was trinidad really great?
i have no doubts that tito was a verey good fighter, but i am undecided yet as to if i think of him as great. he was onl beaten at middleweight, of whjich both fights he was made to look very ordinary. however against de la hoya, who must of gone mad after the 8th round i think he was being boxed out his skin. could tito of ever really beaten a great boxer is what im sayin i guess? de la hoya won theuir fight i think, and im not even sure if i think of himas great either, opinons?
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by oakleyno1
i have no doubts that tito was a verey good fighter, but i am undecided yet as to if i think of him as great. he was onl beaten at middleweight, of whjich both fights he was made to look very ordinary. however against de la hoya, who must of gone mad after the 8th round i think he was being boxed out his skin. could tito of ever really beaten a great boxer is what im sayin i guess? de la hoya won theuir fight i think, and im not even sure if i think of himas great either, opinons?
Just because he struggled with a style doesn't make him less great just look at the Tito's resume that says it all he was beaten by two greats of our era Winky and Hopkins and how can you say Hitman wasn't great either he won Welterweight world championship and championships all the way up to Cruiserweight.
Re: was trinidad really great?
Re: was trinidad really great?
I'd say so yes look at the fights he's been in an who he's fought, I think the only big fights that he could have had and didn't were Ike Quartey an SSM, and I think he would have beat Ike an maybe struggled with SSMs speed and lost a decision.
Re: was trinidad really great?
Re: was trinidad really great?
yeah i kno it was just random lol
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by oakleyno1
yeah i kno it was just random lol
Lol sorry i thought you said Hitman here
himas
My bad.
Re: was trinidad really great?
He could have been......IF HE DID NOT QUIT EVERYTIME HE LOST!!!!
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
He could have been......IF HE DID NOT QUIT EVERYTIME HE LOST!!!!
He never quit.
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
He could have been......IF HE DID NOT QUIT EVERYTIME HE LOST!!!!
He never quit.
he means retired
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
He could have been......IF HE DID NOT QUIT EVERYTIME HE LOST!!!!
He never quit.
OOPS your right....
He Retired.... ::**
Re: was trinidad really great?
HE GOT BEAT UP AND HE QUIT!!!!!!
Maybe not during a fight but QUIT!! none the less
True greats come back and redeem themselves
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
He could have been......IF HE DID NOT QUIT EVERYTIME HE LOST!!!!
He never quit.
OOPS your right....
He Retired.... ::**
He retired after Wright loss there was nothing left for him he was way above his natural weight and it takes alot out of your confidence i think it was best him retiring.
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
He could have been......IF HE DID NOT QUIT EVERYTIME HE LOST!!!!
He never quit.
And the excuse after the Hopkins fight??
Did Hopkins retire after Taylor 1 or 2??...He had nothing left to prove....
Did De la Hoya quit after his losses at higher weights??
Barrera after his KO loss to Pac?
tHEY SUCKED IT UP AND WENT ON.....Don't give me that there was nothing left for him BS....ICB you are smarter then that....
When Tito was winning he had no probs in claiming his greatness...No probs in talking about who he was going through next...I promise if he had not lost he would still be fighting....And if he was there would have been nothing to prove he would have just fought to fight right????
But he retires due to the losses and now it is he had nothing to prove??...He was out of his weight class???
HMMM I seem to remember a guy named Mosley who was out of his weight class at 154 and he won titles....lost then dropped down in weight where he was more comfortable......
OOPS your right....
He Retired.... ::**
He retired after Wright loss there was nothing left for him he was way above his natural weight and it takes alot out of your confidence i think it was best him retiring.
Re: was trinidad really great?
Pointless thread.Look at his resume. Look at his record. Look at who he lost to(2 LEGENDS). So what if he quit? He lost to 2 greats,it doesnt diminish his legacy,everyone deals with losses differently. Is Ksotya Tszyu legacy diminished because he quit v Hatton? Also,Tito was fighting at a weight he did not really belong to.
If you can look at his record and question whether he was a legend,you need to revise what your criteria is for legend. ::** ::** ??? ::** ??? ::** :-X :( >:mad >:mad
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Pointless thread.Look at his resume. Look at his record. Look at who he lost to(2 LEGENDS). So what if he quit? He lost to 2 greats,it doesnt diminish his legacy,everyone deals with losses differently. Is Ksotya Tszyu legacy diminished because he quit v Hatton? Also,Tito was fighting at a weight he did not really belong to.
If you can look at his record and question whether he was a legend,you need to revise what your criteria is for legend. ::** ::** ??? ::** ??? ::** :-X :( >:mad >:mad
Pretty sweet explanation right there..
And among the above reasons there is always the arguement that when you take away what is really just a bunch of names on paper..
then what youn have is one of the most entertaining fighters in history
Either the hardest or second hardest hitting welterweight of all time..
a serious former p4p contender, multi weight champion great amatuer fighter
Frankly i just cant think of an arguement for him not bieng considered great..
The word great doesnt even do him justice..Hes a legend
Re: was trinidad really great?
He was defenatly one of the most entertaining fighters I ever seen in a ring. I think when we talk about being great we shouldn't try to dicect a fighter so much and try too hard to find holes. Just think to yourself, how would Tito have done in any era. And the answer is he would probably be top 3 every time. Give me the top 10 WW of all time and he probably have a good shot at beating each one of them at least 1 out of 3 times.
That to me equals being a great.
Re: was trinidad really great?
What does really great mean? Depends how you rank your fighters. In depends a lot on level of competition in your time.
In terms of how I think he would fare against other fighters who have fought at welterweight since the 70's, I'd say he has a decent chance to crack top 10.
Re: was trinidad really great?
Felix "TITOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO" Trinidaaaaddd
then the crowd ( no exactly puerto ricans) Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito Tito until the fight was over.
Re: was trinidad really great?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Quote:
Originally Posted by oakleyno1
i have no doubts that tito was a verey good fighter, but i am undecided yet as to if i think of him as great. he was onl beaten at middleweight, of whjich both fights he was made to look very ordinary. however against de la hoya, who must of gone mad after the 8th round i think he was being boxed out his skin. could tito of ever really beaten a great boxer is what im sayin i guess? de la hoya won theuir fight i think, and im not even sure if i think of himas great either, opinons?
Just because he struggled with a style doesn't make him less great just look at the Tito's resume that says it all he was beaten by two greats of our era Winky and Hopkins and how can you say Hitman wasn't great either he won Welterweight world championship and championships all the way up to Cruiserweight.
Great point.... but when Hitman lost, he gave it his ALL and more. When Tito lost, he was stuck in first or second gear.