Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
Yeah, just keep comparing 1995-96 Pac to present fighters. ;D
Coz that's the only way to win your arguements against Pac. LOL!
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Leave me alone ive just been bleeding banned again they thought i was that F****** Pedro
leave you alone? ;D I help you out with cool clicks when you needed it. Remember when you posted that thread about u got banned yea i cc u then, but u need better posting i guess to solve ur problem ;)
Leave TysonBruno alone! :'(
Boo-hoo! Waaaaa!
;D
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
Yeah, just keep comparing 1995-96 Pac to present fighters. ;D
Coz that's the only way to win your arguements against Pac. LOL!
He is apresent fighter ???
What are we supposed forget he was badly k.o'd by bums as if it never happend . You keep up bringing teh Barrera fight which was years ago .
Pacs loss was the most embarassing of the lot , then it was Erik quitting in 3 rounds , then it was Barreras 11 round loss then Finally Hameds close points defeat.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Here are the evidence your honor...
What ???
a.) Learn to speak English
b.) Stop posting irrelevant pictures
c.) I could go and get pics of Pac getting knocked out by nobodies but it would mean nothing
josef4334 - I said Nasem always got off the floor to win and its true . I never said he beat Barrera . You just misinterpreted my post because you were seeing red at the time.
I'm sorry, me no habla english amiga. LOL!
The Pac-MAB video is more graphic than the pix that I posted.
Go research some pix of Pac getting KOed by nobodies. LOL!
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Here are the evidence your honor...
What ???
a.) Learn to speak English
b.) Stop posting irrelevant pictures
c.) I could go and get pics of Pac getting knocked out by nobodies but it would mean nothing
josef4334 - I said Nasem always got off the floor to win and its true . I never said he beat Barrera . You just misinterpreted my post because you were seeing red at the time.
I'm sorry,
me no habla english amiga. LOL!
The Pac-MAB video is more graphic than the pix that I posted.
Go research some pix of Pac getting KOed by nobodies. LOL!
Thats your style not mine .
I've already seen Pac getting humiliated by Torrencampo , Sinsgurat ( or whatever his name was ) , Sanchez , Marquez and Morales . I dont need to go posting pics on the net.
When you claimed to have proof of Pacs superiority over Nas , why did you post two pictures of the Phillipines flag ? What has that got to do with anything ? Are you very insecure about your heritage or summat ?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
Yeah, just keep comparing 1995-96 Pac to present fighters. ;D
Coz that's the only way to win your arguements against Pac. LOL!
He is apresent fighter ???
What are we supposed forget he was badly k.o'd by bums as if it never happend . You keep up bringing teh Barrera fight which was years ago .
Pacs loss was the most embarassing of the lot , then it was Erik quitting in 3 rounds , then it was Barreras 11 round loss then Finally Hameds close points defeat.
Pac worked his way up from the bottom.
He was nobody and got KOed by nobodies.
But he kept on trying and succeeding (2006 RingMag FOTY and p4p best fighter).
Unlike your loser Naz. Clearly, MAB broke his spirit, Naz went home as sore loser, got drunk, went drunk driving, hit someone, and now he's somebody's cellbitch.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Here are the evidence your honor...
What ???
a.) Learn to speak English
b.) Stop posting irrelevant pictures
c.) I could go and get pics of Pac getting knocked out by nobodies but it would mean nothing
josef4334 - I said Nasem always got off the floor to win and its true . I never said he beat Barrera . You just misinterpreted my post because you were seeing red at the time.
I'm sorry,
me no habla english amiga. LOL!
The Pac-MAB video is more graphic than the pix that I posted.
Go research some pix of Pac getting KOed by nobodies. LOL!
Thats your style not mine .
I've already seen Pac getting humiliated by Torrencampo , Sinsgurat ( or whatever his name was ) , Sanchez , Marquez and Morales . I dont need to go posting pics on the net.
When you claimed to have proof of Pacs superiority over Nas , why did you post two pictures of the Phillipines flag ? What has that got to do with anything ? Are you very insecure about your heritage or summat ?
I don't live in communist country.
You can't stop me from posting my beloved national flag.
And besides, those people waiving flags are celebrating Pac's win.
You have problem with that?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
Yeah, just keep comparing 1995-96 Pac to present fighters. ;D
Coz that's the only way to win your arguements against Pac. LOL!
He is apresent fighter ???
What are we supposed forget he was badly k.o'd by bums as if it never happend . You keep up bringing teh Barrera fight which was years ago .
Pacs loss was the most embarassing of the lot , then it was Erik quitting in 3 rounds , then it was Barreras 11 round loss then Finally Hameds close points defeat.
Pac worked his way up from the bottom.
He was nobody and got KOed by nobodies.
But he kept on trying and succeeding (2006 RingMag FOTY and p4p best fighter).
Unlike your loser Naz. Clearly, MAB broke his spirit, Naz went home as sore loser, got drunk, went drunk driving, hit someone, and
now he's somebody's cellbitch.
Do your research atleast before you make such spurious statements . ::**
Jeez , talking to a pacfan is like banging your head against a wall but less fun
Quote:
I don't live in communist country.
You can't stop me from posting my beloved national flag.
And besides, those people waiving flags are celebrating Pac's win.
You have problem with that?
Its all good mate , keep em coming , I just dont see the relevance :-\
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
already did and yes he actually did in the past but guess what mab and naz never reach any better level after they got owned and pac did ;) so if you put Torrencampo with pac again, pac will murder him ;D
GAME what else you got?
Thats just your opinion . Its my opinion Barrera would beat Pac in a return and yes he did reach a better level after he lost to Pac cuz he went on to beat Morales - a man who went on to beat Pac
Manny has lost and drew since the Barrera fight . Get over it
mab won a decision over morales in the third. all three fight of mab and eric could of gone either way because neither one could beat down eachother like how pac beat both of them down. theres a different between actually beating an opponent down then just rewarded the decision, and yes pac has gone after the mab fight with one lost and one draw, but can you actually say pac was prime when he drew against jmm and lose the first one against eric ? i didn't think so, anyone would tell you even the pac haters that pac was one deminsional then, but anyone would tell you that pac has improve since his last lost. pac was putting the elite through hell when he wasn't even fully primed. his first 126lbs fight he murdered mab, then right afterwards he drew with jmm, and first 130lbs fight he lost to eric, thats an excellent schedule for a young raw fighter. name someone at the same age as pac then that has put elites through scares like that. but now 28 pac has just reach his prime
scary ain't it?
Not really no . Take away the win over an undertrained Barrera and Pacs record is full of hasbeens and never weres .
now ur as sad as TYSONBRUNO ;D
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
Yeah, just keep comparing 1995-96 Pac to present fighters. ;D
Coz that's the only way to win your arguements against Pac. LOL!
He is apresent fighter ???
What are we supposed forget he was badly k.o'd by bums as if it never happend . You keep up bringing teh Barrera fight which was years ago .
Pacs loss was the most embarassing of the lot , then it was Erik quitting in 3 rounds , then it was Barreras 11 round loss then Finally Hameds close points defeat.
Pac worked his way up from the bottom.
He was nobody and got KOed by nobodies.
But he kept on trying and succeeding (2006 RingMag FOTY and p4p best fighter).
Unlike your loser Naz. Clearly, MAB broke his spirit, Naz went home as sore loser, got drunk, went drunk driving, hit someone, and
now he's somebody's cellbitch.
Do your research atleast before you make such spurious statements . ::**
Jeez , talking to a pacfan is like banging your head against a wall but less fun
Quote:
I don't live in communist country.
You can't stop me from posting my beloved national flag.
And besides, those people waiving flags are celebrating Pac's win.
You have problem with that?
Its all good mate , keep em coming , I just dont see the relevance :-\
:banghead:
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
All these Hamed matchup threads make me pissed at Naz, because we should've gotten the chance to see him fight guys like Marquez, Morales and Pacquiao. I think Hamed would've lost to all of them, but they definitely would've been exciting fights.
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
All these Hamed matchup threads make me pissed at Naz, because we should've gotten the chance to see him fight guys like Marquez, Morales and Pacquiao. I think Hamed would've lost to all of them, but they definitely would've been exciting fights.
I'm with you there bro.
I don't get why his handlers didn't find a way to get him a tune up fight (like Pac-Velasquez) to get him back on his feet.
When you're drunk, don't drive...
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
already did and yes he actually did in the past but guess what mab and naz never reach any better level after they got owned and pac did ;) so if you put Torrencampo with pac again, pac will murder him ;D
GAME what else you got?
Thats just your opinion . Its my opinion Barrera would beat Pac in a return and yes he did reach a better level after he lost to Pac cuz he went on to beat Morales - a man who went on to beat Pac
Manny has lost and drew since the Barrera fight . Get over it
mab won a decision over morales in the third. all three fight of mab and eric could of gone either way because neither one could beat down eachother like how pac beat both of them down. theres a different between actually beating an opponent down then just rewarded the decision, and yes pac has gone after the mab fight with one lost and one draw, but can you actually say pac was prime when he drew against jmm and lose the first one against eric ? i didn't think so, anyone would tell you even the pac haters that pac was one deminsional then, but anyone would tell you that pac has improve since his last lost. pac was putting the elite through hell when he wasn't even fully primed. his first 126lbs fight he murdered mab, then right afterwards he drew with jmm, and first 130lbs fight he lost to eric, thats an excellent schedule for a young raw fighter. name someone at the same age as pac then that has put elites through scares like that. but now 28 pac has just reach his prime
scary ain't it?
Not really no . Take away the win over an undertrained Barrera and Pacs record is full of hasbeens and never weres .
now ur as sad as TYSONBRUNO ;D
Leave me alone Naz would have KO'D pac deal with it
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
WOW THIS IS GETTING SAD :'(
excuses excuses ::**
TYSONBRUNO i once had respect for you man, but your really trying hard to find excuses now huh :P
and GAME its dissapointing for you to even try to back up TYSONBRUNO and all his crap post :P
bottom line is pac whoop mab, and if mab believe he can ever beat pac he would of demanded a rematch right away but just like everyone who watch that fight, even mabs corner would say "DO NOT DO MAB ANY FAVOR AND MAKE A REMATCH WITH PAC" just think about it, pac owns mab!!!!!!!!! accept it, just like how mab owns naz just accept it.
mab has bluff a few times trying to say he wants pac again, but seriously mab is just trying to show balls, he doesn't really want pac again. pac is a beast he knows eric knows it jmm knows it. I once had more respect for mab, but it turned out eric had more balls then him no doubt ;)
but all four pac eric jmm and mab are all great, put any two of them in the same ring and you'll get a real fight ;D
Torrencampo owns Pac . Just accept it ;)
already did and yes he actually did in the past but guess what mab and naz never reach any better level after they got owned and pac did ;) so if you put Torrencampo with pac again, pac will murder him ;D
GAME what else you got?
Thats just your opinion . Its my opinion Barrera would beat Pac in a return and yes he did reach a better level after he lost to Pac cuz he went on to beat Morales - a man who went on to beat Pac
Manny has lost and drew since the Barrera fight . Get over it
mab won a decision over morales in the third. all three fight of mab and eric could of gone either way because neither one could beat down eachother like how pac beat both of them down. theres a different between actually beating an opponent down then just rewarded the decision, and yes pac has gone after the mab fight with one lost and one draw, but can you actually say pac was prime when he drew against jmm and lose the first one against eric ? i didn't think so, anyone would tell you even the pac haters that pac was one deminsional then, but anyone would tell you that pac has improve since his last lost. pac was putting the elite through hell when he wasn't even fully primed. his first 126lbs fight he murdered mab, then right afterwards he drew with jmm, and first 130lbs fight he lost to eric, thats an excellent schedule for a young raw fighter. name someone at the same age as pac then that has put elites through scares like that. but now 28 pac has just reach his prime
scary ain't it?
Not really no . Take away the win over an undertrained Barrera and Pacs record is full of hasbeens and never weres .
now ur as sad as TYSONBRUNO ;D
Leave me alone Naz would have KO'D pac deal with it
YUP. We may be sad but not as sad as him ;)