Can these guys beat Floyd (in their prime)?

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

Out of all the fighter you could have named

Hearns
Duran
Mosley (In his prime)
Pryor
Kosta
Whitaker
Trinidad

you name Arguello and say that he will kill him, and then you blame the Floyd LOVERS, enough said ::**

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brazilianbomber

Out of all the fighter you could have named

Hearns
Duran
Mosley (In his prime)
Pryor
Kosta
Whitaker
Trinidad

you name Arguello and say that he will kill him, and then you blame the Floyd LOVERS, enough said ::**

---

Actually I'm not a huge fan of Arguello, though the guy was awesome back then. I believe Arguello would kick his ass! ...and i'm sticking to that. Trinidad would have left himself way too open for Floyd's quick right hand, I see him losing by UD. I do like your list though...we should also add Oscar De La Hoya & Marvin Hagler.

Whitaker & Floyd would put me to sleep though if they would fight( it's all about the styles )...zzz...They would make it a boring fight. It would be nearly impossible to determine who would win this one.

Having seen Judah, DLH and now Hatton all failing to beat Floyd using varying tactics i believe no one fighting today can beat him at 147lb. I lean towards a prime Tszyu due to his stalking style, using that left lead to measure his opponents and then unleashing a huge right hand, of course he would have to find Floyd but i just can't help thinking that over twelve rounds KT would have hit him at least once and no one in Floyd's career has really tested his chin. It's all hypothetical but the Tszyu of 1999-2002 would have caused huge problems for PBF. Floyd has incredible defensive skills and appears to work his opponents out very early on in his fights, maybe Hearns with his height and power might have done the job, i think we are seeing a true all time great in this era and we are finding it difficult to believe that Floyd could beat our favorite fighters of the past, he is already beating our favorite fighters of the present.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

---

How would Arguello vs Mayweather be anything like Oscar vs Mayweather ?? first off Mayweather is about x2 times better at Superfeatherweight than he was at Lightmiddleweight. The fight would be little similar to Castillo fight, with Arguello picking his shots well and not wasting any punches, Arguello was very accurate puncher way more accurate than Castillo of course, but it was Castillo's head movement when he bobbed and weaved and come up with the punches that gave Mayweather trouble. Arguello stands straight up unlike Castillo i could see Superfeatherweight version of Mayweather beating Arguello. Mayweather was so fast at Superfeatherweight it was unbelievable, plus he had great punching power at that weight.

Oscar De La Hoya was throwing flurries and missed almost all of them. Mayweather out boxed Oscar De La Hoya. I think thats bad comparison to Mayweather vs Arguello.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brazilianbomber

Out of all the fighter you could have named

Hearns
Duran
Mosley (In his prime)
Pryor
Kosta
Whitaker
Trinidad

you name Arguello and say that he will kill him, and then you blame the Floyd LOVERS, enough said ::**

---

Hearns = Hearns by TKO.
Duran = Mayweather by decision.
Mosley (In his prime) = Mayweather by close decision.
Pryor = Umm unsure about this one.
Kosta = Mayweather by UD.
Whitaker = Draw.
Trinidad = Mayweather by UD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

---

Arguello would bet outpointed by a larger margin, as for Leonard, its a toss, up I think Mayweather's style causes more problems for Leonard than vice virsa, but Leonard is the natural WW.

I'd put my money on koysta and mosley to have beaten floyd in their prime.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

---

I wouldn't say kill but I def. see Alexis beating PBF. I've posted why before.

I think Floyd is a very good fighter and he'd be difficult for many fighters but then again many fighters would be very difficult for him to handle.

Most Difficult to beat for Floyd

Ray Robinson - he's THE BEST, great footwork, great speed, excellent power, well rounded fighter he could move he could stalk he could fight going backwards.

Ray Leonard - He's extremely close to THE BEST, he could brawl he could stick and move and he had good power too. Ray had the attitude to really draw Floyd out and have a brawl and I think it would have been a toe to toe brawl between those two.

Tommy Hearns - he's rangy powerful and he controlled distance pretty well....I doubt Floyd would have stood up to the punishment he dished out to Ray Leonard

Roberto Duran - Duran had a horrible attitude and if there was one guy who could mentally take Floyd out of a fight it was this guy. Good chin tough as nails and he was an extremely talented BOXER he could bull into the inside and hit and not get hit he did a marvelous job vs Ray Leonard in Montreal.


I think a fight vs Pryor or Mosley would be too hard to call


Honorable mentions: Pernell Whittaker, Emile Griffith, Julio Cesar Chavez, Henry Armstrong, Kid Gavilain, Carmen Basilio

Against Robinson I think this fight could really go either way, but Robinson would be a heavy favorite. THe reason is that we don't know how Ray would have delt with speed that matched his own, and also the combinations he threw wouldn't be able to land on Floyd because of the angles he used, and just because combinations don't land on Floyd. One thing both Leonard and Robinson would have an advantage at is that as Mayweather has moved up he has used less and less footwork and I think they would capatilize on this because when he pot shots Mayweather is a lot easier to read what he is going to do offensively. However the reason I think Floyd has a shot of beating RObinson a few times at WW is because Robinson is so easy to hit(for a pure boxer) sometimes I would wonder how he is one of the greatest all time, until he would go on an offensive fury consisting of 10-15 brutally hard punches, but both of them threw wildly when they threw their combinations and I think once Mayweather got used to their speed, if he lasted that long, he would started getting countering them hard enough to earn their respect. Now people are going to say they both had indestructible chins, but Robinson's chin wasn't as good as it was at middleweight and psychologicall it helps when you can return the fire, but once he found that he couldn't hit Mayweather very easily to would interesting to see how Robinson would go on from there, either he would just go on an offensive rampage for the rest of the fight and win through pressure and the occasional hard punch landing or he would try to box on the outside with his height and might lose because Mayweather has the better defense.

Well like i said before SRL beat PBF i can not see it any other way. SRL was quicker on his feet them PBF not by much but it would trouble Floyde. Had speed they are about the same but SRL with a reach and advantage coudl use his jab ong PBf for the earlier rounds and trun it up it up in the later rounds of the fight. SRL had everything going for him at the weight and i can not see PBF winning if they fought 20 times i bet SRl everytime.

And you would lose at least ten times ;). SRL wasn't quicker on his feet than Mayweather, if you watch Baldomir Mayweather compared to Leonard-Hearns or Duran its even, and Mayweather is a little bit quicker(time wise) getting in with his punches. You keep on talking about this reach advantage, but Ray was 2 inches taller an he had a 2 inch reach advantage(THough Mayweather's arms are longer). At their speed this means almost nothing, maybe if Leonard was 6' and he had Hearn's reach it would be different, but thats not the case. Also I see Leonard landing a few jabs early on, but it wouldn't go on for long becuase Mayweather would either bring his left hand up which he has done against fast southpaws or he would slip it which he would most likely do and go to work on the inside, and thats where this fight would take place mostly IMO, I see Mayweather coming forward like he did against Judah, and Leonard trying to box from the outside, but Mayweather would slip his punches and get inside where his sharper technique would make this fight an ATG. Also this would be the first opponent Leonard faced who was as fast as him, but also in better shape than him. I think Hagler was also in better shape than him, but Hagler was a lot slower. I just think you are hyperbolizing Leonard's physical advantages. He obviously hits harder, a little stronger, but in terms of speed, reflexes at WW they are equal and Mayweather's better technically. I am not saying he is the greatest ever, but he is easily up there with any WW and this is 17 pounds above where he is the best ever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pernell "Sweet Pea" Whitaker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

---

How would Arguello vs Mayweather be anything like Oscar vs Mayweather ?? first off Mayweather is about x2 times better at Superfeatherweight than he was at Lightmiddleweight. The fight would be little similar to Castillo fight, with Arguello picking his shots well and not wasting any punches, Arguello was very accurate puncher way more accurate than Castillo of course, but it was Castillo's head movement when he bobbed and weaved and come up with the punches that gave Mayweather trouble. Arguello stands straight up unlike Castillo i could see Superfeatherweight version of Mayweather beating Arguello. Mayweather was so fast at Superfeatherweight it was unbelievable, plus he had great punching power at that weight.

---

How would Alexis vs. PBF be like JLC vs. PBF?
JLC & Alexis are worlds apart in the technical aspect alone not considering footwork, accuracy (as you noted), speed & power.
For 1 Alexis is not one to swarm in the way JLC did.
One thing you make note of was Alexis standing up straight, that's right with both hands hel'd high. Very similar stands to Finitos, JMM & Rafa ("The Nacho Way" in other words). Alexis was able to pick up shots with his gloves this way and or just take a step to the side making his opponents miss.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CutMeMick

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pernell "Sweet Pea" Whitaker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

---

How would Arguello vs Mayweather be anything like Oscar vs Mayweather ?? first off Mayweather is about x2 times better at Superfeatherweight than he was at Lightmiddleweight. The fight would be little similar to Castillo fight, with Arguello picking his shots well and not wasting any punches, Arguello was very accurate puncher way more accurate than Castillo of course, but it was Castillo's head movement when he bobbed and weaved and come up with the punches that gave Mayweather trouble. Arguello stands straight up unlike Castillo i could see Superfeatherweight version of Mayweather beating Arguello. Mayweather was so fast at Superfeatherweight it was unbelievable, plus he had great punching power at that weight.

---

How would Alexis vs. PBF be like JLC vs. PBF?
JLC & Alexis are worlds apart in the technical aspect alone not considering footwork, accuracy (as you noted), speed & power.
For 1 Alexis is not one to swarm in the way JLC did.
One thing you make note of was Alexis standing up straight, that's right with both hands hel'd high. Very similar stands to Finitos, JMM & Rafa ("The Nacho Way" in other words). Alexis was able to pick up shots with his gloves this way and or just take a step to the side making his opponents miss.

---

How would Alexis vs. PBF be like JLC vs. PBF?

I didn't mean exactly like Castillo vs Mayweather, i meant Arguello would use patient aggression against Mayweather like Castillo did.

look anyone can look fast verse Bladomiar so that is the first thing i have disagree with on. And if Pbf faced Hearns i doubt he look so fast to be honest with and Duran faster then you think and it is not just me that fell SRL would win the majority of times if they fought. SRL had all the advantages and all the flim i have seen on PBF he is not as fast as SRL is at Welter and his footwork is not either. SRL yet again i have to say would beat PBF 20 times out 20 if they fought he was a better fighter then PBf and there acheviements and opponents speak for them selfs and i still pick SRL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

look anyone can look fast verse Bladomiar so that is the first thing i have disagree with on. And if Pbf faced Hearns i doubt he look so fast to be honest with and Duran faster then you think and it is not just me that fell SRL would win the majority of times if they fought. SRL had all the advantages and all the flim i have seen on PBF he is not as fast as SRL is at Welter and his footwork is not either. SRL yet again i have to say would beat PBF 20 times out 20 if they fought he was a better fighter then PBf and there acheviements and opponents speak for them selfs and i still pick SRL.

---

I wouldn't say its as clear cut as your saying 20 out of 20, but i do think Leonard would win because i think Mayweather is much better at Superfeatherweight.

Ice did you change your name again just to ask because it sounds like you and the postes match.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

Ice did you change your name again just to ask because it sounds like you and the postes match.

---

Yup.

You get bored with your name alot dont you i only know it is you because you have alot of post under you so it gives it away.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taeth

And you would lose at least ten times ;). SRL wasn't quicker on his feet than Mayweather, if you watch Baldomir Mayweather compared to Leonard-Hearns or Duran its even, and Mayweather is a little bit quicker(time wise) getting in with his punches. You keep on talking about this reach advantage, but Ray was 2 inches taller an he had a 2 inch reach advantage(THough Mayweather's arms are longer). At their speed this means almost nothing, maybe if Leonard was 6' and he had Hearn's reach it would be different, but thats not the case. Also I see Leonard landing a few jabs early on, but it wouldn't go on for long becuase Mayweather would either bring his left hand up which he has done against fast southpaws or he would slip it which he would most likely do and go to work on the inside, and thats where this fight would take place mostly IMO, I see Mayweather coming forward like he did against Judah, and Leonard trying to box from the outside, but Mayweather would slip his punches and get inside where his sharper technique would make this fight an ATG. Also this would be the first opponent Leonard faced who was as fast as him, but also in better shape than him. I think Hagler was also in better shape than him, but Hagler was a lot slower. I just think you are hyperbolizing Leonard's physical advantages. He obviously hits harder, a little stronger, but in terms of speed, reflexes at WW they are equal and Mayweather's better technically. I am not saying he is the greatest ever, but he is easily up there with any WW and this is 17 pounds above where he is the best ever.

---

no way in crap mayweather beats SRL. Not only was leonard probably faster than floyd he used combinations. Leonard was a versitile figher and probably the best ever.

I think many, if not most, of the great WWs could beat Mayweather in their prime at welterweight.

The same cannot be said through at Lightweight or superfeatherweight. Were PBF was very close to unbeatable.

Any of them could, but none of them would for sure. Just my opinion. Everyone floyd ever faces is supposed to be "the guy" and they never are. But that is a good good list of fighters there so who knows, i wouldn't bet against him though.

It sais a lot about PBF that we are comparing him with ATG welterweights. But frankly, I think we are getting ahead of ourselves. I would not put him as an ATG welterweight yet. I would sertanly not cosider him the favorite in a prime for prime match up with any of the top 10 WWs of all time.

I think Prime DLH and Prime Mosley would beat him at ww and I don't consider DLH nor Mosley a top 10 WW.

I cannot compare Floyd to the all time great Welterweights as I am not even close to being convinced he is the best current welterweight.

Lightweight and Below, he was a great fighter. Above Lightweight, he really has not proved himself in my eyes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigLuke

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Taeth

And you would lose at least ten times ;). SRL wasn't quicker on his feet than Mayweather, if you watch Baldomir Mayweather compared to Leonard-Hearns or Duran its even, and Mayweather is a little bit quicker(time wise) getting in with his punches. You keep on talking about this reach advantage, but Ray was 2 inches taller an he had a 2 inch reach advantage(THough Mayweather's arms are longer). At their speed this means almost nothing, maybe if Leonard was 6' and he had Hearn's reach it would be different, but thats not the case. Also I see Leonard landing a few jabs early on, but it wouldn't go on for long becuase Mayweather would either bring his left hand up which he has done against fast southpaws or he would slip it which he would most likely do and go to work on the inside, and thats where this fight would take place mostly IMO, I see Mayweather coming forward like he did against Judah, and Leonard trying to box from the outside, but Mayweather would slip his punches and get inside where his sharper technique would make this fight an ATG. Also this would be the first opponent Leonard faced who was as fast as him, but also in better shape than him. I think Hagler was also in better shape than him, but Hagler was a lot slower. I just think you are hyperbolizing Leonard's physical advantages. He obviously hits harder, a little stronger, but in terms of speed, reflexes at WW they are equal and Mayweather's better technically. I am not saying he is the greatest ever, but he is easily up there with any WW and this is 17 pounds above where he is the best ever.

---

no way in crap mayweather beats SRL. Not only was leonard probably faster than floyd he used combinations. Leonard was a versitile figher and probably the best ever.

---

I agree, sure mayweather has great boxing skills but this is SUGAR RAY LEONARD!!!! HELLO PEOPLE...SRL knew how to win close rounds, you could see how he wanted to win and was not scared to brawl when he needed to. Floyd would block many punches but Leonard was used to fighting 15 rounds...no way he would tire and give up, he would mess him up. It would be close though for the first 8 rounds or so, then I see SRL winning...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ricardo "Finito" Lopez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

---

How would Arguello vs Mayweather be anything like Oscar vs Mayweather ?? first off Mayweather is about x2 times better at Superfeatherweight than he was at Lightmiddleweight. The fight would be little similar to Castillo fight, with Arguello picking his shots well and not wasting any punches, Arguello was very accurate puncher way more accurate than Castillo of course, but it was Castillo's head movement when he bobbed and weaved and come up with the punches that gave Mayweather trouble. Arguello stands straight up unlike Castillo i could see Superfeatherweight version of Mayweather beating Arguello. Mayweather was so fast at Superfeatherweight it was unbelievable, plus he had great punching power at that weight.

Oscar De La Hoya was throwing flurries and missed almost all of them. Mayweather out boxed Oscar De La Hoya. I think thats bad comparison to Mayweather vs Arguello.

---

A few things:
1) Yes Arguello would stand up straight...so what? He had decent defense, GREAT power, and VERY GOOD boxing skills, and A LOT of patience. I recall seeing some of his fights and ONE punch would F*** up the other guy.
2) Floyd's pussy right hands would be like feathers tickling Arguello's face. Did you see the MASSIVE shots in the Arguello/Olivares or Arguello/Pryor 1 fight? At one point I thought Arguello had knocked off Pryor's head...same with some of Pryor's shots, these too were tough SOBs.

3) In my eyes, criticize me all you want, it was NOT NOT NOT clear that Floyd beat Oscar. A draw would have made sense but no way Floyd won " EASILY ". I had Oscar barely winning...But regardless of who won, it was a close fight. Nobody can argue that, and remember this was against a older Oscar. Oscar De La Hoya or Mosley would beat Floyd if they were in their primes.

4) Trinidad would NOT though, he would lose EASILY to Floyd. His only chance would be to land a lucky left hook against Floyd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyle

I think Floyd is a very good fighter and he'd be difficult for many fighters but then again many fighters would be very difficult for him to handle.

Most Difficult to beat for Floyd

Ray Robinson - he's THE BEST, great footwork, great speed, excellent power, well rounded fighter he could move he could stalk he could fight going backwards.

Ray Leonard - He's extremely close to THE BEST, he could brawl he could stick and move and he had good power too. Ray had the attitude to really draw Floyd out and have a brawl and I think it would have been a toe to toe brawl between those two.

Tommy Hearns - he's rangy powerful and he controlled distance pretty well....I doubt Floyd would have stood up to the punishment he dished out to Ray Leonard

Roberto Duran - Duran had a horrible attitude and if there was one guy who could mentally take Floyd out of a fight it was this guy. Good chin tough as nails and he was an extremely talented BOXER he could bull into the inside and hit and not get hit he did a marvelous job vs Ray Leonard in Montreal.


I think a fight vs Pryor or Mosley would be too hard to call


Honorable mentions: Pernell Whittaker, Emile Griffith, Julio Cesar Chavez, Henry Armstrong, Kid Gavilain, Carmen Basilio

---

This is a good post, Lyle ..... and I have to agree with most of it.

I actually do think that Floyd might yet be a great great fighter, but the guys mentioned above are already known to be great fighters!!

The key point for me, is that Floyd is not a natural welterweight, he has moved up from the lighter weights whereas many of the other guys ended up moving to higher weights than welterweight. Hearns ended up fighting cruiserweight!!

Personally, a prime motivated Ray Robinson was the nearest things I have ever seen to being unbeatable at welter. I think he could have boxed with Floyd, or rumbled with him. IN terms of experience and savvy, the old timers had much more ringcraft formed from many more fights than the guys today.

I think Hearns would have just been too tall and rangy for Floyd. The long right would have kept Floyd on the back foot and I don;t think many people could have outboxed Tommy from distance. That saud, Floys would have had top do a Ray Leonard on him to win, and that's unlikely but not beyond the realms of possibility.

A Ray Leonard fight would have been a classic .... to me, Floyd is almost a reincarnation of Leonard. Very similar styles and any fight would have started out as a chess match. Whover ended up being outboxed would have to go to the trenches and turn it into a fight ..... we know that Leonard could do this when he had to, but Floyd has never had to do it yet.

I think a peak Duran would have outhustled Floyd ..... I think he could have pulled off the Hatton gameplan (but I am not sure that Floyd would have been drawn into the war that Leonard was). Also, don;t forget that Duran was not really a welterweight either !!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

---

if Alexis had a weakness it was other boxers.

I don't think he'd beat Floyd.

Can people stop digging up fighters of 30 years ago just to put down the fighters of today???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ricardo "Finito" Lopez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

1) Mayweather vs. SRL...this would be a hard fight. I see Leonard winning this in 12 rounds, there's no way Floyd would make Leonard look silly. I might even say Leonard would KO him in the 10th or 11th round. I honestly believe SRL had the right style/skills to beat Floyd.

2) Mayweather vs. Alexis Arguello...this fight would be very similar to the DLH fight ( in the sense that Arguello would be attacking throughout the fight) BUT the big difference is that he would not tire in 8/9 rounds. Arguello would DESTROY Floyd! Sorry Floyd LOVERS, those of you who think Mayweather is superior to God, Alexis would punish him all night long.

What do you think? Agree or disagree with me? I would love to hear your thoughts...let's hear 'em... ;D

---

How would Arguello vs Mayweather be anything like Oscar vs Mayweather ?? first off Mayweather is about x2 times better at Superfeatherweight than he was at Lightmiddleweight. The fight would be little similar to Castillo fight, with Arguello picking his shots well and not wasting any punches, Arguello was very accurate puncher way more accurate than Castillo of course, but it was Castillo's head movement when he bobbed and weaved and come up with the punches that gave Mayweather trouble. Arguello stands straight up unlike Castillo i could see Superfeatherweight version of Mayweather beating Arguello. Mayweather was so fast at Superfeatherweight it was unbelievable, plus he had great punching power at that weight.

Oscar De La Hoya was throwing flurries and missed almost all of them. Mayweather out boxed Oscar De La Hoya. I think thats bad comparison to Mayweather vs Arguello.

---

A few things:
1) Yes Arguello would stand up straight...so what? He had decent defense, GREAT power, and VERY GOOD boxing skills, and A LOT of patience. I recall seeing some of his fights and ONE punch would F*** up the other guy.
2) Floyd's pussy right hands would be like feathers tickling Arguello's face. Did you see the MASSIVE shots in the Arguello/Olivares or Arguello/Pryor 1 fight? At one point I thought Arguello had knocked off Pryor's head...same with some of Pryor's shots, these too were tough SOBs.

3) In my eyes, criticize me all you want, it was NOT NOT NOT clear that Floyd beat Oscar. A draw would have made sense but no way Floyd won " EASILY ". I had Oscar barely winning...But regardless of who won, it was a close fight. Nobody can argue that, and remember this was against a older Oscar. Oscar De La Hoya or Mosley would beat Floyd if they were in their primes.

4) Trinidad would NOT though, he would lose EASILY to Floyd. His only chance would be to land a lucky left hook against Floyd.

---

A few things:
1) Yes Arguello would stand up straight...so what? He had decent defense, GREAT power, and VERY GOOD

The reason i brought it up is because why Castillo gave Mayweather trouble was his head movement, because he would duck and come up with his punches it off set Mayweather's rhythm.

2) Floyd's pussy right hands would be like feathers tickling Arguello's face. Did you see the MASSIVE shots in the Arguello/Olivares or Arguello/Pryor 1 fight? At one point I thought Arguello had knocked off Pryor's head...same with some of Pryor's shots, these too were tough SOBs.

First off Pryor is not a puncher, he may of had high KO ratio but he would wear you down with barrage of punches.

And actually you bringing up Olivares just helps my argument even more because Olivares was out boxing Arguello. Plus Olivares gave Arguello fits with his movement, you forget Mayweather is a puncher at Superfeatherweight, and he could turn your legs to jelly with 1 punch. Speed combined with timing is scary combination speed does actually contribute to your power. Plus Mayweather throws his punches so quick you can't anticipate it and you don't see them coming and like the old saying goes. The worst punches are the ones you don't see coming.

3) In my eyes, criticize me all you want, it was NOT NOT NOT clear that Floyd beat Oscar. A draw would have made sense but no way Floyd won " EASILY ". I had Oscar barely winning...But regardless of who won, it was a close fight. Nobody can argue that, and remember this was against a older Oscar. Oscar De La Hoya or Mosley would beat Floyd if they were in their primes.

Sorry but i have to criticize you because no way on this earth Oscar De La Hoya got a draw or won the fight. Oscar De La Hoya must of fooled you with his flurries that were missing. Mayweather landed sharper cleaner blows, Mayweather was out landing Oscar De La Hoya in most rounds all you have to do is look at the punch stats they are landslide for Mayweather.

El Flaco Explosive was a wonderfull fighter,one of my all time faves(thanks to Tuctan,where did he go?!) However,I think he had some problems with guys who used lateral movement. Coupled with Mayweather's pop at the lower weights,I'd favour Floyd to win on points but I can see Alexis hurting him a few times with those pin point shots. Would have been a beautiful fight.

147,Floyd v SRL. SRL wins for me.He had the speed and offence to go along with it and it would that v Floyd's speed and defence. I'd favour Leonard on points.

I think Hearns has the style to give Mayweather hell:1 punch ko power,plus freakishly long reach and jab. Everything needed to combat Floyd's speed. Heanrs wins that for me.

It's a testament to Mayweather's skills that we can talk about him v these other legends. It's not a matter of who we think would win but rather that we are even comparing him to them shows how much talent he has.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN

Having seen Judah, DLH and now Hatton all failing to beat Floyd using varying tactics i believe no one fighting today can beat him at 147lb. I lean towards a prime Tszyu due to his stalking style, using that left lead to measure his opponents and then unleashing a huge right hand, of course he would have to find Floyd but i just can't help thinking that over twelve rounds KT would have hit him at least once and no one in Floyd's career has really tested his chin. It's all hypothetical but the Tszyu of 1999-2002 would have caused huge problems for PBF. Floyd has incredible defensive skills and appears to work his opponents out very early on in his fights, maybe Hearns with his height and power might have done the job, i think we are seeing a true all time great in this era and we are finding it difficult to believe that Floyd could beat our favorite fighters of the past, he is already beating our favorite fighters of the present.

---

Great post mate CC i agree with the lot of that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

It's a testament to Mayweather's skills that we can talk about him v these other legends. It's not a matter of who we think would win but rather that we are even comparing him to them shows how much talent he has.

---

You're absolutely right, it is a testament to his skills it is really a shame he doesn't WANT to be the best. He needs to fight others to be considered a " legend "; however it is fun trying to match up Floyd with old fighters ( since he has a lot of skill and great defense ). But I'm with Emanuel Steward on this one, he is not yet GREAT...almost though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jman76

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

It's a testament to Mayweather's skills that we can talk about him v these other legends. It's not a matter of who we think would win but rather that we are even comparing him to them shows how much talent he has.

---

You're absolutely right, it is a testament to his skills it is really a shame he doesn't WANT to be the best. He needs to fight others to be considered a " legend "; however it is fun trying to match up Floyd with old fighters ( since he has a lot of skill and great defense ). But I'm with Emanuel Steward on this one, he is not yet GREAT...almost though.

---

Of course Mayweather is a great how can he not be ?? he has won 5 world titles in 5 different weight classes beating some good opposition like.

Jose Luis Castillo x2
Diego Corrales
Ricky Hatton
Arturo Gatti
Genaro Hernandez
Carlos Hernandez
Zab Judah
Angel Manfredy
Phillip Ndou
Jesus Chavez
Oscar De La Hoya

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

El Flaco Explosive was a wonderfull fighter,one of my all time faves(thanks to Tuctan,where did he go?!) However,I think he had some problems with guys who used lateral movement. Coupled with Mayweather's pop at the lower weights,I'd favour Floyd to win on points but I can see Alexis hurting him a few times with those pin point shots. Would have been a beautiful fight.

147,Floyd v SRL. SRL wins for me.He had the speed and offence to go along with it and it would that v Floyd's speed and defence. I'd favour Leonard on points.

I think Hearns has the style to give Mayweather hell:1 punch ko power,plus freakishly long reach and jab. Everything needed to combat Floyd's speed. Heanrs wins that for me.

It's a testament to Mayweather's skills that we can talk about him v these other legends. It's not a matter of who we think would win but rather that we are even comparing him to them shows how much talent he has.

---

Im just watching Mayweather Sr vs Leonard again and Mayweather Sr did give Leonard a few problem's i think Mayweather Jr does a lot better against Leonard than most people expect.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ricardo "Finito" Lopez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

El Flaco Explosive was a wonderfull fighter,one of my all time faves(thanks to Tuctan,where did he go?!) However,I think he had some problems with guys who used lateral movement. Coupled with Mayweather's pop at the lower weights,I'd favour Floyd to win on points but I can see Alexis hurting him a few times with those pin point shots. Would have been a beautiful fight.

147,Floyd v SRL. SRL wins for me.He had the speed and offence to go along with it and it would that v Floyd's speed and defence. I'd favour Leonard on points.

I think Hearns has the style to give Mayweather hell:1 punch ko power,plus freakishly long reach and jab. Everything needed to combat Floyd's speed. Heanrs wins that for me.

It's a testament to Mayweather's skills that we can talk about him v these other legends. It's not a matter of who we think would win but rather that we are even comparing him to them shows how much talent he has.

---

Im just watching Mayweather Sr vs Leonard again and Mayweather Sr did give Leonard a few problem's i think Mayweather Jr does a lot better against Leonard than most people expect.

---

My Dad was and remains a huge Leonard fan. He watched evert single Leonard fight and interview. He was big into Leonard and I think he even has an embossed memory of Leonard (and indeed Hagler) in his mind.

His knowledge of modern boxing is limited as a result of boxing falling off mainstream media and Dec 8th was the first time he saw Floyd Mayweather jr. He said in his opinion Floyd had evrything needed to beat Leonard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hitmandonny

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ricardo "Finito" Lopez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gamo

El Flaco Explosive was a wonderfull fighter,one of my all time faves(thanks to Tuctan,where did he go?!) However,I think he had some problems with guys who used lateral movement. Coupled with Mayweather's pop at the lower weights,I'd favour Floyd to win on points but I can see Alexis hurting him a few times with those pin point shots. Would have been a beautiful fight.

147,Floyd v SRL. SRL wins for me.He had the speed and offence to go along with it and it would that v Floyd's speed and defence. I'd favour Leonard on points.

I think Hearns has the style to give Mayweather hell:1 punch ko power,plus freakishly long reach and jab. Everything needed to combat Floyd's speed. Heanrs wins that for me.

It's a testament to Mayweather's skills that we can talk about him v these other legends. It's not a matter of who we think would win but rather that we are even comparing him to them shows how much talent he has.

---

Im just watching Mayweather Sr vs Leonard again and Mayweather Sr did give Leonard a few problem's i think Mayweather Jr does a lot better against Leonard than most people expect.

---

My Dad was and remains a huge Leonard fan. He watched evert single Leonard fight and interview. He was big into Leonard and I think he even has an embossed memory of Leonard (and indeed Hagler) in his mind.

His knowledge of modern boxing is limited as a result of boxing falling off mainstream media and Dec 8th was the first time he saw Floyd Mayweather jr. He said in his opinion Floyd had evrything needed to beat Leonard.

---

Mayweather Sr actually won quite a few rounds off Leonard, but he wasn't nowhere near as effective at using shoulder roll while he was on the ropes as Mayweather Jr is. And thats where he got into the most trouble while being on the ropes.

Agreed there. I thought that Mayweather Sr. was proving problematic up until getting hurt. I think Sr. was hurt by something and all his plans were then dispensed.

Look say what you want about that fight but Leonard was still a very green fighter it was leonard 14 fight and i thought he dominated Floyd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr140

Look say what you want about that fight but Leonard was still a very green fighter it was leonard 14 fight and i thought he dominated Floyd.

---

It's difficult to say really. Leonard had a huge amateur career behind him and the finest training available at the time so he should have been 100% prepared.

Furthermore, Floyd Sr. Wasn't all that much more expierienced.