And how? ;D
Printable View
And how? ;D
Norris because Mayweather isn't as good at 154 Norris had the speed and certainly enough power for Mayweather to be cautious and Mayweather would not have the power to dent Norris's suspect chin so Norris by decision at 154.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
Norris is best 154 fighter ever imo.
Agreed Ice
Bad match up for Mayweather. Norris by lopsided points win. Maybe even stoppage
This would be the same fight as when he beat Meldrick Taylor, very entertaining fight but KO and beating for Mayweather.
Why can't a Norris be around and beat his much needed ass?
Wowowo! Norris a HOT favourite here!!
i agree el gamo..Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gamo
this is a heck of a fight just on the size aspect. But in reality Norris had great handspeed. Norris is a good match against any fast fighter since he was so underrated in speed also. His problem was his chin and his habit of staying inside a little too long. Against the fast guys like Mayweather who do not punch hard, those are good fights for Norris.
Totally agree well said.Quote:
Originally Posted by LegendBoxing65
Mayweather does pack some sting in his punches as evidenced by wobbling Oscar twice. Are you saying Norris wons bro?Quote:
Originally Posted by LegendBoxing65
Terry Norris. Now thats someone i know nothing of.
One of the most exciting fighters of all time, and one of the best Lightmiddleweights of all time your missing out big time.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Grinch
Here is Norris destroying John Mugabi in 1 round, Mugabi went 11 tough rounds with Hagler. And gave Hagler one of his toughest fights of his career.
Terry Norris Vs John Mugabi
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pncGgZl2MLw
I would of love to see SRL fight Terry Noris when he was in his prime i think he would of sparked Norris out of there. When they met unfortuianly for SRL him being 35 and try what he did when he was in his 20s was not working for him droping down 16 pounds i think hurt him to i hated that fight.
Even prime SRL would have big problems with Norris.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr140
Norris was damn good. His only flaw was that he was easily drawn into a war. He was however a beautiful boxer and a good puncher. I feel he beats PBF only because of his size.
Norris against Jackson was a display of how good a boxer terry was, until...
OH no i not sying it would be a below out but i think SRL could of beat him in prime.
Agreed!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr140
Norris beating SRL was justice for the manipulative way he was handling himself after the Hagler victory. He was a ATG in his prime at Welter but I only saw his dark side when he fought Lalonde, Hearns and Duran. I knew he was going to loose to Norris and it was a great beating. Norris was a brilliant boxer and he is not better than Mayweather p4p but is at light middle.
You say you say Leonards darkside.....What exactly are you refering to?
Terry Norris no questions asked
I THINK CHUCK NORRIS VS TERRY NORRIS WOULD BE A BETTER FIGHT