Ring's NEW Top 10 P4P... Look where Hopkins is at!!!

POUND-FOR-POUND
1. FLOYD MAYWEATHER
Junior Welterweight
2. WINKY WRIGHT
Junior Middleweight
3. MARCO ANTONIO BARRERA
Junior Lightweight
4. ERIK MORALES
Junior Lightweight
5. MANNY PACQUIAO
Featherweight
6. JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ
Featherweight
7. RICKY HATTON
Junior Welterweight
8. DIEGO CORRALES
Lightweight
9. JERMAIN TAYLOR
Middleweight
10. BERNARD HOPKINS
Middleweight


Hopkins at number 10! Hahaha, never thought I'd live to see the day! And Mayweather finally at number 1!!! Boxing just keeps getting more surprising. I don't think Mayweather, a fighter who hasn't fought a super-fight, oustide of Arturo Gatti, deserves such a crown.

As for Hopkins at number 10...Â
When you fall, you fall hard! I didn't think Hopkins' would be disrespected that easily after a loss. ...But you know what? Keep disrespecting and you'll get Disrespected Back!

With all due respect to the "champion," Hopkins, he did beat the hell outta Jermain, physically and most of all... mentally. Jermain isn't the man to dethrone Hopkins, it's a man with talent who is willing to maul Hopkins and willing to take punishment to do it.  Either that or a super fast boxer-counterpuncher. Basically a Mexican or a Mayweather, both would have to be bigger of course.

After the Jermain fight, I thought Sugar Ray Leonard has a chance against Hopkins, but Hagler has a better chance at Hopkins. Hypothetically speaking, of course.

Put in your two cents on the NEW Ring's ratings. ;D

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

thats bullshit he should be at least be #3 and thats at LEAST

boxing needs some kind of commison the can stop shit like that from happinging, and i think the fight was a draw, who ever scored the 12 round for hopkins should be asked to resign as a judge, beacuse thes fucking wrong who ever wrote the for the ring is a fucking idoit and should be culled!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired :'( ::) Hopkins should still be #1, he fukkin won the FIGHT!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

Heheh, Not surprising to hear that from you. ;) Â Not that I agree, but I enjoy your absurd or creative posts now and then. Â I'd like to agree with you, but I mustn't. Â The old man is consistent, despite his shallow division. Â And he beat-up a young olympian.

I think Hopkins stock dropped so much because they figure at his age he's not getting any better. Â Though I disagree with the outcome of the Hopkins-Taylor fight, it did show weakness in Hopkins and that weakness is only going to increase (most likely) Â I don't think he should be at #10, but that explains why he dropped so far...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired :'( ::) Hopkins should still be #1, he f***in won the FIGHT!!!!

---

When's somebody going to ban this idiot?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheChosenOne

thats bulls*** he should be at least be #3 and thats at LEAST

boxing needs some kind of commison the can stop s*** like that from happinging, and i think the fight was a draw, who ever scored the 12 round for hopkins should be asked to resign as a judge, beacuse thes f***ing wrong who ever wrote the for the ring is a f***ing idoit and should be culled!

---

I thought that possibly they should have done something NEW... Â for this situation...

which is Put Jermain at number NINE or SEVEN and have Hopkins STILL HIGHER at number Three for instance. Â Because one win won't put Jermain on top, but one loss won't put Hopkins to far down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dasamm

I think Hopkins stock dropped so much because they figure at his age he's not getting any better. Â Though I disagree with the outcome of the Hopkins-Taylor fight, it did show weakness in Hopkins and that weakness is only going to increase (most likely) Â I don't think he should be at #10, but that explains why he dropped so far...

---

I didn't see ANY weaknesses. I aslo fear Jermain won't be the same either. Hopkins looked beatiful in there and wasn't even tired at the end of the 12th.

The only weakness I saw was Hopkins was taking it easy on the kid. Had Hopkins gone "Balls Out" in the last part of the fight AND threw in a tad more punches in the middle, Taylor would have been either seriously hurt or Knocked Out. Hopkins was being too economical and admiring his own punches, at times.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired :'( ::) Hopkins should still be #1, he f***in won the FIGHT!!!!

---

When's somebody going to ban this idiot?

---

What is your problem huh? You can completely ridicule and belittle my boys Bernard and RJJ, but dare I say anything about Eubank?!!! Get a life man!

WTF..........Ricky hatton..........fuck off. The guy beat one man and hes number 7, thats fucking disgraceful. Hopkins should be number 2.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Snakey

WTF..........Ricky hatton..........f*** off. The guy beat one man and hes number 7, thats f***ing disgraceful. Hopkins should be number 2.

---

Yeah, Hatton should never be under Juan Manuel Marquez.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gyrokai

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Snakey

WTF..........Ricky hatton..........f*** off. The guy beat one man and hes number 7, thats f***ing disgraceful. Hopkins should be number 2.

---

Yeah, Hatton should never be under Juan Manuel Marquez.

---

At least marquez has earned his way into the top 10, hatton beat kostya tszyu (to me it looked like an off night) and now hes number 7. Jesus christ, these ratings are screwed up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Snakey

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gyrokai

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Snakey

WTF..........Ricky hatton..........f*** off. The guy beat one man and hes number 7, thats f***ing disgraceful. Hopkins should be number 2.

---

Yeah, Hatton should never be under Juan Manuel Marquez.

---

At least marquez has earned his way into the top 10, hatton beat kostya tszyu (to me it looked like an off night) and now hes number 7. Jesus christ, these ratings are screwed up.

---

Marquez earned it by one fight too. Except Hatton's undefeated and Marquez isn't. Not only that, I aslo think Pacquiao beat Marquez on points.

Hatton beat a great fighter, Kostya Tszyu, and fought every second in every round. He wasn't afraid of the incoming onslaught from the p4p power puncher. With that showing, Hatton came closer to greatness than Jermain ever was.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired :'( ::) Hopkins should still be #1, he f***in won the FIGHT!!!!

---

When's somebody going to ban this idiot?

---

What is your problem huh? You can completely ridicule and belittle my boys Bernard and RJJ, but dare I say anything about Eubank?!!! Get a life man!

---

Well Eubank's not the one who many idiots believe is better than Sugar Ray Robinson, are you dumb? Eubank is probably the most hated boxer in the history of the game whereas Hopkins and Jones Jr are grossly over-rated (Sugar Ray Robs would eat them for supper).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

but you know you brought this up because of benn and eubank.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dasamm

I think Hopkins stock dropped so much because they figure at his age he's not getting any better. Â Though I disagree with the outcome of the Hopkins-Taylor fight, it did show weakness in Hopkins and that weakness is only going to increase (most likely) Â I don't think he should be at #10, but that explains why he dropped so far...

---

who is in your avatar?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dasamm

I think Hopkins stock dropped so much because they figure at his age he's not getting any better. Â Though I disagree with the outcome of the Hopkins-Taylor fight, it did show weakness in Hopkins and that weakness is only going to increase (most likely) Â I don't think he should be at #10, but that explains why he dropped so far...

---

who is in your avatar?

---

Good question. Cool click, dasamm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

but you know you brought this up because of benn and eubank.

---

What??

Yeah, I mean William Joppy, Glen Johnson, and Antwun Echols were all garbage! ::)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired :'( ::) Hopkins should still be #1, he f***in won the FIGHT!!!!

---

When's somebody going to ban this idiot?

---

What is your problem huh? You can completely ridicule and belittle my boys Bernard and RJJ, but dare I say anything about Eubank?!!! Get a life man!

---

Well Eubank's not the one who many idiots believe is better than Sugar Ray Robinson, are you dumb? Eubank is probably the most hated boxer in the history of the game whereas Hopkins and Jones Jr are grossly over-rated (Sugar Ray Robs would eat them for supper).

---

Who said that Hopkins was better than SRR? Neither of them are, doesn't mean he deserves to be 10th on the P4P.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

---

He didnt loose every round. Roy is probably my favorite fighter of all time and that shit is bogus. Dont type shit like this because some people will actually believe.

Even if Manny did say that you know it isnt true and shouldnt be typed.

who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Yeah, I mean William Joppy, Glen Johnson, and Antwun Echols were all garbage! ::)

---

NOWHERE NEAR good enough opposition to be considered ANYWHERE NEAR Sugar Ray Robinson.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OumaFan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

Haha. Sure whatever, MW just hasn't been the same since Eubanks retired :'( ::) Hopkins should still be #1, he f***in won the FIGHT!!!!

---

When's somebody going to ban this idiot?

---

What is your problem huh? You can completely ridicule and belittle my boys Bernard and RJJ, but dare I say anything about Eubank?!!! Get a life man!

---

Well Eubank's not the one who many idiots believe is better than Sugar Ray Robinson, are you dumb? Eubank is probably the most hated boxer in the history of the game whereas Hopkins and Jones Jr are grossly over-rated (Sugar Ray Robs would eat them for supper).

---

Who said that Hopkins was better than SRR? Neither of them are, doesn't mean he deserves to be 10th on the P4P.

---

it isnt hopkins fault that people rank him where they do. He always says that SRR is the best fighter of all time and during one of the round in the taylor fight he asked bouie if he should do one of srr's tricks.

it is true that bernards rule of opposition was a bit shallow, but nevertheless he deserves to be higher on the top p4p list.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

---

who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

---

Gerald McClellan, who was waaaaaaay better than Hopkins.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

---

who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

---

And why are you bringing this up? We're talking about HOPKINS you dumb ass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

---

who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

---

Gerald McClellan, who was waaaaaaay better than Hopkins.

---

dont avoid the question. that all of thim faced.

mcclellan was very good and I really like the guy. But he lost to Benn for a reason. He loaded up on everything and couldnt pace himself. He would have had trouble hitting Hopkins. he never did reach his prime and he would have been great, but the version that benn beat wasnt great. not to mention the controversy in that fight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Yeah, I mean William Joppy, Glen Johnson, and Antwun Echols were all garbage! ::)

---

NOWHERE NEAR good enough opposition to be considered ANYWHERE NEAR Sugar Ray Robinson.

---

Neither were ur opponents or Eubanks either.

And ur only sayin McClennan was better than Hopkins cause you beat him, Nigel. Â ::)

If anythin, McClennan wasn't more skillfull, but he hit harder. Â

But u found dat out first hand didn't u  ;D

J/P all respect all respect for you not getting Ko'd in the first round Nige.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

---

who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

---

And why are you bringing this up? We're talking about HOPKINS you dumb ass.

---

dont resort to name calling because you arguement sucks.

i am bringing this up because all of this is just a way to bash him for not fighting the guys. also you believe that they would have beat them and they dont get anywhere near the credit he does. THAT IS WHY I AM BRINGING THIS UP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

---

who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

---

Gerald McClellan, who was waaaaaaay better than Hopkins.

---

dont avoid the question. that all of thim faced.

mcclellan was very good and I really like the guy. But he lost to Benn for a reason. He loaded up on everything and couldnt pace himself. He would have had trouble hitting Hopkins. he never did reach his prime and he would have been great, but the version that benn beat wasnt great. not to mention the controversy in that fight.

---

And I suppose Benn wasn't great ::)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Purist

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Yeah, I mean William Joppy, Glen Johnson, and Antwun Echols were all garbage! ::)

---

NOWHERE NEAR good enough opposition to be considered ANYWHERE NEAR Sugar Ray Robinson.

---

Neither were ur opponents or Eubanks either.

---

We're talking about HOPKINS, hello??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magnum

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

It's a disgrace to even have Hopkins in the top 10, I would never of had that guy near my top 10. 160 has been the worst division in boxing by miles for 10 years now.

---

eah its a lot worse than super middle and cruiserweight. not to mention a lot of other divisions. try not to be so biased.

---

Biased?? I'm stating the Truth.

---

hey.. I will be the first to tell you out of the 21 attempted defenses Hopkins hasnt had but 6 or 7 real challengers.

---

6 ot 7 real challengers?? Where did you get that from? The guy has had NO real challengers.

Manny Steward quote: "The last world-class, natural Middleweight that Hopkins fought was Roy Jones, and he lost every round."

---

who was the best fighter benn, eubank and collins ever faced besides if they fought themselves?

---

Gerald McClellan, who was waaaaaaay better than Hopkins.

---

dont avoid the question. that all of thim faced.

mcclellan was very good and I really like the guy. But he lost to Benn for a reason. He loaded up on everything and couldnt pace himself. He would have had trouble hitting Hopkins. he never did reach his prime and he would have been great, but the version that benn beat wasnt great. not to mention the controversy in that fight.

---

And I suppose Benn wasn't great ::)

---

hey I never said he wasnt a good fighter. you arent reading what i am typing. I said who were the best opponents of the three fighters since you are bashing bernard.

DD, Purist thinks you are Nigel Benn. ;D
I think you are out of your mind. Hopkins is a great Middleweight. No one has ever said he was better than SRR or Hagler so chill out!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Purist

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

Yeah, I mean William Joppy, Glen Johnson, and Antwun Echols were all garbage! ::)

---

NOWHERE NEAR good enough opposition to be considered ANYWHERE NEAR Sugar Ray Robinson.

---

Neither were ur opponents or Eubanks either.

---

We're talking about HOPKINS, hello??

---

I know Nigel. Â Jus dun double standard a lil.

In your opinion, do you think you, in your "Dark Destroyer" Days, before you fought McClennan, do you think you'dve beat Hopkins?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

DD, Purist thinks you are Nigel Benn. ;D
I think you are out of your mind. Hopkins is a great Middleweight. No one has ever said he was better than SRR or Hagler so chill out!

---

I wasn't mocking him Hulk, he IS Nigel Benn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Purist

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hulk

DD, Purist thinks you are Nigel Benn. ;D
I think you are out of your mind. Hopkins is a great Middleweight. No one has ever said he was better than SRR or Hagler so chill out!

---

I wasn't mocking him Hulk, he IS Nigel Benn.

---

Sure he is... ::) In PMs he has claimed to have done well against Howard Eastman in a sparring session. That was his big achievement his claim to fame. And IF it is true I applaud him for that. He also told me he was expected to do well in the pro ranks but was sent to prison instead. He never said any thing about being World Champ Nigel Benn. So I highly doubt he is. Not to mention if he was, wouldn't he be praising Benn more and NOT EUBANK?!