I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??
Printable View
I like a system they got on B o X ing Sc ene where you can see who gives you good and bad Karma why can't we have something similar here ??
It would be nice, huh? Alot less SC's would be given then ;) I'm sure I'll get one now ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Yeah, maybe with saying what thread it was from..Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Cause if you get a random SC and you know who it's from, it would be nice to know what post they were sad clicking.
I wouldn't mind what post they were sad clicking, but I am not sure I would want to know who the clicker was. I am sure there has been an occasion or two where the person who issued me a SC was someone I admire. Those people should be able to repremand me without stepping from the shadows. Otherwise it could sour our friendship. Also, having an open-click policy could create a neverending shitstorm of sad-clicking or create a "perfect society" where no one is ever sad-clicked again. Neither of those scenarios appeal to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by RP33
This is just my opinion and I understand the counterargument. Revenge? j/k
They have that on the site i mentioned it shows you what post you was given bad karma.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla
You know what they could do..... If you've sad clicked someone 5 or 10 times, it should come up with a screen where you have to type out your reason for sad clicking the poor sod all the time.
So even if you don't know the exactly person who sad clicked you, you'll know it's been at least 5 or 10 times from a single person, and you can read their reason for it...
That would probably be fair as it still keeps people anonymous, but retards who wonder why the keep getting sad clicks won't have to wonder anymore..
I couldnt agree more Ice.Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
I started a topic on the Hatton-Collazo fight (my delayed opinion on it) and i swear i got like 6 silent SC's in a day >:mad
Thats completely unjust IMO. And it wouldnt happen if posters were named and shamed for it.
Mind you, on the flip-side, i suppose a quick stealthy click prevents mindless flamming.
Apperances flatter to decieve, ay? :P
Treat 'em like battle scars, badges of honour, if you will :army:
They're representative of times when you've stuck to your guns, faced down the opposition and they've been so frustrated at thier inabilty to counter your pugilistic brilliance, that they've been left no option but to go below the belt.
So, for my money, if you've not got enough SCs you aint getting stuck in ;)
hahaha. I like the idea that people who give sad clicks without reason are the ones who can't beat you in a debate and in their frustration they resort to sad clicking you. nice counter psychology Steelie. :coolclick:Quote:
Originally Posted by Steelie
would be nice to see what you were SC 4 my ones seemed to have come from 1 post and i couldnt see anything wrong with it ???.....could get some revenge SC's in..
I think best thing it would be good to know what post got the sc...or cc..but the members to remain
unknown..
Yes but i think there should be a system like on the site i mentioned where it atleast shows you what post you was given SC or something like that ??Quote:
Originally Posted by Steelie
Well it would be nice to know which battle I am receiving my scars from, and which war I am getting handed a badge of courage. I swear some people must just log on and then say:eenie-meeny-miny-mo and start randomly sad clicking; like Ted Bundy randomly picking people to butcher.Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
We seem to know when we get cc'd, but raarely are we told why we get sc'd. I could really care less about cc's or sc's, but their here and so let people know what we get them for. If someone isn't being abusive and rude to another poster, and is just giving their opinion on a subject, they shouldn't be sc'd for it. Blah blah blah.
Does it matter? The real posters on this forum know who the regulars are and know who's talking sense or through their arse. It's good when you start out, but I feel accepted enough anyway.
Plus, if someone disagrees with me, I take their sadclick as their way of hitting out that their opinion doesn't matter as much as mine.
I have given more CC's than I've received anyways. I tend to only sadclick the idiots who end up being kicked out anyway for trying to push someone's buttons. I also own up to mine anyway.
I think it would be good idea just to atleast show what post you was given a sc or ccQuote:
Originally Posted by bzkfn
I like the fact that I can't see who it is, or where they're coming from...keeps me sharp ;D
It's funny, this thread will get so heated people will start giving SC's out for a thread about SC's being given out. LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by Steelie
I only give out sad clicks when someone starts a thread implying that a good fight has been made (Ie: Cotto vs Williams) only to click on the thread to find out the it is a hypothetical question; not a fight annoucement.
Would it kill you to put a question mark after the fight: (IE: Cotto vs Williams? or Cotto vs William- who wins)
Bruce Lee is the only person I SC on a regular basis.Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
here's your cc+187 Booze for being honest. I don't know why you give me an sc on a regular basis but I trust you give SCs with valid reasons.
Nope he just does it for the hell of it because he picks randomly and unfortunately for you its your turn ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by brucelee
CC. To both of you. Now that I think of it.......random SCing Bruce is kindof immature.Quote:
Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
Everyman needs his releases ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by boozeboxer
Its a shame Ted Bundy wasn't intoduced to the sad-cick during his childhood :(
I propose we stop mincing about and make it compulsary for female members to get thier nipples out.
Who's with me!?!
We have still got female members haven't we?
:biker: :gay-as-steelie: :indian_chief:
just kidding :lolololol:
I think the more :boobs2: we get the better off we all are :feedme:
Anyways. I really do think we should know who sad click us. I'm sick and tired of these cowards who randomly sad clicks me just cause I don't worship their oppinions like other posters do. or don't agree with them and i don't try to bond relationships with them cause i rather speak my damned mind. I want to know who sad clicks me so i can pm them and get an explanation on why, and it better be good cause if not they are getting more from me for being assclowns.
the idea of owning sad clicks and cool clicks is good.I am actually wondering why I still get a daily sad click even when I'm not around and even when I didn't make any post for 2 two weeks.
anyway, I console myself with the fact that I'm not forgotten and someone remembers me ( and someone's actually fond of me, hehehe)..... sadly though coz it's through sad clicks.
I'm jumping on the bandwagon here, iv been sadclicked daily now for quite a few days, it doesn't bother me at all, but what does bother me is that i have made no posts where i've said anything controversial without backing them up with legitimate points and everybody iv been in debate with have been joking and kidding with me afterward!!!
ICB stop crying over sc's ;D too many people get hung up on the as if they actually mean something. People sc/cc for all different reasons. If someone starts on about why have I got 20 sc's in a week you can guarantee they'll get 20 more because I, we, posters find it funny
ITs easy to deal with a care factor of zero.
;D