Printable View
I would love to see Rahman VS Wladimir so much . . . I wanna see how Rahman take the IBF belt too and be undisputed champ . . .
Only strong hard hitter can beat the Klitchko's like Sanders,Peter and Rahman and maybe Sultan . . .
Softies like Byrd,Toney,Ruiz or Lyakhovich can better retire or glass chin's like Grant or Whitaker . . .
Your missing something...wlad already beat peter. This could be interesting though....if rahman beats wladimir then that might ignite the rage of big bro! Big Bro comes back and knocks out rahman....interesting.
I dont missing something my friend make it sure ! ! !We all saw that Peter was very strong VS Wladmir and we see that Peter got more power then Wladimir and better chin but we saw that Wladimir have the better boxing skills . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by Snakey
If Peter make his target better even Rahman have no chance VS him with that power . . .
Hahhaha yes i think if Rahman beat Wladimir maybe Vitaly will back . . . :lolhaha:
what is it with you guys and rahman he s u c k s. Im sick of rahman whos gotten more undeserved title shots than anyone ive ever seen, Id rather see klitchko fight calvin brock at least he is undefeated, no more rahman pleaSE HE BLOWS
It would be a good fight if Emanuel Stewart didn't train Wladimer. But Emanuel Stewart trained Lennox to beat Rahman's style in that rematch, I don't doubt he'd do it again
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacdog
Man i even see Rahman at the statistic at front ! ! ! Rahman have the right to KO any1 from Joe Louis to Muhammad Ali to Lennox Lewis . . .
When Wladimir made Rahman dropped Rahman would give his everything thing to the card for the lucky punch and attack him and dont stay there as a tree like Byrd ! ! !
But am sure that a Rahman at shape would give much trouble to Wladimir and beat him . . . It would be like Fraizer VS Foremen from 2000 years . . . ::**
Rahamns style he sucks lennox just was lazy and took him lightly, keep in mind rahma was getting outboxed by 40 year old holyfield before the hemtoma. he sucks
Lennox was lazy and took him lightly ???
Didn't James Toney just give the same excuse ??? :)
lennox has a suck chin he has to fight very cautious if he fought the same way he did in the second fight rahman should never have won the title, has rahman done anything since, Im not a big fan of lennox but rahman sucks, when he gives an interview he sounds like a moron, "no one talks trash like toney and rahman" yeah no one talks trash like rahman because no one who loses all the times opens his mouth. he barely beat a fat slob in james toney a middle weight for christ sake and if james mabey had trained his fat ass a little harder he should of beat him. I cant beleive anyone has a desire to see rahman fight he sucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacdog
Man u sucks damn ! ! ! Corrie Sanders show enough to the world how easy he beat Wladimir and never got a knock down SV Vitaly . . . And Rahman show to the world that he fight VS Sanders with a brave heart hit him down but Rahman down too and then got back to the fight and then made the finnaly KO VS Sanders . . . When Sanders was KO from Rahman he was at the 7. heaven ! ! ! :Beat: Like Lewis . . . ;)
U mean now Sanders and Lewis was just simple lucky punches ? ? ? :lolhaha:
Who did sanders ever beat, Im sorry 1 punch wins against fighters with questionable chins doesnt make you a great fighter. Sanders big win was that 1 win against klitchko jus tlike rahmans big win was against lennox and neithe rman did anything before or after since. Rahman got knocked threw the ropes agianst maskev a good durable fighter but a world beater he is not, rahman did nothing since his first win against lennox and then did not know what planet he was on in the rematch after getting koed. He lost to ruiz, a pathetic evander holyfield who was outspeeding him at 40 years of age and hes as slow as dog s h i t now. What has he done, he barely beat a blown up middle who could ha ve beaten rahman ha dhe trained a little harder or ate few less burgers. Face it he sucks he doesnt desreve another shot let a young guy have a chance
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacdog
Hmmmmm first of it Sanders was a awesome brave fighter and got really great power and his left . . . And he was near to be the nightmare from both Klitschko's but dont had the chance VS Klitscko and can u believe it he beat with 30 or 39 Wladimir and he had the chance to beat Vitaly too with 40 . . . But it would be end of history when Vitaly would lose there VS 40 years old Sanders . . .
2. Holyfield was not great as he was at 90's but he was not bad too like after 2003 . . . He made a good fight VS Rahman and we cant say that Rahman sucks with that big cut because there was a head butt from Evander ! ! !
I dont think that Rahman do nothing . . . Rahman is good since he lost to Ruiz by a boring UD ! ! ! Rahman is going in a good way but to much money love and be arogant can his end of career too . . . But for now we cant say that he sucks . . . When i imagine the Rahman in good shape and wild agrasive boxing style i see even Rahman at front VS Wladimir ! ! !
But a damn paid Rahman from Don King would lose to VS Wladimir or any other boxer for money . . . :-X
dude he sucks face it thats why he keeps getting shots don king and now just because the diviosn sucks
U will say even when Rahman knock Wladimir out that he sucks ? ? ? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by pacdog
Now fellas ...
In a well-balanced world, Rahman will not KO Wlad. (Not that the world is always well-balanced!)
He won against a complacent Lewis. No one denies he has KO power; virtually any true hw does. Even Lewis can't let anyone hit him full without expecting to get hurt. Doesn't mean he has a glass chin. You can have a great chin and still get KO'd by a powerful punch from a hw. I don't recommend that you prove it to yourself, however. Some things are best taken on faith; this is one of them.
Lewis fought a sluggish fight against Rahman and he left himself open and he got caught. Good for Rahman that he was prepared to walk through that open door, but he didn't force the door open. Their next fight was more accurate in terms of assessing the relative stature of each as a hw boxer.
I don't think Wladimir will ever have the full grace of Lewis but he has many of the same kinds of boxing skills - namely, the ability to control with the jab and to box. He also has power. He should find Rahman a tougher opponent than was Byrd, certainly - but though it would not be impossible for Rahman to win by any means, it should not be expected that he should defeat Wlad.
Wladimir would box smart until he saw openings in Rahman's defense and then throw his straight right hand down the middle.Wladimir has the better skills and fights a lot smarter, that he just proved when he fought one of the best defensive fighters in Byrd.
rahman will get treated even worse than byrd
i really think if he will catch rahman with a nice one
he aint getting up ;D
Ok i agree honesty too that Wladimir have better boxing skills then Rahman . . . But u know Wladimir had always much trouble with agrasive boxers like Sanders,Brewster and Peter even Williamson ;D . . . And Rahman is 1 of them too and he got good boxing experienced . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by Klitschkofan