Khan want's Bradley next.

"I'm fighting Timothy Bradley next. I'm going [to] tell Golden Boy. Let's see if they want it for real. Talk is cheap. I'll fight Tim Bradley, it's the first time he has called me out. I'm going Vegas and [I'll] talk to Golden Boy. I wuld love the fight, good style for me. By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said.


I do believe the lad, everyone can say he is ducking fighter A B and C, but for me Khan would fight anyone but he is just a very small part of a big team, HBO GoldenBoy advisors aadviors they are the ones to blame trying to build him up fighting pensioners and feather fisted goons, I don't see Golden Boy wanting this fight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by skel1983

"I'm fighting Timothy Bradley next. I'm going [to] tell Golden Boy. Let's see if they want it for real. Talk is cheap. I'll fight Tim Bradley, it's the first time he has called me out. I'm going Vegas and [I'll] talk to Golden Boy. I wuld love the fight, good style for me. By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said.


I do believe the lad, everyone can say he is ducking fighter A B and C, but for me Khan would fight anyone but he is just a very small part of a big team, HBO GoldenBoy advisors aadviors they are the ones to blame trying to build him up fighting pensioners and feather fisted goons, I don't see Golden Boy wanting this fight.

---

Agreed, Khan isn't personally afraid of fighting anyone.

He's got a good chance of beating Bradley.

If he walks the talk, he should receive some credit for it, win or lose.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CFH

He's got a good chance of beating Bradley.

---

Would not disagree at all mate, Khan is showing maturity now and with a disciplined game plan has deffo got the tools for the job, but Bradley is a handful for anyone and in the back of my mind I can see at some point Khan being reckless and not fighting the right fight.

Definitely a winnable fight for Khan. Bradley is a well balanced fighter but lacks power IMO 11 kayos in 26 wins:-\ His physique and training regimen in the HBO video does not coincide with his punching. I still think the 140 pound division is either Alexander's or Khan's to take!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Definitely a winnable fight for Khan. Bradley is a well balanced fighter but lacks power IMO 11 kayos in 26 wins:-\ His physique and training regimen in the HBO video does not coincide with his punching. I still think the 140 pound division is either Alexander's or Khan's to take!!!

---

To be fair mate I don't think you need to be a Julian Jackson sort of puncher to test Khan's chin, I think Bradley has enough power to hurt Khan for sure, but other parts of his game not to sure.

Bradley is the best at 140 and if Khan wants to give Bradley a go then fair enough. No complaints from me.

this fight isn't going to happen cause amir khan is one of those very protected fighters. they (management) want to get every last dime out of him while he's still world champ. fighting bradley would be a good fight but bradley would beat him hands down.

I dont believe Bradley will dodge Khan so if Khan wants it this fight can be made. If the fight happens I think it would be great and give Khan a good shot to win. If it doesnt I would tend to believe it is Khan doing the dodging. I just dont see Bradley dodging anyone. I dont believe he is afraid to lose.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hunter

I dont believe Bradley will dodge Khan so if Khan wants it this fight can be made. If the fight happens I think it would be great and give Khan a good shot to win. If it doesnt I would tend to believe it is Khan doing the dodging. I just dont see Bradley dodging anyone. I dont believe he is afraid to lose.

---

Am pretty certain no one thinks Bradley would avoid Khan, but the only way this fight don't happen will be Golden Boy and I dont think they would want this fight now.

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

But both will be easily destroyed by pacquiao so who gives a fuck about their resumes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mad_takamura

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

But both will be easily destroyed by pacquiao so who gives a fuck about their resumes?

---

what the fuck does Pacquiao have to do with Bradley Vs Khan at 140 you jackass?!?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mad_takamura

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

But both will be easily destroyed by pacquiao so who gives a fuck about their resumes?

---

Just so you know, there are other fighters and interesting fights not involving the PAcman, just sayin.

That would be a great fight, I'll guarentee you one thing if the fight doesnt happen, its not gonna be Bradleys fault. He fights all comers. Talk is cheap, lets get the fight made then Khan can try and say hes the best at 140.

Somewhere dishes slip from hands and crash to the floor :o Come on Nameless,the next thing your going to say is that there is no Santa Clause :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Definitely a winnable fight for Khan. Bradley is a well balanced fighter but lacks power IMO 11 kayos in 26 wins:-\ His physique and training regimen in the HBO video does not coincide with his punching. I still think the 140 pound division is either Alexander's or Khan's to take!!!

---

I think Bradley's power is enough to hurt Khan. This is a good fight if it's made. I don't think it's going to happen. Khan might need a couple more fights to be ready for him.

i think khan is good to go now. if he gets ko'd he gets ko'ed.

I like this fight, before Bradley calls out the Tiger lets see if he gets past the cub.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

I disagree. First of all i don't even know who Salido is. That aside....

He shut out Kotelnik who to be fair had just beaten the most feared fighter since....erm Jeff Lacy.

He then blasted out Salita who was his mandatory. Now if Khan had started slower and let the fight become more competitive, he would have received more credit for it, as the fight would have at least seemed challenging.

Then he fought Maliganggi and completely outclassed him. IMO he did a better job than both Hatton and Cotto. I'll explain myself here; Basically Cotto made a mess of Paulie, but the fight was closer, and Paulie even managed to wobble Cotto. He was always in the fight to some extent.

Against Hatton, Paulie fought one-handed, and even then, the stoppage surprised me. Against Khan, i was calling out for a stoppage a few rounds before it happened. Total domination, and this was against a rejuvenated Paulie coming of a cracking win over Juan Diaz. I think you're doing him a dis-service.

As for Bradley, you could quite easily make a case for Witter being shit in the first place. Same goes for Cherry. Holt is one of those who gets a half decent press without actually justifying it. He did headbutt Torres quite spectacularly though, and he did put Bradley on his arse with the funniest punch i've ever seen (other than Tyson Fury's of course).

Peterson is a great win, because he's talented, but then again you could make an argument for him being merely a prospect. I'm not going to, because i rate Peterson. Not impressed by what happened against Campbell, especially not at 140.

I'm not trying to say Khan's resume is better, because it isn't. But it's far from a joke, and it's not a million miles behind Bradley's.

Unless of course you really, really rate Edner Cherry, Junior Witter and Kendall Holt. I don't believe any of those are any better than Kotelnik. Witter was fortunate to get a decision over him a few years ago as it happens.

I just think you're finding another way to discredit King Khan. ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

I disagree. First of all i don't even know who Salido is. That aside....

He shut out Kotelnik who to be fair had just beaten the most feared fighter since....erm Jeff Lacy.

He then blasted out Salita who was his mandatory. Now if Khan had started slower and let the fight become more competitive, he would have received more credit for it, as the fight would have at least seemed challenging.

Then he fought Maliganggi and completely outclassed him. IMO he did a better job than both Hatton and Cotto. I'll explain myself here; Basically Cotto made a mess of Paulie, but the fight was closer, and Paulie even managed to wobble Cotto. He was always in the fight to some extent.

Against Hatton, Paulie fought one-handed, and even then, the stoppage surprised me. Against Khan, i was calling out for a stoppage a few rounds before it happened. Total domination, and this was against a rejuvenated Paulie coming of a cracking win over Juan Diaz. I think you're doing him a dis-service.

As for Bradley, you could quite easily make a case for Witter being shit in the first place. Same goes for Cherry. Holt is one of those who gets a half decent press without actually justifying it. He did headbutt Torres quite spectacularly though, and he did put Bradley on his arse with the funniest punch i've ever seen (other than Tyson Fury's of course).

Peterson is a great win, because he's talented, but then again you could make an argument for him being merely a prospect. I'm not going to, because i rate Peterson. Not impressed by what happened against Campbell, especially not at 140.

I'm not trying to say Khan's resume is better, because it isn't. But it's far from a joke, and it's not a million miles behind Bradley's.

Unless of course you really, really rate Edner Cherry, Junior Witter and Kendall Holt. I don't believe any of those are any better than Kotelnik. Witter was fortunate to get a decision over him a few years ago as it happens.

I just think you're finding another way to discredit King Khan. ;D

---

Khan did a better job that Cotto and Hatton cause Malignaggi cause he's already on the slide, Cotto was already weight drained at 140 by his last 3 or 4 fights at the weight, Kotelnik got a gift against Maidana and i'm pretty damn sure that Alexander will blast him out in less than 8 rounds, i'm not saying that Khan's win against Malignaggi wasn't a good win cause it was but don't try to sugar coat it, no one was giving Paulie a chance in hell to win it, and Salita was utter crap, the guy's record is a joke and that was even before Khan got his hands on him, and then going by your own words Hatton was scared and ducked a fighter who was shit in Witter?!? yet when i said that Junior Witter was a joke you still defended his ass trying to make him seem like a solid fighter, hmmm interesting, the way i see it Bradley takes the #1 spot at 140, Alexander gets #2, and Khan gets 3rd place by default

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

I disagree. First of all i don't even know who Salido is. That aside....

He shut out Kotelnik who to be fair had just beaten the most feared fighter since....erm Jeff Lacy.

He then blasted out Salita who was his mandatory. Now if Khan had started slower and let the fight become more competitive, he would have received more credit for it, as the fight would have at least seemed challenging.

Then he fought Maliganggi and completely outclassed him. IMO he did a better job than both Hatton and Cotto. I'll explain myself here; Basically Cotto made a mess of Paulie, but the fight was closer, and Paulie even managed to wobble Cotto. He was always in the fight to some extent.

Against Hatton, Paulie fought one-handed, and even then, the stoppage surprised me. Against Khan, i was calling out for a stoppage a few rounds before it happened. Total domination, and this was against a rejuvenated Paulie coming of a cracking win over Juan Diaz. I think you're doing him a dis-service.

As for Bradley, you could quite easily make a case for Witter being shit in the first place. Same goes for Cherry. Holt is one of those who gets a half decent press without actually justifying it. He did headbutt Torres quite spectacularly though, and he did put Bradley on his arse with the funniest punch i've ever seen (other than Tyson Fury's of course).

Peterson is a great win, because he's talented, but then again you could make an argument for him being merely a prospect. I'm not going to, because i rate Peterson. Not impressed by what happened against Campbell, especially not at 140.

I'm not trying to say Khan's resume is better, because it isn't. But it's far from a joke, and it's not a million miles behind Bradley's.

Unless of course you really, really rate Edner Cherry, Junior Witter and Kendall Holt. I don't believe any of those are any better than Kotelnik. Witter was fortunate to get a decision over him a few years ago as it happens.

I just think you're finding another way to discredit King Khan. ;D

---

Khan did a better job that Cotto and Hatton cause Malignaggi cause he's already on the slide, Cotto was already weight drained at 140 by his last 3 or 4 fights at the weight, Kotelnik got a gift against Maidana and i'm pretty damn sure that Alexander will blast him out in less than 8 rounds, i'm not saying that Khan's win against Malignaggi wasn't a good win cause it was but don't try to sugar coat it, no one was giving Paulie a chance in hell to win it, and Salita was utter crap, the guy's record is a joke and that was even before Khan got his hands on him, and then going by your own words Hatton was scared and ducked a fighter who was shit in Witter?!? yet when i said that Junior Witter was a joke you still defended his ass trying to make him seem like a solid fighter, hmmm interesting, the way i see it Bradley takes the #1 spot at 140, Alexander gets #2, and Khan gets 3rd place by default

---

I don't think i've ever said Witter was anything other than average. I defended Hatton, because i didn't believe Witter had done enough to warrant a shot, in the sense that he doesn't shift tickets, nor had he really done anything in the ring to justify his constant arrogance towards Hatton. I even said his win over Harris which a lot of people creamed over, was nothing special because Harris imo was cack.

How can you say Malignaggi is on the slide when he'd just come off the best win of his career? What had he done Pre Cotto and Pre Hatton which was more impressive than his win over Juan Diaz?

Disagree about Kotelnik getting a gift. Can understand that way of thinking if you like somebody applying Fight Night style pressure without getting much done, but imo it was a close fight. Both Boxing News and Boxing Monthly both agreed that Kotelnik won so i know i'm in good company.

All that aside, i agree with your final assessment. Bradley, Alexander and the Khan. But i don't think there's a great deal between them in terms of resume or ability.

Kudos to Khan if he actually makes this fight, Bradley is a rugged machine, but Khan's physicality will be too much IMO, he punches mach 3 for 12 rounds and has a reach that will seriously trouble Bradley. There is always the chance that Bradley catches him, but punch for punch Khan will always be first and will always land more.

My prediction Khan late stoppage.

As an aside, I think I've just thought of the most boring fight possible, Clottey vs. Kotelnik at 147 It would look like a couple of turtles running into each other.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

I disagree. First of all i don't even know who Salido is. That aside....

He shut out Kotelnik who to be fair had just beaten the most feared fighter since....erm Jeff Lacy.

He then blasted out Salita who was his mandatory. Now if Khan had started slower and let the fight become more competitive, he would have received more credit for it, as the fight would have at least seemed challenging.

Then he fought Maliganggi and completely outclassed him. IMO he did a better job than both Hatton and Cotto. I'll explain myself here; Basically Cotto made a mess of Paulie, but the fight was closer, and Paulie even managed to wobble Cotto. He was always in the fight to some extent.

Against Hatton, Paulie fought one-handed, and even then, the stoppage surprised me. Against Khan, i was calling out for a stoppage a few rounds before it happened. Total domination, and this was against a rejuvenated Paulie coming of a cracking win over Juan Diaz. I think you're doing him a dis-service.

As for Bradley, you could quite easily make a case for Witter being shit in the first place. Same goes for Cherry. Holt is one of those who gets a half decent press without actually justifying it. He did headbutt Torres quite spectacularly though, and he did put Bradley on his arse with the funniest punch i've ever seen (other than Tyson Fury's of course).

Peterson is a great win, because he's talented, but then again you could make an argument for him being merely a prospect. I'm not going to, because i rate Peterson. Not impressed by what happened against Campbell, especially not at 140.

I'm not trying to say Khan's resume is better, because it isn't. But it's far from a joke, and it's not a million miles behind Bradley's.

Unless of course you really, really rate Edner Cherry, Junior Witter and Kendall Holt. I don't believe any of those are any better than Kotelnik. Witter was fortunate to get a decision over him a few years ago as it happens.

I just think you're finding another way to discredit King Khan. ;D

---

Khan did a better job that Cotto and Hatton cause Malignaggi cause he's already on the slide, Cotto was already weight drained at 140 by his last 3 or 4 fights at the weight, Kotelnik got a gift against Maidana and i'm pretty damn sure that Alexander will blast him out in less than 8 rounds, i'm not saying that Khan's win against Malignaggi wasn't a good win cause it was but don't try to sugar coat it, no one was giving Paulie a chance in hell to win it, and Salita was utter crap, the guy's record is a joke and that was even before Khan got his hands on him, and then going by your own words Hatton was scared and ducked a fighter who was shit in Witter?!? yet when i said that Junior Witter was a joke you still defended his ass trying to make him seem like a solid fighter, hmmm interesting, the way i see it Bradley takes the #1 spot at 140, Alexander gets #2, and Khan gets 3rd place by default

---

I don't think i've ever said Witter was anything other than average. I defended Hatton, because i didn't believe Witter had done enough to warrant a shot, in the sense that he doesn't shift tickets, nor had he really done anything in the ring to justify his constant arrogance towards Hatton. I even said his win over Harris which a lot of people creamed over, was nothing special because Harris imo was cack.

How can you say Malignaggi is on the slide when he'd just come off the best win of his career? What had he done Pre Cotto and Pre Hatton which was more impressive than his win over Juan Diaz?

Disagree about Kotelnik getting a gift. Can understand that way of thinking if you like somebody applying Fight Night style pressure without getting much done, but imo it was a close fight. Both Boxing News and Boxing Monthly both agreed that Kotelnik won so i know i'm in good company.

All that aside, i agree with your final assessment. Bradley, Alexander and the Khan. But i don't think there's a great deal between them in terms of resume or ability.

---

does a win over Juan Diaz really mean much now?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

I disagree. First of all i don't even know who Salido is. That aside....

He shut out Kotelnik who to be fair had just beaten the most feared fighter since....erm Jeff Lacy.

He then blasted out Salita who was his mandatory. Now if Khan had started slower and let the fight become more competitive, he would have received more credit for it, as the fight would have at least seemed challenging.

Then he fought Maliganggi and completely outclassed him. IMO he did a better job than both Hatton and Cotto. I'll explain myself here; Basically Cotto made a mess of Paulie, but the fight was closer, and Paulie even managed to wobble Cotto. He was always in the fight to some extent.

Against Hatton, Paulie fought one-handed, and even then, the stoppage surprised me. Against Khan, i was calling out for a stoppage a few rounds before it happened. Total domination, and this was against a rejuvenated Paulie coming of a cracking win over Juan Diaz. I think you're doing him a dis-service.

As for Bradley, you could quite easily make a case for Witter being shit in the first place. Same goes for Cherry. Holt is one of those who gets a half decent press without actually justifying it. He did headbutt Torres quite spectacularly though, and he did put Bradley on his arse with the funniest punch i've ever seen (other than Tyson Fury's of course).

Peterson is a great win, because he's talented, but then again you could make an argument for him being merely a prospect. I'm not going to, because i rate Peterson. Not impressed by what happened against Campbell, especially not at 140.

I'm not trying to say Khan's resume is better, because it isn't. But it's far from a joke, and it's not a million miles behind Bradley's.

Unless of course you really, really rate Edner Cherry, Junior Witter and Kendall Holt. I don't believe any of those are any better than Kotelnik. Witter was fortunate to get a decision over him a few years ago as it happens.

I just think you're finding another way to discredit King Khan. ;D

---

Khan did a better job that Cotto and Hatton cause Malignaggi cause he's already on the slide, Cotto was already weight drained at 140 by his last 3 or 4 fights at the weight, Kotelnik got a gift against Maidana and i'm pretty damn sure that Alexander will blast him out in less than 8 rounds, i'm not saying that Khan's win against Malignaggi wasn't a good win cause it was but don't try to sugar coat it, no one was giving Paulie a chance in hell to win it, and Salita was utter crap, the guy's record is a joke and that was even before Khan got his hands on him, and then going by your own words Hatton was scared and ducked a fighter who was shit in Witter?!? yet when i said that Junior Witter was a joke you still defended his ass trying to make him seem like a solid fighter, hmmm interesting, the way i see it Bradley takes the #1 spot at 140, Alexander gets #2, and Khan gets 3rd place by default

---

I don't think i've ever said Witter was anything other than average. I defended Hatton, because i didn't believe Witter had done enough to warrant a shot, in the sense that he doesn't shift tickets, nor had he really done anything in the ring to justify his constant arrogance towards Hatton. I even said his win over Harris which a lot of people creamed over, was nothing special because Harris imo was cack.

How can you say Malignaggi is on the slide when he'd just come off the best win of his career? What had he done Pre Cotto and Pre Hatton which was more impressive than his win over Juan Diaz?

Disagree about Kotelnik getting a gift. Can understand that way of thinking if you like somebody applying Fight Night style pressure without getting much done, but imo it was a close fight. Both Boxing News and Boxing Monthly both agreed that Kotelnik won so i know i'm in good company.

All that aside, i agree with your final assessment. Bradley, Alexander and the Khan. But i don't think there's a great deal between them in terms of resume or ability.

---

does a win over Juan Diaz really mean much now?

---

In comparison to Malignaggi's other victories it means a lot. Diaz is the peak of the mountain for Paulie. That's why i found it odd that you said he was on the slide. It would stand true if he had a host of great victories, but he doesn't. The two Diaz performances were probably his best. I think McGirt held him back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales

"By the way, clever way to avoid the best [at] 140-pounds by moving up," Khan said

says the guy that jumped up to 140 to avoid fights with guys like, Marquez, Katsidis, Funeka, Guzman, Valero (at the time), and Campbell

and lets just say his resume at 140 is a joke compared to Bradley's

Khan (Kotelnik, Salido, and Malignaggi)
Bradley (Holt, Witter, Cherry, Peterson, Campbell)

---

I disagree. First of all i don't even know who Salido is. That aside....

He shut out Kotelnik who to be fair had just beaten the most feared fighter since....erm Jeff Lacy.

He then blasted out Salita who was his mandatory. Now if Khan had started slower and let the fight become more competitive, he would have received more credit for it, as the fight would have at least seemed challenging.

Then he fought Maliganggi and completely outclassed him. IMO he did a better job than both Hatton and Cotto. I'll explain myself here; Basically Cotto made a mess of Paulie, but the fight was closer, and Paulie even managed to wobble Cotto. He was always in the fight to some extent.

Against Hatton, Paulie fought one-handed, and even then, the stoppage surprised me. Against Khan, i was calling out for a stoppage a few rounds before it happened. Total domination, and this was against a rejuvenated Paulie coming of a cracking win over Juan Diaz. I think you're doing him a dis-service.

As for Bradley, you could quite easily make a case for Witter being shit in the first place. Same goes for Cherry. Holt is one of those who gets a half decent press without actually justifying it. He did headbutt Torres quite spectacularly though, and he did put Bradley on his arse with the funniest punch i've ever seen (other than Tyson Fury's of course).

Peterson is a great win, because he's talented, but then again you could make an argument for him being merely a prospect. I'm not going to, because i rate Peterson. Not impressed by what happened against Campbell, especially not at 140.

I'm not trying to say Khan's resume is better, because it isn't. But it's far from a joke, and it's not a million miles behind Bradley's.

Unless of course you really, really rate Edner Cherry, Junior Witter and Kendall Holt. I don't believe any of those are any better than Kotelnik. Witter was fortunate to get a decision over him a few years ago as it happens.

I just think you're finding another way to discredit King Khan. ;D

---

Spot on;)