Saddam Hussein executed in Iraq

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/6218485.stm

Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has been executed by hanging at an unspecified location in Baghdad, for crimes against humanity.

Iraqi TV said the execution took place just before 0600 local time (0300GMT).

The news was confirmed to the BBC by the Iraqi Deputy Foreign Minister, Labeed Abawi.

Two co-defendants, Saddam Hussein's half-brother Barzan al-Tikriti and former Iraqi chief judge Awad Hamed al-Bandar, were also executed.

All three were sentenced to death by an Iraqi court on 5 November after a year-long trial over the 1982 killings of 148 Shias in the town of Dujail.

"Criminal Saddam was hanged to death," state-run Iraqiya television announced, as patriotic music and images of national monuments were broadcast.

A scrolling headline read: "Saddam's execution marks the end of a dark period of Iraq's history."

Other Arab TV stations aired live footage of the sunrise over Baghdad's Firdous Square, where US Marines pulled down a statue of Saddam Hussein, after he was deposed in April 2003.

'Turning a page'

US troops and Iraqi security forces are on high alert for any violent backlash. The US State Department has urged all its embassies to increase security.

The BBC's Peter Greste in Baghdad says Shias have generally welcomed Saddam Hussein's death and hailed the execution as justice for the suffering endured under his leadership.

But Saddam's own Sunni tribesman were angered by his treatment and they may well protest once more, our correspondent adds.

The White House is expected to issue a written statement, although President Bush is not expected to make an address.

The BBC's Adam Brookes in Washington says the Bush administration will see the act as turning a page in Iraq - a demonstration that Iraq has a sovereign and democratic government.

However, the administration will be keen to portray the execution as a matter purely for the Iraqi government and its court system, our correspondent says.

UK Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett welcomed the fact Saddam Hussein had been tried by an Iraqi court "for at least some of the appalling crimes he committed" and said "he has now been held to account".

France called on Iraqis to "look towards the future and work towards reconciliation and national unity".



Fucking hyprocrites. Hanged for killing just over a 100 kurds whilst good Christian Bush has the blood of 1 million Iraqi civillians on his hands >:mad

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbo

Fucking hyprocrites. Hanged for killing just over a 100 kurds whilst good Christian Bush has the blood of 1 million Iraqi civillians on his hands >:mad

---

Do you really think he killed only 100?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbo

F****** hyprocrites. Hanged for killing just over a 100 kurds whilst good Christian Bush has the blood of 1 million Iraqi civillians on his hands >:mad

---

Do you really think he killed only 100?

---

Nah of course not, but I bet in his entire reign he didnt kill as many as Bush and his dad did ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMicK

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbo

F****** hyprocrites. Hanged for killing just over a 100 kurds whilst good Christian Bush has the blood of 1 million Iraqi civillians on his hands >:mad

---

Do you really think he killed only 100?

---

Nah of course not, but I bet in his entire reign he didnt kill as many as Bush and his dad did ;)

---

Well a lot of shit! has happened as time goes by. You see that way, I see it as events will happen both good and bad your gonna have unfortunate events as in anything else that deals with countries at war.


The way he treated the Iraqi people for many years, since 1979 to be exact was just shit!
His death won't stop the violence but hopefully it will push things forward towards a better day for the Iraqi people.

Bush saying "the death of Hussein makes up for the deaths in Iraq" makes him no less of a killer then Hussein.

And the question everyone seems to be avoiding is... "where the hell is Osama?!?"

Lol i like france's two cents at the end. "Yeah now that you have freedom (which we were against giving you) be sure to become friends with everyone by never engaging in conflict (like us).

The only difference between good guys and bad guys is who starts it, who finishes it, or who can look like a better victim. For the people caught in the middle it comes down to who would you rather be killed by.

As for osama, why don't you ask 1 of the camera men that films him where he is?

Bush should be taken to a war crime court himself the mothafucker for all the innocent Afghani and Iraqi blood he has on his hands. Neither he nor anyone else had any right to invade either country,it was their business what they were up to and nothing to do with fooking America. And Iraqis have been through shit not just because of Saddam but also because of alllll the sanctions imposed.

And who armed Saddam with chemical weapons to fight Iran? Have you guys not seen the pic of Saddam shaking hands with Rumsfeld?

And finding Osama is irrelevany,he's probably dead in the all the bombings,do you think the insurgency will just stop? Wasn't the Iraqi resistance meant to crumble with the capture of Saddam? Alllll that noise,dumbass conferences(we got him etc etc) about nothing....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

Bush should be taken to a war crime court himself the mothafucker for all the innocent Afghani and Iraqi blood he has on his hands. Neither he nor anyone else had any right to invade either country,it was their business what they were up to and nothing to do with fooking America. And Iraqis have been through S*** not just because of Saddam but also because of alllll the sanctions imposed.

And who armed Saddam with chemical weapons to fight Iran? Have you guys not seen the pic of Saddam shaking hands with Rumsfeld?

And finding Osama is irrelevany,he's probably dead in the all the bombings,do you think the insurgency will just stop? Wasn't the Iraqi resistance meant to crumble with the capture of Saddam? Alllll that noise,dumbass conferences(we got him etc etc) about nothing....

---

Nicely put, El Gamo :coolclick:

The war in Iraq was fought reasons that turned out to be entirely non existent. The war was planned rashly and with no real scope for what should happen once the regime had been toppled. Saddam was a cruel murderer but likewise so is Mr Bush. Blood is on both hands.

I dont believe in the death penalty, and especially not in such a high profile case and after such a shoddy trial!!

CC back Miles,I'm glad there are others who see things for how they are. Far too many average Joe's read the Sun or whichever equivalent there is stateside(or in your case Korea!) and think they know everything there is to know..not many people know America armed Saddam with chemical weapons,there have been no weapons of mass destruction found...nothing!

And on top of millions of other flaws with America's arguments for invading Iraq,have Israel not OPENLy admitted that they have weapons of mass destrcution(Olmert let it slip in a press conference the other day..ass!) and even more so,who else was on the so called axis of evil....North Korea yet I don't see anything being done to punish them!!

Far too many double standards and far too much of America sticking it's nose where it is not wanted...I'm not saying what was happening in Iraq or Afghanistan was right but it was not America's place to start bombing the place for no reason..I'd like to see stats of how many Bush's bombings have killed,everyone knows officials stats are always altered to suit the puropse of whomever is using them...

I won't get into defending or dissing Bush...but he's a gotdam moron.

That's all I got to say about that.

Now...anyone that defends Hussein or doesn't think he should have been executed...you need your heads checked.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

CC back Miles,I'm glad there are others who see things for how they are. Far too many average Joe's read the Sun or whichever equivalent there is stateside(or in your case Korea!) and think they know everything there is to know..not many people know America armed Saddam with chemical weapons,there have been no weapons of mass destruction found...nothing!

And on top of millions of other flaws with America's arguments for invading Iraq,have Israel not OPENLy admitted that they have weapons of mass destrcution(Olmert let it slip in a press conference the other day..a**!) and even more so,who else was on the so called axis of evil....North Korea yet I don't see anything being done to punish them!!

Far too many double standards and far too much of America sticking it's nose where it is not wanted...I'm not saying what was happening in Iraq or Afghanistan was right but it was not America's place to start bombing the place for no reason..I'd like to see stats of how many Bush's bombings have killed,everyone knows officials stats are always altered to suit the puropse of whomever is using them...

---

Spot on, mate. U.S. foreign policy reeks of contradiction, hypocrisy and downright dishonesty. It is strange how so few people talk about the original reasons for going to war, and all this time later the military death toll is creeping towards the 3000 mark! There wasnt even a UN passed resolution to go to war! It was done unilaterally and of course Blair had to jump on board for the ride!

I think the only reason America has not done so much to tackle North Korea, is the highly unstable nature of the regime. North Korea could obliterate Seoul within minutes of a declaration of war. They could also target Japan and China. Though very poor, North Korea has a huge peoples army and compared to Iraq is far superior. Economically it would be a huge task to fund a region with a broken down North Korea. The US would have to foot that bill. America is not invading North Korea any time soon! Trust me! ;D ;)

You are correct,North Korea has like an army of 1.5million....still though,America wants to impose it's own brand of democracy on the world etc so why not go ahead and try? And Iraq was supposed to be able to launch weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes was it not?! Blair is a cocksucker too..

Again,try,the UN did not even sanction the war but then again,I ask you,who is the UN's biggest financier?? Have a guess.... ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

You are correct,North Korea has like an army of 1.5million....still though,America wants to impose it's own brand of democracy on the world etc so why not go ahead and try? And Iraq was supposed to be able to launch weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes was it not?! Blair is a cocksucker too..

Again,try,the UN did not even sanction the war but then again,I ask you,who is the UN's biggest financier?? Have a guess.... ;D

---

Its not David Icke is it? ;D

As for the US trying to impose its own brand of democracy, well, Bush's time is nearly up and with the situation in Iraq failing to show development I highly doubt another regime change is on the cards. Too costly. Way too costly, in terms of cash and returning body bags. The returning body bags are so few in comparison with the number of Iraqi dead though. Unbelievable blood shed. An utter travesty!!! :(

A travesty but I don't see how a cnahge of regime will do anything to be honest,I cannot really think of any USA PM (not in a while anyway_ who has not attempted to impose his countries will on another country,regardless of where it is. And Bush is a weirdo with all his skull and Bones background etc. I don't know if you're interested in this type of thing Miles but you seem like an intelligent old man,so I suggest reading up some of Alex Jones ideas/theories. He really exposes the US governement and although one may not agree with ALL of his ideas,alot of his theories certainly make sense!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

A travesty but I don't see how a cnahge of regime will do anything to be honest,I cannot really think of any USA PM (not in a while anyway_ who has not attempted to impose his countries will on another country,regardless of where it is. And Bush is a weirdo with all his skull and Bones background etc. I don't know if you're interested in this type of thing Miles but you seem like an intelligent old man,so I suggest reading up some of Alex Jones ideas/theories. He really exposes the US governement and although one may not agree with ALL of his ideas,alot of his theories certainly make sense!

---

The best thing to hope for would be to get the Republicans out of office ASAP!! Cronies like Cheney and Rumsfeld have been around for far too long. Get them out of office and let them die off quietly!! Ive not heard of Alex Jones...Is there much on this guy on the internet? That would be my first stop off point. Im ready to listen to any sensible theory, but its a theory that can be supported with decent evidence that interests me more. I will have a search or two...

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

---

Don't misunderstand me I know he's responsible for the deaths of many many more, my point is he was charged with killing 137 Kurds.

You also have to conclude that if it is right and proper for the Americans to inflict casualties on Iraqi civilians to further their own self interests then surely its hypocrisy to say that Saddam's killings of civilians is more wrong?

At least Saddam was the legal ruler of Iraq and was operating to defend his own rule and government in his own country.

America kills millions of civilians in lands that arn't even theirs.

Saddam authorised the killing of civilians in reponse to an assassination attempt on his life. He was cracking down on terrorism, no different to the Americans, the Jews or anybody else.

How can you say one is evil and wrong wheras the others are doing the necessary thing?

It's all bullshit. Yes Saddam was an evil monster, but SO is George Bush!

In fact Bush is worse because he operates behind this mask of Christian self righteousness when he's most likely a servant of the devil. >:mad

Try searching his name on google etc and search prison planet too,I think that is the name of his site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

---

I'm not saying I don't agree with the execution of Saddam but neither Bush nor any other leading political figure who has sanctioned the bombing of other countries and stained it with even more loss of human life has the right to judge other leaders.

What about the Chinese regime which sanctioned the killings of families which had more than 1 child or something along those lines? SHould they not be executed too? There are millions of examples and as mentioned before,Bish himself should be taken to a war crime committee.

And again,I stress,Saddam was an evil man and sanctioned killings of innocents and Bilbo did under estimate the use of chemical weapons on the town of Halabja I think it was but Bush is NOT one to pass judgements on others.

Just as the reasons for invading Afganistan were weak and feeble with the stated goal yet to be achieved,a similar situation has occurred in Iraq on a larger scale.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

---

Don't misunderstand me I know he's responsible for the deaths of many many more, my point is he was charged with killing 137 Kurds.

You also have to conclude that if it is right and proper for the Americans to inflict casualties on Iraqi civilians to further their own self interests then surely its hypocrisy to say that Saddam's killings of civilians is more wrong?

At least Saddam was the legal ruler of Iraq and was operating to defend his own rule and government in his own country.

America kills millions of civilians in lands that arn't even theirs.

Saddam authorised the killing of civilians in reponse to an assassination attempt on his life. He was cracking down on terrorism, no different to the Americans, the Jews or anybody else.

How can you say one is evil and wrong wheras the others are doing the necessary thing?

It's all bullshit. Yes Saddam was an evil monster, but SO is George Bush!

In fact Bush is worse because he operates behind this mask of Christian self righteousness when he's most likely a servant of the devil. >:mad

---

he was also charged with the killings of thousands of kurds, but don't what happened with that.
the killings of shias is not a problem to me,almost all those were his own people if not all. But why kill 1 year old kurds. kurds are not arabs so he was not the ruler of kurdistan, north iraq.
i am not stupid i know the trial wasn't fair, but what he did to kurds wasn't fair either. so since i am a kurd myself he can f****** burn in hell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

---

Don't misunderstand me I know he's responsible for the deaths of many many more, my point is he was charged with killing 137 Kurds.

You also have to conclude that if it is right and proper for the Americans to inflict casualties on Iraqi civilians to further their own self interests then surely its hypocrisy to say that Saddam's killings of civilians is more wrong?

At least Saddam was the legal ruler of Iraq and was operating to defend his own rule and government in his own country.

America kills millions of civilians in lands that arn't even theirs.

Saddam authorised the killing of civilians in reponse to an assassination attempt on his life. He was cracking down on terrorism, no different to the Americans, the Jews or anybody else.

How can you say one is evil and wrong wheras the others are doing the necessary thing?

It's all bullshit. Yes Saddam was an evil monster, but SO is George Bush!

In fact Bush is worse because he operates behind this mask of Christian self righteousness when he's most likely a servant of the devil. >:mad

---

A horrible thread really, but you post very adroitly Mr Bilbo :coolclick: to you sir!

anone idea when the film of him getting hun will be on the net to download?

There ain't enough rope in the world for ALL the people who need to be hanged.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

Try searching his name on google etc and search prison planet too,I think that is the name of his site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

---

I'm not saying I don't agree with the execution of Saddam but neither Bush nor any other leading political figure who has sanctioned the bombing of other countries and stained it with even more loss of human life has the right to judge other leaders.

What about the Chinese regime which sanctioned the killings of families which had more than 1 child or something along those lines? SHould they not be executed too? There are millions of examples and as mentioned before,Bish himself should be taken to a war crime committee.

And again,I stress,Saddam was an evil man and sanctioned killings of innocents and Bilbo did under estimate the use of chemical weapons on the town of Halabja I think it was but Bush is NOT one to pass judgements on others.

Just as the reasons for invading Afganistan were weak and feeble with the stated goal yet to be achieved,a similar situation has occurred in Iraq on a larger scale.

---

i understand what your saying about wars, but i am a kurd so it's only natural for me to have hate towards that scum.

bilbo i have nothing against you :), the comment of 100 kurds made me laugh that is all.

i'll give you a cc. :coolclick:

Sorry dude,I meant no offence,like I said,Saddam was not a nice man and I understand where you are coming from.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

Try searching his name on google etc and search prison planet too,I think that is the name of his site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

---

I'm not saying I don't agree with the execution of Saddam but neither Bush nor any other leading political figure who has sanctioned the bombing of other countries and stained it with even more loss of human life has the right to judge other leaders.

What about the Chinese regime which sanctioned the killings of families which had more than 1 child or something along those lines? SHould they not be executed too? There are millions of examples and as mentioned before,Bish himself should be taken to a war crime committee.

And again,I stress,Saddam was an evil man and sanctioned killings of innocents and Bilbo did under estimate the use of chemical weapons on the town of Halabja I think it was but Bush is NOT one to pass judgements on others.

Just as the reasons for invading Afganistan were weak and feeble with the stated goal yet to be achieved,a similar situation has occurred in Iraq on a larger scale.

---

i understand what your saying about wars, but i am a kurd so it's only natural for me to have hate towards that scum.

bilbo i have nothing against you :), the comment of 100 kurds made me laugh that is all.

i'll give you a cc. :coolclick:

---

Hey Iron, have a :coolclick: back friend.

To be honest as a Kurd yourself then you obviously have more right to hate Saddam than anybody.

Don't misunderstand me I'm not saying he didn't deserve justice and what he did to your people was clearly despicable but I don't believe for a second that George Bush is any better.

He has the blood of far more innocents on his own hands and for Saddam's death to be seen as some kind of moral victory in these circumstances is just plain wrong.

One war mongering cruel despot whose interests were local and limited to his own self rule around his own country has been killed and deposed by another war mongering cruel despot whose interests and ambitions are global, and who wants to spread his rule and dominion over the whole entire earth.

As a middle earth resident permit me the use of this analogy, Saddam was a petty Orc warlord, the kind who maybe had a small army of goblins and orc scirmishers and ruled a tiny kingdom in one of the Misty Mountains.

He has now been killed and his army taken over by Sauron the Dark Lord of Morder ;)

Oh and cc returned Miles ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

Sorry dude,I meant no offence,like I said,Saddam was not a nice man and I understand where you are coming from.

---

it's cool

Just read on bbc news website since his death

One car bomb at a market in Kufa killed at least 31, then another 37 at least more were killed in two blasts in the Hurria.

As John Simpson said in his report here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/6219861.stm

'the revenge attacks have already started, at least 77 people were killed today in 4 car bombs across Iraq, to add to Saddam's life'.

Yup, so bloody worth it, well done Mr Bush :'(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

Try searching his name on google etc and search prison planet too,I think that is the name of his site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IRON

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wacko3205

Where the fwock is Lyle when you need him. ;D

---

you don't need lyle for this, i agree with you

bilbo made me laugh when he said he only killed 100 kurds, this a****** killed over 5000 kurds in one town alone with the poison gas attack.

---

I'm not saying I don't agree with the execution of Saddam but neither Bush nor any other leading political figure who has sanctioned the bombing of other countries and stained it with even more loss of human life has the right to judge other leaders.

What about the Chinese regime which sanctioned the killings of families which had more than 1 child or something along those lines? SHould they not be executed too? There are millions of examples and as mentioned before,Bish himself should be taken to a war crime committee.

And again,I stress,Saddam was an evil man and sanctioned killings of innocents and Bilbo did under estimate the use of chemical weapons on the town of Halabja I think it was but Bush is NOT one to pass judgements on others.

Just as the reasons for invading Afganistan were weak and feeble with the stated goal yet to be achieved,a similar situation has occurred in Iraq on a larger scale.

---

yes, i


i understand what your saying about wars, but i am a kurd so it's only natural for me to have hate towards that scum.

bilbo i have nothing against you :), the comment of 100 kurds made me laugh that is all.

i'll give you a cc. :coolclick:

---

Hey Iron, have a :coolclick: back friend.

To be honest as a Kurd yourself then you obviously have more right to hate Saddam than anybody.

Don't misunderstand me I'm not saying he didn't deserve justice and what he did to your people was clearly despicable but I don't believe for a second that George Bush is any better.

He has the blood of far more innocents on his own hands and for Saddam's death to be seen as some kind of moral victory in these circumstances is just plain wrong.

One war mongering cruel despot whose interests were local and limited to his own self rule around his own country has been killed and deposed by another war mongering cruel despot whose interests and ambitions are global, and who wants to spread his rule and dominion over the whole entire earth.

As a middle earth resident permit me the use of this analogy, Saddam was a petty Orc warlord, the kind who maybe had a small army of goblins and orc scirmishers and ruled a tiny kingdom in one of the Misty Mountains.

He has now been killed and his army taken over by Sauron the Dark Lord of Morder ;)

---

yes, i understand what your saying

Here's the thing...& let's be realistic...Bush aint anywhere near as bad as Saddam.

That's a ridiculous statement. No offence...because everyone is entitled to an opinion.

The thing is...Bush ain't just one man running the show & the war doesn't get made just by the Prez. Anyone that follows politics abroad knows this. There's a cabinet & a governing body...who, YES, can be manipulated...but there is a huge difference.

Granted, I do not agree with Bush & the cabinet & all the goings on in Iraq...but Saddam is a dictator that murdered men women & children...not to mention his own people...& let's not forget that he was the triggerman in many slayings.

Bush gave the word & the legions followed...but Saddam was a madman & no matter what anyone says...the had WMD's. They'll be sitting somewhere in Syria or Iran right about now.

War is a horrible horrible thing...but one man is not an army...& that includes the President.

A murdering dictator is a totall different thing.

I ain't a patriot or a die hard or even a peace crazy opposer...but Hussein got what he deserved...they could have sweetened the punch & turned that shit into a stoning with all the people that he hurt involved...but his exectution would have lasted years.

I say good riddance to that piece of shit.

I don't mind anything you said Wack and you know you're the man imo BUT firstly regardless of whom gave the orders,Bush is the president therefore has some power at least and secondly,

"the had WMD's. They'll be sitting somewhere in Syria or Iran right about now."

Thats a pile of shat..you really think Saddam,if he did have them,would have them moved firstly,secondly have them moved without alllllllllllllll those satellites which USA has in place not realising,and third,if he actually had them,don't you think he would have passed them to loyalists to use in case he was caught?

And if you don't believe any of those,all I need to say is that anyone thinks Saddam would have WMD and NOT USE THEM ON ISRAEL/other enemies,then seriously,you're deluding yourself.

And you cannot say Bush is not as bad as Saddam just because Saddam attacked his own people....Bush attacked Afghanis,Iraqi and is most probably in his little Skull and Bones meetings figuring out how to start a war with Iran and Syria...Granted Saddam is worse now but Bush seems to have a LOOOOOOONG term plan for the "war on terror"....

Have avoided comments already made in this thread so not tainted by opinion WHICH I USUALLY AVOID as im a bit of a head in the sand kinda guy...

but just watched the filiming of putting the loose around his neck and to be honest it didnt make me feel good :-\

and does it really make an difference to anything apart from a negative slant on the propaganda

they kill people and and film it and its bad.

we do it and its good.

sorry i just dont get it... but dont ask me for answers as im only going on my feeling of what ive just seen and plan to stick my head right back in the sand.

Clinton was impeached for lying about getting a nobjob. What the hell does bush have to do wrong that he already hasn't to be impeached and why the fuck did he get re-elected in the first place?

u guys remember couple years back when they showed DEAD photo of his sons like in magazines?????? WTF was up with that??????

i was at Downtown Spearmint Rhino with my entourage after partying and clubbing hard we roll there to sober up before driving back to our cribs. so this bangin pinay/viet/french stripper starts "HOOKING" me up in the VIP room and just when im bout to tell her its cool i gotta go now the DJ announces: "This just in....... we caught that bastard! Saddam Hussein is now captured, 6FREE LAP DANCES for everyone currently getting a lap dance!"

;D thats right biotchez!

Another thing is americans aren't all for this war in iraq. We're behind the troops over there but not the war. Probably the only people over here who support the war are those making money off of it which isn't gonna matter much once the debt gets high enough our money will be worth absolute crap anywhere else in the world.

I've got some Saddam Hussein T-Shirts if anyone wants one.

They're a bit tight around the neck, but they hang well.


;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by X

I've got some Saddam Hussein T-Shirts if anyone wants one.

They're a bit tight around the neck, but they hang well.


;D

---

;D