Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Why does Bhop get praised for his hitting and holding style and Hatton gets crucified for it? If anything, at least with Hatton there is a pretty good chance that the fight will end by KO. I like both and consider Hopkins an ATG, but I cannot sit here and say that Hopkins is exciting and Hatton holds too much it just doesn't make sense. I never would have thought that this would be effective against Winky, does this mean that Hatton has a better chance against the welters than previously thought?
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
hop only did that last night...that's not his signature style like hatton's
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Hop gets praised?
When did this happen?
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
....Hopkins has ALWAYS been tough to watch fight....his fights vs Robert Allen were just HORRID.
He's a great boxer though.....Ricky is just an all out brawler, I like his style but hey what'cha' gonna do everyone can like the same thing
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Because he's American, hehe I'm j/k I know how to piss people off. :lickish:
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
hop only did that last night...that's not his signature style like hatton's
Hopkins vs Wright was a bit excessive, but Bernard has always thrown his shots, lunged in and put his forehead in your face. After that he holds and hits. That is his signature style. The only difference is he used to do it with more movement in between.
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
At this point in Bernards carrier I would much rather see Ricky fight than B-hop. Ricky may have some similarities but he is more exciting I think. I would like to see a B-hop Jones rematch . I dont know why. ;D
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joerod
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
hop only did that last night...that's not his signature style like hatton's
Hopkins vs Wright was a bit excessive, but Bernard has always thrown his shots, lunged in and put his forehead in your face. After that he holds and hits. That is his signature style. The only difference is he used to do it with more movement in between.
When are people going to learn
Hopkins doesnt have a signature style
Hes like Dunkin Donoughts,"Made Fresh Daily"
He tailors what he wants to do,and how he fights to who he's fighting
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joerod
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
hop only did that last night...that's not his signature style like hatton's
Hopkins vs Wright was a bit excessive, but Bernard has always thrown his shots, lunged in and put his forehead in your face. After that he holds and hits. That is his signature style. The only difference is he used to do it with more movement in between.
When are people going to learn
Hopkins doesnt have a signature style
Hes like Dunkin Donoughts,"Made Fresh Daily"
He tailors what he wants to do,and how he fights to who he's fighting
I agree he is probably the best at adapting to his opponent's style, but I can guarantee whatever fight style he chooses there will be leading with the head and hitting and holding. ;)
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joerod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joerod
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather+Mosley
hop only did that last night...that's not his signature style like hatton's
Hopkins vs Wright was a bit excessive, but Bernard has always thrown his shots, lunged in and put his forehead in your face. After that he holds and hits. That is his signature style. The only difference is he used to do it with more movement in between.
When are people going to learn
Hopkins doesnt have a signature style
Hes like Dunkin Donoughts,"Made Fresh Daily"
He tailors what he wants to do,and how he fights to who he's fighting
I agree he is probably the best at adapting to his opponent's style, but I can guarantee whatever fight style he chooses there will be leading with the head and hitting and holding. ;)
Naw against Tarver he was back most of it,lots of shoulder feints,didnt want to come in to Tarvers range,and he was constantly wapping Tarvers pawing jab so Tarver couldnt find his range
He'd decide all night,and then charge with his head up
Throw his three and be gone
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
I hate Hopkins style (AKA Juggernaut from the X-men) more than Hatton's
I will never praise that style.
The intentional holding in boxing has to be stopped it's ruining the sport IMO.
Some people may like it, but IMO it's cheating straight up.
I can understand a fighter holding on for dear life, what I can't
condone is using it as a defensive strategy.
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
I hate Hopkins style (AKA Juggernaut from the X-men) more than Hatton's
I will never praise that style.
The intentional holding in boxing has to be stopped it's ruining the sport IMO.
Some people may like it, but IMO it's cheating straight up.
I can understand a fighter holding on for dear life, what I can't
condone is using it as a defensive strategy.
No cheating is Listons blatant eye gouges
Cheating is Holyfields at least once a fight headbut
And even then,if the ref didnt see it,werent cheating
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
I hate Hopkins style (AKA Juggernaut from the X-men) more than Hatton's
I will never praise that style.
The intentional holding in boxing has to be stopped it's ruining the sport IMO.
Some people may like it, but IMO it's cheating straight up.
I can understand a fighter holding on for dear life, what I can't
condone is using it as a defensive strategy.
No cheating is Listons blatant eye gouges
Cheating is Holyfields at least once a fight headbut
And even then,if the ref didnt see it,werent cheating
Those are ALSO cheating.
When you hold excessively you get warned, and then you should lose points.
Re: Why is Hopkins praised for his style and Hatton crucified?
Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by killersheep
I hate Hopkins style (AKA Juggernaut from the X-men) more than Hatton's
I will never praise that style.
The intentional holding in boxing has to be stopped it's ruining the sport IMO.
Some people may like it, but IMO it's cheating straight up.
I can understand a fighter holding on for dear life, what I can't
condone is using it as a defensive strategy.
No cheating is Listons blatant eye gouges
Cheating is Holyfields at least once a fight headbut
And even then,if the ref didnt see it,werent cheating
Those are ALSO cheating.
When you hold excessively you get warned, and then you should lose points.
A warning aint a point deduction
