Printable View
I know this Topic is a very delicated one and alot people talk BS about everything but this guy has done his homework and gives us his point of view with is very interesting and convincing. please post you opinios over this video because im' stunt REALLY!!
http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/112264/the_truth_about_9_11_and_wtc_loose_change_part_2_o f_3.swf
this is the same documentary i watched and its very convincing i saw slow mo of that object hitting pentagon and it looked like missle ill try find it for u
I lost interest when he compared a plane skimming a desert floor to a plane hitting a solid reenforced concrete wall...
No Shock wave? why do you fucking think?
I really think the conspiracy theory junk is disrespectful....why not say The US caused Pearl Harbor too? It pisses me off is what it does...you guys have fun in fantasy land, tell me when you get back
some of it though has interesting and strong arguement it isnt all junk..Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle
personally i think its wank made by people looking for things that just aint there... very well put together but clutching at straws...
if a plane crashed into my house there would be explosions afterwards... id be more supprised if there wasnt explosions.
as for the ground floor...
take a stick and put it in the ground and kick the top of the stick... the part in the ground gets the main force of movments.
the people who made the steel claimed it should have tood the blast... WOW i wonder why ::**
all in all intresting video but for me it dosnt prove anything except if you have an official sounding voice like the guy narrating you can make anything sound like fact ;)
i see video just before it crashed into pentagon and it looked like missle i paused it where i could see it and it looked just like missle did u see slow mo with detenation in twin towers something is fishy about it even people inside bulding were saying it was like bombs in building plus there were unauthorized people inside twin towers about week before it happened sent by none other than bushs brother plus twin towers people didnt know about these *new* so called people going in twin towers i think some of it is bs but not all of it by any means
If it was that easy to place bombs in a building that runs 24/7... why wouldn't the goverment just say Terrorists planted the bombs in the building?
Why would they throw planes into the equation just to complicate things for them selves?
well because it would look even more suspect wouldnt it they even were saying that they have remote control planes or something like that i dont believe it all by any means but i do believe some of itQuote:
Originally Posted by AdamGB
...did you not account for how jet fuel spewing out of a wrecked plane reacts???
That's the "Loose Change" film....which is pretty convincing and "entertaining" but it takes about two seconds to find a host of sites debunking the shit out of it....thats why they have to keep changing/updating it.
There was a UK film about Pearl HarboUr recently, and I understand that there were no Americans there. It was the British who were sneakily attacked after years of American meddling in the Far East, I thought.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle
We then went on to win the war on our own.
;D
What would be more suspect about it?!Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
BANG!
And then faked evidence such as CCTV footage is shown of what ever and the blame for the lapse in sercurity goes on security staff who died in the tower...
If we beleive they could take over a plane and bring weapons past airport security, a building important to national security then some how placing explosives in a Comercial building that has 100000s or people and equipment moving in and out of it every day doesn't seem as unbeleivable does it?
We are talking about the most powerfull goverment in teh world with the world's largest economy, why would they go to 'Budget conspiracys R us'?
Loose change is a load of crap... as with this documentry... the second they raised to point about Jet Fuel not burning hot enough to melt Steel I turned it off...
Does a steel structure that has had a Jet weighing tens of tonnes flying into it really have to be liquified before it collapses?
It didn't have to be even half way near melting point for a failure in the structure to happen.
If you find it so unbelievable about 911 being more than planes and fires knocking them down, check out the info about Oklahoma City.
How do you explain news reports by bomb squads saying they diffused multiple devices inside the building. But the next day, it was just one bomb, and it was outside, and it split the building in half.
Just think critically and see what happens. Put the same amount of scrutiny into the "official" version as the conspiracy. You might be suprised by what you come out with.
i totally agree i dont think these guys have seen it all i would of never thought it was believebale until i see documentaryQuote:
Originally Posted by luvfightgame