-
Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
I've heard a lot about guys who have had amazing amateur careers, won Olympic medals and other championships, but just didn't make the transition to professional very well and fell far short of their potential.
What about vice versa? Does anyone know of any fighters who had bad or average amateur careers but went on to be great in the pros?
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
I've heard a lot about guys who have had amazing amateur careers, won Olympic medals and other championships, but just didn't make the transition to professional very well and fell far short of their potential.
What about vice versa? Does anyone know of any fighters who had bad or average amateur careers but went on to be great in the pros?
chris eubank
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
A lot of great fighters from other countries had no amateur career at all because the amateur scene in Southern and Central America is nowhere near as developed as it is in the US and throughout Europe. Hopkins had no amateur career, only boxed in prison and was the middleweight champ but I have heard that he only fought a handful of times while in there.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by amat
A lot of great fighters from other countries had no amateur career at all because the amateur scene in Southern and Central America is nowhere near as developed as it is in the US and throughout Europe. Hopkins had no amateur career, only boxed in prison and was the middleweight champ but I have heard that he only fought a handful of times while in there.
Damn thats right I forgot about B-Hop. I doubt I'll find any better examples than him.
Thanks for the replies guys
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
I've heard a lot about guys who have had amazing amateur careers, won Olympic medals and other championships, but just didn't make the transition to professional very well and fell far short of their potential.
What about vice versa? Does anyone know of any fighters who had bad or average amateur careers but went on to be great in the pros?
chris eubank
Chris Eubank was never a great fighter. Eubank and the word "great" do not go together. I doesn't matter how much the UK fans pump him up to be. It's just not true. Wins over club fighters Michael Watson and Thulani Malinga (a fucking gift) are not great accomplishments. Hell the man in all reality loss twice to Ray Close. But was given a gift draw and gift win over him. Just cuz he's foolish enough to think he is, Eubank is not great. Far from it.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Violent demise you dont think your taking the wording just a bit too literally?
Cotto was a pretty ordinary amateur wasnt he?
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis
Violent demise you dont think your taking the wording just a bit too literally?
Cotto was a pretty ordinary amateur wasnt he?
cotto is far from great, as well
7 months from today, and you won't even remember the name "Miguel Cotto."
Judah is gonna trash the prospect, bet the house on it ;)
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Yes I know point taken. But if only GREAT fighters are eligible for discussion its a pretty short and sweet thread isnt it?
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis
Yes I know point taken. But if only GREAT fighters are eligible for discussion its a pretty short and sweet thread isnt it?
agreed.......
there are very few fighters todat that have the potential of being "great"
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Cotto was on the PR olympic team if I am not mistaken.Winky Wrights amatuer career wasnt spectacular.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Winky won the golden gloves, and wasn't eligible for the olympics or he would have been to old so he joined the pro's early, but from all I've heard he was a very good amateur.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
I know he is not great but Welsh feather weight Steve Robinson had only a few amuture fights and went on to win and defend the wbo belt against a few decent fighters before he lost to Naz.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
I just remembered Hasim Rahman. Far from being anywhere close to great, but from what I heard he only had a handful of amateur fights before going pro. He started boxing real late from what I remember.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Yea winky only won the florida golden gloves he never won any national golden glove tournys,and I think he would have had to beat DLH that year to make the olympic team if I am remembering correct.Paul Williams doesnt have a major amatuer background...he says that he had around 30 fights.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Roberto Duran was 13-3 i believe as an amateur,
Julio Caesar Chavez didnt have any amateur experince i dont think
and his JCC Jr. definately doesnt
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis
Violent demise you dont think your taking the wording just a bit too literally?
Cotto was a pretty ordinary amateur wasnt he?
Maybe. But it says what it says.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by frozensolid_702
cotto is far from great, as well
7 months from today, and you Judah won't even remember the name "Miguel Cotto" after he's been KTFO.
Judah is gonna talk trash to the prospect, bet the house on it ;)
Seriously tho...... Judah's best chance is to aim for Miguel's nuts, and then rabbit punch him when he bends over. Oh wait... it didn't work against Mayweather, did it.
;D
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
I doubt many all time greats managed it without amatuer experience. I know Johnny Nelson lost his first 3 pro fights and ended up a world champ.
Thats about as bad a start as you can get.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
I doubt many all time greats managed it without amatuer experience. I know Johnny Nelson lost his first 3 pro fights and ended up a world champ.
Thats about as bad a start as you can get.
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoom
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
I doubt many all time greats managed it without amatuer experience. I know Johnny Nelson lost his first 3 pro fights and ended up a world champ.
Thats about as bad a start as you can get.
And both Marquez Brother lost their debuts
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
I've heard a lot about guys who have had amazing amateur careers, won Olympic medals and other championships, but just didn't make the transition to professional very well and fell far short of their potential.
What about vice versa? Does anyone know of any fighters who had bad or average amateur careers but went on to be great in the pros?
chris eubank
Chris Eubank was never a great fighter. Eubank and the word "great" do not go together. I doesn't matter how much the UK fans pump him up to be. It's just not true. Wins over club fighters Michael Watson and Thulani Malinga (a F****** gift) are not great accomplishments. Hell the man in all reality loss twice to Ray Close. But was given a gift draw and gift win over him. Just cuz he's foolish enough to think he is, Eubank is not great. Far from it.
Michael Watson a club fighter ? He Ko'ed Nigel Benn who was world class, so going by your logic i guess both Benn and Gerald Mcclelan were club fighters too eh ?
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoom
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBoom
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo
I doubt many all time greats managed it without amatuer experience. I know Johnny Nelson lost his first 3 pro fights and ended up a world champ.
Thats about as bad a start as you can get.
And both Marquez Brother lost their debuts
as did Calzaghe and James Toney
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Rocky Marciano had two so-called 'amateur' bouts, I believe.
He was disqualified on both for persistent fouling, and it is fair to say he was heading for defeats as his style was particularly unsuited to amateur 3 rounders.
I would have thought he is the best example of this yet?
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
I thought rocky was 11-3 as an amateur? Either way he is a good example
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Kelly oliver..Three time aba campion.. Only made cruiserweight wbo intercontinental champ...
Also..For me..Clazaghe.. He won the aba's two times wasnt it?.. But hasnt fought the competition he should have..He should have been huge way before now
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito_BHB
Kelly oliver..Three time aba campion.. Only made cruiserweight wbo intercontinental champ...
Also..For me..Clazaghe.. He won the aba's two times wasnt it?.. But hasnt fought the competition he should have..He should have been huge way before now
Calzaghe had a steller amatuer record. I believe he was the only man in British history to win 3 ABA titles at 3 different weights.
It's struck me that possibly the best current example is Anthony Mundine.
I'm not sure if he boxed as an amatuer but he was a top Aussie Rules football player before he turned pro in his twenties. He may not have had any amatuer experience at all, does anyone know? Where's Snakey?
-
Re: Unlikely Great Pro Boxers?
im not sure about his amateur career exactly but im sure kermit cintron didnt have much of an amateur career, as he was a pretty good wrestler in college or some other sport, not sure the exact facts but heard the commentators menton it on one of his fights