks for the ANNOYING smileys :icon16:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

it aint over yet... i'll love to have the last words like GAyME said ;D

Quote:

---

I can see that having the last word means so much to you

---

it do mean a lot to me :nono:

Quote:

---

I will let the_answer have the last word as it means more to him than it does to me

---

definitely.. watch :scratchchin:

Quote:

---

I never said Barrera was past his prime when he lost to Pac .

---

:bs:

Quote:

---

For the record I never said Barrera wasnt in his prime in the 1st fight . You fabricated that to suit your argument

---

:liar:






this is the exciting part :excited: the moment of truth

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GAyME

I suppose time will tell . [size=10pt]What im saying is Pac wasnt beating a prime Marco that night[/size] . Manny went on to get outboxed by [size=10pt]Marquez and Morales , two inferior Mexicans[/size] so how could he beat the best Mexican ? cuz Barrera wasnt focused that night thats why .

We can go round and round in circles but all that matters is the rematch . Im saying Barrera UD . You can go and put all ya life savings on Pac if you are so sure the 1st 1 wasnt a fluke

---

:dontknow:


dude its over... :smash: 'the numbers dont lie' :deal2:






peace to the whole forum :angel:





and thanks for the ANNOYING smileys :icon16:

---

Ridiculous twit! ::** ;D

Good on you Game for not responding to this imbecile...just isnt worth it. ;)

have you read the previous posts
please tell me whos sillly and why
im proving things while hes trying to run
and before you insult me try to know what
has been argued and who has a point
your trying to be a peacemaker but its obvious
your bias.. you have affronted my post and you
aligned with GAyME then i think the whole forum is
laughing at both of you

Lets clean this up fellows.
Both parties have had their says...
And I must admit I enjoyed it untill the name calling starts, other then that it was fun. ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

have you read the previous posts
please tell me whos sillly and why
im proving things while hes trying to run
and before you insult me try to know what
has been argued and who has a point
your trying to be a peacemaker but its obvious
your bias.. you have affronted my post and you
aligned with GAyME then i think the whole forum is
laughing at both of you

---

Your'e proving that you are not the better man.

I for one do not agree with GAME...in any way shape or form on the arguement...but it is one that he has tried to drop & one that you keep drawing back into points befoer the case can be resolved.

Also...don't try to flex on CutMeMick as a moderator. His purpose, like mine, is to defuse these situations & keep members friendly no matter what their arguements.

Be satisfied that you believe that you are right & let this witch hunt go.

Please. You get out of hand from time to time...but it;s basically been with GAME & he with you...so please...settle this beef in PM;s.

This forum isn;t the type of place that thrives on members gloating about being right & then maliciuosly cramming it down their throats.

Again...let it go...okay?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

have you read the previous posts
please tell me whos sillly and why
im proving things while hes trying to run
and before you insult me try to know what
has been argued and who has a point
your trying to be a peacemaker but its obvious
your bias.. you have affronted my post and you
aligned with GAyME then i think the whole forum is
laughing at both of you

---

You may have proven your point right but you can do it in a nicer way. Can you prove him wrong without insulting him honey?

wow this fight sounded like a real DOOZY! wish i was there ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheBESTP4P

wow this fight sounded like a real DOOZY! wish i was there ;)

---

haha thats it
thats the proper ending
ya think its time to change your sig bro?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

have you read the previous posts
please tell me whos sillly and why
im proving things while hes trying to run
and before you insult me try to know what
has been argued and who has a point
your trying to be a peacemaker but its obvious
your bias.. you have affronted my post and you
aligned with GAyME then i think the whole forum is
laughing at both of you

---

I have read read what has been argued and seen the quite humorous put downs too. Im not on anybodies side, and it is yours and GAME's quibble. I saw that what was being said was really bringing nothing new to a perfectly decent thread and suggested that it should stop. To be fair to GAME, he decided enough was enough and called it a day. For some juvenile reason you decided to pursue it and even post his stuff from this thread onto another thread and still insist on calling him GAYME. And still you come back onto this thread with the same stuff. Sure, things get heated and we can annoy each other sometimes but there comes a point when we should realise that its going beyond merely discussing boxing, which is after all why we are here at the end of the day. I called you a twit, but did you notice the smiley after it? It isnt a personal thing and therefore not much of an insult. Dont be so sensitive. And your posting was very silly. Now come on, really! ;D

Im on nobodies side, but GAME has kept his word and stayed off of perpetuating the insults. As for the forum laughing at me or GAME, well im sure the forum is laughing at nobody. Lets let this all rest now. Quite enough, young chap! :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

have you read the previous posts
please tell me whos sillly and why
im proving things while hes trying to run
and before you insult me try to know what
has been argued and who has a point
your trying to be a peacemaker but its obvious
your bias.. you have affronted my post and you
aligned with GAyME then i think the whole forum is
laughing at both of you

---

Your'e proving that you are not the better man.

I for one do not agree with GAME...in any way shape or form on the arguement...but it is one that he has tried to drop & one that you keep drawing back into points befoer the case can be resolved.

Also...don't try to flex on CutMeMick as a moderator. His purpose, like mine, is to defuse these situations & keep members friendly no matter what their arguements.

Be satisfied that you believe that you are right & let this witch hunt go.

Please. You get out of hand from time to time...but it;s basically been with GAME & he with you...so please...settle this beef in PM;s.

This forum isn;t the type of place that thrives on members gloating about being right & then maliciuosly cramming it down their throats.

Again...let it go...okay?

---

I hold my hands up there! I think the_answer was trying to get at me there for my attempts to diffuse this little affair

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the_answer

have you read the previous posts
please tell me whos sillly and why
im proving things while hes trying to run
and before you insult me try to know what
has been argued and who has a point
your trying to be a peacemaker but its obvious
your bias.. you have affronted my post and you
aligned with GAyME then i think the whole forum is
laughing at both of you

---

You may have proven your point right but you can do it in a nicer way. Can you prove him wrong without insulting him honey?

---

the_answer = this guy is really fond of insulting people.

Haha! I think it's not finished.