http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOFyD5n-yEI
Printable View
OH SNAAAAAP!!!
Killer ! CC #266 O0Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDukeof74
sweet, cc duke
meh, they shuda hung the guy filming it after for doing such a lame ass job.
If it's one thing I can't watch is someone being killed. I've seen one too many deaths in person.
I started to watch it, but came to the conclusion that I don’t like the fuckers doing the hanging anymore then I like Saddam ,, . its so 18th century , I am all about living today, modern times, I could give two flips about those 3rd world mutherfuckers ,, They just barbarians.. Raping and pillaging each other.. Fuckem all ! O0Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Hahahaha they will probably have Osama on Pay Per View and then Wacko can do the minute by minute ;D
Thought it was a joke vid until i opened the link
sounded like those guys were telling him your place is hell.
saddam says some s*** like you call this bravery.
Dammm....
Honestly had no desire to watch it but it was there why not? Thought I would feel a little guilty but really didn't. The guy was the worst of the worst.
Not worse then our president...Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Listen, I hate Bush but that's bullshit. I can go out in the street and scream FUCK BUSH all I want and not think twice. There that was liable to get you and your family killed. He unleashed poisonous gas on whole villages for fucks sake. Bush is a terrible person I understand that but saying that Sadaam is no worse then Bush is seriously some ignorant stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by P.G.H Angel Eyes
Just because Bush is not in Iraq doing it does not mean he is not as bad. How many people have American bombings in Iraq and Afghanistan killed? And there is lots of evidence that America dropped phosphorous bombs in Iraq on Falluja and in Afghanistan so...?Isn't that the usage of chemical weapons? How many people died in that 2 week siege of Fallujah? Fucking wankers did not even let cameras go in,that's how bad it was.Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Who sanctioned all of this? Who said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? Who wanted to go to war with Iraq as soon as he took to office?
The only difference is Saddam was openly an evil,sick man,Bush is not so open about it but it does not make him any less evil the fucking prick.
Since the war has started,how many civilians have been killed? 52563-58148...(my source http://www.iraqbodycount.org/). Shouldn't Bush or some motherfucker be held accountable for that?
Actually you can't say what you want. You may jokingly go out on the streets and say bush wants shooting OR but a bounty of his head like he did for OBL and it's an arrestible offence.Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
Yes he poisoned villagers=bad, western sanctions on iraq causing 500,000 deaths=? bombing civilians=?
I dunno how he got re-elected or even elected in the first place.
I hear ya my brothaQuote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
seen one too many people get killed in front of me
I rather not see that anymore, in video or in person
and you're next my Canadian friend.
as in sess right my sweet?
it has been awhile that you have paid any attention to me
You know it's going tits up when:
1. We in the UK don't do anything despite the death penalty being illegal here.
2. Somehow, our glorious leaders linked him with the war on Terror (whatever that means) when he had nothing to do with any terrorist activity outside his own country - and certainly not 9/11 or London and Madrid.
3. Saddam gets done for crimes against humanity, when our invading force into a sovereign country has terrorised (there's that word again) and killed over half a million civilians.
4. He gets done for gassing civilians, when we just attack them with missiles and call it collateral damage.
5. We in the west armed and supported him and kept him on power for over 20 years
6. We invaded him because he tortured people and imprisoned them without trial. Then we did the same in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.
7.Our occupation troops routinely refer to the Iraquis as filthy towelheads, sand niggers etc (and so do some people on this board). Hearts and Minds, eh? We've done well there.
8. We invaded him the second time because he had WMD (ha!), was a trynannical dictator, did not allow any democracy, presided over a system of corrupt judges etc. Yet we don't invade Kim Il Jung in North Korea. What is the obvious answer to every tinpot third world nutter ...... make sure you actually DO have WMD and nobody will dare attack you. maybe those Iranians aren't stupid after all!
and finally
9. When a mass-murdering megolomaniac dictator has more dignity and courage facing death, than the cowards that we have now decided to put in place to replace him.
Didn't see them shouting 'Muqtadr' too much when Saddam was in power, but it must serve the interests of jihad to do so to an unarmed, bound 70year old who is about to die
Do you see what we have done ... we have cocked this up so much we have made that psycho a martyr.
I like wars, generally - we Brits are very very warlike .......... but this one stinks and I feel consistently lied to. If they remade Apocalypse Now about the Iraq war, Marlon would not be quoting 'The horror, the horror', it would be 'The hypocrisy, the hypocrisy'
Did you know that in Britain and the US it is illegal to lie to a government official, but not for the government to lie to the people?
X ya little tiot, how the hell R you? It has been awhile that I get the pleasure of reading that blue font of yours. anyhooQuote:
Originally Posted by X
can you tell me what is the source for the 500,000 dead iraquis? There has been a story that varies a bit from time to time, but it basically says that sanctions caused 500,000 iraqui children to die. The source most often quoted is UNICEF but that report, I could not find it on their website. Someone gave me this link http://www.unicef.org.uk/index_s.asp...news/iraq1.htm, and it did not work. again, I searched on their website and was unable to find anything.
I am beginning to suspect that this is an urban legend and in fact bogus. BUT maybe my darling missy can give us the source of the report.
I really don't know how we let it get that bad. I dunno why the majority of america was convinced to re-elect bush thinking he'd finish the war with alittle more time in office. My favorite line of this reasoning "in a second term he'll have the confidence to pass important bills" ::** . He started his presidency by throwing the surplus right out the window. We'd be in substantial debt even if the war and stuff didn't happen. Thankfully he has to leave office in '08 regardless.
Hi Mad_Dog, happy new year to you. I don't have a source for the 500,000 figure - it's just something that have seen bandied around by talking heads on the TV. It may well be untrue .... but my point was about the fact that we have killed innocent civilians, and probably more than Saddam did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Dog
I don't have the answer to the problem out there, if I did, I would be shouting it from the rooftops, but I'm pretty sure that I would have mishandled things less badly than the idiots running our respective countries.
X
I have long suspected that you and I are in fact the same person
Are you the grandmaster of the Priory of Sion?
the ol M_D is slowly getting to the bottom of this yeeshew
it appears that this figure originated from UNICEF but there was misrepresentation of facts that even UNICEF had to clarify itself. Seems like this 500K figure is a bogus one. The ol M_D will return with resources as soon as his family responsibilities allow
in the mean time, feel free to call each other faigs and what not.
hey missy baby
can you empty your inbox, been trying to pm you with words of my undying love and I have been unsuccessful
either that or you blocked me
consider my box cleared for you 8)
ooooh double entendre so to speak!!!!
this is hot on so many levels
Son of a bitch!!!
I didn't get to SEE him die, I only got to hear it. Mayaan!! :(