The balls on Macklin for taking this fight. Would love to travel over for it. Dont give Mack much of a chance here.
Printable View
The balls on Macklin for taking this fight. Would love to travel over for it. Dont give Mack much of a chance here.
Oh I don't know, he surprised the crap out of me when he won a few rounds against Sergio, he can box very well. I have seen every american fight featuring GGG and I do like the guy, but something in the back of my mind that I can quite put to words is urging me caution before writing off Mack the knife.
Of course he is going to make it an exciting fight.... nothing like seeing a tiger in captivity try to rip apart a deer that thinks there is still space to run in the wild.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe
;D
A Golovki- Sturm/Mundine/Soliman fight would have been a bit better. jmo...
Brave of Macklin but only one outcome, Golovkin will KO him does he stand a chance, if WE are
all honest very little chance. Good luck to Macklin he needs all the luck he can get.
??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
So when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
OK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Most of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Uhmm...what a brilliantly objective post.
And more importantly I ain't British. For every overrate British boxer there has been 5 overrated Anerican fighter. I'm equally critical of both.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Uhmm...what a brilliantly objective post.
Haahahahahaha. Send all three of them out to pasture cause they are done. I dont think you have even seen Macklin fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
True Macklin would be these guys and he will make it a tough fight for GGG.Quote:
Originally Posted by IamInuitHaahahahahaha. Send all three of them out to pasture cause they are done. I dont think you have even seen Macklin fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
I never back a Brit, only if I think he has a chance of beating his opponent but I will wish them luck,Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Rees was out of his depth, as a former World Champion he was rated weather you like it or not,
he got his shot. Golovkin is a bit special in my book, Macklin has his shot as padding records go Macklin is hardly a BUM, is he a decent fighter.!
I highlight 2 quotes here and would like you to explain. Rees didnt deserve his shot? His record was 37 and 1 with 1 draw with his only loss coming by way of 12th round TKO to a decent fighter Kotelnik. He had also never been knocked down before.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Crap analysis??? who are u referrring to here, i dont think any boxing analysis, Brit or otherwise said he had a chance, bar some fecking eejits on sky sports. his own promoter said he just wanted to give a good account for himself and i think he did.
More deserving fighters??? like who?? the majority of fighters would likely turn down the fight. Vasquez and Burns were set to fight and Abril was fighting Bogere so the best lightweights were already tied up. Doubt Shafikov would take the fight and the outcome would be the same as the Rees fight did.
Recycling Bums??? How is this recycling bums. If anyones guilty of that its the US, getting guys like Mosely to fight over and over again despite not deserving the fight or standing a chance to win it.
Im more then happy to debate and have my opinion opposed but talking shit with no facts to back it up is just retarded and makes me wonder how much boxing the person watches.
I said what I said!
:teacher:
There are crap American prospects, but they are found out MUCH quicker in the game than are British crap prospects.
The Brits have this nasty habit of pumping crappy tomato cans as fighters, with their fluffed up records and nothing to REALLY show for it other than piss and wind.
And I'm not having anymore of it. The Brits are keen at this!!!
:mad:
You are a very angry young man, my I suggest you soak your feet in a bowl of warm not hot water,Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeI highlight 2 quotes here and would like you to explain. Rees didnt deserve his shot? His record was 37 and 1 with 1 draw with his only loss coming by way of 12th round TKO to a decent fighter Kotelnik. He had also never been knocked down before.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Crap analysis??? who are u referrring to here, i dont think any boxing analysis, Brit or otherwise said he had a chance, bar some fecking eejits on sky sports. his own promoter said he just wanted to give a good account for himself and i think he did.
More deserving fighters??? like who?? the majority of fighters would likely turn down the fight. Vasquez and Burns were set to fight and Abril was fighting Bogere so the best lightweights were already tied up. Doubt Shafikov would take the fight and the outcome would be the same as the Rees fight did.
Recycling Bums??? How is this recycling bums. If anyones guilty of that its the US, getting guys like Mosely to fight over and over again despite not deserving the fight or standing a chance to win it.
Im more then happy to debate and have my opinion opposed but talking shit with no facts to back it up is just retarded and makes me wonder how much boxing the person watches.
and place a nice cool towel on your forehead.;D
Or its a boxing forum, live with it remember this is not life and death, you take yourself far to serous
we debate we may not agree, and the amount of boxing I've seen is VAST, it comes with age.
May I suggest you start boxing boxing yourself, it may take the edge off that anger, on the keyboard.;)
Angry? I dont think my posts make me come across as angry? I also said I am happy to take other peoples opinions on board but they need to back it up with support from what has happened in fights. Guys running there mouth calling guys bums without any support to back it up have no place in boxing forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bandoYou are a very angry young man, my I suggest you soak your feet in a bowl of warm not hot water,Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeI highlight 2 quotes here and would like you to explain. Rees didnt deserve his shot? His record was 37 and 1 with 1 draw with his only loss coming by way of 12th round TKO to a decent fighter Kotelnik. He had also never been knocked down before.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Crap analysis??? who are u referrring to here, i dont think any boxing analysis, Brit or otherwise said he had a chance, bar some fecking eejits on sky sports. his own promoter said he just wanted to give a good account for himself and i think he did.
More deserving fighters??? like who?? the majority of fighters would likely turn down the fight. Vasquez and Burns were set to fight and Abril was fighting Bogere so the best lightweights were already tied up. Doubt Shafikov would take the fight and the outcome would be the same as the Rees fight did.
Recycling Bums??? How is this recycling bums. If anyones guilty of that its the US, getting guys like Mosely to fight over and over again despite not deserving the fight or standing a chance to win it.
Im more then happy to debate and have my opinion opposed but talking shit with no facts to back it up is just retarded and makes me wonder how much boxing the person watches.
and place a nice cool towel on your forehead.;D
Or its a boxing forum, live with it remember this is not life and death, you take yourself far to serous
we debate we may not agree, and the amount of boxing I've seen is VAST, it comes with age.
May I suggest you start boxing boxing yourself, it may take the edge off that anger, on the keyboard.;)
I think Dia was referring to ykdadamaja not you SilkeyJoe. You are right calling proven fighters bums is the mark of somebody trolling for a reaction.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeAngry? I dont think my posts make me come across as angry? I also said I am happy to take other peoples opinions on board but they need to back it up with support from what has happened in fights. Guys running there mouth calling guys bums without any support to back it up have no place in boxing forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bandoYou are a very angry young man, my I suggest you soak your feet in a bowl of warm not hot water,Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeI highlight 2 quotes here and would like you to explain. Rees didnt deserve his shot? His record was 37 and 1 with 1 draw with his only loss coming by way of 12th round TKO to a decent fighter Kotelnik. He had also never been knocked down before.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Crap analysis??? who are u referrring to here, i dont think any boxing analysis, Brit or otherwise said he had a chance, bar some fecking eejits on sky sports. his own promoter said he just wanted to give a good account for himself and i think he did.
More deserving fighters??? like who?? the majority of fighters would likely turn down the fight. Vasquez and Burns were set to fight and Abril was fighting Bogere so the best lightweights were already tied up. Doubt Shafikov would take the fight and the outcome would be the same as the Rees fight did.
Recycling Bums??? How is this recycling bums. If anyones guilty of that its the US, getting guys like Mosely to fight over and over again despite not deserving the fight or standing a chance to win it.
Im more then happy to debate and have my opinion opposed but talking shit with no facts to back it up is just retarded and makes me wonder how much boxing the person watches.
and place a nice cool towel on your forehead.;D
Or its a boxing forum, live with it remember this is not life and death, you take yourself far to serous
we debate we may not agree, and the amount of boxing I've seen is VAST, it comes with age.
May I suggest you start boxing boxing yourself, it may take the edge off that anger, on the keyboard.;)
That's right bud Yakdoodaa sorry for that Silkey , I shall have to go lay down in a darken room, BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzI think Dia was referring to ykdadamaja not you SilkeyJoe. You are right calling proven fighters bums is the mark of somebody trolling for a reaction.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeAngry? I dont think my posts make me come across as angry? I also said I am happy to take other peoples opinions on board but they need to back it up with support from what has happened in fights. Guys running there mouth calling guys bums without any support to back it up have no place in boxing forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bandoYou are a very angry young man, my I suggest you soak your feet in a bowl of warm not hot water,Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeI highlight 2 quotes here and would like you to explain. Rees didnt deserve his shot? His record was 37 and 1 with 1 draw with his only loss coming by way of 12th round TKO to a decent fighter Kotelnik. He had also never been knocked down before.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Crap analysis??? who are u referrring to here, i dont think any boxing analysis, Brit or otherwise said he had a chance, bar some fecking eejits on sky sports. his own promoter said he just wanted to give a good account for himself and i think he did.
More deserving fighters??? like who?? the majority of fighters would likely turn down the fight. Vasquez and Burns were set to fight and Abril was fighting Bogere so the best lightweights were already tied up. Doubt Shafikov would take the fight and the outcome would be the same as the Rees fight did.
Recycling Bums??? How is this recycling bums. If anyones guilty of that its the US, getting guys like Mosely to fight over and over again despite not deserving the fight or standing a chance to win it.
Im more then happy to debate and have my opinion opposed but talking shit with no facts to back it up is just retarded and makes me wonder how much boxing the person watches.
and place a nice cool towel on your forehead.;D
Or its a boxing forum, live with it remember this is not life and death, you take yourself far to serous
we debate we may not agree, and the amount of boxing I've seen is VAST, it comes with age.
May I suggest you start boxing boxing yourself, it may take the edge off that anger, on the keyboard.;)
I still think Steel Spam are wonderful, all around my hat 20 times, again all around my hat, they don't
make records like that anymore, your a musical philistine.;D;D;D
You sure I'm the one that needs to calm down? hehehhehe....Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bandoThat's right bud Yakdoodaa sorry for that Silkey , I shall have to go lay down in a darken room, BeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzI think Dia was referring to ykdadamaja not you SilkeyJoe. You are right calling proven fighters bums is the mark of somebody trolling for a reaction.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeAngry? I dont think my posts make me come across as angry? I also said I am happy to take other peoples opinions on board but they need to back it up with support from what has happened in fights. Guys running there mouth calling guys bums without any support to back it up have no place in boxing forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bandoYou are a very angry young man, my I suggest you soak your feet in a bowl of warm not hot water,Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeI highlight 2 quotes here and would like you to explain. Rees didnt deserve his shot? His record was 37 and 1 with 1 draw with his only loss coming by way of 12th round TKO to a decent fighter Kotelnik. He had also never been knocked down before.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost of you British guys would cheer on and ramp up a tomato can, just because you guys can. I have heard about countless of fluffed up British prospects that were destroyed when they faced even mediocre opposition- so, save it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeOK well someone clearly doesnt watch much British boxing, Macklin is clearly the best from the 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaSo when does failing a drug test hinder you from fighting again? Mundine would last longer than Macklin would- who is just like Gavin Rees, a pumped up Brit tomato can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe??? Solomon failed a drug test, Mundine is shit and Sturm is past it. Macklin offers the best fight for Golovkin at the moment in my opinion. If he beats Mack it could be Martinez nextQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
Guys keep overlooking Sturm when he is quite durable and probably the best fight for Golovkin at that weight aside from Martinez or Chavez.
A Quillin fight seems to be a championship fight down the road. Out of all of the contenders at middle, Macklin stands THEE LEAST CHANCE of beating Golovkin.
FFS... put Murray in there if anything.
:rolleyes:
What from Sturm-Macklin, Sturm-Murray, Sturm-Geale, Sturm-Solimon suggest Sturm would do better then Macklin would against GGG?
Solimon doesnt have the backing of a commision and will serve a ban so the fight aint gonna happen. Macklin has a better chance of winning then Solimon would anyway.
Murray is fighting Martinez so should GGG wait til Martinez beats him and then fight him??? Anyway Macklin is tougher and a better boxer then Murray.
Mundine??? Did you not watch Geale-Mundine? Mundine aint a hope against any decent fighter anymore.
Quillin aint fighting GGG at this stage of his career, they know a brutal KO could destroy Quillins career.
I have no problem with you saying GGG is winning this easy but your lack of respect for Macklin is shocking. And whats so bad about Rees. He took a fight against the best in the world and put in an honest performance. I dont think anyone will try sell Rees as a world class http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...icon6.pngboxer but he has some heart and is a genuine guy that is good for boxing.
It seems like so many people on this forum are blinded by there dislike of a certain fighter or of fighters from certain regions, come on guys be objective.:cool:
Macklin is what he is- another tomato can with a fluffed up record.
Your analysis of a Mundine when he fought Geale is silly. That Mundine is STILL better than Macklin and more worthy of a fight. Geale is ranked #1.
Gavin Rees got a fight with Broner when he shouldn't have, all because of crap analyses and fluffed up Brit-piss and wind. In the meantime better fights could be made and more deserving guys could get a shot- and we all know GGG would take an easy payday and solidify his stature on a fluffed up tomato can. Anyone would!
:rolleyes:
I'm getting sick of this boxing political interference emminating from Engerland. Sending up tomato cans and recycling bums just to say that you can. It got out of hand and I'm here to nip that BS in the bud.
Odds are Macklin gets brutally ko'd within 3 rounds.
And I'm not saying Soliman could fight now, just stating that a fight with him would have been better than one with Macklin.
Crap analysis??? who are u referrring to here, i dont think any boxing analysis, Brit or otherwise said he had a chance, bar some fecking eejits on sky sports. his own promoter said he just wanted to give a good account for himself and i think he did.
More deserving fighters??? like who?? the majority of fighters would likely turn down the fight. Vasquez and Burns were set to fight and Abril was fighting Bogere so the best lightweights were already tied up. Doubt Shafikov would take the fight and the outcome would be the same as the Rees fight did.
Recycling Bums??? How is this recycling bums. If anyones guilty of that its the US, getting guys like Mosely to fight over and over again despite not deserving the fight or standing a chance to win it.
Im more then happy to debate and have my opinion opposed but talking shit with no facts to back it up is just retarded and makes me wonder how much boxing the person watches.
and place a nice cool towel on your forehead.;D
Or its a boxing forum, live with it remember this is not life and death, you take yourself far to serous
we debate we may not agree, and the amount of boxing I've seen is VAST, it comes with age.
May I suggest you start boxing boxing yourself, it may take the edge off that anger, on the keyboard.;)
I still think Steel Spam are wonderful, all around my hat 20 times, again all around my hat, they don't
make records like that anymore, your a musical philistine.;D;D;D
Did I say that this will be GGG hardest fight? It will be.
it will, its a step up for GGG without a doubtQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
and if macklin wins what a win it will be
i think its a good move for macklin
and if he does lose hes got what would probably be quite a lucrative domestic fight to fall back on
Guys are here talkin' smack about Sturm when Sturm beat Macklin not too long ago...
Funny thing is, on paper, Macklin will be the highest rated person that Golovkin will face. Aside from the WBA where he is champion, Golovkin isn't even ranked- dear God- but Macklin IS.
:rolleyes:
I would have much rather have seen a Sturm fight, or a Soliman fight if he was able.
This Macklin fight reeks of crappy boxing politricks. Instead of denouncing it, you guys are cheering on a wasteful event where the fans don't win!
There is nothing exciting about seeing an over-hyped fighter get hurt in the ring...
At least fight Martin Murray... at least he is the mandatory, or fight Sturm- who is the second ranked in the WBA. This Macklin fight makes no sense, at all...
:-\
Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
who doesnt it make sense for?
Ykdadamaja doesn't watch fights he just comments on how shit fighters are without watching them fight. I wouldn't take his opinion on board.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
who doesnt it make sense for?
I think it will be an entertaining fight with GGG getting a 7th or 8th round TKO.
Style wise this will be a barn burner, it will be very exciting whilst it lasts.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
This Macklin fight does nothing for Golovkin. Minimum risk with little or no gain. The only spin on this will be the notion of comparison between Martinez and himself and can he use that to lobby himself into a Martinez Super-fight.
;D
By all means, hurry and dispatch with the over-hyped tomato can!
did the macklin fight make sense to sturn and martinez at a much more establish point in their careers?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
I'm really looking forward to this fight. Not sure if I've seen Golovkin really pushed back yet, and I think Macklin could actually do that. He throws ALOT of punches and I'm pretty confident he hits harder than Rosado, who managed to land some decent clean shots on Golovkin and mark him up. Another point also, Macklin really works the body really well early when he gets inside so if he can be clever inside letting the shots go and covering well when needed, Golovkin could take some decent body shots early to make the fight interesting later.
I say this is a great test for GGG for sure, with maybe a late stoppage win for Golovkin or Macklin taking it on the cards being the busier guy. Macklin does a bunch better than the Light Middleweight Rosado anyway IMO.
That's not the point. The point is that perhaps Macklin would have been dominated in the fight anyways by either of them. I just don't think Macklin is the gate-keeper for anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44did the macklin fight make sense to sturn and martinez at a much more establish point in their careers?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
This coming from a guy that has warmed up to Tyson Fury, quite a great deal too!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaThat's not the point. The point is that perhaps Macklin would have been dominated in the fight anyways by either of them. I just don't think Macklin is the gate-keeper for anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44did the macklin fight make sense to sturn and martinez at a much more establish point in their careers?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
This coming from a guy that has warmed up to Tyson Fury, quite a great deal too!
You have just massively undermined your own argument. Most Brits and anyone else who has the first clue about boxing can see that Fury is much closer to being a bum or tomato can than Macklin. When you make ill informed sweeping statements accusing all British fighters of being feather fisted and then call Macklin a bum you should not be surprised if people don't take your judgement seriously. Ya bum.
of course its the point and your point isnt the point because its not really got any point at allQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaThat's not the point. The point is that perhaps Macklin would have been dominated in the fight anyways by either of them. I just don't think Macklin is the gate-keeper for anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44did the macklin fight make sense to sturn and martinez at a much more establish point in their careers?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
This coming from a guy that has warmed up to Tyson Fury, quite a great deal too!
what are you on about?
Most Brit boxing fans are blinded by their blatant nuthugging... Fury has a better chance against Wlad or Vitali than Macklin does against Golovkin or Martinez, or even Sturm or Soliman.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaThat's not the point. The point is that perhaps Macklin would have been dominated in the fight anyways by either of them. I just don't think Macklin is the gate-keeper for anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44did the macklin fight make sense to sturn and martinez at a much more establish point in their careers?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
This coming from a guy that has warmed up to Tyson Fury, quite a great deal too!
You have just massively undermined your own argument. Most Brits and anyone else who has the first clue about boxing can see that Fury is much closer to being a bum or tomato can than Macklin. When you make ill informed sweeping statements accusing all British fighters of being feather fisted and then call Macklin a bum you should not be surprised if people don't take your judgement seriously. Ya bum.
Macklin is a damn tomato can. Hasn't been in the ring with any noteworthy name and won. Face it, he is a hyped up tomato can.
This Brit poump and bombast over shit fighters really needs to stop.
:mad:
Macklin beat up a few taxi cab drivers and dishwashers from the South-west or from Sheffield, and all of a sudden he is a contender? lololol....
;D
GTHOOH!!!!!!
:rolleyes:
Macklin fought well against Sturm and Martinez , yes he lost but i found both fights enjoyable. You call him a tomato can.
Fury hasnt fought anybody in the top class , when he does you will see he is a tomato without the can.
He is a far worst fighter at HW than Macklin is at MW.
hang on a minute, you never answered my questionQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost Brit boxing fans are blinded by their blatant nuthugging... Fury has a better chance against Wlad or Vitali than Macklin does against Golovkin or Martinez, or even Sturm or Soliman.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaThat's not the point. The point is that perhaps Macklin would have been dominated in the fight anyways by either of them. I just don't think Macklin is the gate-keeper for anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44did the macklin fight make sense to sturn and martinez at a much more establish point in their careers?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
This coming from a guy that has warmed up to Tyson Fury, quite a great deal too!
You have just massively undermined your own argument. Most Brits and anyone else who has the first clue about boxing can see that Fury is much closer to being a bum or tomato can than Macklin. When you make ill informed sweeping statements accusing all British fighters of being feather fisted and then call Macklin a bum you should not be surprised if people don't take your judgement seriously. Ya bum.
Macklin is a damn tomato can. Hasn't been in the ring with any noteworthy name and won. Face it, he is a hyped up tomato can.
This Brit poump and bombast over shit fighters really needs to stop.
:mad:
what are you on about?
yakidyama or whatever there is a great boxing forum for you , Boxing News and Views , you may actually end up being one of their brighter posters.
Hang on are you retarded? Seriously? Macklin lost a SD to Sturm in Germany. Did you watch the fight? I actually think Macklin did enough to win the fight. Since then Sturm has looked average at best against Murray, Geale and Solimon. Macklin on the other hand did a good job against Martinez and was impressive against Alcine, who had just shocked Lemieux.Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaMost Brit boxing fans are blinded by their blatant nuthugging... Fury has a better chance against Wlad or Vitali than Macklin does against Golovkin or Martinez, or even Sturm or Soliman.Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenbeanzQuote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaThat's not the point. The point is that perhaps Macklin would have been dominated in the fight anyways by either of them. I just don't think Macklin is the gate-keeper for anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by erics44did the macklin fight make sense to sturn and martinez at a much more establish point in their careers?Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamaja
This coming from a guy that has warmed up to Tyson Fury, quite a great deal too!
You have just massively undermined your own argument. Most Brits and anyone else who has the first clue about boxing can see that Fury is much closer to being a bum or tomato can than Macklin. When you make ill informed sweeping statements accusing all British fighters of being feather fisted and then call Macklin a bum you should not be surprised if people don't take your judgement seriously. Ya bum.
Macklin is a damn tomato can. Hasn't been in the ring with any noteworthy name and won. Face it, he is a hyped up tomato can.
This Brit poump and bombast over shit fighters really needs to stop.
:mad:
To say Fury has a better chance against Vlad then Macklin has against Sturm is just retarded. I have no doubt now that you don't watch fights and just go by rankings and belt holders which mean nothing.