Both in their prime at feather... Who do you think would win? Would Naz's Akward style trow Manny off balance, or would Pac outpower the Prince?
Printable View
Both in their prime at feather... Who do you think would win? Would Naz's Akward style trow Manny off balance, or would Pac outpower the Prince?
Manny is a genuinely dangerous world class fighter.
Probably ends in a TKO or embarassing UD win for Pacman
Yeah im guessing the same.. altough I feel like Naz could of been a world class fighter too, he had so much talent and i think he did not get to reach his prime. Their is a guy for everyone out there Naz should of keept working harder. I don't understand how he could retire tough.. the guy was a damn PPV fighter.. great fighters even legends go all their whole carrers dreaming about PPV status and some might get it near the end sometimes ( Hopkins) But this kid had it already... i just dont get it...Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamGB
Whoever connected first would probabaly win this one - what a battle it would've been.
Although i think pacman would win due to the fact naz does not have a defense which u do need aginst a fighter like Paquiao it could just as easily go the other way as naz had the power knock ne featherweightQuote:
Originally Posted by AdamGB
Would of been a great fight.
Pac comes forward trying to knock Naz out
Pac ends up unconscious.
MAB showed the way to beat Naseem.
The trick is fight him in your own 'envelope', and no matter what he does, do not attempt to hit him if he is not in that 'envelope', even if you think you can, because it is a trick.
If Pacquiao followed that tactic he would of won, but would he have the discipline to do it?
Of course the other part to MAB's plan was if Naz was still on his feet in the final round, ram him head first into a turnbuckle ;)
Naz. TKO inside of 4. He might go down from getting nailed a few times while being off balance. But then, out of nowhere, he leaps in and cracks manny with one of his flying uppercuts. that's the beginning of the end.
In a fight between two big hitters you have to go with the guy with the better punch resistance . Nas has never been stopped but Pacs been k.o'd early a couple of times by fighters that were less than world class
Yes he was knocked out back when he himself wasn't world class.Quote:
Originally Posted by GAME
Naz choked against the only true elite he ever fought, he would of choked a second time as well IMO :)
i agreeQuote:
Originally Posted by raleights
Well he fought Kevin Kelly... altough not Elite... Kelly is alright he beat Derrick Gainer ....once... who is pretty good... but like I stated above Naz was only getting better he did not get to reach his prime if he did Naz would of KO PacmanQuote:
Originally Posted by raleights
who wins ??
Quote:
Originally Posted by outspoken
Yeah but PACMAN "hasnt" reached his prime yet either.....If NAZ was metally lost after all that Barerra pressure, he would be in really deep shite against PAC's. Before you can be physically tough, you have to be mentally strong, yeah PAC was KO'd when he was 17, but since then he's been knocked down several times and has always come back to knock the other guy out....NAZ has power and talent, but a weak mind....no chance for the Prince against a PACMAN that hasnt even reached the best of his game yet....Quote:
Originally Posted by outspoken
Well he fought Kevin Kelly... altough not Elite... Kelly is alright he beat Derrick Gainer ....once... who is pretty good... but like I stated above Naz was only getting better he did not get to reach his prime if he did Naz would of KO Pacman
Manny Pac would beat Naz IMO.
I'd take Hamed by KO
The problem is, Pacquiao fights 180 degrees from that style. He would be roaming forward. And really I was youtubing them both and then I saw thisQuote:
Originally Posted by BK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_IYM8qapEA
And now I'm not so sure, if Pacquiao got hit like that which he probably would, he may not recover
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majesty
just watched the vid,naz hands are way low. im pretty sure pac would take advantage of that! the last kd was a fake i mean he went down belly first, when u get hit with a strong punch u often land flat on your back i think that guy just wanted the fight to be over no heart at all.
I think Pacquiao would probably win, but he doesn't have Barrera's chin IMO, and Hamed hits harder, and faster than Paq IMO
Pacman would have tap danced on his snatch box . IMO Pac wins 6th R KO
it's not like his opponent had enough time to think about where Hamed's hands were. And he probably holds his hands low to make you see an opening you take so he can counter. Not like he needed to there.Quote:
Originally Posted by mnmc10
Its easy to look back with hindsight and say Hamed wasnt that good afterall but in his prime it was hard finding him a worthy opponent .
In his hayday , putting him in with a Flip with two early K.o losses would have seemed an easy fight for him .
Jmm didnt look like being the man to dethrone him and perhaps if he fought Morales instead of Barrera he would have won cuz stylistically that would be a better fight for him against a guy whos easier to hit and loses his composure when rocked
what does IMO mean?
In My OpinionQuote:
Originally Posted by a harmful of swallows
IMHO means in my honest opinion
I can see both fighters going down for sure but I believe Naz's leaky defence would be his downfall. He kept his hands way way to low and Pac is more relentless than Naz,however I'd say Naz packs more in 1 punch.Hmmm....He could counter Pac couldn't he?? I think I'd go for Pac,late stoppage.
Hamed early KO
CC. I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lords Gym
naz cant take the punches of MAB what more of pacs?
you can disregard both of pacs early losses, those where against bums
the only loss he had was against EM.. you all know what happened then...
Murad Muhammad can answer it! :)
i'd like to say naz but i really aint gotta clue.
how good was naz ??? was barrera just an off night ???
if naz came back after barrera, and continued to fight, not just 1 fight outpointing the spaniard, calvo was it ??? could he have beaten barrera or would he have always been second best
Hamed was at his worst on the Barerra fight but its his own fault.
if he stayed with brendan ingle i think he would of dominated for years
but of course like to many boxers now they think there better of on there own with the yes men
A thread was opended on this yesterday folks ;)
http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxing_fo...c,34752.0.html
I totally agree with you bro! good point of view!Quote:
Originally Posted by the_answer
You have to consider the quality of opponents. Lawal, the African opponent of Hamed in that video isn't really top tierred. Besides, Hamed at 5'41/2 is even bigger than this Nigerian. Note that Pacquiao is even bigger at 5'6". Watch this pacman fight against Jorge Eliecer Julio, a former 2 time world champ and then tell me what you think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Majesty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwGII...cquiao%20julio
pac by ko in the 6th if he can catch naz, but if naz catches pac.......might be trouble for pacman...
pacs jab jab straight left would force naz to keep his hands up thus messing up naz style of fighting.
naz would need;
JMM heart just to last with pac
morales mental toughness to perform at his best
and he has neither of those...if he got in the same ring with pac...he is fowck...pac fights bigger guys too and look what he does with them...a smaller naz would shyt himself against relentless pacman...it'll be a worst beating then em and mab recieve by pac combine...
naz only fight against an elite(barrera) he got expose and choke...the pressure of just the name pacman would make him terrified...it'll be a bad fight...pac would murder him.......