Printable View
Michael Bisping was robbed! He had that fight 29-28. He won the first two. I'm a Chael fan but Bisping should have won that fight and he should be the one fighting Anderson regardles of how well he would do in that fight. Everyone on here said he couldn't hang with the top guy's and he couldn't fight a top ten well he did and he was robbed. He should be given some serious credit.
Rashad is getting the win in this next one unless there's another robbery.
I like Bisping, but he spent some time on his back. Chael needs to be in the WWE fo sho.
That 1st match shows again that mma is ore than capable of stinking out the tv audience on par with boxing at times.
Come on now.
It was arguably 30-27 for Sonnen.
Second round was close and I gave it to Bisping but the 1st and especially the 3rd were clear Sonnen rounds. The 3rd was so dominant it was nearly 10-8.
Bisping hung tough and can hold his head up high, but Sonnen won that fight fair and square. He closed the distance and took away Bisping's striking, in the second Sonnen himself was pushed against the cage and roughed up a bit, but aside from that second round Bisping was simply outwrassled.
Good call on Rashad, he won every round.
P.S.
Yahoo! Sports had it 30-27 Sonnen.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news;_yl...c_on_fox012812
Bisping performed much better than I expected but I still gave the decision to Chael.
I went into this fight with no bias I was totals for either guy winning but Chael did not deserve to win. First round Bisping controlled the fight he put him against the cage and roughed him up. Chael got him down and did nothing he got back up and same goes for the second round. Chael got him down and did nothing but Bisping got back up and won the round. The last round was Chaels but never a 10-8 he didn't do anything close to justifying that. He got a dominant position and landed a limited number of strikes. 29-28 Bisping. Don't let your hate for the guy cloud your judgement because none of you guys gave him a chance before this fight.
Chael is going to hand Silva his ass again.
Joe Rogan had Bisping winning at the end of the third, so I'm not on my own.
Dana has expressed his views on his twitter account saying the ref should not be allowed to watch a fight again.
I was shocked and just about fell outta my seat when Joe Rogan said "Chael may need a submission to win this fight, I gave Bisping the 1st two rounds". Absolute nonsense.
Mattboxingfan you were equally for both guys ?
You were 150% for Bisping and you know it ! ;D
I mean we had just argued about your undying loyalty for Bisping in another thread. I think that is why you see a robbery where is there is none.
Regarding Dana White's tweets, I don't put much bank into anything that idiot said. He's prone to hyperbole and exaggeration.
Go look in another thread and I argueing with Mattyhitman about Chael being a great fighter. Look even further back and I have started threads on Chaels return to the octagon. I was a Chael fan before I was a Bisping fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
In that same thread you gave two accounts when you though Bisping lost fights that in actual fact he had one so your hardly going to be supporting him. Your obviously going to be bias.
Chael himself had Bisping winning the first two rounds. You can't get much better than that.
Michael Bisping On His Controversial Chael Sonnen Loss - YouTube
Dana White on the UFC On FOX: Evans vs Davis Drama - YouTube
It's funny there's plents of people saying Bisping won. It's all over twitter and mma forums. But obviously Michael Bisping the Englishman fighting in the US against a US fighter doesn't have robbery written all over it. I mean comon it's not like Sonnen vs Silva 2 is one of the most anticipated rematches in MMA history. Little bit fishy this one. And the chants of USA didn't help the judging I bet.
But obviously my loyalty to Bisping has made me delusional! What to do with this Sonnen walkout shirt?
;D:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanGo look in another thread and I argueing with Mattyhitman about Chael being a great fighter. Look even further back and I have started threads on Chaels return to the octagon. I was a Chael fan before I was a Bisping fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
In that same thread you gave two accounts when you though Bisping lost fights that in actual fact he had one so your hardly going to be supporting him. Your obviously going to be bias.
Chael himself had Bisping winning the first two rounds. You can't get much better than that.
Michael Bisping On His Controversial Chael Sonnen Loss - YouTube
Dana White on the UFC On FOX: Evans vs Davis Drama - YouTube
It's funny there's plents of people saying Bisping won. It's all over twitter and mma forums. But obviously Michael Bisping the Englishman fighting in the US against a US fighter doesn't have robbery written all over it. I mean comon it's not like Sonnen vs Silva 2 is one of the most anticipated rematches in MMA history. Little bit fishy this one. And the chants of USA didn't help the judging I bet.
But obviously my loyalty to Bisping has made me delusional! What to do with
this Sonnen walkout shirt?
I'm bias too. No doubt about it. I can't stand Bisping.
And I was wrong. He did not get run over. He was competitive. But he lost. He knows he lost. You have to do more than what he did to WIN the fight.
Hell my friend you think he should have won against Wanderlei !
We are both bias.
But, the decision went to Sonnen and rightfully so.
Bisping has had his share of questionable decisions.
He wasn't gonna be awarded this one, and if anything he gets the benefit of the doubt because he is BRITISH in order for the UFC to reach British fans. Everyone always talks about that on comments, forums etc.
He was def not discriminated against because of his nationality. He lost.
i had bisping winning.
Because he did.Quote:
Originally Posted by ruthless rocco
I don't even need to read past this line because the rest is irrelevent your bias whats the point in arguing? You'll never see outside your tunnel vision.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk;D:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanGo look in another thread and I argueing with Mattyhitman about Chael being a great fighter. Look even further back and I have started threads on Chaels return to the octagon. I was a Chael fan before I was a Bisping fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
In that same thread you gave two accounts when you though Bisping lost fights that in actual fact he had one so your hardly going to be supporting him. Your obviously going to be bias.
Chael himself had Bisping winning the first two rounds. You can't get much better than that.
Michael Bisping On His Controversial Chael Sonnen Loss - YouTube
Dana White on the UFC On FOX: Evans vs Davis Drama - YouTube
It's funny there's plents of people saying Bisping won. It's all over twitter and mma forums. But obviously Michael Bisping the Englishman fighting in the US against a US fighter doesn't have robbery written all over it. I mean comon it's not like Sonnen vs Silva 2 is one of the most anticipated rematches in MMA history. Little bit fishy this one. And the chants of USA didn't help the judging I bet.
But obviously my loyalty to Bisping has made me delusional! What to do with
this Sonnen walkout shirt?
I'm bias too. No doubt about it. I can't stand Bisping.
And I was wrong. He did not get run over. He was competitive. But he lost. He knows he lost. You have to do more than what he did to WIN the fight.
Hell my friend you think he should have won against Wanderlei !
We are both bias.
But, the decision went to Sonnen and rightfully so.
Bisping has had his share of questionable decisions.
He wasn't gonna be awarded this one, and if anything he gets the benefit of the doubt because he is BRITISH in order for the UFC to reach British fans. Everyone always talks about that on comments, forums etc.
He was def not discriminated against because of his nationality. He lost.
The BRIT beat your American at his own game. Just because he didn't get the nod in a decision that could have/should have gone the other way doesn't make a difference. His fan base just doubled.
You did watch the fight right? It was 28th january 2012 not new years eve, you realise that right? ;D
Listen my condescending limey friend, the BRIT LOST. As they usually do when they face American fighters in any form of combat. We have 300 million fuckin people over here so its a much deeper pool of talent and fighters than the UK.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanI don't even need to read past this line because the rest is irrelevent your bias whats the point in arguing? You'll never see outside your tunnel vision.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk;D:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanGo look in another thread and I argueing with Mattyhitman about Chael being a great fighter. Look even further back and I have started threads on Chaels return to the octagon. I was a Chael fan before I was a Bisping fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
In that same thread you gave two accounts when you though Bisping lost fights that in actual fact he had one so your hardly going to be supporting him. Your obviously going to be bias.
Chael himself had Bisping winning the first two rounds. You can't get much better than that.
Michael Bisping On His Controversial Chael Sonnen Loss - YouTube
Dana White on the UFC On FOX: Evans vs Davis Drama - YouTube
It's funny there's plents of people saying Bisping won. It's all over twitter and mma forums. But obviously Michael Bisping the Englishman fighting in the US against a US fighter doesn't have robbery written all over it. I mean comon it's not like Sonnen vs Silva 2 is one of the most anticipated rematches in MMA history. Little bit fishy this one. And the chants of USA didn't help the judging I bet.
But obviously my loyalty to Bisping has made me delusional! What to do with
this Sonnen walkout shirt?
I'm bias too. No doubt about it. I can't stand Bisping.
And I was wrong. He did not get run over. He was competitive. But he lost. He knows he lost. You have to do more than what he did to WIN the fight.
Hell my friend you think he should have won against Wanderlei !
We are both bias.
But, the decision went to Sonnen and rightfully so.
Bisping has had his share of questionable decisions.
He wasn't gonna be awarded this one, and if anything he gets the benefit of the doubt because he is BRITISH in order for the UFC to reach British fans. Everyone always talks about that on comments, forums etc.
He was def not discriminated against because of his nationality. He lost.
The BRIT beat your American at his own game. Just because he didn't get the nod in a decision that could have/should have gone the other way doesn't make a difference. His fan base just doubled.
You did watch the fight right? It was 28th january 2012 not new years eve, you realise that right? ;D
Did you watch the 1st round ? Or just close your eyes, plug your ears while chanting "Bisping Bisping Bisping " ?
Because Chael Sonnen easily won 3 1/2 minutes of the first round. He got takedowns, and he beat Bisping up against the cage.
Now for the other 1 1/2 minutes of the 1st round Bisping had Sonnen against the cage and won.
The first round is the only one really worth debating so go back and watch it.
Also...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGuhZvO1DKg
Your an okay poster, shame your so bias and have such little mma knowledge.Quote:
Originally Posted by HulkListen my condescending limey friend, the BRIT LOST. As they usually do when they face American fighters in any form of combat. We have 300 million fuckin people over here so its a much deeper pool of talent and fighters than the UK.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanI don't even need to read past this line because the rest is irrelevent your bias whats the point in arguing? You'll never see outside your tunnel vision.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk;D:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanGo look in another thread and I argueing with Mattyhitman about Chael being a great fighter. Look even further back and I have started threads on Chaels return to the octagon. I was a Chael fan before I was a Bisping fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
In that same thread you gave two accounts when you though Bisping lost fights that in actual fact he had one so your hardly going to be supporting him. Your obviously going to be bias.
Chael himself had Bisping winning the first two rounds. You can't get much better than that.
Michael Bisping On His Controversial Chael Sonnen Loss - YouTube
Dana White on the UFC On FOX: Evans vs Davis Drama - YouTube
It's funny there's plents of people saying Bisping won. It's all over twitter and mma forums. But obviously Michael Bisping the Englishman fighting in the US against a US fighter doesn't have robbery written all over it. I mean comon it's not like Sonnen vs Silva 2 is one of the most anticipated rematches in MMA history. Little bit fishy this one. And the chants of USA didn't help the judging I bet.
But obviously my loyalty to Bisping has made me delusional! What to do with
this Sonnen walkout shirt?
I'm bias too. No doubt about it. I can't stand Bisping.
And I was wrong. He did not get run over. He was competitive. But he lost. He knows he lost. You have to do more than what he did to WIN the fight.
Hell my friend you think he should have won against Wanderlei !
We are both bias.
But, the decision went to Sonnen and rightfully so.
Bisping has had his share of questionable decisions.
He wasn't gonna be awarded this one, and if anything he gets the benefit of the doubt because he is BRITISH in order for the UFC to reach British fans. Everyone always talks about that on comments, forums etc.
He was def not discriminated against because of his nationality. He lost.
The BRIT beat your American at his own game. Just because he didn't get the nod in a decision that could have/should have gone the other way doesn't make a difference. His fan base just doubled.
You did watch the fight right? It was 28th january 2012 not new years eve, you realise that right? ;D
Did you watch the 1st round ? Or just close your eyes, plug your ears while chanting "Bisping Bisping Bisping " ?
Because Chael Sonnen easily won 3 1/2 minutes of the first round. He got takedowns, and he beat Bisping up against the cage.
Now for the other 1 1/2 minutes of the 1st round Bisping had Sonnen against the cage and won.
The first round is the only one really worth debating so go back and watch it.
Also...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGuhZvO1DKg
Haha, what a joker ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanYour an okay poster, shame your so bias and have such little mma knowledge.Quote:
Originally Posted by HulkListen my condescending limey friend, the BRIT LOST. As they usually do when they face American fighters in any form of combat. We have 300 million fuckin people over here so its a much deeper pool of talent and fighters than the UK.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanI don't even need to read past this line because the rest is irrelevent your bias whats the point in arguing? You'll never see outside your tunnel vision.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk;D:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanGo look in another thread and I argueing with Mattyhitman about Chael being a great fighter. Look even further back and I have started threads on Chaels return to the octagon. I was a Chael fan before I was a Bisping fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
In that same thread you gave two accounts when you though Bisping lost fights that in actual fact he had one so your hardly going to be supporting him. Your obviously going to be bias.
Chael himself had Bisping winning the first two rounds. You can't get much better than that.
Michael Bisping On His Controversial Chael Sonnen Loss - YouTube
Dana White on the UFC On FOX: Evans vs Davis Drama - YouTube
It's funny there's plents of people saying Bisping won. It's all over twitter and mma forums. But obviously Michael Bisping the Englishman fighting in the US against a US fighter doesn't have robbery written all over it. I mean comon it's not like Sonnen vs Silva 2 is one of the most anticipated rematches in MMA history. Little bit fishy this one. And the chants of USA didn't help the judging I bet.
But obviously my loyalty to Bisping has made me delusional! What to do with
this Sonnen walkout shirt?
I'm bias too. No doubt about it. I can't stand Bisping.
And I was wrong. He did not get run over. He was competitive. But he lost. He knows he lost. You have to do more than what he did to WIN the fight.
Hell my friend you think he should have won against Wanderlei !
We are both bias.
But, the decision went to Sonnen and rightfully so.
Bisping has had his share of questionable decisions.
He wasn't gonna be awarded this one, and if anything he gets the benefit of the doubt because he is BRITISH in order for the UFC to reach British fans. Everyone always talks about that on comments, forums etc.
He was def not discriminated against because of his nationality. He lost.
The BRIT beat your American at his own game. Just because he didn't get the nod in a decision that could have/should have gone the other way doesn't make a difference. His fan base just doubled.
You did watch the fight right? It was 28th january 2012 not new years eve, you realise that right? ;D
Did you watch the 1st round ? Or just close your eyes, plug your ears while chanting "Bisping Bisping Bisping " ?
Because Chael Sonnen easily won 3 1/2 minutes of the first round. He got takedowns, and he beat Bisping up against the cage.
Now for the other 1 1/2 minutes of the 1st round Bisping had Sonnen against the cage and won.
The first round is the only one really worth debating so go back and watch it.
Also...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGuhZvO1DKg
My dear I have forgotten more about mma than you will ever know.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanYour an okay poster, shame your so bias and have such little mma knowledge.Quote:
Originally Posted by HulkListen my condescending limey friend, the BRIT LOST. As they usually do when they face American fighters in any form of combat. We have 300 million fuckin people over here so its a much deeper pool of talent and fighters than the UK.Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanI don't even need to read past this line because the rest is irrelevent your bias whats the point in arguing? You'll never see outside your tunnel vision.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk;D:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by mattboxingfanGo look in another thread and I argueing with Mattyhitman about Chael being a great fighter. Look even further back and I have started threads on Chaels return to the octagon. I was a Chael fan before I was a Bisping fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulk
In that same thread you gave two accounts when you though Bisping lost fights that in actual fact he had one so your hardly going to be supporting him. Your obviously going to be bias.
Chael himself had Bisping winning the first two rounds. You can't get much better than that.
Michael Bisping On His Controversial Chael Sonnen Loss - YouTube
Dana White on the UFC On FOX: Evans vs Davis Drama - YouTube
It's funny there's plents of people saying Bisping won. It's all over twitter and mma forums. But obviously Michael Bisping the Englishman fighting in the US against a US fighter doesn't have robbery written all over it. I mean comon it's not like Sonnen vs Silva 2 is one of the most anticipated rematches in MMA history. Little bit fishy this one. And the chants of USA didn't help the judging I bet.
But obviously my loyalty to Bisping has made me delusional! What to do with
this Sonnen walkout shirt?
I'm bias too. No doubt about it. I can't stand Bisping.
And I was wrong. He did not get run over. He was competitive. But he lost. He knows he lost. You have to do more than what he did to WIN the fight.
Hell my friend you think he should have won against Wanderlei !
We are both bias.
But, the decision went to Sonnen and rightfully so.
Bisping has had his share of questionable decisions.
He wasn't gonna be awarded this one, and if anything he gets the benefit of the doubt because he is BRITISH in order for the UFC to reach British fans. Everyone always talks about that on comments, forums etc.
He was def not discriminated against because of his nationality. He lost.
The BRIT beat your American at his own game. Just because he didn't get the nod in a decision that could have/should have gone the other way doesn't make a difference. His fan base just doubled.
You did watch the fight right? It was 28th january 2012 not new years eve, you realise that right? ;D
Did you watch the 1st round ? Or just close your eyes, plug your ears while chanting "Bisping Bisping Bisping " ?
Because Chael Sonnen easily won 3 1/2 minutes of the first round. He got takedowns, and he beat Bisping up against the cage.
Now for the other 1 1/2 minutes of the 1st round Bisping had Sonnen against the cage and won.
The first round is the only one really worth debating so go back and watch it.
Also...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGuhZvO1DKg
As I explained I've watched since before it was even called mma and I've trained at an mma gym since 2007.
You just recently got into the sport in the last two years yet feel obligated to tell everyone everything about it.
Shame because aside that you are an okay poster. That smart ass Dan Hardy avatar is a wearing on me though...;D