Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Just wanted everyones thoughts on what the toughest human beings on earth are in regards to just being able to beat someones arse all over the place.
Shaolin monks..
Are these the toughest people on earth?
You always here the stories and watch the videos of how superhuman these guys are but they never compete in such events as in mma or anything as its not in their nature to participate in these type of events.
Is there any footage of any real life shaolin monks in competitive action or is there any chance that these monks could possibly be overated?!
I know we all have our favourite boxers and favourite mma fighters but in a real life pound for pound situation ignoring weight what type of contact professional is the ultimate warrior.
(The question is a bit immature, but just give me an idea on who you think is toughest type of human being on earth and why and perhaps some reasoning on the monks that bend metal with ease and take kicks to the groin etc)
Cheers.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Be good to see how one went, I think they are well above the average joe in fight abilities but I recon it ends there. Western take over of martial arts has left all traditional ones flat in the Octagon. But out of most arts you would think those boys would have the variable ground and bridging the gap from kick to grapple skills to build on better than some others.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
they seem to beat themselves a whole lot, the answer is obvious.
C.N
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
they seem to beat themselves a whole lot, the answer is obvious.
C.N
:D Haha be great to see a match up between a monk and a self flagellating priest, separate rings, see who can beat themselves to death first.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Boxer4life
Mike Tyson
Would mike take a shaolin monk at the same weight?
In gloves with rules Mike all day long.
No rules no gloves would probably mean to the death. We all know who would have to have whos eyes out and toes or knees broken just to be able to survive a round, Id go with the monk because he'd realize the gravity of the situation fast and fingers outreach fists.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
I don't think you can legitimately answer this one with a single name (because individual humans are very different and there are too many unpredictable variables.)
Taking the debate in a slightly different direction, I've been thinking about what 'type' of person was likely the biggest badass in history.
Throughout human history, only two 'types' of people have been purely and wholly dedicated to fighting and killing from birth. They did nothing else in their lives, thought of nothing else, and spent literally all their lives getting better at it. They were highly educated, trained harder and longer than anyone else in history, had the best weapons and technology available and believed that they were the best of the best. In fact, their social class existed only to make war.
Ladies and gents, I give you:
- the feudal Japanese Samurai, and
- the 12th Century Egyptian Mamluk slave soldiers
Look them up. Would be interested in people's views ........
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Boxer4life
Mike Tyson
Would mike take a shaolin monk at the same weight?
Honestly i think so, i think they lack the power to stop mike, while hes trying to kick him mikes punching, its very hard to hurt a guy like mike.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
X's post is great, as far as the Shaolin Monks it still would highly depend on the individual as he said of course. I think it's likely that marial artists have declined on the whole since modern warfare, as they used to in fact be the most practical killing machines known to man in many cases.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Yeah, why are there no Shaolin Monks in the UFC?
http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n...inmonks003.jpg
Everybody knows that the Shaolin Monks are the undisputed Masters of Martial Arts of the Far East; not even the Muay Thailanders can f*<k with the Shaolin Monks and their dragon brands on their inner forearms, yet none are in the UFC ?!
Why not?!
the bradguy never seen a holy-man that didn't have some clandestine agenda involving money.
Do the Shaolin Monks think the UFC's not good enough for them, do the Monks think that they're better than other people, do the Monks think that their poop don't stink?!
http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n...inmonks010.jpg
Certainly the Monks are bad@$$, nobody disputes that...
but still...
Put-up or shut-up, in the cage, Shaolin Monks...if you've got the stones for it...
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8564/wink01kh0.jpg
.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Shaolin Monk is damn near super-human....
...or sub-human at least.
http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n...ngfuurn032.jpg
Can sleep outside in Winter at 40 below with only a bedsheet for warmth.
Can take full-power shots to the testicles with no apparent damage.
Can mentally adjust their own heartbeats and body-temperature.
Shaolin Monk possesses unbelievable resilience and endurance.
I can't see BJ Penn beating this kind of disciplined force of nature...
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8564/wink01kh0.jpg
.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Which leads us to why Kung fu hasnt a place in UFC. Because it cant compete with more modern blends of Mixed martial arts, neither can straight Karate or Takwondo or any other other strictly traditional "Arts". Bits from each of them could be used at times though.
Ego is what the main fight is all about in varying styles.
Real Monks shouldn't have one of those at all.
Re: Shaolin monks...the tough ones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Andre
Which leads us to why Kung fu hasnt a place in UFC. Because it cant compete with more modern blends of Mixed martial arts, neither can straight Karate or Takwondo or any other other strictly traditional "Arts". Bits from each of them could be used at times though.
Ego is what the main fight is all about in varying styles.
Real Monks shouldn't have one of those at all.
MMA began with multitudes of various, esoteric, traditional martial arts systems.
During the past 19 years under stringent battle-test conditions in the Octagon and in the MMA ring, most systems have been eliminated from MMA leaving 4 basic styles currently in MMA:
Muay Thai.
Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.
Boxing.
Wrestling.
However, Karate came back, baby, with Machida! And with St.Pierre too!
Why not Kung Fu?
Why can't Shaolin Kung Fu be successful in the Octagon?
It's about the fighter, not the style.
A gifted exponent can make lots of things work.
Cung Le is bad@$$ with the Sanshou.
Le has practiced other systems, but he's still primarily a Kung Fu guy, and his Kung Fu is very good.
http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n...gLeFrank02.jpg
I mean, Frank Shamrock sure got Kung Fu'ed by Cung Le.
Frank's arm bone was all jacked-up.
If Cung Le can have success in MMA with his Kung Fu, then why can't a Shaolin Monk who's got a lifelong dedication and discipline to it? And holy men LOVE money.
I'm not sure if a Shaolin Monk could be a Draw at the gate/UFC ppv sales though.
The financial bottom line is what matters most to the UFC which is why an unproven novice like Lesnar got the fast track to the main event: because he was already a proven, bankable ppv Draw in Pro-Wrestling.
The UFC did everything they could to prevent Machida with his Karate from getting a Title-shot because they knew he would probably win the Title, but he'd be bad business for the UFC as Lyoto's a non-draw...
