Printable View
You may not have heard of Erik Skoglund , but this weekend he took on the feared Lolenga Mock , and he easily outpointed him.
He was not floored , but he did take a standing count , we all know Mock floored Haye , and Haye went on to win a version of the HW title. So I give this guy Skoglund a real bright future.
That is some awesome form right there.
What do you think Ross ?
this here is a 21 year old guys, pretty sharp stuff for a youngster.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP5D-FVoGvE
I think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
are you calling Mock a twat @ross?
I was using your logic , Haye the only person shit enough to get floored by Mock , so Haye went on to win the WBA title at HW, so does that not mean this guy Skoglund has a better chance ? it was a fair question if we are to use your blind logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
I belive in this guy, not sure why :rolleyes: ;D
your a true believer .Quote:
Originally Posted by Xwetie
Went on to "win" the WBA title...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord AlI was using your logic , Haye the only person shit enough to get floored by Mock , so Haye went on to win the WBA title at HW, so does that not mean this guy Skoglund has a better chance ? it was a fair question if we are to use your blind logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
76 year old Evander Holyfield gave a more convincing performace against Valuev:rolleyes:
Skoglund fought a journeyman who you seem to enjoy ridiculing. Big deal. At least he didn't get dropped;D
I thought Haye lost to Valuev , however nobody here ridicules Mock we all think he is awesome.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWent on to "win" the WBA title...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord AlI was using your logic , Haye the only person shit enough to get floored by Mock , so Haye went on to win the WBA title at HW, so does that not mean this guy Skoglund has a better chance ? it was a fair question if we are to use your blind logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
76 year old Evander Holyfield gave a more convincing performace against Valuev:rolleyes:
Skoglund fought a journeyman who you seem to enjoy ridiculing. Big deal. At least he didn't get dropped;D
let's get to the part about how long it takes to get fresh fish into the center of town :rolleyes:
Or we could all go down the beach and hit sand dunes with a twig;DQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
so you saw that? Big twig there too.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossOr we could all go down the beach and hit sand dunes with a twig;DQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Yet your boy has won NOTHING at wotld level, 76 year old Holyfield and small, overhyped part time boxer Haye did it... So the division must be shite, why has oversized lummox not done anything other than punch his own face?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWent on to "win" the WBA title...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord AlI was using your logic , Haye the only person shit enough to get floored by Mock , so Haye went on to win the WBA title at HW, so does that not mean this guy Skoglund has a better chance ? it was a fair question if we are to use your blind logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
76 year old Evander Holyfield gave a more convincing performace against Valuev:rolleyes:
Skoglund fought a journeyman who you seem to enjoy ridiculing. Big deal. At least he didn't get dropped;D
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamGBYet your boy has won NOTHING at wotld level, 76 year old Holyfield and small, overhyped part time boxer Haye did it... So the division must be shite, why has oversized lummox not done anything other than punch his own face?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWent on to "win" the WBA title...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord AlI was using your logic , Haye the only person shit enough to get floored by Mock , so Haye went on to win the WBA title at HW, so does that not mean this guy Skoglund has a better chance ? it was a fair question if we are to use your blind logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
76 year old Evander Holyfield gave a more convincing performace against Valuev:rolleyes:
Skoglund fought a journeyman who you seem to enjoy ridiculing. Big deal. At least he didn't get dropped;D
Well...
Fury would probably be having a world title challenge imminently if Booth hadnt called Peter Fury to offer them a match. Fury would have beaten Pulev (judging by his performance against Thompson, showing no urgency) and now be mandatory. As it is hes been held up big time by Haye. Lets not forget that Haye hadnt fought for a heavyweight title until he was a pro 7 years and even then it was a very dubious win against the worst title holder. Fury has only been a pro 5 years.
Haye fought for a world title after 5 years as a pro no? 2 years if you count the IBOQuote:
Originally Posted by rossQuote:
Originally Posted by AdamGBYet your boy has won NOTHING at wotld level, 76 year old Holyfield and small, overhyped part time boxer Haye did it... So the division must be shite, why has oversized lummox not done anything other than punch his own face?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWent on to "win" the WBA title...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord AlI was using your logic , Haye the only person shit enough to get floored by Mock , so Haye went on to win the WBA title at HW, so does that not mean this guy Skoglund has a better chance ? it was a fair question if we are to use your blind logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
76 year old Evander Holyfield gave a more convincing performace against Valuev:rolleyes:
Skoglund fought a journeyman who you seem to enjoy ridiculing. Big deal. At least he didn't get dropped;D
Well...
Fury would probably be having a world title challenge imminently if Booth hadnt called Peter Fury to offer them a match. Fury would have beaten Pulev (judging by his performance against Thompson, showing no urgency) and now be mandatory. As it is hes been held up big time by Haye. Lets not forget that Haye hadnt fought for a heavyweight title until he was a pro 7 years and even then it was a very dubious win against the worst title holder. Fury has only been a pro 5 years.
Like I said, if Booth hadnt have turned Furys head with a big money fight and big name scalp Fury would now be waiting for his date to fight Wlad.Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkeyjoeHaye fought for a world title after 5 years as a pro no? 2 years if you count the IBOQuote:
Originally Posted by rossQuote:
Originally Posted by AdamGBYet your boy has won NOTHING at wotld level, 76 year old Holyfield and small, overhyped part time boxer Haye did it... So the division must be shite, why has oversized lummox not done anything other than punch his own face?Quote:
Originally Posted by rossWent on to "win" the WBA title...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord AlI was using your logic , Haye the only person shit enough to get floored by Mock , so Haye went on to win the WBA title at HW, so does that not mean this guy Skoglund has a better chance ? it was a fair question if we are to use your blind logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossI think only Haye has a shit enough chin to get dropped by a middle weight;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al
You have the nerve to criticise other posters threads then come up with this shit;D
What a twat:vd:
76 year old Evander Holyfield gave a more convincing performace against Valuev:rolleyes:
Skoglund fought a journeyman who you seem to enjoy ridiculing. Big deal. At least he didn't get dropped;D
Well...
Fury would probably be having a world title challenge imminently if Booth hadnt called Peter Fury to offer them a match. Fury would have beaten Pulev (judging by his performance against Thompson, showing no urgency) and now be mandatory. As it is hes been held up big time by Haye. Lets not forget that Haye hadnt fought for a heavyweight title until he was a pro 7 years and even then it was a very dubious win against the worst title holder. Fury has only been a pro 5 years.
If you say so;)Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbustso you saw that? Big twig there too.Quote:
Originally Posted by rossOr we could all go down the beach and hit sand dunes with a twig;DQuote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Brock I think he missed that reference. :lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
No Al...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord AlBrock I think he missed that reference. :lolhaha:Quote:
Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
You obviously didnt notice or get my "reference" in my reply to that remark:rolleyes:
Bringing up something unrelated that I had done, I did the same back;)