-
Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
- and why do they bring their own ref when fighting in the EU?
Why on earth is Jeff Lacy allowed to hold so much against Calzaghe when he was almost down? American Ref!
Why on earth did Nady allowed Rahman to recover against Oleg and even hold his F****** leg so much? American Ref!
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
yes, nothing makes for a snoozefest more than holding. Is there any reason it can't be treated like a low blow? Maybe 2 warnings then a point deducted?
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
HAHA - yeah Jeff holding on in the 12th was really the difference in that fight. What a boring fighter Lacy is anyways. It's a good thing Mikkel Kessler is carved of solid gold and turns water into wine otherwise I don't know how I could get over these American boxers holding.
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Why are morons who dont understand boxing allowed to post on this board?
Why do they post the same crap over and over,when noone cared the first 20 times?
Why doesnt god strike these tools dead?
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Plys 44
- and why do they bring their own ref when fighting in the EU?
Why on earth is Jeff Lacy allowed to hold so much against Calzaghe when he was almost down? American Ref!
Why on earth did Nady allowed Rahman to recover against Oleg and even hold his F****** leg so much? American Ref!
Why do you keep making so many accounts to diss America Royal.
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Plys 44
- and why do they bring their own ref when fighting in the EU?
Why on earth is Jeff Lacy allowed to hold so much against Calzaghe when he was almost down? American Ref!
Why on earth did Nady allowed Rahman to recover against Oleg and even hold his F****** leg so much? American Ref!
Why is it you have no knowledge about boxing?
Why is it every post you make has to do with America and American boxers?
Did you lose your life savings when an American fighter beat one of your favorites?
Did you wife leave you afterwards because she found out you are not only a degenerate gambler but wear womens under garments?
Are you really Julius Francis?
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
I think he wants attention and will say anything to get it.
::**
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Because there is a huge conspiracy going on, the U.S government has paid off all boxing officials to make it seem America is the best. We refuse to give other fighters coverage because they will no doubt become more popular than our own fighters over here. Everyone knows that Americans are all obese and watch 10 hours of TV each day. This is just propaganda to take the spotlight off the real problem: The War in Iraq...this whole boxing explosion of 2007 is just to keep us not talking about the war. Good work on seeing the truth Peter PLys 44. :domo-kun: <----what the hell is this thing???
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
sounds like a big case of Red White and Blue penis envy to me
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanChilds
sounds like a big case of Red White and Blue penis envy to me
Please don't suggest for a minute that Peter Plys is British. >:mad
WE DON'T FUCKING WANT HIM!!!!
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Plys 44
- and why do they bring their own ref when fighting in the EU?
Why on earth is Jeff Lacy allowed to hold so much against Calzaghe when he was almost down? American Ref!
Why on earth did Nady allowed Rahman to recover against Oleg and even hold his F****** leg so much? American Ref!
Calzaghe always holds with his right hand and punches with his left.
Hatton would be the picture next to the word 'Hold' in the English dictionary if it were a picture dictionary.
Neither of those boxers are American.
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Shocking that Peter Pan started this thread
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
I have to take a shiit... Is this thread a good place to do it ??? ;D
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
ricky hatton is allowed to hold , so y do u complain ???
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
What the hell is wrong with a little holding?? Hell I don't even care if they hold quite a bit as long as they punch every so often.......
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanChilds
sounds like a big case of Red White and Blue penis envy to me
Please don't suggest for a minute that Peter Plys is British. >:mad
WE DON'T FUCKING WANT HIM!!!!
And what colors are the British flag Bilbo? ;D
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
what a dickhead?
I guess ricky hatton is american, and so was wlad against sam peter
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanChilds
sounds like a big case of Red White and Blue penis envy to me
Please don't suggest for a minute that Peter Plys is British. >:mad
WE DON'T F****** WANT HIM!!!!
Sorry I guess I should have said big case of Stars and Stripes penis envy...I forget the Union Jack is also red white and blue
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Holding cannot be attributed to any one boxing nation more than another. And in the case of lacy, of course the man was holding but he was holding courageously, tryin not to get KO'd and stay in the fight, nothin wrong with that.
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitmandonny
Holding cannot be attributed to any one boxing nation more than another. And in the case of lacy, of course the man was holding but he was holding courageously, tryin not to get KO'd and stay in the fight, nothin wrong with that.
Nope you're wrong, Peter Plys 44 has done it again he's figured it all out.
The only fighters that hold are Americans. In fact America as a nation IS SATAN,
:Sarcasm:
Seriously, this is getting old Peter, you sir are racist..................
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Im british and the topic of the post is clearly BS.....Theres a difference between holding and hitting....and Holding until the ref breaks the clinch....If you can hold hit and break And hit without the ref stepping in..no probs its good tactics if ur just a fanny and your gonna hold until the refs steps in ...
SNOOZEFEST!
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tins06
Im british and the topic of the post is clearly BS.....Theres a difference between holding and hitting....and Holding until the ref breaks the clinch....If you can hold hit and break And hit without the ref stepping in..no probs its good tactics if ur just a fanny and your gonna hold until the refs steps in ...
SNOOZEFEST!
cc to you
Well said, even if you did use the word "fanny" LOL . Your reply does say it all though. I thought fighters were trained to hold at times. If a guy is good on the outside and his opponet is better on the inside then the outside fighter should "tie him up" or whatever you want to call it so he cant get anything done.
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Lacy was doing a doggy on Calzaghe and Ratman was holding Oleg's foot as it was the gold of Afirca - but no warning no nothing.....
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Peter Plys 44 - where are you from? (the guys think you have been here before under the name 'Royal')
I did indeed hate Royal with a pure passion and genuinely wished him a long lfe, but lingering death to all his loved ones so he could watch and feel all the pain.
Are you indeed he?
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by X
Peter Plys 44 - where are you from? (the guys think you have been here before under the name 'Royal')
I did indeed hate Royal with a pure passion and genuinely wished him a long lfe, but lingering death to all his loved ones so he could watch and feel all the pain.
Are you indeed he?
I am not sure what you are looking for and if it is right, but I was complaining that Lacy way allowed to hold very much in round 9-12 against Calzaghe and especially that Rahmann was allowed to hold in round 10-12, WHEN NADY had said to OLEG over and over and over and over again that he did NOT want any holding - BUT when the RAT - Then RATMAN was in problems it was okay to hold on for life efen a ones foot...
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Rahman holds and all of a sudden ALL American fighters hold....and Jay Nady is USUALLY very good about not allowing holding
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Hatton has made a career out of it.
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by southakron314
Hatton has made a career out of it.
now now ::**
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle
Rahman holds and all of a sudden ALL American fighters hold....and Jay Nady is USUALLY very good about not allowing holding
At that moment what else was there for him to do???
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
someone better alert the boss that royals got 113 posts and is allowed to hand out sc's
-
Re: Why are American boxers allowed to hold?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: