-
How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
I just think he's a good athlete with a big punch but I dont see the " great " boxing skills that some of you talk about.. He's a good fighter and maybe he'll get better but I dont think he's great as he's cracked up to be..
What do you see in Thurman that separates him from the likes of POrter, Brook, and the other top talents at WW?
Oh yea, and he needs to cut his gay hair and watch out for the fashion police cuz he dont know how to dress.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Like you said , he is a great athlete but he hasn't yet developed as a great boxer. He is fast ,athletic and a power puncher and we will see what happens when he steps up
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
He's enjoyable to watch and that's the main thing
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
He's enjoyable to watch and that's the main thing
Yeah, finally someone who is actually watchable. Sure, he is certainly not polished, but why be so concerned about what may or may not happen down the road and enjoy what he's doing now and see him progress?
I'm tired of duds like Devon Alexander being propped up.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Yeah, but you can't fault a guy for trying to make a living.
Never know how far a guy's talent can take him unless he dedicates himself and gives it his best shot. Some guy's can surprise you.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sleepwalker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tam Seddon
He's enjoyable to watch and that's the main thing
Yeah, finally someone who is actually watchable. Sure, he is certainly not polished, but why be so concerned about what may or may not happen down the road and enjoy what he's doing now and see him progress?
I'm tired of duds like Devon Alexander being propped up.
I love most of boxing but Thurman just brings the action. I do like Alexander at times like when he schooled maidana that was good to see and the KO of urango
-
He hasn't fought a lot of big names, hasn't had a lot of fights but you guys talk about being a great athlete in ho-hum manner.
I'm not comparing him to RJJ, but being a great athlete is a real good thing and he seems to be fast on the uptake. You could say I'm sold on him.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
I just think he's a good athlete with a big punch but I dont see the " great " boxing skills that some of you talk about.. He's a good fighter and maybe he'll get better but I dont think he's great as he's cracked up to be..
What do you see in Thurman that separates him from the likes of POrter, Brook, and the other top talents at WW?
Oh yea, and he needs to cut his gay hair and watch out for the fashion police cuz he dont know how to dress.
Not sure how you measure great. Seems fans have different views on what that actually means. If we are expecting someone to measure up to Floyd then we may be in for a long wait. We are in an era that has manufactured greatness. Lots of "Stars"
What I see in Thurman that seems to lack in many today is an old school simple bad ass mentality. The mentality can also be seen in the way he carries himself, his body language. I think that if he was in charge of his own career he'd most likely fight anybody. We both know how careers are steered with very few that call their own shots. The mikmen are many.
He looks to me to have better skills the Porter but less then Brook but with that Lamotta like mentality he could most definitely beat or even dominate better skilled opponents. He may also have been born in the wrong era. He could get a little pacified in todays market and lose that edge that he brought with him.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
I much prefer the look of Jeff Horn.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
I just think he's a good athlete with a big punch but I dont see the " great " boxing skills that some of you talk about.. He's a good fighter and maybe he'll get better but I dont think he's great as he's cracked up to be..
What do you see in Thurman that separates him from the likes of POrter, Brook, and the other top talents at WW?
Oh yea, and he needs to cut his gay hair and watch out for the fashion police cuz he dont know how to dress.
Not sure how you measure great. Seems fans have different views on what that actually means. If we are expecting someone to measure up to Floyd then we may be in for a long wait. We are in an era that has manufactured greatness. Lots of "Stars"
What I see in Thurman that seems to lack in many today is an old school simple bad ass mentality. The mentality can also be seen in the way he carries himself, his body language. I think that if he was in charge of his own career he'd most likely fight anybody. We both know how careers are steered with very few that call their own shots. The mikmen are many.
He looks to me to have better skills the Porter but less then Brook but with that Lamotta like mentality he could most definitely beat or even dominate better skilled opponents. He may also have been born in the wrong era. He could get a little pacified in todays market and lose that edge that he brought with him.
There are different levels of greatness. Floyd and Roy are special breeds that come along once every 50 years or so and nobody expects to see that often. One doesn't have to be on their level to be regarded as great because greatness comes in many forms and they are in a class of their own.
All I'm saying is while Thurman is good, he's not great as some people think he is and that's just my opinion.
He is still growing as a fighter so we will see.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
He's a prospect, I'm not sure how well I could be sold on one. If he becomes a "champ" then I'll judge it based on his title defenses.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
He reminds me of a WW David Haye: an athletic, mobile, EXPLOSIVE bomber.
When you have that kind of one-punch power, of course the technique will sometimes suffer and skillfulness will be put on the back burner in pursuit of the KO.
I'm a big believer in Thurman though. I expect him to destroy tonight and hopefully set up a bigger WW fight with a guy like Porter. That would be a fuckin war.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
I am sold on him and hope he becomes a super star. Put him in with Guerrero, Berto, Porter, Brooks and Devon.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
He reminds me of a WW David Haye: an athletic, mobile, EXPLOSIVE bomber.
When you have that kind of one-punch power, of course the technique will sometimes suffer and skillfulness will be put on the back burner in pursuit of the KO.
I'm a big believer in Thurman though. I expect him to destroy tonight and hopefully set up a bigger WW fight with a guy like Porter. That would be a fuckin war.
That's a fair comparison actually, David Haye.. in another words he's an ambush fighter with a lack of real substance..
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
He reminds me of a WW David Haye: an athletic, mobile, EXPLOSIVE bomber.
When you have that kind of one-punch power, of course the technique will sometimes suffer and skillfulness will be put on the back burner in pursuit of the KO.
I'm a big believer in Thurman though. I expect him to destroy tonight and hopefully set up a bigger WW fight with a guy like Porter. That would be a fuckin war.
That's a fair comparison actually, David Haye.. in another words he's an ambush fighter with a lack of real substance..
Haha we shall see. I liked David Haye other than his outside of the ring nonsense and his "owww my poor toe" excuses.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
:lolhaha:
Id be surprised if he hit harder than Canelo..
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
:lolhaha:
Id be surprised if he hit harder than Canelo..
I'm not going to go that far... hahahahahhahhaa..... but I believe he can take a decent amount of his power upwards. Not bone-crushing kayo power, but enough to make guys wanna quit.
:cool:
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
:lolhaha:
Id be surprised if he hit harder than Canelo..
I'm not going to go that far... hahahahahhahhaa..... but I believe he can take a decent amount of his power upwards. Not bone-crushing kayo power, but enough to make guys wanna quit.
:cool:
You think he can hit harder than Curtis Stevens?
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
:lolhaha:
Id be surprised if he hit harder than Canelo..
I'm not going to go that far... hahahahahhahhaa..... but I believe he can take a decent amount of his power upwards. Not bone-crushing kayo power, but enough to make guys wanna quit.
:cool:
You think he can hit harder than Curtis Stevens?
Stevens is overrated... plus he looks like a Roid-er. Make him do tests and then come back and tell me....
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
:lolhaha:
Id be surprised if he hit harder than Canelo..
I'm not going to go that far... hahahahahhahhaa..... but I believe he can take a decent amount of his power upwards. Not bone-crushing kayo power, but enough to make guys wanna quit.
:cool:
You think he can hit harder than Curtis Stevens?
Stevens is overrated... plus he looks like a Roid-er. Make him do tests and then come back and tell me....
I agree he's not much as a fighter but that's beside the point here..
Do you think the overrated Thurman punches harder than him?
BTW, roids dont give you punching power..
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
:lolhaha:
Id be surprised if he hit harder than Canelo..
I'm not going to go that far... hahahahahhahhaa..... but I believe he can take a decent amount of his power upwards. Not bone-crushing kayo power, but enough to make guys wanna quit.
:cool:
You think he can hit harder than Curtis Stevens?
Stevens is overrated... plus he looks like a Roid-er. Make him do tests and then come back and tell me....
I agree he's not much as a fighter but that's beside the point here..
Do you think the overrated Thurman punches harder than him?
BTW, roids dont give you punching power..
Thurman may punch as equally effective as him, or better... power is something one can't just say: one punches harder than the other. But, I would say, Thurman can hit harder than Stevens at MW.
Roids do give you punching power... it gives you extra energy, at the very least. Late in the game one just doesn't "surge" ala Chavez Sr. vs. Meldrick Taylor and win fights. Stevens is a poster child for Roids.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
On that Stacker 2, and Stacker 2 is lame compared to the stuff these dudes are on these days, I would take kayo power into 4pm in the morning- after training, work, beers and sex.
:lickish:
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Card thread here ??? Showtime extreme is about to start. Jermall Charlo beating up meeting Hector Munoz in main
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
I'm sold on the notion that he has better than average power for a WW, and can possibly take that power right up to MW.
:cool:
:lolhaha:
Id be surprised if he hit harder than Canelo..
I'm not going to go that far... hahahahahhahhaa..... but I believe he can take a decent amount of his power upwards. Not bone-crushing kayo power, but enough to make guys wanna quit.
:cool:
You think he can hit harder than Curtis Stevens?
Stevens is overrated... plus he looks like a Roid-er. Make him do tests and then come back and tell me....
I agree he's not much as a fighter but that's beside the point here..
Do you think the overrated Thurman punches harder than him?
BTW, roids dont give you punching power..
No but enhances reflexes which does aid in KO increase. So your response is not entirely correct.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
I just think he's a good athlete with a big punch but I dont see the " great " boxing skills that some of you talk about.. He's a good fighter and maybe he'll get better but I dont think he's great as he's cracked up to be..
What do you see in Thurman that separates him from the likes of POrter, Brook, and the other top talents at WW?
Oh yea, and he needs to cut his gay hair and watch out for the fashion police cuz he dont know how to dress.
Not sure how you measure great. Seems fans have different views on what that actually means. If we are expecting someone to measure up to Floyd then we may be in for a long wait. We are in an era that has manufactured greatness. Lots of "Stars"
What I see in Thurman that seems to lack in many today is an old school simple bad ass mentality. The mentality can also be seen in the way he carries himself, his body language. I think that if he was in charge of his own career he'd most likely fight anybody. We both know how careers are steered with very few that call their own shots. The mikmen are many.
He looks to me to have better skills the Porter but less then Brook but with that Lamotta like mentality he could most definitely beat or even dominate better skilled opponents. He may also have been born in the wrong era. He could get a little pacified in todays market and lose that edge that he brought with him.
Great post. I thought Thurman was underrated but with recent chatter I think the pendulum has swung. I'm not sure how we define greatness either. For instance I think he would dominate and stop Marquez right now. But I don't think he'll ever be as good as Marquez if that makes any sense.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Swanson
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
I just think he's a good athlete with a big punch but I dont see the " great " boxing skills that some of you talk about.. He's a good fighter and maybe he'll get better but I dont think he's great as he's cracked up to be..
What do you see in Thurman that separates him from the likes of POrter, Brook, and the other top talents at WW?
Oh yea, and he needs to cut his gay hair and watch out for the fashion police cuz he dont know how to dress.
Not sure how you measure great. Seems fans have different views on what that actually means. If we are expecting someone to measure up to Floyd then we may be in for a long wait. We are in an era that has manufactured greatness. Lots of "Stars"
What I see in Thurman that seems to lack in many today is an old school simple bad ass mentality. The mentality can also be seen in the way he carries himself, his body language. I think that if he was in charge of his own career he'd most likely fight anybody. We both know how careers are steered with very few that call their own shots. The mikmen are many.
He looks to me to have better skills the Porter but less then Brook but with that Lamotta like mentality he could most definitely beat or even dominate better skilled opponents. He may also have been born in the wrong era. He could get a little pacified in todays market and lose that edge that he brought with him.
Great post. I thought Thurman was underrated but with recent chatter I think the pendulum has swung. I'm not sure how we define greatness either. For instance I think he would dominate and stop Marquez right now. But I don't think he'll ever be as good as Marquez if that makes any sense.
Makes 100% senses. I believe he would also crush Pac but do not believe he will ever be greater than the two. It's all relative to timing
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Well I think hes fuc*ing awesome. Dangerous on the back foot. Powerful with good stamina. Shuts his opponents out. The guy gets hit but if you are a fighter like him that takes risks to win, your gonna get hit. He is very easy to watch. Im a fan and think he is the next big thing.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanflicker
He reminds me of a WW David Haye: an athletic, mobile, EXPLOSIVE bomber.
When you have that kind of one-punch power, of course the technique will sometimes suffer and skillfulness will be put on the back burner in pursuit of the KO.
I'm a big believer in Thurman though. I expect him to destroy tonight and hopefully set up a bigger WW fight with a guy like Porter. That would be a fuckin war.
That's a fair comparison actually, David Haye.. in another words he's an ambush fighter with a lack of real substance..
No no and no.
Thurman is more durable than Haye...plus he brings a plan B into the ring..not to mention he has a damn good team behind him.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Leighton
Well I think hes fuc*ing awesome. Dangerous on the back foot. Powerful with good stamina. Shuts his opponents out. The guy gets hit but if you are a fighter like him that takes risks to win, your gonna get hit. He is very easy to watch. Im a fan and think he is the next big thing.
He can box his ass off when he has to.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
he is very athletic but seems like a fighter who will eventually get totally outboxed by a random opponent then be considered exposed but then comeback and beat a top guy. he is one of those fighters who has some great qualities which will help him beat some great fighters but also lacks certain qualities which make him very beatable.
i agree that if we are looking for another boxing superstar then thurman is not it. i believe that he will be around for a long time though beating good fighters and spending time as the champion.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
he is very athletic but seems like a fighter who will eventually get totally outboxed by a random opponent then be considered exposed but then comeback and beat a top guy. he is one of those fighters who has some great qualities which will help him beat some great fighters but also lacks certain qualities which make him very beatable.
i agree that if we are looking for another boxing superstar then thurman is not it. i believe that he will be around for a long time though beating good fighters and spending time as the champion.
Selling Thurman short I see.
You can only hope he doesn't become a star...I don't see anybody stopping him from being just that.
-
Re: How many of you are NOT sold on Keith Thurman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyclone
Quote:
Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
he is very athletic but seems like a fighter who will eventually get totally outboxed by a random opponent then be considered exposed but then comeback and beat a top guy. he is one of those fighters who has some great qualities which will help him beat some great fighters but also lacks certain qualities which make him very beatable.
i agree that if we are looking for another boxing superstar then thurman is not it. i believe that he will be around for a long time though beating good fighters and spending time as the champion.
Selling Thurman short I see.
You can only hope he doesn't become a star...I don't see anybody stopping him from being just that.
He is exciting but I have been bitten before, I thought Berto was going to be the next great thing. I want him to do well but always have doubt after that.