how does RJ power compare to Gerald McClellan,jackson,hurns,ben

guys i just want to hear whats your view on this i want u to put a mark out of ten.

jackson 10
gman 9.7
jones 9.5
hearns 9.2
ben 9

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by artest2000

guys i just want to hear whats your view on this i want u to put a mark out of ten.

jackson 10
gman 9.7
jones 9.5
hearns 9.2
ben 9

---

:o Wtf Bro? Lol

This is mine..
Hearns 10
Jackson 10, Perhaps 9.9
Jones 9
Benn 8.8 Or something to that effect

Hearns deserves to be way up on the list..Since we have to consider Tommy's power as a welter since the rest are original Middles..Ranging from light middle to super..

hill said that jones hits harder then hearns so i think he does not hit harder then jones. and there is noway he hits harder then jackson and gman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by artest2000

hill said that jones hits harder then hearns so i think he does not hit harder then jones. and there is noway he hits harder then jackson and gman

---

Oh my god!

Hearns is a welterweight! ..he hardest hitting welterweight ever

Hill is a lightheavy/ cruiser..

Tommy fought hill up there.. P4P Hearns cracks hardest!..

Gman was powerful but also full of energy..He didnt have the same one punch power as hearns and julian jackson... Norris hits harder then Gman too imo

And jones was just crazy with his power..But also so gifted and unorthadox that the ko's came to him well since he used crazy angles and great combo's to ko his opponents.. But the power isnt the same p4p

this is not p4p this is whos the hardest hitter and how does rj compare to them.

Benn hit the hardest - his superb natural punching leverages were like nothing we've ever seen

Jones's power came mostly from strong tendons and range of motion in the shoulders, because he wouldn't plant his feet down too much or pivot his feet

Hearns and Jackson were one-punch KO artists - they took guys out with S.A.T (speed, accuracy, timing)

McClellan had the heaviest hands

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by artest2000

this is not p4p this is whos the hardest hitter and how does rj compare to them.

---

RJJ is similar to SRR...they both had KO power in either hand...sure Hearns hit like a mack truck but that was mostly with his right hand....Jackson G-MAN and others were devastating but mostly against the lower class fighters...RJJ enjoyed beating a man so bad that he would hold off on the KO...that's what make him right below SRR...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by artest2000

this is not p4p this is whos the hardest hitter and how does rj compare to them.

---

But it has to be considered p4p Because hearns isnt a middleweight hes a natural welter..

And Jackson is a light middle..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by artest2000

hill said that jones hits harder then hearns so i think he does not hit harder then jones. and there is noway he hits harder then jackson and gman

---

Hearns hit harder at welterweight than Jones at middleweight probably. The comparison stuff is hard to judge but Hearns fought a boxing fight with Virgil. Actually against Virgil. Jones turned to puncher. But this is hard to rate who punches hardest at thier weights.. Jones was a 10 at middleweight/supermiddleweight. Hearns a 10 at welt. All were 10 and Jackson was probably a 10 plus.

Hearns and McClellan are the two hardest punchers that ever lived. Roy had very good power but not anything like them.

Jackson hit hardest out of the ones you mentioned he used to ko guys without trying hardest p4p puncher ever ?? well i woudn't disagree.

Imo Jackson gets an 11 for his power.
Hearns is a 10
The rest probaly a 9.5.
But they had different ways to use their power
Hearns- max leverage with his tall and rangy body and arms
Jackson- one punch KO power in both hands, excellent timing
Jones- speed, speed and speed combined with more than mediocre power
G-Man- energetic and enthousiastic, a killer if he had you hurt
Benn- Power by phisical strenght and massive willpower

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarkDestroyer

Imo Jackson gets an 11 for his power.
Hearns is a 10
The rest probaly a 9.5.
But they had different ways to use their power
Hearns- max leverage with his tall and rangy body and arms
Jackson- one punch KO power in both hands, excellent timing
Jones- speed, speed and speed combined with more than mediocre power
G-Man- energetic and enthousiastic, a killer if he had you hurt
Benn- Power by phisical strenght and massive willpower

---

Tommy Hearns is my all time favorite fighter , but i think Julian Jackson had power oozing from every part of his body if the other hit u like a gunshot , Jackson shot u with a cannonball .

I think RJJ hit hard - but alot of it was down to the fact he picke his punches right, made the guy go off balance and hit him, that mde his power imo seem more than it was.

I would say Benn was underrated at middleweight, he had ferocious power

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_One77

I would say Benn was underrated at middleweight, he had ferocious power

---

Under-rated?? He was power-crazy

Check your PM's on BS, One77

Jones power does'nt compare to these guys

I say Jones is right up there with Jackson followed by Gerald and Hearns
Jones 10
Jackson 10
Gerald 9.5
Hearns 9

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taeth

I say Jones is right up there with Jackson followed by Gerald and Hearns
Jones 10
Jackson 10
Gerald 9.5
Hearns 9

---

Sorry but no way on earth is Jones equal with Jackson in power not a chance in hell and Gerald hits harder aswell im Jones biggest fan and he did hit hard but not in Jacksons league he used to ko guys without trying he hit way harder than Jones did all of Jacksons kos were 1 punch kos Jones had few 1 punch kos aswell but mostly it was from alot of punches that he wears his opponents down difference is if Jackson even hit you clean once that would be it game over.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nium

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The_One77

I would say Benn was underrated at middleweight, he had ferocious power

---

Under-rated?? He was power-crazy

---

Benn was unique. He had underrated power and an overrated chin maybe. Thing which was odd about Benn is you could see him wiping out a great fighter and then being knocked out by a mediocre fighter. Not saying Barkley was great , but he beat in one round.

Under-rated power?? Benn??

If anything he had over-rated power.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nium

Under-rated power?? Benn??

If anything he had over-rated power.

---

Why was his power overrated explain.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nium

Under-rated power?? Benn??

If anything he had over-rated power.

---

Why was his power overrated explain.

---

Uhh, it was power-mad. Benn's power this, Benn's power that, Benn's power this again and Benn's power that again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nium

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nium

Under-rated power?? Benn??

If anything he had over-rated power.

---

Why was his power overrated explain.

---

Uhh, it was power-mad. Benn's power this, Benn's power that, Benn's power this again and Benn's power that again.

---

All of those things are true though :)