-
OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin...
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
really? I don't remember anyone not acknowledging naz's power..i remember "them" once talking about him being able ko light heavys, but his height would have affected his ability to fight that high..but then "they" also said mayorga ko'ed a horse...
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin...
Naz has a chin coz he never got stopped before, Jose Luis Castillo is also known for his chin has been stopped before by a lighter framed CESAR Cobrita Sotto. PAC moving up in weight and maturing "seemed" to strnghthen his chin quite abit, I see PAC stopping NAZ this time.
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated
Naz can't lose to anyone in your eyes ;D how about Tyson vs Naz how would that have gone ;)
Regarding this fight well i might agree that Naz could win because Pacs come forward pressure style could be disaster for Pac.
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP100
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin...
Naz has a chin coz he never got stopped before, Jose Luis Castillo is also known for his chin has been stopped before by a lighter framed CESAR Cobrita Sotto. PAC moving up in weight and maturing "seemed" to strnghthen his chin quite abit,
I see PAC stopping NAZ this time.
you said that as if they've fought before... ;)
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated
Naz can't lose to anyone in your eyes ;D how about Tyson vs Naz how would that have gone ;)
Regarding this fight well i might agree that Naz could win because Pacs come forward pressure style could be disaster for Pac.
I admit he lost to Barrera fare and square but im saying the glove thing did'nt help him mentally he did'nt get time to warm up he did'nt do his flip it was a really bad night for Naz from start to finish but i think Morales and Pac were made for him
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP100
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin...
Naz has a chin coz he never got stopped before, Jose Luis Castillo is also known for his chin has been stopped before by a lighter framed CESAR Cobrita Sotto. PAC moving up in weight and maturing "seemed" to strnghthen his chin quite abit,
I see PAC stopping NAZ this time.
I said it because I honestly thought before that NAZ would beat PAC if they fought.
you said that as if they've fought before... ;)
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated
Naz can't lose to anyone in your eyes ;D how about Tyson vs Naz how would that have gone ;)
Regarding this fight well i might agree that Naz could win because Pacs come forward pressure style could be disaster for Pac.
I admit he lost to Barrera fare and square but im saying the glove thing did'nt help him mentally he did'nt get time to warm up he did'nt do his flip it was a really bad night for Naz from start to finish but i think Morales and Pac were made for him
this stupidity has to stop, the glove thing and he couldnt do the flip...!!!!
why didnt he have time to warm up, him and barrera was under the excact same conditions.. simply another stupid argument..
btw.. naz would get knocked down by pacquiao..
personallyim a huge barrare fan, and prime vs prime, im not totally sure he could beat pacquiao, but one thing is for sure, and that is naz would be out powered by pacquiao, out worked and out speeded.. no chance for naz
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
2 very exciting offensive fighters, that are wide open and have defense pretty low on their priority list in the ring... Lets just say this isin't goint to the judges
Hard to say... Naz had devestating power and cat like reflexes, Pac is reminescent of the Tazmanian Devil just a nonstop pressure punching whirlwind..... definetly would be a FOTY candidate
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Naz is a arrogant, cocky, and slacker.
He got floored by Kelley.
He got bitchslapped by Barrera.
And ofcourse we all know what Pac did to Barrera.
I hated is damn corny half hour ring entrances.
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
2 very exciting offensive fighters, that are wide open and have defense pretty low on their priority list in the ring... Lets just say this isin't goint to the judges
Hard to say... Naz had devestating power and cat like reflexes, Pac is reminescent of the Tazmanian Devil just a nonstop pressure punching whirlwind..... definetly would be a FOTY candidate
no its really not hard to say..
against who did naz have catlike reflexes, against the one and only elite guy he fought, or the huys brought in, to make him look good..??we all know the answer to that one..
the difference is, that while naz looked powerfull and quick against b-level opponents, pac has done it against simply the best..
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatdane
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
2 very exciting offensive fighters, that are wide open and have defense pretty low on their priority list in the ring... Lets just say this isin't goint to the judges
Hard to say... Naz had devestating power and cat like reflexes, Pac is reminescent of the Tazmanian Devil just a nonstop pressure punching whirlwind..... definetly would be a FOTY candidate
no its really not hard to say..
against who did naz have catlike reflexes, against the one and only elite guy he fought, or the huys brought in, to make him look good..??we all know the answer to that one..
the difference is, that while naz looked powerfull and quick against b-level opponents, pac has done it against simply the best..
kevin kelley was more than b-rated
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Kevin Kelley was'nt B rated neither was Medina,Johnson or Vasquez Johnson was number 1 when they met and Vasquez was current WBA champ
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
when i say b-fighters, its compared to what i call a fighters, and at that time a means barrera, marquez and morales..
and lets not forget, that it wasnt prime kelley naz fought.. he was a tought guy, but past his prime..
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Kelley had only lost once
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated
Naz can't lose to anyone in your eyes ;D how about Tyson vs Naz how would that have gone ;)
Regarding this fight well i might agree that Naz could win because Pacs come forward pressure style could be disaster for Pac.
Double KO!!!! ;)
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
heres the comparison:
naz was a entertainer that was protected and hyped.
pac is a entertaining warrior who came up from the brutal battles in asia.
both fighters first true elite fighter they fought was mab.
naz got owned against his first elite.
pac demolished his first elite.
after naz first elite he pretty much prove he had no heart.
after pacs first lose to an elite(morales) he brutally took out the legendary iron chin of morales.
naz has power up until an elite.
pac has power to make the elite quit.
mab took everything naz had.
mab couldn't take anymore of pacs power after the 10th.
ok enough with that, no wait one more.
naz is a clown in the ring.
pac is a proven monster in the ring.
so yea pac knocks him the fwock out cold no doubt.
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
I can't help but think Naz gets some harsh critisism on here
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Kelley had only lost once
cant se what this proves, kelley was not in his prime against naz.. still tough, but not an elite fighter, seems as if you are misreading, i havent stated kelley was a walk over, im saying that kelley wasnt prime, everybody knows this..
julio cesar chavez has only lost 1 before de la hoya.. this proves you can be out of prime, with only 1 loss..
me saying this proves my point as much as yours, its just i faill to se, what it in the end proves..
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Naz had a good chin for sure he only had flash knockdowns against him and some he was off balance he had to take big full blooded shots off Barrera i think Naz could stop the Pacman i think sometimes Naz's power gets underrated
are you serious ??? naz power underrated? its actually overrated who did he knock out worth talking about?
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
pacman crushes dickhead hameds head in till his balls explode
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Bungu,Ingle,Vazquez,Kelley,Johnson,Medina
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYSONBRUNO
Bungu,Ingle,Vazquez,Kelley,Johnson,Medina
ahahahahaha but seriously who ???
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ds91
pacman crushes dickhead hameds head in till his balls explode
:coolclick:
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
He can't be that bad he won WBO,IBF,WBC and beat the guy who was WBA but was stripped because he fought Naz Naz was a good fighter he was recognised as number 1 featherweight for 4 or 5 year
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather
don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin...
I think a lot of it comes down to what period Hamed we are talking about. Hamed was showing more and more flaws the further his career was going. The ego grew, training habits became slack and the Hamed that fought Barrera was really a one trick pony. He could only throw 1 at a time and he was extremely ineffective. Of course Barrera fought the perfect fight, but Hamed showed little of the flair that had become his trademark. I couldnt imagine Pac fighting the style of fight against Naseem that Barrera did. Pac is more open defensively.
Its an intriguing matchup and Ive no way of picking a winner...
:coolclick:, JonesJrMayweather for an interesting thread
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julius Rain
heres the comparison:
naz was a entertainer that was protected and hyped.
pac is a entertaining warrior who came up from the brutal battles in asia.
both fighters first true elite fighter they fought was mab.
naz got owned against his first elite.
pac demolished his first elite.
after naz first elite he pretty much prove he had no heart.
after pacs first lose to an elite(morales) he brutally took out the legendary iron chin of morales.
naz has power up until an elite.
pac has power to make the elite quit.
mab took everything naz had.
mab couldn't take anymore of pacs power after the 10th.
ok enough with that, no wait one more.
naz is a clown in the ring.
pac is a proven monster in the ring.
so yea pac knocks him the fwock out cold no doubt.
nice!
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
Your final statement gave me a grin! :coolclick: ;D
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
for the record, how many times floyd said he would beat the shat out of everybody???? never seen it happen since corrales. and corrales was in a midst of trouble. he did go to jail after that fight.. he had a lot on his mind.. if he wasnt. maybe he could have knocked mayweather to another zip code
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef4334
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
for the record, how many times floyd said he would beat the shat out of everybody???? never seen it happen since corrales. and corrales was in a midst of trouble. he did go to jail after that fight.. he had a lot on his mind.. if he wasnt. maybe he could have knocked mayweather to another zip code
I'm sorry but who the hell are you???? and thanks for validating my above post... Your just bitter because your caterpillar lipped little hero is not PFP#1 Like "Pretty Boy" Floyd Mayweather
Out of my whole post you chose the bottom half which was clearly a wind up and a raz to comment on.. ::** like I said Typical
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
JT said something lighthearted and it was funny, some people need to lighten up!! :-\
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Manny's style was made for Hamed to look spectacular against.
The only person that beat Naseem Hamed Barerra did so by staying away.
I never ever see Pacquiao doing that, he would go right at Hamed. And that plays right into Hamed's style.
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Manny's style was made for Hamed to look spectacular against.
The only person that beat Naseem Hamed Barerra did so by staying away.
I never ever see Pacquiao doing that, he would go right at Hamed. And that plays right into Hamed's style.
yeah pacquiao is gonna lose. pac would never hit hamed, his style will get him knocked out against hamed..
mayweather fans are just too much.. hey manny, please give the FOTY award to mayweather so pbf fan boys could give you a lil credit..
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef4334
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
for the record, how many times floyd said he would beat the shat out of everybody???? never seen it happen since corrales. and corrales was in a midst of trouble. he did go to jail after that fight.. he had a lot on his mind.. if he wasnt. maybe he could have knocked mayweather to another zip code
Listen Junior, Floyd owned the lower weight classes without a doubt, with excellent fundamentals and a wizard like defense... I'm sorry to break your heart but he would be faster than Pac and match his power too... ;)
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef4334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Manny's style was made for Hamed to look spectacular against.
The only person that beat Naseem Hamed Barerra did so by staying away.
I never ever see Pacquiao doing that, he would go right at Hamed. And that plays right into Hamed's style.
yeah pacquiao is gonna lose. pac would never hit hamed, his style will get him knocked out against hamed..
mayweather fans are just too much.. hey manny, please give the FOTY award to mayweather so pbf fan boys could give you a lil credit..
Oh he'd hit Hamed. But the way he fights 9 times out of 10 Hamed knocked out fighters like that.
Pacquiao is one of my favorite fighters but its about style not favoritism. And Pac's style was made for Hamed.
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef4334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Manny's style was made for Hamed to look spectacular against.
The only person that beat Naseem Hamed Barerra did so by staying away.
I never ever see Pacquiao doing that, he would go right at Hamed. And that plays right into Hamed's style.
yeah pacquiao is gonna lose. pac would never hit hamed, his style will get him knocked out against hamed..
mayweather fans are just too much.. hey manny, please give the FOTY award to mayweather so pbf fan boys could give you a lil credit..
Please stop your crying about Pac.... No one discredited him at all, you took a tongue and cheek comment way out of context and now your carrying on with some Pac-man martyr campaign... Please stop the non-sense ;)
-
Re: OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef4334
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Rock
SHEESH!!! They talk about us Mayweather guys are Fanboyz.....
Pac-Fans think the man walks on water and can leap tall buildings in a single bound
Naz fans think he is a superhuman juggernaut that really has a flying carpet...
Instead why dont you concede that it is a hell of a Matchup between to guys that arent exactly conventional or predictable... Mab, Morales are very fundamentallly sound Boxers and very Orthodox... Naz or Pac arent, Pac is very off balance and applies pressure utilizing handspeed and power... Naz is like rubberman avoiding punches and has great power and reflexes, who also is offbalance and shows more angles than anyone Pac has ever seen....
Just concede it would be a crowd pleasing fight......
And for the record.... Floyd would beat the living shat out both of them ;D
for the record, how many times floyd said he would beat the shat out of everybody???? never seen it happen since corrales. and corrales was in a midst of trouble. he did go to jail after that fight.. he had a lot on his mind.. if he wasnt. maybe he could have knocked mayweather to another zip code
Listen Junior, Floyd owned the lower weight classes without a doubt, with excellent fundamentals and a wizard like defense... I'm sorry to break your heart but he would be faster than Pac and match his power too... ;)
owned who.. who was in that division at the time??? any names??? break my heart? hahaha.. thats funny.. its funny how you guys believe that pbf is p4p #1 yet even larry merchant cant even appreciate the way he fights.
