-
Boxing truisms, what we've learned
#1. Marquez stopped drinking his own urine, but he'll never win a decision against Pacquiao.
#2. Pacquiao ain't the superman some of us thought he was, and if the fight ever happens, the counter punching Mayweather Jr. would hand him his ass on a silver platter.
#3. miles is a histrionic douche-bag, who needs to get a life.
#4. The ultra corrupt and ever devious snake in the grass, Bob Arum, has every boxing judge in the world, HBO and Lederman in his back pocket.
#5. Freddie Roach is the Steven Hawking of the boxing world, and/or one of the smartest disabled muther-fuckers who ever lived.
#6. Pacquiao prefers being hit in the head with Dos Equis beer bottles - “Stay thirsty, my friends.”
Got any to add?
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
#3. miles is still a histrionic, yet entertaining cunt, who probably needs to get a life. :-X
:lol::lolhaha::appl:
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
that stepping on each others feet isn't a natural occurrence between a southpaw and orthodox fighter if the southpaw fighter is named Manny Pacquiao, instead it's referred to as "Marquez' Foot Stomping Trick" :-X
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
that stepping on each others feet isn't a natural occurrence between a southpaw and orthodox fighter if the southpaw fighter is named Manny Pacquiao, instead it's referred to as "Marquez' Foot Stomping Trick" :-X
I remember a fight a while back where one of the guys was blatantly trying to step on the other's foot. I think his corner might have even told him to do it. I just can't remember who it was.
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
that stepping on each others feet isn't a natural occurrence between a southpaw and orthodox fighter if the southpaw fighter is named Manny Pacquiao, instead it's referred to as "Marquez' Foot Stomping Trick" :-X
Lol. That's a good one.
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
that stepping on each others feet isn't a natural occurrence between a southpaw and orthodox fighter if the southpaw fighter is named Manny Pacquiao, instead it's referred to as "Marquez' Foot Stomping Trick" :-X
I remember a fight a while back where one of the guys was blatantly trying to step on the other's foot. I think his corner might have even told him to do it. I just can't remember who it was.
one fight, it was clear that in JMM/Pac 3 it wasn't the case, and that both guys were doing it often with neither one doing it to be dirty
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
that stepping on each others feet isn't a natural occurrence between a southpaw and orthodox fighter if the southpaw fighter is named Manny Pacquiao, instead it's referred to as "Marquez' Foot Stomping Trick" :-X
I remember a fight a while back where one of the guys was blatantly trying to step on the other's foot. I think his corner might have even told him to do it. I just can't remember who it was.
one fight, it was clear that in JMM/Pac 3 it wasn't the case, and that both guys were doing it often with neither one doing it to be dirty
I'm not calling Marquez dirty, I'm just trying to figure out what fight that was.
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Counter right hand is the best punch to hit a southpaw.
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CFH
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
that stepping on each others feet isn't a natural occurrence between a southpaw and orthodox fighter if the southpaw fighter is named Manny Pacquiao, instead it's referred to as "Marquez' Foot Stomping Trick" :-X
I remember a fight a while back where one of the guys was blatantly trying to step on the other's foot. I think his corner might have even told him to do it. I just can't remember who it was.
one fight, it was clear that in JMM/Pac 3 it wasn't the case, and that both guys were doing it often with neither one doing it to be dirty
I'm not calling Marquez dirty, I'm just trying to figure out what fight that was.
oh I know YOU'RE not, but there were plenty of fanboys on here trying to insinuate such
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
After all the smoke has been cleared, Juan Manuel is still a loser in many more ways than one! :)
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
After all the smoke has been cleared, Juan Manuel is still a loser in many more ways than one! :)
Agreed, and so are some of his fans, who must have watched the fight with blinders on..
There seems to have been a lot of wishful thinking and group hysteria going on for Marquez last weekend. After watching the replay, I came to a totally different conclusion, Pac wins 7-5 in rounds. Just goes to show, the "majority" of boxing fans aren't always right.
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
After all the smoke has been cleared, Juan Manuel is still a loser in many more ways than one! :)
Agreed, and so are some of his fans, who must have watched the fight with blinders on..
There seems to have been a lot of wishful thinking and group hysteria going on for Marquez last weekend. After watching the replay, I came to a totally different conclusion, Pac wins 7-5 in rounds.
Just goes to show, the "majority" of boxing fans aren't always right.
Or that perhaps you're wrong. :cool:
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
After all the smoke has been cleared, Juan Manuel is still a loser in many more ways than one! :)
Agreed, and so are some of his fans, who must have watched the fight with blinders on..
There seems to have been a lot of wishful thinking and group hysteria going on for Marquez last weekend. After watching the replay, I came to a totally different conclusion, Pac wins 7-5 in rounds. Just goes to show, the "majority" of boxing fans aren't always right.
so let me get this right, just because you and a handful of Pactards scored it in favor of Pacquiao, it means that the "majority" of not only fans, but also professional fighters, and sportswriters are by default "wrong"? hahaha get the fuck out of here dude, it's become more and more evident that you're as much on Pacquiao's dick as the rest of the Pactards, that little comment and the fact that you and Kankersore try to play it up as if Manny dominated or even had a clear win is laughable, Pacquiao won against Marquez just as DLH won against Sturm, it might say so on paper but reality speaks differently :-X
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Hindsight is indeed 20-20. Seeing a fight closely and from different perspectives after the fact does not make fans calling it as they see it losers or agenda driven loons. It's those who state opinion as fact with certainy who may fit the bill though. That whole stones in a glass house thing.
I think Mayweather beats Pac.
Mannys footwork and raggedy falling in leftward motion lastweek would see Mayweather time him like a clock. He was hesitant big time.
Jim Lamply is bad for boxing and must have more mirrors and platforms in his home than a circus funhouse.
Tecante vs Corona ring girl boxing & wraslin' must happen!
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
#1. Marquez stopped drinking his own urine, but he'll never win a decision against Pacquiao.
#2. Pacquiao ain't the superman some of us thought he was, and if the fight ever happens, the counter punching Mayweather Jr. would hand him his ass on a silver platter.
#3. miles is a histrionic douche-bag, who needs to get a life.
#4. The ultra corrupt and ever devious snake in the grass, Bob Arum, has every boxing judge in the world, HBO and Lederman in his back pocket.
#5. Freddie Roach is the Steven Hawking of the boxing world, and/or one of the smartest disabled muther-fuckers who ever lived.
#6. Pacquiao prefers being hit in the head with Dos Equis beer bottles - “Stay thirsty, my friends.”
Got any to add?
You bet I do.
#7. If THIS is what it takes to finally get Mayweather interested in a match with Pacquiao........ then SHIT YEAH!!! I've almost lost interest in that "pie-in-the-sky" match anyway. If history is any indication, by the time (and IF) they finally meet, it will go down as bigges ANTI-CLIMACTIC fight in the history of boxing.
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
After all the smoke has been cleared, Juan Manuel is still a loser in many more ways than one! :)
Agreed, and so are some of his fans, who must have watched the fight with blinders on..
There seems to have been a lot of wishful thinking and group hysteria going on for Marquez last weekend. After watching the replay, I came to a totally different conclusion, Pac wins 7-5 in rounds. Just goes to show, the "majority" of boxing fans aren't always right.
so let me get this right, just because you and a handful of Pactards scored it in favor of Pacquiao, it means that the "majority" of not only fans, but also professional fighters, and sportswriters are by default "wrong"? hahaha get the fuck out of here dude,
it's become more and more evident that you're as much on Pacquiao's dick as the rest of the Pactards, that little comment and the fact that you and Kankersore try to play it up as if Manny dominated or even had a clear win is laughable, Pacquiao won against Marquez just as DLH won against Sturm, it might say so on paper but reality speaks differently :-X
ElTerrible, when I started watching the replay last night, I kept expecting to see Marquez dominate and clearly win rounds, that simply never happened. Take round 2 for example, I gave it to Marquez, but it was hardly a clearcut round for him, I really should have scored it even. Call me a Pactard, Pac-dickrider or what ever you want, while it was by no means a dominant performance by him, I believe Pacquiao won the fight 7-5. Good effort by Marquez, but no cigar.
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ninjaspy3
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KananKrus
After all the smoke has been cleared, Juan Manuel is still a loser in many more ways than one! :)
Agreed, and so are some of his fans, who must have watched the fight with blinders on..
There seems to have been a lot of wishful thinking and group hysteria going on for Marquez last weekend. After watching the replay, I came to a totally different conclusion, Pac wins 7-5 in rounds.
Just goes to show, the "majority" of boxing fans aren't always right.
Or that perhaps you're wrong. :cool:
Me wrong? Neva! :cool:
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
#8. "Robberies" happen more frequently when a large number of histrionic Pac haters, blow money in Vegas betting on Marquez.
#9. Close fights are hard to score and judges decisions are usually final, so "cry me a fucking Rio".
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
#7. "Robberies" happen more frequently when a large number of histrionic Pac haters, blow money in Vegas betting on Marquez.
#8. Close fights are hard to score and judges decisions are usually final, so "cry me a fucking Rio".
Those would be 8 and 9. Already gave you # 7.
;)
-
Re: Boxing truisms, what we've learned
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mars_ax
#8. "Robberies" happen more frequently when a large number of histrionic Pac haters, blow money in Vegas betting on Marquez.
#9. Close fights are hard to score and judges decisions are usually final, so "cry me a fucking Rio".
Those would be 8 and 9. Already gave you # 7.
;)
Thank you for the correction sir.
#10. Never take what the "majority" thinks happened in a fight as the holy grail before witnessing the event for yourself.
