-
Tyson Fury is classless!
... his derogatory remarks about Chisora and Johnson at ringside gave us a taste of how classless and idiotic Fury is. It's good to be cocky, but there is a level of respect you give fighters.
I'm with Chisora for the rematch. Del Boy's right hand is starting to cook and sizzle... better than it has before. I think he can put hurt on Fury and touch him in places he is not used to being touched.
Fury needs a DECENT American opponent now... or a good European opponent... Joey Abell proved nothing as he was a beaten man from when Arreola smacked him around the ring.
Warren will most likely wait til the heat and anger is off before he puts him with a prospect that's hungry and worked up over Fury's antics... but, no doubt, he can't walk into a Wlad fight just yet.
But, hell, if Wlad is prefering to fight Alex Lepai and not a Pulev, Jennings, Scott, etc... then Fury may just walk in for a fight. Who knows?!?!
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
... his derogatory remarks about Chisora and Johnson at ringside gave us a taste of how classless and idiotic Fury is. It's good to be cocky, but there is a level of respect you give fighters.
I'm with Chisora for the rematch. Del Boy's right hand is starting to cook and sizzle... better than it has before. I think he can put hurt on Fury and touch him in places he is not used to being touched.
Fury needs a DECENT American opponent now... or a good European opponent... Joey Abell proved nothing as he was a beaten man from when Arreola smacked him around the ring.
Warren will most likely wait til the heat and anger is off before he puts him with a prospect that's hungry and worked up over Fury's antics... but, no doubt, he can't walk into a Wlad fight just yet.
But, hell, if Wlad is prefering to fight Alex Lepai and not a Pulev, Jennings, Scott, etc... then Fury may just walk in for a fight. Who knows?!?!
Touch him in places that he is not used to being touched? Is Chisora batting for the other team now ;D ?
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
What exactly did he say about them? Did he drop an N-bomb?
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
What exactly did he say about them? Did he drop an N-bomb?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwCL11e4YNs
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
What exactly did he say about them? Did he drop an N-bomb?
Go to 25.25 http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7eFjrDW-HLA
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
He says what he thinks which is not necessarily a good thing because he does not think what he says.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
He says what he thinks which is not necessarily a good thing because he does not think what he says.
You mean he talks shit.;D
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
You don't expect anything less from fury.
I do though expect more from the interviewer, why when fury said it was boring didn't he mention that his fight with jogphbson was similarly so and atleast Chisora scored a Kd.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Where can you find the back story of the Furys? I'm not terribly familiar with the family but as I understand it the family is full of bare knuckle boxers?
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Where can you find the back story of the Furys? I'm not terribly familiar with the family but as I understand it the family is full of bare knuckle boxers?
Gypsy John Fury his father was a former pro cruiser weight, done some time gouged some
one's eye out in a pub fight. Salt of the earth.;D
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Where can you find the back story of the Furys? I'm not terribly familiar with the family but as I understand it the family is full of bare knuckle boxers?
Search it on google. There uncle was king of the gypsies. Their whole family fights. They love fighting.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Where can you find the back story of the Furys? I'm not terribly familiar with the family but as I understand it the family is full of bare knuckle boxers?
Search it on google. There uncle was king of the gypsies. Their whole family fights. They love fighting.
King of the gypsies sound like nothing more than a disease.
"Do sir want to buy some lucky 'eather"!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Where can you find the back story of the Furys? I'm not terribly familiar with the family but as I understand it the family is full of bare knuckle boxers?
Search it on google. There uncle was king of the gypsies. Their whole family fights. They love fighting.
King of the gypsies sound like nothing more than a disease.
"Do sir want to buy some lucky 'eather"!
King of the gypsies is a very prestigious title and ill be damned if I'm gonna sit here and let you disrespect it!
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
Yes please go on. For each listed you could name 20 american fighters guilty of the same thing. Macklin deserves a shot because most think he beat him in the 1st fight. So getting beat by possibly the best middleweight in the planet and actually being willing to fight him when noone else will you shouldnt get another shot on the back of that. Your logic is poor dude.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
Yes please go on. For each listed you could name 20 american fighters guilty of the same thing. Macklin deserves a shot because most think he beat him in the 1st fight. So getting beat by possibly the best middleweight in the planet and actually being willing to fight him when noone else will you shouldnt get another shot on the back of that. Your logic is poor dude.
You are a highly insulting and condescending poster.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
Yes please go on. For each listed you could name 20 american fighters guilty of the same thing. Macklin deserves a shot because most think he beat him in the 1st fight. So getting beat by possibly the best middleweight in the planet and actually being willing to fight him when noone else will you shouldnt get another shot on the back of that. Your logic is poor dude.
You are a highly insulting and condescending poster.
Yes and we love his honesty.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
Yes please go on. For each listed you could name 20 american fighters guilty of the same thing. Macklin deserves a shot because most think he beat him in the 1st fight. So getting beat by possibly the best middleweight in the planet and actually being willing to fight him when noone else will you shouldnt get another shot on the back of that. Your logic is poor dude.
You are a highly insulting and condescending poster.
No more condescending then how Americans talk down about Euro fighters. I try call everything straight. I obviously have biased views sometimes and most of the time Ill admit to them. But saying a guy doesnt deserve a title shot after having a 50/50 fight with a world champ in Sturm, and pushing a future HOFr in Martinez to need KDs to win the fight and then getting stopped by one of the most avoided fighters in the planet is poor logic. He also just beat an unbeaten prospect
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Freedom
Fury always calling out guys with fight commitments already. Adamek fighting a good oponent in Glazkov in March. No way hes fighting in April
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Freedom
Fury always calling out guys with fight commitments already. Adamek fighting a good oponent in Glazkov in March. No way hes fighting in April
Should be an easy fight to make as Adamek diesnt know about the man that KOd someone sparko who Adamek got a gift decision against and he will earn better money and get bigger exposure.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
Yes please go on. For each listed you could name 20 american fighters guilty of the same thing. Macklin deserves a shot because most think he beat him in the 1st fight. So getting beat by possibly the best middleweight in the planet and actually being willing to fight him when noone else will you shouldnt get another shot on the back of that. Your logic is poor dude.
You are a highly insulting and condescending poster.
No more condescending then how Americans talk down about Euro fighters. I try call everything straight. I obviously have biased views sometimes and most of the time Ill admit to them. But saying a guy doesnt deserve a title shot after having a 50/50 fight with a world champ in Sturm, and pushing a future HOFr in Martinez to need KDs to win the fight and then getting stopped by one of the most avoided fighters in the planet is poor logic. He also just beat an unbeaten prospect
Sorry if the truth hurts, but that's the way it is. What I'm saying about Macklin is that he has had 3 shots at 3 different champions. Yes , he may have been a bit unlucky and yes he might have put up a good show in 2 of the fights, but he LOST! Who gets a 4th shot? If he keeps getting opportunities, what motivation is there for up and coming fighters and other top 10 ranked guys . If he is to get another shot, he should be fighting other contenders in eliminators. Beating a "prospect" , who in reality is a relative novice And not ranked in any governing body's top 10 is not good enough to justify yet another shot. Andy Lee, Murray, Geale, N'Dam N'Jikam, Lemieux , Nielsen, Stevens, Saunders, Fight any of those . I'm not saying he can't beat those guys, but prove it and EARN it.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Freedom
Fury always calling out guys with fight commitments already. Adamek fighting a good oponent in Glazkov in March. No way hes fighting in April
Should be an easy fight to make as Adamek diesnt know about the man that KOd someone sparko who Adamek got a gift decision against and he will earn better money and get bigger exposure.
For a fight in April? Adamek probably wouldnt even get a 6 figure offer from Furys team let alone anything close to what hed accept
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
Yes please go on. For each listed you could name 20 american fighters guilty of the same thing. Macklin deserves a shot because most think he beat him in the 1st fight. So getting beat by possibly the best middleweight in the planet and actually being willing to fight him when noone else will you shouldnt get another shot on the back of that. Your logic is poor dude.
You are a highly insulting and condescending poster.
No more condescending then how Americans talk down about Euro fighters. I try call everything straight. I obviously have biased views sometimes and most of the time Ill admit to them. But saying a guy doesnt deserve a title shot after having a 50/50 fight with a world champ in Sturm, and pushing a future HOFr in Martinez to need KDs to win the fight and then getting stopped by one of the most avoided fighters in the planet is poor logic. He also just beat an unbeaten prospect
Sorry if the truth hurts, but that's the way it is. What I'm saying about Macklin is that he has had 3 shots at 3 different champions. Yes , he may have been a bit unlucky and yes he might have put up a good show in 2 of the fights, but he LOST! Who gets a 4th shot? If he keeps getting opportunities, what motivation is there for up and coming fighters and other top 10 ranked guys . If he is to get another shot, he should be fighting other contenders in eliminators. Beating a "prospect" , who in reality is a relative novice And not ranked in any governing body's top 10 is not good enough to justify yet another shot. Andy Lee, Murray, Geale, N'Dam N'Jikam, Lemieux , Nielsen, Stevens, Saunders, Fight any of those . I'm not saying he can't beat those guys, but prove it and EARN it.
Andy Lee has called GGG and is likely to get a shot.
Martin Murray got 2 shots and failed twice, why should he be different then Mack? At least Mack would fight the most dangerous middleweight.
Geale just lost to Barker and turned down an offer to fight GGG
Since his loss Ndam has fought journey men in Fitzgerald and Ramallo, not exactly fights that have impressed.
Lemieux lost to a guy Mack beat in one round
Stevens lost to GGG and is calling out Quillin, likely to get a shot. Has also lost any time he has stepped up. No more deserving then Mack.
Saunders still fighting at domestic level. Hell get a shot when his promoter wants him too.
Pretty much as above for Nielson.
I get why you think he doesnt deserve a shot but in all fairness hes just as worthy as most of the others. After his losses he came back and beat decent opposition to earn another shot. If you lose you dont get put to the bottom again.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
LOL, is that it? I think that's hilarious. The HW division needs more characters like him
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
LOL, is that it? I think that's hilarious. The HW division needs more characters like him
Exactly!
In fact... Exfuckinxatly!;)
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
LOL, is that it? I think that's hilarious. The HW division needs more characters like him
It was worse during the match interviews... I think its tasteless.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
In that video, why is he jittery and flashing his nose? Seems like he is on some snuff...
:o
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Fury talking shit about a former cruiserweight with an even smaller reach than the tomato can he just fought?!...
*shock*
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Greenbeanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
When I saw the heading of this thread, I thought it was missing something. Like "oh yeah, and Rain is wet!!!!" Of course he's classless, no disrespect to him, but he's a pikey with probably no formal education. But say what you like, he is funny and he is very entertaining to watch. Yes he's crap, and yes he'd have no chance against Klitschko. But I have no doubt that he'll have no problem disposing of Chisora. He is not much different to all the so-called top British fighters, they all do far too much talking than do-ing. Froch, even Groves, Khan, Brook, Haye, Macklin, Chisora, Haye, Bellew, even Frampton and Quigg.
What a load of nonsense. The other "so called top British fighters" have far more dedication, respect, ability, gumption, common sense, courage and experience at a level Fury will never reach.
That may be so, but it doesn't stop them talking up the big fights and the BIG MONEY that they don't merit.
Khan - why should he fight Mayweather based on what he's done the last 2 years?
Froch - Banging on about all his "options" and clearly in denial about what ACTUALLY happened against Groves. And don't get me started about his Legacy nonsense!
Groves - he's caught the bug, trying to get a no contest.
Haye - how many times is he's he going to insult his fans?
Macklin - why should he get another shot at Sturm after his performance against GGG?
Do I need to go on? I could write a book about Bellew! Chisora is poor , Brook needs to actually fight for a title and Frampton and Quigg are good but they both admit they're not in Rigondeaux's class yet probably earn double because they talk a lot.
Yes please go on. For each listed you could name 20 american fighters guilty of the same thing. Macklin deserves a shot because most think he beat him in the 1st fight. So getting beat by possibly the best middleweight in the planet and actually being willing to fight him when noone else will you shouldnt get another shot on the back of that. Your logic is poor dude.
You are a highly insulting and condescending poster.
No more condescending then how Americans talk down about Euro fighters. I try call everything straight. I obviously have biased views sometimes and most of the time Ill admit to them. But saying a guy doesnt deserve a title shot after having a 50/50 fight with a world champ in Sturm, and pushing a future HOFr in Martinez to need KDs to win the fight and then getting stopped by one of the most avoided fighters in the planet is poor logic. He also just beat an unbeaten prospect
Sorry if the truth hurts, but that's the way it is. What I'm saying about Macklin is that he has had 3 shots at 3 different champions. Yes , he may have been a bit unlucky and yes he might have put up a good show in 2 of the fights, but he LOST! Who gets a 4th shot? If he keeps getting opportunities, what motivation is there for up and coming fighters and other top 10 ranked guys . If he is to get another shot, he should be fighting other contenders in eliminators. Beating a "prospect" , who in reality is a relative novice And not ranked in any governing body's top 10 is not good enough to justify yet another shot. Andy Lee, Murray, Geale, N'Dam N'Jikam, Lemieux , Nielsen, Stevens, Saunders, Fight any of those . I'm not saying he can't beat those guys, but prove it and EARN it.
Andy Lee has called GGG and is likely to get a shot.
Martin Murray got 2 shots and failed twice, why should he be different then Mack? At least Mack would fight the most dangerous middleweight.
Geale just lost to Barker and turned down an offer to fight GGG
Since his loss Ndam has fought journey men in Fitzgerald and Ramallo, not exactly fights that have impressed.
Lemieux lost to a guy Mack beat in one round
Stevens lost to GGG and is calling out Quillin, likely to get a shot. Has also lost any time he has stepped up. No more deserving then Mack.
Saunders still fighting at domestic level. Hell get a shot when his promoter wants him too.
Pretty much as above for Nielson.
I get why you think he doesnt deserve a shot but in all fairness hes just as worthy as most of the others. After his losses he came back and beat decent opposition to earn another shot. If you lose you dont get put to the bottom again.
That proves my point. I'm not saying just Macklin, obviously others are in the same boat, exactly why they should fight each other first to get another shot if they've lost a title fight already. I don't think that is going to the bottom of the pile.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
I think that the only answer to my question is and you'll pardon me because I only saw him once on his American debut where the hypocrites yelled out his name in praise, meaning the sportscasters. It most certainly showed one thing, his performance was flawed. Here was a guy with good physical attributes and meaner than a Gerry Cooney could have ever been but I feel that if he should ever lose it would be because he is lacking education and proper motivation with his trainers etc. I still have another question and I cannot criticize or praise this guy based on viewing one fight. I would appreciate it if someone dissected this fighter and described his true style if possible. Don't worry I am not calling out for someone with a crystal ball, just a little enlightenment. I am curious since I keep missing the point on threads involving this man.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Tyson Fury talks big shit for a guy who fights a bunch of bums.
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Tyson Fury talks big shit for a guy who fights a bunch of bums.
When was the last time Wlad fought someone in the top ten? (povetkin scrapes in;))
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Tyson Fury talks big shit for a guy who fights a bunch of bums.
When was the last time Wlad fought someone in the top ten? (povetkin scrapes in;))
Povetkin would beat Fury!
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Tyson Fury talks big shit for a guy who fights a bunch of bums.
When was the last time Wlad fought someone in the top ten? (povetkin scrapes in;))
Every fighter is a bum compared to Wladimir, just the way it is when you're on top of the mountain. Tyson Fury is just another big talker who can't do shit in the ring. Oooh he stopped Abell in 4 rounds, big whoopty fuck! Fight a live body!
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Tyson Fury talks big shit for a guy who fights a bunch of bums.
When was the last time Wlad fought someone in the top ten? (povetkin scrapes in;))
Povetkin would beat Fury!
Yeah right!
Fucking hell! He was lucky to get past Huck! Cunningham knocked Huck out;D
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Tyson Fury talks big shit for a guy who fights a bunch of bums.
When was the last time Wlad fought someone in the top ten? (povetkin scrapes in;))
Povetkin would beat Fury!
Yeah right!
Fucking hell! He was lucky to get past Huck! Cunningham knocked Huck out;D
But Fury was lucky to get past McDermott, but McDermott probably beats Povetkin
-
Re: Tyson Fury is classless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El Kabong
Tyson Fury talks big shit for a guy who fights a bunch of bums.
When was the last time Wlad fought someone in the top ten? (povetkin scrapes in;))
Povetkin would beat Fury!
Yeah right!
Fucking hell! He was lucky to get past Huck! Cunningham knocked Huck out;D
Who cares?
Wladimir beats them all.......ALL OF THEM.....EASILY
If Tyson Fury wants to talk some shit he had best fight someone worth a damn really fucking pronto soon otherwise he's going to be fatter and slower....which I didn't think was possible until this past weekend
