George Facing SERIOUS Charges

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/modro...fite07.article

So this person waits till he's famous to file a suit?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Majesty

So this person waits till he's famous to file a suit?

---

I'm kinda curious to see how they're gonna prove that he did this (if he did this) so long after it supposedly happened.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frozensolid_702

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Majesty

So this person waits till he's famous to file a suit?

---

Let me see they said when he was 11-13 and she was 8-7 or something..

Why wait 9 years?? Because if you wait till he is famous it just seems wrong to me, why wait till the yare famous?


I'm kinda curious to see how they're gonna prove that he did this (if he did this) so long after it supposedly happened.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Majesty

So this person waits till he's famous to file a suit?

---

If hes convicted he's in deep S
I report you deride ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Majesty

So this person waits till he's famous to file a suit?

---

If hes convicted he's in deep S
I report you deride ;D

---

Oh yeah if he's convicted he's in trouble. But the timing makes me question it.

I know that I may well be on the wrong board here, but ......



























If you read the full article, at least he's not a homo.



;)

it all seems kind of funny to me but....Truth is I have interviewd Geroge on a few occasions and he seemed like a nice kid??.....Go figure????

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Majesty

So this person waits till he's famous to file a suit?

---

How many 7 or 8 year old victims of rape do you know? Do they all come forward immediately?

He's hardly Michael Jackson ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

it all seems kind of funny to me but....Truth is I have interviewd Geroge on a few occasions and he seemed like a nice kid??.....Go figure????

---

Oh dear ;D

Shit happened when he was 11 to 13. I say you let the shit go. The man is an undefeated prospect.

1. since george was a child himself at the time of the alledged assault, I doubt he faces much jail time (assuming they don't charge him as an adult)

2. the long timespan is easily explainable by the fact that the victim was a young child. look how long it took victims of catholic priests to come forward. children don't know what is going on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by X

I know that I may well be on the wrong board here, but ......
If you read the full article, at least he's not a homo.
;)

---

Actually, gay bashing is common signifier of closet homosexuality. And the don't mention the sex of the alledged victim.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manju

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by X

I know that I may well be on the wrong board here, but ......
If you read the full article, at least he's not a homo.
;)

---

Actually, gay bashing is common signifier of closet homosexuality. And the don't mention the sex of the alledged victim.

---

Don't make intelligent ponts ...... you just won't fit in on here ;)

Well obviously if he was an adult when this happened you'd say he deserves everything thrown at him but between 11 and 13 he's just a kid himself.

I'd imagine he'd get a police caution and then leave it at that.

But honestly how do prove something like this anyway, unless she hasn't douched her vadge out in the last 10 years it's unlikely they'll find any trace of him inside of her although if her surname is Lewinsky I wouldn't put it past her..........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by X

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manju

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by X

I know that I may well be on the wrong board here, but ......
If you read the full article, at least he's not a homo.
;)

---

Actually, gay bashing is common signifier of closet homosexuality. And the don't mention the sex of the alledged victim.

---

Don't make intelligent ponts ...... you just won't fit in on here ;)

---

Come on God you going to let him talk to you like that? I say strike him down with an almighty thunderbolt

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Well obviously if he was an adult when this happened you'd say he deserves everything thrown at him but between 11 and 13 he's just a kid himself.

I'd imagine he'd get a police caution and then leave it at that.

But honestly how do prove something like this anyway, unless she hasn't douched her vadge out in the last 10 years it's unlikely they'll find any trace of him inside of her although if her surname is Lewinsky I wouldn't put it past her..........

---

Yes, unless it has been preserved like some sort of shrine to the guy ever since. All he has to say it wasn't him, and unless he was doing the other kid in front of a cheering group of onlookers, then it will be impossible to prove.

CC for the news flash, T-Monk


I have no idea how he could go down for this unless he confesses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla

CC for the news flash, T-Monk


I have no idea how he could go down for this unless he confesses.

---

Actually though thinking about if it did happen he may confess.

I mean after all if he was under 13 when he (allegedly) did it he wouldn't really realise the consequences of his actions or how seriously wrong that was to do.

Now at age 22 if something happened he may well apologise and admit wrongdoing in the hope that the (alleged) victim could get some sort of closure on it and get on with her life.

If it was me I'd own up, I mean imagine doing that and having the shame of knowing not only that you did it, but that you lied about it and denied it afterwards, basically screwing the poor victim twice.



This may sound completely absurd but if he admit's it and faces a short prison sentence I'd have more respect for him than if he denies it and gets away with, presuming of course the (alleged) victim isn't lying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Well obviously if he was an adult when this happened you'd say he deserves everything thrown at him but between 11 and 13 he's just a kid himself.

I'd imagine he'd get a police caution and then leave it at that.

But honestly how do prove something like this anyway, unless she hasn't douched her vadge out in the last 10 years it's unlikely they'll find any trace of him inside of her although if her surname is Lewinsky I wouldn't put it past her..........

---

if he did do this then he deserves whateva he gets


if a 13yr old has sexual contact with a 8yr old that is wrong

and u no wat u r doing at 13 (id seriously kill any 13 yr old that touched my daughter at 9,and i bet any of u with kids feel the same way!!!!!!)

and i dont know bout usa but in uk to even get to court there has to be significant evidence in rape cases and child abouse cases




child abuse victims dont often tell straight away whether the abuse was by an adult or another child



if she is lying then she should be the one facing a court hearing but someof the responses on here have really shocked me to this post

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by katfight

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Well obviously if he was an adult when this happened you'd say he deserves everything thrown at him but between 11 and 13 he's just a kid himself.

I'd imagine he'd get a police caution and then leave it at that.

But honestly how do prove something like this anyway, unless she hasn't douched her vadge out in the last 10 years it's unlikely they'll find any trace of him inside of her although if her surname is Lewinsky I wouldn't put it past her..........

---

if he did do this then he deserves whateva he gets


if a 13yr old has sexual contact with a 8yr old that is wrong

and u no wat u r doing at 13 (id seriously kill any 13 yr old that touched my daughter at 9,and i bet any of u with kids feel the same way!!!!!!)

and i dont know bout usa but in uk to even get to court there has to be significant evidence in rape cases and child abouse cases




child abuse victims dont often tell straight away whether the abuse was by an adult or another child



if she is lying then she should be the one facing a court hearing but someof the responses on here have really shocked me to this post

---

Well it said between 11 and 13. I don't think I even knew where babies came from at 11 I certainly wouldn't have been aware of things like child abuse.

There is a world of difference between an 11 year or (or even 13) fooling around with an 8 year old and a grown man doing it.

You're right if I had kids I'd hate the idea of anybody touching them (even when they are grown up and married lol) but an 11 year old doing it isn't even remotely in the same ball park as a grown man doing it.

I guess he'll only get a caution and maybe put on a register for a few years even if he is found guilty.

If he does it again in his 20's then string him up, but an offence at 11 years old doesn't mean he;s a dangerous pedo now.


Remember 17 year old Mike Tyson tried to touch Teddy Atlas 11 year old niece and Teddy pointed a gun at his head. :o

where i agree that there is a difference between an adult doin these things and an 11 yr old



re read it bilbo wen he was 11 she was 5

thats a big difference than 11 and 8 even though that wud be wrong too but i wud get ur reasoning behind the '' he was onli a kid ''



and ur right it doesnt mean he's a dangerous paedo now
so does that mean he should be held responsible for his actions?

but IF it did happen i will tell u now that her life will remain affected 4eva

and its not like he could accidently 15x commit a serious sexual assault
over the space of 4yrs without eva realising what u were doin was wrong!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by katfight

where i agree that there is a difference between an adult doin these things and an 11 yr old



re read it bilbo wen he was 11 she was 5

thats a big difference than 11 and 8 even though that wud be wrong too but i wud get ur reasoning behind the '' he was onli a kid ''



and ur right it doesnt mean he's a dangerous paedo now
so does that mean he should be held responsible for his actions?

but IF it did happen i will tell u now that her life will remain affected 4eva

and its not like he could accidently 15x commit a serious sexual assault
over the space of 4yrs without eva realising what u were doin was wrong!

---

I agree completely and that's why I said I'd actually have more respect for him if he did admit it than if he denied and got away with it.

Now at 21 he's old enough to know the seriousness of what he did and how wrong it was. He has a chance to man up, apologise for his actions and in so doing hopefully give his victim some sort of closure.

But if he denies it (presuming here that it did happen) he in effect is abusing her all over again and just adding to the misery and suffering he has caused.

if it didnt happen then she is a devious stupid cow ---------and pplwho lie to get money are the ppl who ruin the 100's of REAL cases that dont make it to court




but if it did an apology for 4 yrs of abuse isnt enough imo..........

and i wouldn't have repect for any one who participated in that type of activity whether they admited it or not

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by katfight

if it didnt happen then she is a devious stupid cow ---------and pplwho lie to get money are the ppl who ruin the 100's of REAL cases that dont make it to court




but if it did an apology for 4 yrs of abuse isnt enough imo..........

and i wouldn't have repect for any one who participated in that type of activity whether they admited it or not

---

I don't mean that if he admits he should get a pat on the back I just mean..........they were both kids at the time, he's (hopefully) a different person now and it can be put to rest.

I am of course assuming the assualt wern't violent rapes but rather two kids experimenting with each other.

If he pinned her down and forcefully assaulted her then you can scratch everything I've said upto now :o

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by katfight

if it didnt happen then she is a devious stupid cow ---------and pplwho lie to get money are the ppl who ruin the 100's of REAL cases that dont make it to court




but if it did an apology for 4 yrs of abuse isnt enough imo..........

and i wouldn't have repect for any one who participated in that type of activity whether they admited it or not

---

I don't mean that if he admits he should get a pat on the back I just mean..........they were both kids at the time, he's (hopefully) a different person now and it can be put to rest.

I am of course assuming the assualt wern't violent rapes but rather two kids experimenting with each other.

If he pinned her down and forcefully assaulted her then you can scratch everything I've said upto now :o

---

Bilbo 5 yr olds dont experiment at sex

13yr old s yeah maybe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by katfight

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bilbo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by katfight

if it didnt happen then she is a devious stupid cow ---------and pplwho lie to get money are the ppl who ruin the 100's of REAL cases that dont make it to court




but if it did an apology for 4 yrs of abuse isnt enough imo..........

and i wouldn't have repect for any one who participated in that type of activity whether they admited it or not

---

I don't mean that if he admits he should get a pat on the back I just mean..........they were both kids at the time, he's (hopefully) a different person now and it can be put to rest.

I am of course assuming the assualt wern't violent rapes but rather two kids experimenting with each other.

If he pinned her down and forcefully assaulted her then you can scratch everything I've said upto now :o

---

Bilbo 5 yr olds dont experiment at sex

13yr old s yeah maybe

---

I can see I'm digging a hole here........

lol i do get what ur saying


i just dont agree ..............



personal opinion thats all ;D

Umm 3 words here:

Statue (i think thats the right word ???) of Limitations

This case can't go on because

1. Except for murder, every other crime (felony or not) has a certain window for which you can bring charges. I'd have to believe that 10+ is a bit past it.

2. These events happened when he was a minor and once you turn 18 your juvenille record is erased. Aside from murder, i really don't think they bring about charges like this several years after the fact..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NotGuilty136

Umm 3 words here:

Statue (i think thats the right word ???) of Limitations

This case can't go on because

1. Except for murder, every other crime (felony or not) has a certain window for which you can bring charges. I'd have to believe that 10+ is a bit past it.

2. These events happened when he was a minor and once you turn 18 your juvenille record is erased. Aside from murder, i really don't think they bring about charges like this several years after the fact..

---

Well I'm not totally sure of how it is relevant to foreign cases and juvenile cases, but at the moment here in west Wales we have a case of two brothers who are now pensioners being brought to justice for about 20 offences between them relating to cases that happened in the 1970s, but certainly in terms of British law, sexual crimes against children are taken very seriously, and time is not necassaily a barrier, especially as it often takes victims many many years to come forward and speak about the incidents.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by superheavyrhun

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NotGuilty136

Umm 3 words here:

Statue (i think thats the right word ???) of Limitations

This case can't go on because

1. Except for murder, every other crime (felony or not) has a certain window for which you can bring charges. I'd have to believe that 10+ is a bit past it.

2. These events happened when he was a minor and once you turn 18 your juvenille record is erased. Aside from murder, i really don't think they bring about charges like this several years after the fact..

---

Well I'm not totally sure of how it is relevant to foreign cases and juvenile cases, but at the moment here in west Wales we have a case of two brothers who are now pensioners being brought to justice for about 20 offences between them relating to cases that happened in the 1970s, but certainly in terms of British law, sexual crimes against children are taken very seriously, and time is not necassaily a barrier, especially as it often takes victims many many years to come forward and speak about the incidents.

---

Thats possible as i don't have a masters degree in law. Usually tho late cases like this are only trialable in civil court. It's very possible that sex crimes don't have a statue of limitations but again most of these that are brought on late are against people who were adults at the time of the crime.