McCline Negative for Steroids!
The results of drug testing done on recent heavyweight title challenger Jameel “Big Time” McCline by the New York State Athletic Commission came back today and he is reportedly “100% clean.” Manager Scott Hirsch says McCline tested negative for any form of steroids in both his pre- and post-fight tests. The day before McCline’s challenge of Samuel Peter for the WBC Heavyweight Championship on October 6 at Madison Square Garden,
http://www.fightnews.com/
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
well there goes that excuse for the peter lovers ;D
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Deuce
well there goes that excuse for the peter lovers ;D
"Peter lovers" LMAO thats just wrong. I wish Mcline was a better fighter with more endurance ,I like him much beter than fat head peter.
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
wish i realized that before i typed it lol
of course you had to find it, and point it out for me lol ;D
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Deuce
wish i realized that before i typed it lol
of course you had to find it, and point it out for me lol ;D
Pervert... this is a family forum ;D J.K.
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
.....but, but, but, but
BUT NOTHING Sam Peter fans.....YOUR BOY just got dropped 3 times by a scaredy cat, feather fisted, underachiever, washed up heavyweight JOURNEYMAN.
And Sam Peter is supposed to be in his prime and able to leap tall buildings and beat Wladimir Klitschko in a rematch......Oh I disagree ;D
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
I am a Peter fan but McLine exposed him. He's just another Calvin Brock
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
I think that this issue isn't really being looked at in the right way, because as I read it, it is McCline's most recent drug tests that have come back clean, but he was allegedly supplied with the steroids in 05-06. The point is, it is easier to maintain muscle mass than it is to build it, and it seems to me that what is being suggested is that he used the steroids to build the muscle mass he has since maintained.
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
he doesn't look any bigger than he did back when he fought Shannon Briggs
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle
he doesn't look any bigger than he did back when he fought Shannon Briggs
Even when Toney was using steroids he still looks like a fairly rotund gentleman who makes several visits to the dessert cart, so don't always judge on looks. ;)
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Quote:
Originally Posted by superheavyrhun
I think that this issue isn't really being looked at in the right way, because as I read it, it is McCline's most recent drug tests that have come back clean, but he was allegedly supplied with the steroids in 05-06. The point is, it is easier to maintain muscle mass than it is to build it, and it seems to me that what is being suggested is that he used the steroids to build the muscle mass he has since maintained.
true, unless you gained muscle mass in a non-natural manor. If i juiced in 2006, and maintained the same regiment, i would not be as "muscular" in 2007
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugar_Shaw
I am a Peter fan but McLine exposed him. He's just another Calvin Brock
wow.
that is actually a great comparison.
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Deuce
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugar_Shaw
I am a Peter fan but McLine exposed him. He's just another Calvin Brock
wow.
that is actually a great comparison.
.....except Calvin can actually box (and he only got knocked down once by McCline)
Re: McCline Negative for Steroids!
Who gives a f*** about the heavyweights anyway?