Discuss.
Printable View
Discuss.
I wasn't aware Manny was on the P4P throne
floyd mayweathers king of the p4p hill.
Whoa whoa whoa!!!
Hold your horses there cowboy. You're sounding like Max Kellerman.
First of all, PBF is the no.1
And second, Pac is in no.2 spot.
And third, a prime Hopkins would've easily whoop Calzaghe's ass.
PBF and Pac fought more quality fighters than Joe did.
He sure was, after beating HOFer Morales twice, HOFer MAB twice, and HOFer JMM twice (if not for a scoring error).Quote:
Originally Posted by the wiz
P4p, Floyd would not have beaten Nard, and you know it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Joe, by doing the impossible, gets the top spot.
What do you mean "impossible"?Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQP4p, Floyd would not have beaten Nard, and you know it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Joe, by doing the impossible, gets the top spot.
I thought Hopkins was the underdog?
Well, we all thought we'd never see the day when Hopkins gets outjabbed, outhustled, outpunched by anyone much less a white boy didn't we?Quote:
Originally Posted by PacstraightleftWhat do you mean "impossible"?Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQP4p, Floyd would not have beaten Nard, and you know it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Joe, by doing the impossible, gets the top spot.
I thought Hopkins was the underdog?
Get out the plunger...theres a clogged crapper
Hopkins is a down-the-hill fighter bro.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQWell, we all thought we'd never see the day when Hopkins gets outjabbed, outhustled, outpunched by anyone much less a white boy didn't we?Quote:
Originally Posted by PacstraightleftWhat do you mean "impossible"?Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQ
I thought Hopkins was the underdog?
Putting Calzaghe in the top spot right now is a little premature, don't you think? I mean, Kelly Pavlik would knock his snot out.
So Joe just beat the bejeesus out of Hopkins, but Hopkins schools Pavlik, and Pavlik KOs Joe? There's something wrong about this logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by PacstraightleftHopkins is a down-the-hill fighter bro.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQWell, we all thought we'd never see the day when Hopkins gets outjabbed, outhustled, outpunched by anyone much less a white boy didn't we?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Putting Calzaghe in the top spot right now is a little premature, don't you think? I mean, Kelly Pavlik would knock his snot out.
You can say Calzaghe won, but I wouldn't say he was beating "the bejeesus" out of him.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQSo Joe just beat the bejeesus out of Hopkins, but Hopkins schools Pavlik, and Pavlik KOs Joe? There's something wrong about this logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by PacstraightleftHopkins is a down-the-hill fighter bro.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQ
Putting Calzaghe in the top spot right now is a little premature, don't you think? I mean, Kelly Pavlik would knock his snot out.
And who said Hopkins schools Pavlik?
Please stop! I've had enough with your nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQSo Joe just beat the bejeesus out of Hopkins, but Hopkins schools Pavlik, and Pavlik KOs Joe? There's something wrong about this logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by PacstraightleftHopkins is a down-the-hill fighter bro.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQ
Putting Calzaghe in the top spot right now is a little premature, don't you think? I mean, Kelly Pavlik would knock his snot out.
You're more and more embarassing yourself.
"Joe beat the bejeesus out of Hopkins"?..:confused:.. WTF?
If not for the flash KD and Cortez' incompetent refereeing it would've been a SCHOOLING, and you know it.
This thread makes me smile :cool:
So Joe beats everyone in front of him, including Nard in a fight where the ref was against Joe, and the immediate conclusion is Pavlik KOs Joe? Great analysis there.Quote:
Originally Posted by the wizYou can say Calzaghe won, but I wouldn't say he was beating "the bejeesus" out of him.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQSo Joe just beat the bejeesus out of Hopkins, but Hopkins schools Pavlik, and Pavlik KOs Joe? There's something wrong about this logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
And who said Hopkins schools Pavlik?
Not as much as Calzaghe fans all over the world. THANKS JOE! :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanrw
Ok JLAQ, we get it, you're a big Calzaghe fan :rolleyes:
Not really, I just give props to somebody who achieves something great. Peppering Nard's face with uncontested punches is not something you would see very often, and considering the handicap of a biased referee, this has to be a victory ten times better than Floyd's victory over Hatton, with the help of the same frigging biased ref in Joe Cortez. In all honesty, if you thought Floyd beating Hatton was spectacular, Joe beating Nard should be making all true boxing fans crazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by the wiz
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQNot really, I just give props to somebody who achieves something great. Peppering Nard's face with uncontested punches is not something you would see very often, and considering the handicap of a biased referee, this has to be a victory ten times better than Floyd's victory over Hatton, with the help of the same frigging biased ref in Joe Cortez. In all honesty, if you thought Floyd beating Hatton was spectacular, Joe beating Nard should be making all true boxing fans crazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by the wiz
Uncontested punches? Are you sure you weren't watching an old Calzaghe fight tonight?
And I'm not a big Cortez fan but tonight I didn't think he played a role.
A ref is supposed to limit illegal blows, which, in everyone's opinion, was raining like crazy. If you permit a fighter to get away with all these sheet, it DOES get to be a factor in the outcome of a fight. FYI, headbutts affect a fighter. Lowblows affect a fighter. Those rabbit punches affect a fighter.Quote:
Originally Posted by the wizQuote:
Originally Posted by JLAQNot really, I just give props to somebody who achieves something great. Peppering Nard's face with uncontested punches is not something you would see very often, and considering the handicap of a biased referee, this has to be a victory ten times better than Floyd's victory over Hatton, with the help of the same frigging biased ref in Joe Cortez. In all honesty, if you thought Floyd beating Hatton was spectacular, Joe beating Nard should be making all true boxing fans crazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by the wiz
Uncontested punches? Are you sure you weren't watching an old Calzaghe fight tonight?
And I'm not a big Cortez fan but tonight I didn't think he played a role.
Who is this fukin 20 post jerkoff anyway?
Your an idiot you said Hopkins is an average fighter without all his illegal blows so how would Mayweather lose to an average fighter ?? and if you think Mayweather would lose to a 43 year old man P4P then your a moron pure and simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQP4p, Floyd would not have beaten Nard, and you know it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Joe, by doing the impossible, gets the top spot.
You know what? I have no problem with calling Joe C #2 right now, ahead of Pac and behind Mayweather. He beat one of the greatest fighters of our generation last night.
LOL@ Calzaghe being above Floyd and LOL @ Calzaghe's victory being better than Floyd's over Hatton.
So just barely taking a RAZOR THIN split decision in which you were dropped in the first round is better than dominating and knocking your opponent senseless? Yeaaaaaaah, I think Calzaghe's cock must be cutting off the oxygen to your brain, pal. ;D
Incompetent refereeing ?? Hopkins did get away with a lot of clinching, but Calzaghe was also lucky he didn't get a point taken away for all them rabbit shots and low blows.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQP4p, Floyd would not have beaten Nard, and you know it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft
Joe, by doing the impossible, gets the top spot.
You don't really believe this do you?
I'm a big fan of JC, but last night's performance actually takes him down a few notches.
Bomp, NO-ONE can look good against Hopkins ;)
Jlaq youre not a idiot but a idiat - Stop munching on joe's cock, which fight did you watch last night. Joe JUST JUST managed to beat a 43 yes 43 yr old man, whilst mayweather beat (sorry, whooped) hatton in his prime.Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQNot as much as Calzaghe fans all over the world. THANKS JOE! :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanrw
Whats the point of commenting on somethin when you cleary have no knowledge whatsoever and are an ignarant fool,
Before last night, I had Calzaghe 4th PFP, behind Floyd, Pac and JMM. Maybe I'd move him up to 3rd now, but no higher than that.
You're fairly new to this boxing stuff, now aren't you...Quote:
Originally Posted by JLAQ
I didn't think B-Hop got the bejeesus his face looked a little better after the fight... yea he won but p4p number 1? no
Oh dear the same crap as always...if he won then the other guy was too old.....same old same old
P4P Floyd would destroy Joe... Mayweather besides power does everything this version of B-Hop does, but better, and a lot faster. Joe wouldn't be able to keep up with PBF, and he wouldn't be able to land a thing against Mayweather. Joe is a great fighter, but speed would destroy him... Roy Jones Jr. in his prime also would have dismantled Calzaghe badly.
I'd put Calzhage third behind Mayweather and Manny.
Nope... Joe's performance not enough to take the throne away from "Manny Mayweather" ...
Good bye B-Hop no more I have to hear form you BYEEEE!!!
http://a669.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...5bc7041f4c.gif
:pis2:JLAQ:badass:
as for joe taking away the number two spot from pacquaio ............HELL NO !!!!!
I have PBF still no 1, but if he fights De la hoya and continues wrestling and dancing then he shoud be classed as retired and fighting exhibitions, therefore moved out of the rankings
1.PBF
2.Pac
3.JC
This is how it stood at the start of the year and after Manny scrapped a win past JMM and JC scrapped a win past BHop all stays the same
I dont see any argument in this at all