Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Hahaha. Touche! ;D
Gives me a good new name for Hamed - 'the porker formerly known as prince'.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
So whats the crack then chaps? We all agreed that Naz was fucking awesome and it was gods will that he didnt get to spark Marquez and that he lost to Barrera (the cheat)?
Nice.
It must also be the will of Allah that he now becomes like Buddha.
.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FC4M3j6aDo
The wishes of the world for Naz got transposed onto another..:cool:
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Marquez couldn't beat Chris John and got destroyed by Mayweather, Marquez can handle the style. Naz would have exposed Marquez early on so the decision not to fight Naz turned out to be one of his best career decisions in a history of bad moves under the direction of Nacho.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
He also arguably beat Pac 3 times. :eek:
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
He also arguably beat Pac 3 times. :eek:
Arguably he only ever lost to PBF :-\
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gypsy warrior
Naz would have put him to sleep before round 6
I agree, because Naz did great against the only other young, tough, counter punching elite mexican he ever faced. :rolleyes:
Haha... These fucking people.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gypsy warrior
Naz would have put him to sleep before round 6
I agree, because Naz did great against the
only other young, tough, counter punching elite mexican he ever faced. :rolleyes:
Haha... These fucking people.
No big deal. Just some words need emphasizing to drive home a point.
That is all.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Barrera and Marquez both counter fighters with tough chins both get up off the canvas and go to work better than before. Naz was great when he was getting his own way.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
The term "ducking" regardless of which side you are on here is about as meaningful a term in this business first at all costs last 1/4 century as p4p is.
Johnson and Langford never fought. Neither did,
Graziano/Lamotta
Tyson/Tua
Pryor/Leonard
Leonard/Curry
Frazier/Norton
Roy/Benn, Eubank, Watson maybe, Collins and Dariusz
The elephant in the room is economics and that's why there are about 16 belts for every division.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
The fact that Naz ran away into the sunset and became the poster boy for every fast food chain in Europe is testimony to his lack of intrepidity. A fight with Marquez would've been a good one, i suspect the same result that befell him when fighting Barrera would be the outcome.
Naz was the Prince who turned back into a toad the moment he got hit by a first class Mexican fighter.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE THIRD MAN
The fact that Naz ran away into the sunset and became the poster boy for every fast food chain in Europe is testimony to his lack of intrepidity. A fight with Marquez would've been a good one, i suspect the same result that befell him when fighting Barrera would be the outcome.
Naz was the Prince who turned back into a toad the moment he got hit by a first class Mexican fighter.
Yes it would have. But Naz wanted no part of JMM, after being found out by Barrera. So he retired at the "peak" of his career, and never looked back. Obviously, in fear of having to face JMM and getting a double dose of what Barrera gave him.
Re: Marquez-Naz? Why did Marquez blatantly refuse to fight Naz? Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THE THIRD MAN
The fact that Naz ran away into the sunset and became the poster boy for every fast food chain in Europe is testimony to his lack of intrepidity. A fight with Marquez would've been a good one, i suspect the same result that befell him when fighting Barrera would be the outcome.
Naz was the Prince who turned back into a toad the moment he got hit by a first class Mexican fighter.
Yes it would have. But Naz wanted no part of JMM, after being found out by Barrera. So he retired at the "peak" of his career, and never looked back. Obviously, in fear of having to face JMM and getting a double dose of what Barrera gave him.
I agree it was a fantastic time to end a career. Every fighters dream is to earn MILLIONS and walk away undamaged.
Naz retired from his profession at 27 with £40 million in the bank. He got fat and ran people over in his sports cars. How can anyone view that as a failure?
