Should b a decent fight groves should win but a gd test.wot do u guys think?
Printable View
Should b a decent fight groves should win but a gd test.wot do u guys think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosco1984
Smith is dog shit, I dont like his attitude either, really believes he is better than he is. All the excuses under the sun after the Degale fight. Groves will easily beat him, Anderson rematch is a harder fight.
Yeah a agree mate.but the fight will b worth watching better than him fighting some random african or something.smith isn't big enough at the weight think groves will stop him round 4 or 5
Yes deffo mate, i will look forward to watching it.Quote:
Originally Posted by rosco1984
;D i think you are underestimating smith
especially after his defeat to degale i reckon he will be a bit more dogged and dig in more
I reckon it could be points with smith not throwing enough
Groves is a class above like De Gale was, easy win.
I'm not sure Groves will beat him as easily as DeGale did. Groves showed against DeGale that he can be patient and box to a plan BUT that was a very big fight that he had a lot of hype for. This fight will not be anywhere near that in terms of the size of the event and that is when Groves tends to lose his concentration. I don't think Anderson would beat Smith if they were to meet either.
If Groves can get himself really fired up but not make any silly mistakes like we have seen him make in other fights then I think he can take Smith out around the mid to late rounds, if he goes in there with the mentality of I beat DeGale and he beat you so i'll obviously win, then he could be in for a long night.
This is a step back for Groves IMO in terms of progress. Groves beats DeGale, DeGale moves on to a European Title shot, Groves gets DeGale leftovers at domestic level. I think now Groves is with Warren, him, DeGale and Smith could have a three way fighting triangle for the next few years. No need for any other opponents.
What happened to Smith moving to Middleweight anyways cos he was too small for Super Middle??
No I am not you just seem to think every British fighter is amazing, Paul Smith is shite he had 50/50 wars with bums like Tony Dodson and Quigley and got beat by Bundell ffs. He is very average.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
What is this Anderson guy doing, the one gave that groves such a hard time.
He boxed on a show in edinburgh last month.he wos fighting some bum stoped him in the 4th it wos on the show Alex Arthur wos promoting not convinced he's that dedicated training wise heard a few rumours he likes partying a bit to much!
Anderson probably was not motivated, it will be different if he gets a return against groves or even de Gale.Quote:
Originally Posted by rosco1984
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983No I am not you just seem to think every British fighter is amazing, Paul Smith is shite he had 50/50 wars with bums like Tony Dodson and Quigley and got beat by Bundell ffs. He is very average.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
groves is british too thicko :)
No shit Sherlock.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983No I am not you just seem to think every British fighter is amazing, Paul Smith is shite he had 50/50 wars with bums like Tony Dodson and Quigley and got beat by Bundell ffs. He is very average.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
groves is british too thicko :)
By all accounts your predictions and views on most fighters mate, are not the best. You do seem to over rate all British fighters ( just go and look at the Kell Brook thread ). Smith is crap look at the names I listed he sneeked decisions against crap fighters one of them being Dodson being about 5 years after his best even then he was an average British Fighter, who has Smith beat to make you believe he can live with Groves? Groves will toy with him.
smith is a SKUNT, and will elbow and back-hand his way to a DQ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983No shit Sherlock.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1983No I am not you just seem to think every British fighter is amazing, Paul Smith is shite he had 50/50 wars with bums like Tony Dodson and Quigley and got beat by Bundell ffs. He is very average.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44
groves is british too thicko :)
By all accounts your predictions and views on most fighters mate, are not the best. You do seem to over rate all British fighters ( just go and look at the Kell Brook thread ). Smith is crap look at the names I listed he sneeked decisions against crap fighters one of them being Dodson being about 5 years after his best even then he was an average British Fighter, who has Smith beat to make you believe he can live with Groves? Groves will toy with him.
my predictions are pretty much spot on
take last weekend for example, i predicted about 10 fights, got 9 right method of victory, said Ortiz would have 4 rounds
the only one i got wrong was stephen smith
im pretty special at predicting fights
better than you anyway, but thats no shame on you coz i should be professional
p.s. you think groves will do smith early, i think smith will dig in and it will go a few rounds, maybe even points, lets have this fight as the bench, who ever is closest is the best, yep?
p.s. how is saying Kell Brook is the best british prospect over rating ALL british fighters when i am comparing him to other british fighters? surely i am underrating british fighters as well if there is a better british prospect arent I?
tis true he said ortiz would have 4 rounds.