should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
I remember the opening night of the tournament, being a boxing fan i had been excited about it for some time
watching the first fight between taylor and abraham i wasnt disapointed, both men looking to land punches and both trying to win
then the fight was over and i hoped for more of the same
in step dirrell, his unwillingness to engage was a disgrace, he ran and he ran and made it one of the worst fights i have seen and carl froch hadnt ever been in a bad fight before
not long before i had seen one of froch's old foes matthew barney disqualified early in a fight by richie davies for too much holding, if richie had been the ref that night it wouldnt have lasted 3 rounds
then dirrells 2nd fight, admittedly it was a little more entertaining (he couldnt have made it any worse) probably because abraham didnt hunt as much as froch did dirrell dint run as much, but the performance at the end? I have actually read in places people believing he wasnt play acting
my my, the crying as well when the result was being read out
I have heard many people, specially on this forum, say that MMA is taking fans from boxing, well if anything is going to do that andre dirrell is your man
this is suppose to be boxings premier tournament
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
I remember the opening night of the tournament, being a boxing fan i had been excited about it for some time
watching the first fight between taylor and abraham i wasnt disapointed, both men looking to land punches and both trying to win
then the fight was over and i hoped for more of the same
in step dirrell, his unwillingness to engage was a disgrace, he ran and he ran and made it one of the worst fights i have seen and carl froch hadnt ever been in a bad fight before
not long before i had seen one of froch's old foes matthew barney disqualified early in a fight by richie davies for too much holding, if richie had been the ref that night it wouldnt have lasted 3 rounds
then dirrells 2nd fight, admittedly it was a little more entertaining (he couldnt have made it any worse) probably because abraham didnt hunt as much as froch did dirrell dint run as much, but the performance at the end? I have actually read in places people believing he wasnt play acting
my my, the crying as well when the result was being read out
I have heard many people, specially on this forum, say that MMA is taking fans from boxing, well if anything is going to do that andre dirrell is your man
this is suppose to be boxings premier tournament
No doubt about it in my eyes he play acted. I honestly can't see how anybody else can say it was genuine. It was ridiculous.
That aside, he shouldn't be removed.
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
It's too late now.
Let's just hope he doesn't make it through to the next round. He was losing the momentum in that fight and took a dive. It was a harsh call, the DQ, I've been watching loads of old fights and they all used to take a swing as the man was down/ going down. Tyson in particular used to hit on the way down and never got DQ'd.
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
0james0
It's too late now.
Let's just hope he doesn't make it through to the next round. He was losing the momentum in that fight and took a dive. It was a harsh call, the DQ, I've been watching loads of old fights and they all used to take a swing as the man was down/ going down. Tyson in particular used to hit on the way down and never got DQ'd.
Yeah I watched one last night actually, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAdLQ-WySoU
This was fairly brutal too around the 4:30 mark.
I personally think that the Abraham one deserved a DQ though, he had quite a bit of time to stop/not throw the punch. Also I wouldn't be suprised if Dirrell beat Ward!
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
I personally think that the Abraham one deserved a DQ though, he had quite a bit of time to stop/not throw the punch. Also I wouldn't be suprised if Dirrell beat Ward!
you could argue that abraham deserved it, i think he probably did
but like has already been said it happens so regular, even now, it would never stop
i think both the play acting and the performance against froch deserve at least some public torture
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
I personally think that the Abraham one deserved a DQ though, he had quite a bit of time to stop/not throw the punch. Also I wouldn't be suprised if Dirrell beat Ward!
you could argue that abraham deserved it, i think he probably did
but like has already been said it happens so regular, even now, it would never stop
i think both the play acting and the performance against froch deserve at least some public torture
I totally agree that his performance vs Froch was a shambles but I was super impressed by him upto the end against Abraham. I thought he boxed the perfect fight and beforehand I expected Arthur to catch him around the middle rounds and then destroy him. I was wrong. Very wrong. Dirrell showed me he has got real quality in that fight.
I try to think past his acting and try and appreciate what he did beforehand and then look forward to his next fight. When all is said and done he HAS to win and I see him impressing again.
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
He was very good up until the last few rounds, he looked like he was in complete control until he got hit with that one big shot, then he looked a little shaken and seemed like he was going to go into his shell again.
I was suprised by how one sided most the fight was in his favour.
Will Froch learn from that and outbox Abraham? I doubt it.
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
0james0
It's too late now.
Let's just hope he doesn't make it through to the next round. He was losing the momentum in that fight and took a dive. It was a harsh call, the DQ, I've been watching loads of old fights and they all used to take a swing as the man was down/ going down. Tyson in particular used to hit on the way down and never got DQ'd.
Yeah I watched one last night actually,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAdLQ-WySoU
This was fairly brutal too around the 4:30 mark.
I personally think that the Abraham one deserved a DQ though, he had quite a bit of time to stop/not throw the punch. Also I wouldn't be suprised if Dirrell beat Ward!
;D That was brutal!
You could even argue that it wasn't the knockdown shot that KO'd him, it was the one the uppercut when he was sat on his ass that put him to sleep.
It's hijacking this thread a little, but there are loads of Tyson on floor shots we could put up. I'd be curious to see how many we could find!
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
0james0
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
0james0
It's too late now.
Let's just hope he doesn't make it through to the next round. He was losing the momentum in that fight and took a dive. It was a harsh call, the DQ, I've been watching loads of old fights and they all used to take a swing as the man was down/ going down. Tyson in particular used to hit on the way down and never got DQ'd.
Yeah I watched one last night actually,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAdLQ-WySoU
This was fairly brutal too around the 4:30 mark.
I personally think that the Abraham one deserved a DQ though, he had quite a bit of time to stop/not throw the punch. Also I wouldn't be suprised if Dirrell beat Ward!
;D That was brutal!
You could even argue that it wasn't the knockdown shot that KO'd him, it was the one the uppercut when he was sat on his ass that put him to sleep.
It's hijacking this thread a little, but there are loads of Tyson on floor shots we could put up. I'd be curious to see how many we could find!
Start a new thread then! I'm sure it will be a good enough topic for it's own thread. Or even have it for everyone rather than just Tyson.
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Not every fighter brings excitement to the ring every time.
It's just something that comes with a fight where you get to wear gloves, fight defensively almost every round, and clinch without warning. (Dirrel)
Dirrel should not be removed, but I think he is my least favorite part about this tournament.
And your boy Froch is not all that great either. He needs to take a note from Margarito or Maidana, by learning how to effectively cut off the ring against skilled defensive fighters. If he was effective against fighters who could move, it would make the tournament a little more interesting.
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JonnyFolds
Not every fighter brings excitement to the ring every time.
It's just something that comes with a fight where you get to wear gloves, fight defensively almost every round, and clinch without warning. (Dirrel)
Dirrel should not be removed, but I think he is my least favorite part about this tournament.
And your boy Froch is not all that great either. He needs to take a note from Margarito or Maidana, by learning how to effectively cut off the ring against skilled defensive fighters. If he was effective against fighters who could move, it would make the tournament a little more interesting.
im not saying froch is the most gifted boxer, and im not siding with him in particular
all the other boxers in the tournament have given us entertainment including Taylor
dirrell did everything to make the froch fight a dull fight, and yes he was on the way to redeeming (spelling) himself in the abraham fight, but then he did what he did
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
I agree that the Froch fight was horrible, he held and ran for most of the fight. It looked like he dodn't really want to fight. Should he be removed? No , he fought a great fight against Abraham, he has great boxing ability and i'm really looking forward to him and Ward going at it. Regadless of what happened at the end of the AA fight he still outboxed him for 11 rounds.
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MMASUX
I agree that the Froch fight was horrible, he held and ran for most of the fight. It looked like he dodn't really want to fight. Should he be removed? No , he fought a great fight against Abraham, he has great boxing ability and i'm really looking forward to him and Ward going at it. Regadless of what happened at the end of the AA fight he still outboxed him for 11 rounds.
styles worked perfectly in dirrells favour didnt they? id of liked to have seen what would have happened
do you think abraham might have caught up with him?
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
just out of interest does anyone think dirrell won the froch fight?
i read some articles on east side boxing that suggested some people did
Re: should dirrell be removed from the super 6?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
erics44
just out of interest does anyone think dirrell won the froch fight?
i read some articles on east side boxing that suggested some people did
I thought he had won. Sure it wasnt exciting but i felt he did.