John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
According to the leading philosophy of the OTNB community, the longer ago a fighter reigned the greater their boxing acumen was.
I already heard how the great Muhammad Ali could dance his way to a victory against Wladimir Klitschko.
I've already been schooled how Joe Louis would be a challenge for Lennox Lewis.
Recently I have found myself humbled that Jack Dempsey is a deadlock for Mike Tyson,
And Jack Johnson is the equivalent of Vitali Klitschko.
Therefore the next logical step in this saga would probably be John L Sullivan?
Surely he must have been the greatest boxer who ever lived? I mean given how far back that was, there mustn't be anybody who could hold a candle to this drunken booze bag today or in recent times?
I expect Sullivan to be able to massacre Riddick Bowe within a round or 2..
Agreed??? :)
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Sullivan would catch a beatdown so bad as if he stold the last prohibition bottle..
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Sullivan would catch a beatdown so bad as if he stold the last prohibition bottle..
It'd be over very very quickly and I think Sullivan would deserve it as I've heard he was quite the cock sucker.
Mean spirited fat scum that enjoyed hurting people.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Yes he might have been a grandfather of the modern sport of boxing but by all accounts a racist and a bully.
Interestingly he was the first "athlete" in history to make a million bucks so I believe.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
I am one of the people that believe the further back you go the worse things get.
Cars, technology, medicines... why would sports be any different?
Hell I barely rate anyone from back then.
Rocky Marciano wouldn't get out of the gym today.
Joe Louis? Please Lennox Lewis wouldn't let him carry the spit bucket.
Jack Johnson..... LOL give it a rest.
I (WE) respect them for what they did in their time against their time opponents but gtfo that they come close to competing today.
Take a middleweight back in 1900 and put him against one of the cruizerweights that are squeezed into a middleweights body today, it would be a brutal massacre.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
No fighter pre-1960 is beating a Klitschko.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Fight Sullivan under the conditions he did, 40 rounds bare knuckle and see how long Vitali would last.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
The trouble with some of you clowns that clown the past on a daily basis is that the brush you use is much broader then the one you accuse others of painting with.
Its simply a CROCK of shit to make the suggestion or infer that because some largo 170 pound heavyweight previous bare knuckler/grappler could not compete with the hevs today that nobody else could compete in any other division from any other era. You indict an entire history of a sport based on how some heavyweights would do today. Such a premise is beyond stupidity and simply not worth the effort to even argue anymore. Its an energy taxer and quite possibly a perpetual one in motion because some of these people believe boxing started in 1990. Its myopia to the point of almost being a brain disorder. I mean FFS who on this forum has ever said the JL would beat anyone out of his era?
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
100 years from now Spurs Rockerfella who will be 7 ft 8 inches and weighing 320lb of lean muscle will fuck up Vitali, who will be considered a bum and midget punch bag.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Nobody Inuit.
I thought I would follow the logical conclusion of what some of the guys around here are getting at, that the weaker and more rudimentary boxers get the further back in time the more formidable they were. So I took the liberty of taking the next logical step and concluded that JLS must have been the greatest of all time. :)
I live in Australia remember, we have Aussie rules footy over here right. Do you suppose we watch the latest matches on telly and support the current sides? Of course. We pay respects to teams and players past to be sure but we don't routinely watch 1950's footy matches and make outrageous claims like that one could beat the current Essendon footy team do we!
One of those teams eats oranges at half time and has a 6 pack and the other has a beer gut and smokes a fucking cigarette at half time.
I hope you get the connection and the point was conveyed with this joke thread.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
You say joke thread I say dumb thread.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
JLS would pulverize Klit with feints and fists uncovered. One bone-jarring shot on Klit and the Ukie would fold. Older may have been less skilled but they were WAY tougher.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Id say Sullivan-Kimbo Slice in a bare knuckle is an even matchup..
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Yeah because Klits grew up wrapped in cotton wool didn't they, they were always the children getting hurt and never liked contact sports did they. That's why they began careers In boxing to start with isn't it.
The world has not become more pussy overall it has become even more violent than ever before. The difference now is that is has become illegal to kill and hurt ppl but that doesn't stop ppl who will do it anyway.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Max Power
Yeah because Klits grew up wrapped in cotton wool didn't they, they were always the children getting hurt and never liked contact sports did they. That's why they began careers In boxing to start with isn't it.
The world has not become more pussy overall it has become even more violent than ever before. The difference now is that is has become illegal to kill and hurt ppl but that doesn't stop ppl who will do it anyway.
I heard that when Vitali was young, the Russian mob wanted to scout him as an enforcer but he respectfully refused...
You are right, it's not as if he had a pampered childhood. These guys are from Ukraine FFS...
Sullivan would get beat to death ..
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
I think in a bare knuckle fight over 100 rounds I doubt Vital I would even dare get in the ring with Sullivan. His brother wlad would wet himself.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Wlad would undoubtedly beat the Boston Strong Boy in a boxing ring, but I'm not sure he would in a bar fight after a pint of brandy.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Master
I think in a bare knuckle fight over 100 rounds I doubt Vital I would even dare get in the ring with Sullivan. His brother wlad would wet himself.
All I got to say to that is that to be in the sport of boxing usually requires one to be somewhat of a fighter in the first place.
If you think what can be done in a boxing doesn't translate fairly closely to what might be accomplished on the streets, especially at HW, then I think you are mistaken. The ring is a sport sure but it is still a fight and I'm pretty sure Vitali Klitschko could beat Sullivan regardless of lack of rules barehanded.
Even more wussier Wladimir I could not imagine being thrashed by a guy like that, I mean seriously, some of you guys will find any avenue to have the old timer come up trumps.
It's some code of respect thing I see but I don't think that's a good way to properly honour a past athlete, by rubbishing the present. Whatever you say though!
100 rounder you say? A "round" back then was a KD was it not? I would judge then that a fight between a Klit and Sullivan would not go nearly 100 rounds.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Boxing and a street fight is totally different.
Klit brothers are too smart to get involved in any such fight. They would not even become fighters in those days. Probably politicians and doctors.
Sullivan would make sure it went many rounds by any means necessary if you catch my drift.
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
Vitali and Wladimir do not get into streetfights now, they aren't that stupid no. When they were younger, before they got into boxers, they had to be fighters!
No gentle person decides at a young age that they are going to be a great boxer unless they already have some pre-disposition to violence.
What you are implying is actually ridiculous. That the Klitschko's now could not fight very effectively without gloves on.
Sure boxing and street fighting is vastly different but mate, any pro boxer is going to more than likely clean up in most street fights he is involved in.
I wouldn't see either Klitschko losing too many street fights were they to engage in them.
But sure we will add Sullivan to the list now of Klitschko conquerers.
Klitschko's... The weakest champions of all time, able to be bested by every champ from the past in some way and their opponents, oh yeah they are the weakest opponents of all time as well!! Where's the :patsch symbol on Saddo when ya need it! lol
Re: John L Sullivan vs Vitali Klitschko
I give up trying to talk to you.