-
Worst decisions of 2006?
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
The Toney: Peter decision made absolutely no sense to me. I had Toney leading and landing with the jab and consistently outlanding Peter. Toney won by 4 points IMO....
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
CC, good call, that one slipped my mind
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
Hatton won that fight by 2 rounds IMO....a tough fight, but the KD made the world of difference...
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by miles
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
CC, good call, that one slipped my mind
cc back
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
more people had hatton winning it was close but i think hatton edged it and that certainly shouldnt be one of worse decisions of 2006
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
I had Spinks, Lacy, and Peter all winning. Spinks and Lacy weren't even questionable IMO. I had Peter up by a round, but I could see that decision being questioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
I had Ricky winning the fight. He looked pretty bad, but the first round knockdown made the fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
Good lord, WHAT A HORRIBLE DECISION!!! No wonder Ike doesn't like fighting here. CC to you for choosing the worst decision of the year.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
yeah that was just shocking, cc in 24
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by albsur2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
I had Spinks, Lacy, and Peter all winning. Spinks and Lacy weren't even questionable IMO. I had Peter up by a round, but I could see that decision being questioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
I had Ricky winning the fight. He looked pretty bad, but the first round knockdown made the fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
Good lord, WHAT A HORRIBLE DECISION!!! No wonder Ike doesn't like fighting here. CC to you for choosing the worst decision of the year.
cc bro and cc back in 24 preme already clicked you today bro
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
I will say Erik Morales' decision to fight Manny Pacquiao again as well as Holyfield's decision to keep fighting.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Ike Quartey-Vernon Forrest- A fucking disgrace
Luis Collazo-Ricky Hatton- Why you think Hatton went back on his word about a rematch?
Edison Miranda-Arthur Abraham- Fuck the scores. Abraham said he didn't want to fight
Juan Manuel Marquez-Chris John- What the fuck was Marquez was doing in Indonesia?
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Yeah,I agree with tHE Abraham fight,he was shaking his head the ref after the headbutt but the ref said fight on ANd his corner seemed to be forcing him too!!
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by albsur2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
I had Spinks, Lacy, and Peter all winning. Spinks and Lacy weren't even questionable IMO. I had Peter up by a round, but I could see that decision being questioned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
I had Ricky winning the fight. He looked pretty bad, but the first round knockdown made the fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
vernon forrest vs ike quartey
Good lord, WHAT A HORRIBLE DECISION!!! No wonder Ike doesn't like fighting here. CC to you for choosing the worst decision of the year.
Lacy and Spinks winning?
Peace Man! ::**
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Oh, abraham was loosing everithing he evered faded
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
was wrightvs taylor 06? if it was then thats my pick.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm2681
was wrightvs taylor 06? if it was then thats my pick.
that was a fight that could of gone either way not really worse decision of 2006 bro
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
imo winky never took the fight to taylor at all and if you want to take a title away from a champ you do everything you can in the ring to do so. winky didnt do that! i remember watching that fight and thinking winky might have hurt talor a couple of times and then he would move to the other side of the ring instead of trying to maybe follow up on something! taylor came forqward all night landed the bigger punches and did not deserve a draw on his record. imo it was a taylor ud. i thought it was a bad call.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by elreymatador
BRIAN VILLORIA VS OMAR NINO ROMERO
RICKY HATTON VS LUIS COLLAZO
Is your caps lock button broken or do you just think it adds weight to your post rather than making look like a complete idiot?
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
b
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
You must be related to Eastman or something, because at the most he won 4 rounds. It was an easy win for Abraham. Stop making a fool of yourself by arguing
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
b
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoitsdan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotten Apple
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmanoutofshape
Eastman vs Abraham close but Eastman took it in Germany. Not the most fair country, look at the times Ottke took the home decision.
You need to watch the fight again. Eastman did not win that fight
Its true, Abraham would have won that night if they were fighting in the street, let alone germany. Hometown decisions are a probalem in germany but it damn sure wasn't that night.
Abraham was very vert dirty - please never accept a guy trying to win by foul - Abraham was losing by at least five points if he fougt like a man and not like a child.
You must be related to Eastman or something, because at the most he won 4 rounds. It was an easy win for Abraham. Stop making a fool of yourself by arguing
Agreed. Eastman was handled by Abraham.
Also...I've watched the Abraham Miranda fight over & over & over...& Miranda wasn't robbed. Abraham won that fight. That being said...I don't think that he should have been forced to continue...but he did & Miranda was throwing low & did use his head (admittedly) against Abraham.
I love Miranda's power...but he's raw & he did fight dirty.
The thing is...without the broken jaw or the controversy of the numerous points the drama wouldn't have been there...but points deducted or not...broken jaw or not...Abraham won.
As far as what I see as the worst calls of the year?
Wright vs Taylor (I was as disgusted as Wright was. Taylor seems 2 just get by with the judges help :-X )
Urango vs Rabah (It was a fwockin Rabah-ree. Heh heh heh. Bad joke ;D )
Forrest vs Quartey (Straight up...I honestly wanted to cry for Ike.)
Lacy vs Tsypko (Truly...Calzaghe has ruined Lacy...no doubt, he's mentally wasted)
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm2681
imo winky never took the fight to taylor at all and if you want to take a title away from a champ you do everything you can in the ring to do so. winky didnt do that! i remember watching that fight and thinking winky might have hurt talor a couple of times and then he would move to the other side of the ring instead of trying to maybe follow up on something! taylor came forqward all night landed the bigger punches and did not deserve a draw on his record. imo it was a taylor ud. i thought it was a bad call.
I dont know what fight you were watching but Winky forced much of the action, and was walking forward alot. He landed alot more shots, and despite what everyone says he fought the last round, just not the last minute of it, which was fine because Taylor didnt do anything in the last round. You do have to take the title from the champ, but if he wants to keep it he needs to do something to show he wants to keep it. It wasn't a robbery though, close enough that the judges are entitled to their opinions.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by global
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm2681
imo winky never took the fight to taylor at all and if you want to take a title away from a champ you do everything you can in the ring to do so. winky didnt do that! i remember watching that fight and thinking winky might have hurt talor a couple of times and then he would move to the other side of the ring instead of trying to maybe follow up on something! taylor came forqward all night landed the bigger punches and did not deserve a draw on his record. imo it was a taylor ud. i thought it was a bad call.
I dont know what fight you were watching but Winky forced much of the action, and was walking forward alot. He landed alot more shots, and despite what everyone says he fought the last round, just not the last minute of it, which was fine because Taylor didnt do anything in the last round. You do have to take the title from the champ, but if he wants to keep it he needs to do something to show he wants to keep it.
An Error Has Occurred!
Sorry global, wacko can't repeat a karma action without waiting 24 hours...but I owez ya another :coolclick:
Very well said. Wright won the fight...HBO gave Taylor the draw.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote:
Originally Posted by global
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjm2681
imo winky never took the fight to taylor at all and if you want to take a title away from a champ you do everything you can in the ring to do so. winky didnt do that! i remember watching that fight and thinking winky might have hurt talor a couple of times and then he would move to the other side of the ring instead of trying to maybe follow up on something! taylor came forqward all night landed the bigger punches and did not deserve a draw on his record. imo it was a taylor ud. i thought it was a bad call.
I dont know what fight you were watching but Winky forced much of the action, and was walking forward alot. He landed alot more shots, and despite what everyone says he fought the last round, just not the last minute of it, which was fine because Taylor didnt do anything in the last round. You do have to take the title from the champ, but if he wants to keep it he needs to do something to show he wants to keep it.
An Error Has Occurred!
Sorry global, wacko can't repeat a karma action without waiting 24 hours...but I owez ya another :coolclick:
Very well said. Wright won the fight...HBO gave Taylor the draw.
Jim watts on SSP had taylor winning by two rounds lol...
personaly thought winky won without question, but how taylor was given the last round was totaly beoynd me.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Tommy
Here is a few of the worst decisions IMO in 2006
- Cory Spinks vs. Roman Karmazin
- Jeff Lacy vs. Vitali Tsypko
- Sam Peter vs. James Toney
Yours?
I had Toney up by 1...I would have even been satisfied with a draw....
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
TBH I could see how it could have been a draw or a win for either... Boxing is often not as clear cut as win/loss... people are trying to get things done in a round... pursueing goals and testing each other... depends on what the judges and you score for... never been clearer than in a fight with such a clash of styles either... Each went out and did what the wanted to do to a good degree... Peter was able to Bully Toney and Toney was able to score the cleaner shots and score good counters.
Personally I scored for Toney but I can understand why some one would score for Peter... Toney was Landing better but Peter was controlling the canvas...
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
i got one;
Pac choosing top rank over GBP
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
allowing winky wright to get away with a draw............
taylor clearly had that fight won by AT LEAST 2 rounds
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Ike Quartey-Vernon Forrest- A fucking disgrace
Luis Collazo-Ricky Hatton- Why you think Hatton went back on his word about a rematch?Edison Miranda-Arthur Abraham- Fuck the scores. Abraham said he didn't want to fight
Juan Manuel Marquez-Chris John- What the fuck was Marquez was doing in Indonesia?
Cos he already beat him. I'm sure if Collazo could go down to Light Welter, Hatton would gladly fight him. You're gunna argue that Collazo isn't a light-weler aren't you??
Well Hatton aint a welter so there ya go.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Ike Quartey-Vernon Forrest- A fucking disgrace
Luis Collazo-Ricky Hatton- Why you think Hatton went back on his word about a rematch?Edison Miranda-Arthur Abraham- Fuck the scores. Abraham said he didn't want to fight
Juan Manuel Marquez-Chris John- What the fuck was Marquez was doing in Indonesia?
Cos he already beat him. I'm sure if Collazo could go down to Light Welter, Hatton would gladly fight him. You're gunna argue that Collazo isn't a light-weler aren't you??
Well Hatton aint a welter so there ya go.
No matter what you say it don't change the fact that Hatton opened his big mouth and said he'll give Collazo a rematch. "Collazo deserves the right to try and win his title back." Is what Hatton said. That's a welterweight title. Not Light welter.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Ike Quartey-Vernon Forrest- A fucking disgrace
Luis Collazo-Ricky Hatton- Why you think Hatton went back on his word about a rematch?Edison Miranda-Arthur Abraham- Fuck the scores. Abraham said he didn't want to fight
Juan Manuel Marquez-Chris John- What the fuck was Marquez was doing in Indonesia?
Cos he already beat him. I'm sure if Collazo could go down to Light Welter, Hatton would gladly fight him. You're gunna argue that Collazo isn't a light-weler aren't you??
Well Hatton aint a welter so there ya go.
No matter what you say it don't change the fact that Hatton opened his big mouth and said he'll give Collazo a rematch. "Collazo deserves the right to try and win his title back." Is what Hatton said.
That's a welterweight title. Not Light welter.
Well smart arse if he wants his title back why doesn't he go and ask Mr Cotto for it back? Why the fuck does he deserve the right? He lost. End of. You don't deserve the right for another shot just because you did quite well.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Ike Quartey-Vernon Forrest- A fucking disgrace
Luis Collazo-Ricky Hatton- Why you think Hatton went back on his word about a rematch?Edison Miranda-Arthur Abraham- Fuck the scores. Abraham said he didn't want to fight
Juan Manuel Marquez-Chris John- What the fuck was Marquez was doing in Indonesia?
Cos he already beat him. I'm sure if Collazo could go down to Light Welter, Hatton would gladly fight him. You're gunna argue that Collazo isn't a light-weler aren't you??
Well Hatton aint a welter so there ya go.
No matter what you say it don't change the fact that Hatton opened his big mouth and said he'll give Collazo a rematch. "Collazo deserves the right to try and win his title back." Is what Hatton said.
That's a welterweight title. Not Light welter.
Well smart arse if he wants his title back why doesn't he go and ask Mr Cotto for it back? Why the fuck does he deserve the right? He lost. End of. You don't deserve the right for another shot just because you did quite well.
I really could care less if Collazo gets another title shot or not. But how about you man-up and answer this question. Why give your word your going to give somebody a rematch and than back out like a bitch? It ain't like he backed out to take a big fight, instead. Cuz Urango ain't a big fight.
-
Re: Worst decisions of 2006?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Ike Quartey-Vernon Forrest- A fucking disgrace
Luis Collazo-Ricky Hatton- Why you think Hatton went back on his word about a rematch?Edison Miranda-Arthur Abraham- Fuck the scores. Abraham said he didn't want to fight
Juan Manuel Marquez-Chris John- What the fuck was Marquez was doing in Indonesia?
Cos he already beat him. I'm sure if Collazo could go down to Light Welter, Hatton would gladly fight him. You're gunna argue that Collazo isn't a light-weler aren't you??
Well Hatton aint a welter so there ya go.
No matter what you say it don't change the fact that Hatton opened his big mouth and said he'll give Collazo a rematch. "Collazo deserves the right to try and win his title back." Is what Hatton said.
That's a welterweight title. Not Light welter.
Well smart arse if he wants his title back why doesn't he go and ask Mr Cotto for it back? Why the fuck does he deserve the right? He lost. End of. You don't deserve the right for another shot just because you did quite well.
I really could care less if Collazo gets another title shot or not. But how about you man-up and answer this question. Why give your word your going to give somebody a rematch and than back out like a bitch? It ain't like he backed out to take a big fight, instead. Cuz Urango ain't a big fight.
I agree with you about Urango. Thats a strange fight to me. Hatton admitted in his autobiography that he didnt want to fight Collazo again. Billy Graham (his trainer) seriously advised him against fighting at welter but HBO pretty much cut every other option off and Hatton already being inactive for 6 or so months, didn't want to lose the fight date.....so in his own words he decided to be Billy Big Bollocks. The plan was never for him to fight at welter in the 1st place. That was HBO's fault....and to a degree Hatton's fault.
AS it happens the fight turned out to be very very tough (just like billy graham said it would) and Billy being his caring trainer and all, advised him to swiftly move his arse back down to light welter. There would be no point in a rematch because hatton did win fair and square (i know it was close) abd after Collazo there isn't anything else at welter which is plausable. Cotto, Margarito, Baldomir are all far too big and strong for him. Besides fights with Castillo, Corrales and now possibly Witter await him at light welter which are all obviously more appealing.
Hatton aint stupid. He wants that 0 to remain on his record because thats how he is most likely to get to Mayweather. He aint guna risk losing it at Welter, covering old ground. He said himself he doesn;t wanna be boxing past 30 and only see's 5 or so fights left for him, and they look like being, Urango, Castillo, Corrales, Mayweather and maybe Cotto or Witter.
As for sayin he would fight Collazo again, Hatton has admitted that he did sort of just agree to it without thinking and mainly because Collazo wudnt shut up about it and King kept Waving them fucking flags while blurting 'only in America!'
Cool click VD for a decent argument. Ya kept me awake, cheers,
