Worth a few quid! ;) ;D
Printable View
Worth a few quid! ;) ;D
When was the last time Agassi played a competative match?? 3 months?? longer, i think it is genuinly 50/50 id stay away.Quote:
Originally Posted by gogs67
LOL................do you realise what you just said?If its 'genuinly 50/50' then even more reason to get on the 11/8 odds!!! ;D ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
Never bet on Tennis! ::** ;D
Well i like to bet on matches when i feel my man is going to win, yes 11/8 was better than 5/6 which would of meant 50/50, but i would never had taken Agassi today the guy is 36 and not played for about three months, it was a dodgy bet.Quote:
Originally Posted by gogs67
You know you're getting old when Agassi plays Henman and Timmy is the favourite! ;D
Tim who?
No longer on the Tim Henman bandwagon i'm afraid
henman is a dead cert to get into the wimbledon 2nd round.....you watch him!!! they'll be going mad on that henman hill!!!
Let's see Agassi come beat me and my score of 81 :box3:
nadal's the man! ... though i really hate the guy. >:mad
Nadals the man for around two months of the year then the real man comes out to play:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkisser
ROGER FEDERER!!!
yup, but federer's already 1-6 against nadal.Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
Agreed h2h not great, but for some reason Federer chokes against Nadal, obvioulsy Nadal's intensity and the amount of shots he gets back is the main factor, but Federer had the same problems with Leyton Hewitt a couple of years back where he was like 1-7, i think he has now won his last 9 meetings against Hewitt, just wait and see, if they meet at Wimby which i doubt because Nadal is no where near comfortable on Grass Federer would rape him pretty comfortably, he also struggles with him being a lefty, but i have faith Federer will find away to beat him, no doubt when he does that h2h record will take a dramatic u turn.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkisser
you're probably right skel. i really hate nadal, especially his long shorts.
If Roger played to his peak,he could have crushed NADAL on Sunday but he just...choked plus it was on clay,Nadal's fave surface! Fed needs to do something about that though,watch tapes over and over or something,I can't believe he lost and it was more Fed throwing it away than Nadal winning it in my opinion. If Rog beats him once,he will give him a pounding consistently as he does to Henman even though Ti used to beat him and same with Hewitt and Nalbandian.
The Game it is defintly all in his head, i remember watching the same sort of thing happening against Hewiit, where he ues to loose every time because he made to many silly mistakes, but once he got the btter of him, he did start to beat him but crush him just to let him know that he is the man now, did you see the 04 Us open final?? That was one of the most one sided beatings ever of a final i think Federer beat Hewitt 6-0 7-6 6-0, i have no doubt the same will happen with Nadal, just look at the first set he smashed Nadal off the court but then just started making silly mistakes.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Game
Nadal is a one trick pony - just extremely good at that one trick ;)
Be surprised if he even play at Wimbledon - won't get past 1/4 finals at best if he does
Nadal will NEVER win wimbledon
Federer WILL win the French Open
Nadal is top boy on clay without a doubt, but clays season is very short!!
Henman has no agression in him...
no bottle... thats why he never looses he's not competative enough... he makes excuses when he loses which basicly amount to: the other guy was trying to beat me...
i remember thomas muster becoming world no.1 winning on clay courts alone.Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG H
Yes but there wasnt aplayer that basically won every other slam and event other than on a clay court.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkisser
henman did alright 8)
:o :oQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
:bananasex:
Would that be on a Question of Sport - it would be the 'guess what happened next' bit and Allie would say "Och Sue, ah no thus one, yon man Federer drops his keks and 'Rogers' young rafael up the shitter"
haha ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by X
tim henman would lose at tennis against a 6yr old.henman hill.... loser lawn more like ;D
Well that isnt true is it Emma, he just beat Andre Agassi, do you know who that is by any chance? Dont post silly things like this again unless u have pics of tittys. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by emma
Hneman has one of the best records in the world at Wimbledon over the past 10-12 years
Remember only a handful of people have one it in that period
::** of course i know who andre agassi is.anyway tim has never won wimbledon.or queens for that matter :PQuote:
Originally Posted by skel1983
So that means he would be beaton by a 6 year old girl?? Looks like the shitty English Media have brain washed you aswell as many other non tennis fans, who have this impression Tim Henman is shit, over the last 13 years 5 playes have won Wimbledon, thats all Henman has done this country proud he has been in sf's of three of the GS, He has had a great career.Quote:
Originally Posted by emma
Look, Carl Froch says Henman is shit, end of.
;D
I'll never forget Agassi vs. Blake that for me was probably the single best performance I have seen of him (Agassi).
Anyone remember that match?
I wouldn't be suprised if Agassi decked out a win it's possible....We are talking about Aggasi... ;)
Nadals great on CLAY....but he has yet to prove it elsewhere....Federer is #1 because he can win in Various places just not clay ;D and against Nadal.
Anybody see Sharipova get her ass handed to her a while back? That was fun too see that there was nothing she could do to turn the match around.
]Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis
LMAO!!
That was in Boxing Monthly wasnt it, hahaha, he better watch out the cobra, i heard Henmans in training to take him oin by the end of the year, i fancy Henman UD.