Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
What is the rush, the best part of the journey is getting there. They should be allowed to enjoy the ride before they are exposed and fully found out.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Funk that! The biggest bollocks in boxing is - "wait until they get a bit bigger." It ends up never happening. Groves/Degale turned out alright after meeting as novices. A good fight is a good fight, whatever the journey.
They're not gonna fight, but they should, they genuinely despise each other and it would make me happy.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
Funk that! The biggest bollocks in boxing is - "wait until they get a bit bigger." It ends up never happening. Groves/Degale turned out alright after meeting as novices. A good fight is a good fight, whatever the journey.
They're not gonna fight, but they should, they genuinely despise each other and it would make me happy.
Exactly all that fecking around with Britains great domestic middleweights and none of them ever ended up fighting. Its such bullshit. Promoters are just scared to match any of their draws in risky fights.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Saunders doesn't want any part of Eubank. Not the Eubank I saw on television last night. Saunders may want to back away from those threats.
Eubank has developed some power now to go with his speed. The punch accuracy and punch output is something Saunders will be swarmed with- no doubt Eubank has a decent chin, plus he moves and counter-punches effectively.
Saunders may have bitten off more than he can chew.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
If that was your fighter or child in the ring, you would do exactly what they are doing which is learning their trade.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
I agree, Saunders has always looked shit to me, his belts are honestly, Mickey Mouse bullshit belts as far as I can see.
Every fight he's in, he's shit and his opponent is shitter.
I'd pick Eubank within 6, Saunders is ridiculously easy to hit and CEJr would bet too fast for him.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Saunders doesn't want any part of Eubank. Not the Eubank I saw on television last night. Saunders may want to back away from those threats.
Eubank has developed some power now to go with his speed. The punch accuracy and punch output is something Saunders will be swarmed with-
no doubt Eubank has a decent chin, plus he moves and counter-punches effectively.
Saunders may have bitten off more than he can chew.
Seriously? Why because he got hit in the arm by an Albanian taxi driver ? Eubank Sr and Jr are so full of shit that you could probably cover a couple acres with one answer to a pundits question. Take some sacks to a news conference and the the pair could probably cover half of Somerset. Generally in order to have your claims of being the best boxer in any Division on the planet taken seriously it's probably a good idea to not only have fought people with belts, but to also then take them off them impressively, and not rely on beating up somebody who probably wears braces outside of the ring, and has velcro shoes because the skill level required for laces is beyond them.
Saunders has the British, European and Commonwealth belts and even if world level proves to be too much a step up for him has already achieved much more IN THE RING than Cwis Jr ,whatever his utterly classless, clueless, chavvy cunt of a dad may tell you.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Saunders doesn't want any part of Eubank. Not the Eubank I saw on television last night. Saunders may want to back away from those threats.
Eubank has developed some power now to go with his speed. The punch accuracy and punch output is something Saunders will be swarmed with-
no doubt Eubank has a decent chin, plus he moves and counter-punches effectively.
Saunders may have bitten off more than he can chew.
Seriously? Why because he got hit in the arm by an Albanian taxi driver ? Eubank Sr and Jr are so full of shit that you could probably cover a couple acres with one answer to a pundits question. Take some sacks to a news conference and the the pair could probably cover half of Somerset. Generally in order to have your claims of being the best boxer in any Division on the planet taken seriously it's probably a good idea to not only have fought people with belts, but to also then take them off them impressively, and not rely on beating up somebody who probably wears braces outside of the ring, and has velcro shoes because the skill level required for laces is beyond them.
Saunders has the British, European and Commonwealth belts and even if world level proves to be too much a step up for him has already achieved much more IN THE RING than Cwis Jr ,whatever his utterly classless, clueless, chavvy cunt of a dad may tell you.
God mate do you need any of my blood pressure meds, he does seem to annoy you yes Sr and Jr
seem to have that effect on people,;D I just laugh count to 3 bud it's pure theatre and using the
C word on a Sunday may NV strike you down.;D
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Saunders doesn't want any part of Eubank. Not the Eubank I saw on television last night. Saunders may want to back away from those threats.
Eubank has developed some power now to go with his speed. The punch accuracy and punch output is something Saunders will be swarmed with-
no doubt Eubank has a decent chin, plus he moves and counter-punches effectively.
Saunders may have bitten off more than he can chew.
Seriously? Why because he got hit in the arm by an Albanian taxi driver ? Eubank Sr and Jr are so full of shit that you could probably cover a couple acres with one answer to a pundits question. Take some sacks to a news conference and the the pair could probably cover half of Somerset. Generally in order to have your claims of being the best boxer in any Division on the planet taken seriously it's probably a good idea to not only have fought people with belts, but to also then take them off them impressively, and not rely on beating up somebody who probably wears braces outside of the ring, and has velcro shoes because the skill level required for laces is beyond them.
Saunders has the British, European and Commonwealth belts and even if world level proves to be too much a step up for him has already achieved much more IN THE RING than Cwis Jr ,whatever his utterly classless, clueless, chavvy cunt of a dad may tell you.
Chris Snr was a quality fighter, whatever you think of his publicity antics, to call him what you did shows that you'd be better off showing your tribal prejudices at Millwall FC than in a boxing arena.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nuggetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Saunders doesn't want any part of Eubank. Not the Eubank I saw on television last night. Saunders may want to back away from those threats.
Eubank has developed some power now to go with his speed. The punch accuracy and punch output is something Saunders will be swarmed with-
no doubt Eubank has a decent chin, plus he moves and counter-punches effectively.
Saunders may have bitten off more than he can chew.
Seriously? Why because he got hit in the arm by an Albanian taxi driver ? Eubank Sr and Jr are so full of shit that you could probably cover a couple acres with one answer to a pundits question. Take some sacks to a news conference and the the pair could probably cover half of Somerset. Generally in order to have your claims of being the best boxer in any Division on the planet taken seriously it's probably a good idea to not only have fought people with belts, but to also then take them off them impressively, and not rely on beating up somebody who probably wears braces outside of the ring, and has velcro shoes because the skill level required for laces is beyond them.
Saunders has the British, European and Commonwealth belts and even if world level proves to be too much a step up for him has already achieved much more IN THE RING than Cwis Jr ,whatever his utterly classless, clueless, chavvy cunt of a dad may tell you.
Chris Snr was a quality fighter, whatever you think of his publicity antics, to call him what you did shows that you'd be better off showing your tribal prejudices at Millwall FC than in a boxing arena.
I have Met Eubank Sr and you of course are entitled to your opinion. I maybe should apologise for calling him the C Word but I take nothing else back. I am not impressed by a former fighter touting his untested son as the best fighter in the world in one breath and then dismissing a British, Commonwealth and European champion in another. I am similarly unmoved to attribute even a modicum of class to a self aggrandising dandy who has not the slightest understanding of British tailoring or what a classy gentlemen is made of. Wearing a monocle is both desperate and sad. Choosing then to top an affectation like this, with a ludicrous pair of jodhpurs, that look ridiculous even on the most shapely of horsewomen, is not only stupid, it is to even a crusty Tatler reading aristocrat, offensive. It makes my eyes hurt. He is like one huge walking fashion failure who then misses the mark completely by driving around in an American monstrosity clearly unsuitable for British roads. This is the country that gave us Bentleys, Daimlers, Jaguars, MG's,Caterhams.Locus,Mcclarens and the Rolls Royce. If he wants to be seen as having class maybe he should use his silly trousers and ride a horse. He then, not content with being out psyched by a clearly limited, but tough fighter in Steve Collins, tries to stoke up a rivalry between his own and the Irish fella's son. He was a good fighter but never the best of the British middleweights and I will have to wait for the mighty Plymouth Argyle to get back up into the championship before I get to go and visit Millwall FC. Contrary to your presumptions, one is quite capable of having tribal prejudices and being a boxing fan. So put that in your snuff box and sniff it.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
For the record - the thread title is what they were calling each other on Saturday night, I don't personally regard Jr as "wank" or BJ as "average"
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nuggetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Saunders doesn't want any part of Eubank. Not the Eubank I saw on television last night. Saunders may want to back away from those threats.
Eubank has developed some power now to go with his speed. The punch accuracy and punch output is something Saunders will be swarmed with-
no doubt Eubank has a decent chin, plus he moves and counter-punches effectively.
Saunders may have bitten off more than he can chew.
Seriously? Why because he got hit in the arm by an Albanian taxi driver ? Eubank Sr and Jr are so full of shit that you could probably cover a couple acres with one answer to a pundits question. Take some sacks to a news conference and the the pair could probably cover half of Somerset. Generally in order to have your claims of being the best boxer in any Division on the planet taken seriously it's probably a good idea to not only have fought people with belts, but to also then take them off them impressively, and not rely on beating up somebody who probably wears braces outside of the ring, and has velcro shoes because the skill level required for laces is beyond them.
Saunders has the British, European and Commonwealth belts and even if world level proves to be too much a step up for him has already achieved much more IN THE RING than Cwis Jr ,whatever his utterly classless, clueless, chavvy cunt of a dad may tell you.
Chris Snr was a quality fighter, whatever you think of his publicity antics, to call him what you did shows that you'd be better off showing your tribal prejudices at Millwall FC than in a boxing arena.
I have Met Eubank Sr and you of course are entitled to your opinion. I maybe should apologise for calling him the C Word but I take nothing else back. I am not impressed by a former fighter touting his untested son as the best fighter in the world in one breath and then dismissing a British, Commonwealth and European champion in another. I am similarly unmoved to attribute even a modicum of class to a self aggrandising dandy who has not the slightest understanding of British tailoring or what a classy gentlemen is made of. Wearing a monocle is both desperate and sad. Choosing then to top an affectation like this, with a ludicrous pair of jodhpurs, that look ridiculous even on the most shapely of horsewomen, is not only stupid, it is to even a crusty Tatler reading aristocrat, offensive. It makes my eyes hurt. He is like one huge walking fashion failure who then misses the mark completely by driving around in an American monstrosity clearly unsuitable for British roads. This is the country that gave us Bentleys, Daimlers, Jaguars, MG's,Caterhams.Locus,Mcclarens and the Rolls Royce. If he wants to be seen as having class maybe he should use his silly trousers and ride a horse. He then, not content with being out psyched by a clearly limited, but tough fighter in Steve Collins, tries to stoke up a rivalry between his own and the Irish fella's son. He was a good fighter but never the best of the British middleweights and I will have to wait for the mighty Plymouth Argyle to get back up into the championship before I get to go and visit Millwall FC. Contrary to your presumptions, one is quite capable of having tribal prejudices and being a boxing fan. So put that in your snuff box and sniff it.
Tribal we don't have any of that, if we catch anybody from the next village after dark we just EAT
the fuckers.;D
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Somerset. somebody who probably wears braces outside of the ring
Says somebody from Somerset where everybody holds their trousers up with string.
Re: Chris 'wank' Jr--'Average' Joe Saunders. Fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nuggetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fenster
They're both 24.
Billy Joe is unbeaten in 20 fights, a European, British and Commonwealth champion, top ten rated by the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO.
Eubank Jr is unbeaten in 17, he hasn't fought for any title. His best opponent is Bradley Pryce, who he faced 18 months ago, the level of his opposition has actually gone backwards.
It's a complete mismatch on paper. However, watching them last night, if they fought next week I'd probably pick Jr to win, even though the gulf between their opponents was obvious. It's nuts. Style over substance.
The pricks (I don't mean the boxers) obviously wont make this fight anytime soon, and quite frankly Jr doesn't deserve it, but they should. At the very least Jr's old man needs to stop fucking about and make a serious fight.
Saunders doesn't want any part of Eubank. Not the Eubank I saw on television last night. Saunders may want to back away from those threats.
Eubank has developed some power now to go with his speed. The punch accuracy and punch output is something Saunders will be swarmed with-
no doubt Eubank has a decent chin, plus he moves and counter-punches effectively.
Saunders may have bitten off more than he can chew.
Seriously? Why because he got hit in the arm by an Albanian taxi driver ? Eubank Sr and Jr are so full of shit that you could probably cover a couple acres with one answer to a pundits question. Take some sacks to a news conference and the the pair could probably cover half of Somerset. Generally in order to have your claims of being the best boxer in any Division on the planet taken seriously it's probably a good idea to not only have fought people with belts, but to also then take them off them impressively, and not rely on beating up somebody who probably wears braces outside of the ring, and has velcro shoes because the skill level required for laces is beyond them.
Saunders has the British, European and Commonwealth belts and even if world level proves to be too much a step up for him has already achieved much more IN THE RING than Cwis Jr ,whatever his utterly classless, clueless, chavvy cunt of a dad may tell you.
Chris Snr was a quality fighter, whatever you think of his publicity antics, to call him what you did shows that you'd be better off showing your tribal prejudices at Millwall FC than in a boxing arena.
I have Met Eubank Sr and you of course are entitled to your opinion. I maybe should apologise for calling him the C Word but I take nothing else back. I am not impressed by a former fighter touting his untested son as the best fighter in the world in one breath and then dismissing a British, Commonwealth and European champion in another. I am similarly unmoved to attribute even a modicum of class to a self aggrandising dandy who has not the slightest understanding of British tailoring or what a classy gentlemen is made of. Wearing a monocle is both desperate and sad. Choosing then to top an affectation like this, with a ludicrous pair of jodhpurs, that look ridiculous even on the most shapely of horsewomen, is not only stupid, it is to even a crusty Tatler reading aristocrat, offensive. It makes my eyes hurt. He is like one huge walking fashion failure who then misses the mark completely by driving around in an American monstrosity clearly unsuitable for British roads. This is the country that gave us Bentleys, Daimlers, Jaguars, MG's,Caterhams.Locus,Mcclarens and the Rolls Royce. If he wants to be seen as having class maybe he should use his silly trousers and ride a horse. He then, not content with being out psyched by a clearly limited, but tough fighter in Steve Collins, tries to stoke up a rivalry between his own and the Irish fella's son. He was a good fighter but never the best of the British middleweights and I will have to wait for the mighty Plymouth Argyle to get back up into the championship before I get to go and visit Millwall FC. Contrary to your presumptions, one is quite capable of having tribal prejudices and being a boxing fan. So put that in your snuff box and sniff it.
Chris Senior is having a go in this shit infested sport to get his son in the mix, he has another Sebastian who is apparently a reasonable heavyweightm good luck to him. Anyone who flattens Nigel Benn has to be treated with some respect......... As for Plymouth Green army ... nuff said stick to the insurance adverts....
