-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Hark at Mystic Meg there with her Crystal ball!
I imagine Hatton's body is somewhat wider than Pac's. That is because he is actually bigger than Pac. When that body is crushing down upon you, it isn't so easy to hit it, and it wears you down. I can see that happening a bit in my Emeralds of Enchantment. ;)
You're wrong again. Hatton's Body will not crush on Pac coz Pac's has his arsenal firing from the distance. I can guarantee this. Hatton will more likely be crashing on the canvas Than crushing Pac.
I am not wrong, and neither are you right. We are debating the POSSIBILITIES of a fight. Language such as "I can guarantee" is just ludicrous. Let's hedge our OPINIONS a little more. :)
OK!! But I still Guarantee a pac win!!!
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Does it matter Pac is still with the same woman for a long time now. It means he satisfy his Girl
With money, a cool car, a big ass house, hundred pairs of shoes, designer label bags, etc. ANY girl would be satisfied ;) .
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chino
Quote:
Does it matter Pac is still with the same woman for a long time now. It means he satisfy his Girl
With money, a cool car, a big ass house, hundred pairs of shoes, designer label bags, etc. ANY girl would be satisfied ;) .
Money is not everything. Ask Donald Trump why he can't keep his woman.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
I'll do the math for you:
Pac has 67" reach, That from finger tips to finger tips.
Pac has 25" arms but that's from arm pit to Knuckles, It doesn't include the lenght of the middle finger which aprox about 2" +/-.
Pac's Shoulder to shoulder then will be measured as 67-25-25=17, 17"- 4"(fingertips X2)=approx 13" wide at the shoulder.
Hatton will be like:
65"-20-20=25, 25-4"=21" wide at the shoulder. Compared to Pac's 13
HMM...13" looks really to short for Pac at the shoulder. Maybe this measurement was when Pac was at 122, maybe his bone structure was stretched by the weight gain. Well I did my best, At the shoulder Hatton is 21" wide compared to Pac' 13". That's 8" difference. Maybe Pac Reach really was 69+" now.
U idiot.
I was Good in Math I swear!! How about make your own computations??
So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs?????
And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!
Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Money is not everything. Ask Donald Trump why he can't keep his woman
And ask the women who have been married to him why they ask for more than half of his fortune when they get divorced. It's nothing new to see these things happening to celebrities, pro athletes, rich men, etc.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
U idiot.
I was Good in Math I swear!! How about make your own computations??
So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs?????
And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!
Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!
Then do your math?
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
I was Good in Math I swear!! How about make your own computations??
So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs?????
And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!
Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!
Then do your math?
I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
So u honestly believe Hatton has shoulders 8 inches wider than Pacs?????
And his shoulders are wider than the length of his arms? I cant believe im writing this!
Your computations say Pacs arms are 12 inches longer than his shoulder width yet Hattons arms are 1 inch shorter than his shoulder width!!!! That is fucken ridiculous and wrong!
Then do your math?
I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.
Try to review your HBO tapes where PAC and Hatton were involved. Usually they show you a tale of the tape before the fight begins. It's clearly noted there, PAC's arm length (from armpit to tip of knuckles) is 25" and that of Hatton is 20"... That's where I get my figures...
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pacdbest2
Then do your math?
I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.
Try to review your HBO tapes where PAC and Hatton were involved. Usually they show you a tale of the tape before the fight begins. It's clearly noted there, PAC's arm length (from armpit to tip of knuckles) is 25" and that of Hatton is 20"... That's where I get my figures...
.
Are u seriously trying to tell me that the figures are correct. Do u honestly believe them??? Hatton is no way 8 inches wider across the shoulders than Pac. That is fact. Hattons arms are in no way shorter than his shoulder width, no ones are. Pacs arms are not 5 full inches longer than Ricky's. Wherever u got these 'facts':rolleyes: from they are wrong.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
I did my math!!! The measurements that Saddoboxer came up with are wrong. Pacs arms are not 5 each 5 inches longer than Ricky's. Ricky's shoulders are not 8 inches wider than Pacs.
That is what u are trying to imply and its wrong.
Try to review your HBO tapes where PAC and Hatton were involved. Usually they show you a tale of the tape before the fight begins. It's clearly noted there, PAC's arm length (from armpit to tip of knuckles) is 25" and that of Hatton is 20"... That's where I get my figures...
.
Are u seriously trying to tell me that the figures are correct. Do u honestly believe them??? Hatton is no way 8 inches wider across the shoulders than Pac. That is fact. Hattons arms are in no way shorter than his shoulder width, no ones are. Pacs arms are not 5 full inches longer than Ricky's. Wherever u got these 'facts':rolleyes: from they are wrong.
Here it is... If you can't accept Hatton's arm length is only 20", you better write a protest letter to HBO...
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2429/hat20inch.jpg
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Try to review your HBO tapes where PAC and Hatton were involved. Usually they show you a tale of the tape before the fight begins. It's clearly noted there, PAC's arm length (from armpit to tip of knuckles) is 25" and that of Hatton is 20"... That's where I get my figures...
.
Are u seriously trying to tell me that the figures are correct. Do u honestly believe them??? Hatton is no way 8 inches wider across the shoulders than Pac. That is fact. Hattons arms are in no way shorter than his shoulder width, no ones are. Pacs arms are not 5 full inches longer than Ricky's. Wherever u got these 'facts':rolleyes: from they are wrong.
Here it is... If you can't accept Hatton's arm length is only 20", you better write a protest letter to HBO...
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2429/hat20inch.jpg
.
I have no problem with HBO. U are trying to imply that Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Pacs. That is utter bullshit. It is wrong. Dead wrong.
Your figures are flawed.
As u pointed out Hatton and Pac are about the same height and Weight. If 2 guys are the same height and weight and both are fit, then it is impossible that one guy has shoulders 8 inches wider!
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Are u seriously trying to tell me that the figures are correct. Do u honestly believe them??? Hatton is no way 8 inches wider across the shoulders than Pac. That is fact. Hattons arms are in no way shorter than his shoulder width, no ones are. Pacs arms are not 5 full inches longer than Ricky's. Wherever u got these 'facts':rolleyes: from they are wrong.
Here it is... If you can't accept Hatton's arm length is only 20", you better write a protest letter to HBO...
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2429/hat20inch.jpg
.
I have no problem with HBO. U are trying to imply that Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Pacs. That is utter bullshit. It is wrong. Dead wrong.
Your figures are flawed.
As u pointed out Hatton and Pac are about the same height and Weight. If 2 guys are the same height and weight and both are fit, then it is impossible that one guy has shoulders 8 inches wider!
I'll take what HBO published, PAC with 25" arm length, Hatton with only 20"... At first I thought Hatton is taller than PAC but HBO showed Hatton is shorter... So in reality, Hatton is the midget here being the shorter guy with very short arms...
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I have no problem with HBO. U are trying to imply that Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Pacs. That is utter bullshit. It is wrong. Dead wrong.
Your figures are flawed.
As u pointed out Hatton and Pac are about the same height and Weight. If 2 guys are the same height and weight and both are fit, then it is impossible that one guy has shoulders 8 inches wider!
I'll take what HBO published, PAC with 25" arm length, Hatton with only 20"... At first I thought Hatton is taller than PAC but HBO showed Hatton is shorter... So in reality, Hatton is the midget here being the shorter guy with very short arms...
So u believe Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's?
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
I have no problem with HBO. U are trying to imply that Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Pacs. That is utter bullshit. It is wrong. Dead wrong.
Your figures are flawed.
As u pointed out Hatton and Pac are about the same height and Weight. If 2 guys are the same height and weight and both are fit, then it is impossible that one guy has shoulders 8 inches wider!
I'll take what HBO published, PAC with 25" arm length, Hatton with only 20"... At first I thought Hatton is taller than PAC but HBO showed Hatton is shorter... So in reality, Hatton is the midget here being the shorter guy with very short arms...
So u believe Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's?
I think we're done with this... It's a widely accepted fact that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms... short of a midget arms...
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
OK, we will now discuss the advantages/disadvantages:
....................Speed - PAC
......................Skills - PAC
...................Stance - PAC (southpaw)
..................Stamina - PAC
.....................Heart - PAC
..............Experience - PAC
....................Reach - PAC
...........Height/Taller - PAC
Quality of Opponents - PAC
.......Ring Generalship - PAC
.........Corner/Trainer - PAC
.......................Size - even
.......................Age - even
I don't see any Hatton advantage over PAC... Not even one advantage...
This is why I think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton...
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
OK, we will now discuss the advantages/disadvantages:
....................Speed - PAC
......................Skills - PAC
...................Stance - PAC (southpaw)
..................Stamina - PAC
.....................Heart - PAC
..............Experience - PAC
....................Reach - PAC
...........Height/Taller - PAC
Quality of Opponents - PAC
.......Ring Generalship - PAC
.........Corner/Trainer - PAC
.......................Size - even
.......................Age - even
I don't see any Hatton advantage over PAC... Not even one advantage...
This is why I think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton...
.
Power-Hatton
Style-Hatton
Weight-Hatton has always been in 140
Chin-???
Ability to take shots to body-???
Did you forget those or did you leave them out on purpose?:D Very biased on yourside.:rolleyes:
I dont think Pacman's heart has been tested in a sense that its been a smooth ride for him until now.
Pacman's last too opponents didnt have much fight in them.;D
Mayweather Sr. might looks like a predator on crack but he is a good trainer.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Manuel "Chubby" Medina
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
OK, we will now discuss the advantages/disadvantages:
....................Speed - PAC
......................Skills - PAC
...................Stance - PAC (southpaw)
..................Stamina - PAC
.....................Heart - PAC
..............Experience - PAC
....................Reach - PAC
...........Height/Taller - PAC
Quality of Opponents - PAC
.......Ring Generalship - PAC
.........Corner/Trainer - PAC
.......................Size - even
.......................Age - even
I don't see any Hatton advantage over PAC... Not even one advantage...
This is why I think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton...
.
Power-Hatton
Style-Hatton
Weight-Hatton has always been in 140
Chin-???
Ability to take shots to body-???
Did you forget those or did you leave them out on purpose?:D Very biased on yourside.:rolleyes:
I dont think Pacman's
heart has been tested in a sense that its been a smooth ride for him until now.
Pacman's last too
opponents didnt have much fight in them.;D
Mayweather Sr. might looks like a predator on crack but he is a good
trainer.
Power - can't be really gauge since they don't have a common opponent.
Style - this is advantage to PAC.
Weight - even
Chin - slightly to PAC's favor as of late
PAC's heart was fully tested in Morales 1st fight...
Quality of opponents encompasses all opponents, not only the last 2
Trainer - Sure Floyd Sr is a good trainer but advantage still goes to Roach-PAC which been together for a long time
I think I'm not biased in presenting the advantages/disadvantages...
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Manuel "Chubby" Medina
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
OK, we will now discuss the advantages/disadvantages:
....................Speed - PAC
......................Skills - PAC
...................Stance - PAC (southpaw)
..................Stamina - PAC
.....................Heart - PAC
..............Experience - PAC
....................Reach - PAC
...........Height/Taller - PAC
Quality of Opponents - PAC
.......Ring Generalship - PAC
.........Corner/Trainer - PAC
.......................Size - even
.......................Age - even
I don't see any Hatton advantage over PAC... Not even one advantage...
This is why I think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton...
.
Power-Hatton
Style-Hatton
Weight-Hatton has always been in 140
Chin-???
Ability to take shots to body-???
Did you forget those or did you leave them out on purpose?:D Very biased on yourside.:rolleyes:
I dont think Pacman's
heart has been tested in a sense that its been a smooth ride for him until now.
Pacman's last too
opponents didnt have much fight in them.;D
Mayweather Sr. might looks like a predator on crack but he is a good
trainer.
Power - can't be really gauge since they don't have a common opponent.
Style - this is advantage to PAC.
Weight - even
Chin - slightly to PAC's favor as of late
PAC's heart was fully tested in Morales 1st fight...
Quality of opponents encompasses all opponents, not only the last 2
Trainer - Sure Floyd Sr is a good trainer but advantage still goes to Roach-PAC which been together for a long time
I think I'm not biased in presenting the advantages/disadvantages...
.
So your telling me Hatton has not 1 thing over Pac?
Pac is 100% going to win?
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Manuel "Chubby" Medina
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Manuel "Chubby" Medina
Power-Hatton
Style-Hatton
Weight-Hatton has always been in 140
Chin-???
Ability to take shots to body-???
Did you forget those or did you leave them out on purpose?:D Very biased on yourside.:rolleyes:
I dont think Pacman's heart has been tested in a sense that its been a smooth ride for him until now.
Pacman's last too opponents didnt have much fight in them.;D
Mayweather Sr. might looks like a predator on crack but he is a good trainer.
Power - can't be really gauge since they don't have a common opponent.
Style - this is advantage to PAC.
Weight - even
Chin - slightly to PAC's favor as of late
PAC's heart was fully tested in Morales 1st fight...
Quality of opponents encompasses all opponents, not only the last 2
Trainer - Sure Floyd Sr is a good trainer but advantage still goes to Roach-PAC which been together for a long time
I think I'm not biased in presenting the advantages/disadvantages...
.
So your telling me Hatton has not 1 thing over Pac?
Pac is 100% going to win?
I haven't seen one advantage of Hatton, maybe you can dig one...
I'm not the type who totally write off a boxer... Every boxer has a chance even how slim it is... As long as the boxer throws a punch and that punch can hit his opponent...
Don't be too worried on Hatton... "He has a slim chance" ... Take note, this is coming from a PAC fan...
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Saddoboxer, are you or are you not the Minister of Pacman Propaganda? Do you take your methods direct from the handbook prescribed by Goebbels himself? This is all preposterous, I tell you!!!!! :rolleyes::mad::mad::mad:
To be honest it seems like like you are on a permanent wind up to me. ;);D
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Saddoboxer, are you or are you not the Minister of Pacman Propaganda? Do you take your methods direct from the handbook prescribed by Goebbels himself? This is all preposterous, I tell you!!!!! :rolleyes::mad::mad::mad:
To be honest it seems like like you are on a permanent wind up to me. ;);D
Ha ha ;D You can thank (rep) me m8 for making your day... ;D
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I'll take what HBO published, PAC with 25" arm length, Hatton with only 20"... At first I thought Hatton is taller than PAC but HBO showed Hatton is shorter... So in reality, Hatton is the midget here being the shorter guy with very short arms...
So u believe Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's?
I think we're done with this... It's a widely accepted fact that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms... short of a midget arms...
.
Your done with it cos you are WRONG!!! HAHA I WIN.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
PAC-Hatton advantages/disadvantages:
....................Speed - PAC
......................Skills - PAC
Style (same as skills) - PAC
...................Stance - PAC (southpaw)
..................Stamina - PAC
.......................Chin - PAC (slightly)
.....................Heart - PAC
..............Experience - PAC
....................Reach - PAC
...........Height/Taller - PAC
Quality of Opponents - PAC
.......Ring Generalship - PAC
.........Corner/Trainer - PAC
.......................Size - even
.......................Age - even
...................Weight - even
....................Power - (unknown)
Any more thoughts on this??
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
So u believe Hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's?
I think we're done with this... It's a widely accepted fact that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms... short of a midget arms...
.
Your done with it cos you are WRONG!!! HAHA I WIN.
You mean Hatton's arms are longer than 20 inches?? :confused: Anything that can support your claim??
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
PAC-Hatton advantages/disadvantages:
....................Speed - PAC
......................Skills - PAC
Style (same as skills) - PAC
...................Stance - PAC (southpaw)
..................Stamina - PAC
.......................Chin - PAC (slightly)
.....................Heart - PAC
..............Experience - PAC
....................Reach - PAC
...........Height/Taller - PAC
Quality of Opponents - PAC
.......Ring Generalship - PAC
.........Corner/Trainer - PAC
.......................Size - even
.......................Age - even
...................Weight - even
....................Power - (unknown)
Any more thoughts on this??
You have exhausted all possible questions and everyone on this damn site has given their opinions on said questions. My thought is give it a rest for a week, this is beyond annoying.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
I think we're done with this... It's a widely accepted fact that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms... short of a midget arms...
.
Your done with it cos you are WRONG!!! HAHA I WIN.
You mean Hatton's arms are longer than 20 inches?? :confused: Anything that can support your claim??
.
You claim hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's. Support that claim???
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Your done with it cos you are WRONG!!! HAHA I WIN.
You mean Hatton's arms are longer than 20 inches?? :confused: Anything that can support your claim??
.
You claim hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's. Support that claim???
Did I?? Show me the post where I claimed that.. ;D
I think HBO don't measure shoulder length... What they measure is arms length... It's very clear in this graphic that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms...
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2429/hat20inch.jpg
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
The old Moono is back...minus the wig. :biteit: Are we fitting these guys for a wedding tuxedo.......or a fight.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
You mean Hatton's arms are longer than 20 inches?? :confused: Anything that can support your claim??
.
You claim hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's. Support that claim???
Did I?? Show me the post where I claimed that.. ;D
I think HBO don't measure shoulder length... What they measure is arms length... It's very clear in this graphic that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms...
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2429/hat20inch.jpg
It is simple maths egghead. If Pacs reach is 67 and his arms are 25 inches each then his shoulders have to be 17 inches.
Hattons reach is 65, if his arms are only 20 inches then his shoulders are 25 inches. 8 inches larger. Am i right?
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
You claim hattons shoulders are 8 inches wider than Manny's. Support that claim???
Did I?? Show me the post where I claimed that.. ;D
I think HBO don't measure shoulder length... What they measure is arms length... It's very clear in this graphic that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms...
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2429/hat20inch.jpg
It is simple maths egghead. If Pacs reach is 67 and his arms are 25 inches each then his shoulders have to be 17 inches.
Hattons reach is 65, if his arms are only 20 inches then his shoulders are 25 inches. 8 inches larger. Am i right?
It's only you who is talking about shoulder length... What's presented here are arms length, 25" to PAC and only 20" to Hatton...
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Did I?? Show me the post where I claimed that.. ;D
I think HBO don't measure shoulder length... What they measure is arms length... It's very clear in this graphic that Hatton has only 20 inches of very short arms...
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/2429/hat20inch.jpg
It is simple maths egghead. If Pacs reach is 67 and his arms are 25 inches each then his shoulders have to be 17 inches.
Hattons reach is 65, if his arms are only 20 inches then his shoulders are 25 inches. 8 inches larger. Am i right?
It's only you who is talking about shoulder length... What's presented here are arms length, 25" to PAC and only 20" to Hatton...
.
On the measurements u yourself wrote in this thread it says that Pacs arms are 25 inches and his reach is 67.
If your stats are correct then his 2 arm lengths add up to 5o inches which leaves the gap between his shoulders at 17 inches.
U wrote Hattons arm length at 20 inches and his reach at 65, therefore boht his arm lengths add up to 40 inches and therefore the gap between his shoulders is 25 inches. 8 Inches wider than Pacs. Atleast one of your measurements are wrong. Can i be any clearer or are u just brain dead?
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins
The old Moono is back...minus the wig. :biteit: Are we fitting these guys for a wedding tuxedo.......or a fight.
;D
Saddoboxer, you need to give it a rest man...
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
Is it that Saddoboxer admitting he made a mistake?! :scratchchin:;D
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
At first I really thought it's 25" ;D It's an honest mistake but nevertheless it doesn't change Hatton's arm length of 20 inches only... PAC still enjoys a comfortable 3" advantage...
So what's the difference in their shoulder length now?? :lolhaha:
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
Is it that Saddoboxer admitting he made a mistake?! :scratchchin:;D
YES, it's an honest mistake by me... I'm really sorry my mates...
Good Day...
.
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
At first I really thought it's 25" ;D It's an honest mistake but nevertheless it doesn't change Hatton's arm length of 20 inches only... PAC still enjoys a comfortable 3" advantage...
So what's the difference in their shoulder length now?? :lolhaha:
.
I notice Paulie had a 3 inch advantage too. Didnt really help him.....
-
Re: Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eagle
That says 23 inches for PAcs arm length u fucken idiot.
At first I really thought it's 25" ;D It's an honest mistake but nevertheless it doesn't change Hatton's arm length of 20 inches only... PAC still enjoys a comfortable 3" advantage...
So what's the difference in their shoulder length now?? :lolhaha:
.
I notice Paulie had a 3 inch advantage too. Didnt really help him.....
A 3 inch advantage enjoyed in Paulie's caliber means nothing but if you have it in PAC's caliber and skills, it means disaster to the opponent...
BTW, sorry again for that honest mistake but anyway it doesn't change the fact that PAC enjoys a considerable reach advantage over Hatton... ;)
.
